Sadık Muallaoğlu

Acute transient encephalopathy after weekly paclitaxel infusion

Paclitaxel is highly active against a variety of solid tumors including breast lung, ovarian and head and neck cancer. Although peripheral neurotoxicity is well-known side effect, central nervous system (CNS) toxicity-related standard dose of paclitaxel is extremely uncommon, because paclitaxel dose not cross the blood–brain barrier and is not detectable in the cerebrospinal fluid. We present a patient with advanced stage breast carcinoma who developed acute and spontaneous resolving encephalopathy after weekly dose of paclitaxel. The patient did not have brain metastasis, or prior whole-brain irradiation, or any type of neurosurgery. Radiological imaging studies showed no abnormalities. CNS toxicity of paclitaxel should be kept in mind in patients without a previous history of brain metastasis or brain irradiation and even with low weekly doses.

Lack of Prognostic Significance of C-erbB-2 Expression in Low- and High- grade Astrocytomas

BACKGROUND Astrocytic tumors, the most common primary glial tumors of the central nervous system, are classified from low to high grade according to the degree of anaplasia and presence of necrosis. Despite advances in therapeutic management of high grade astrocytic tumors, prognosis remains poor. In the present study, the frequency and prognostic significance of c-erb-B2 in astrocytic tumors was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS Records of 72 patients with low- and high-grade astrocytic tumors were evaluated. The expression of C-erbB-2 was determined immunohistochemically and intensity was recorded as 0 to 3+. Tumors with weak staining (1+) or no staining (0) were considered Her-2 negative, while tumors with moderate (2+) and strong (3+) staining were considered Her-2 positive. RESULTS Of the 72 patients, 41 (56.9%) had glioblastoma (GBM), 10 (13.9%) had diffuse astrocytoma, 15 (20.8%) had anaplastic astrocytoma, 6 (8.3%) had pilocytic astrocytoma. C-erbB-2 overexpression was detected in the tumor specimens of 17 patients (23.6%). Six (8.3%) tumors, all GBMs, exhibited strong staining, 2 (2.7%) specimens, both GBMs, exhibited moderate staining, and 9 specimens, 5 of them GBMs (12.5%), exhibited weak staining. No staining was observed in diffuse astrocytoma and pilocytic astrocytoma specimens. Median overall survival of patients with C-erbB-2 negative and C-erbB-2 positive tumors were 30 months (95%CI: 22.5-37.4 months) and 16.9 months (95%CI: 4.3-29.5 months), respectively (p=0.244). CONCLUSIONS Although there was no difference in survival, C-erbB-2 overexpression was observed only in the GBM subtype.

Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy with Vinorelbine plus Split-Dose Cisplatin may be an Option in Inoperable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Center Experience

Background Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the current standard treatment for inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study we aimed to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of CCRT with split dose of cisplatin (30 mg/m2) and vinorelbine (20 mg/m2) in patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC followed in our oncology clinic. Material/Methods Medical records of 97 patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin-vinorelbine were retrospectively analyzed. Cisplatin (30 mg/m2) and vinorelbine (20 mg/m2) were administered on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 during radiotherapy. Two cycles of consolidation chemotherapy were given. All patient data, including pathological, clinical, radiological, biochemical, and hematological data, were assessed retrospectively using our database system. Results Our study included 97 unresectable stage III NSCLC patients who were treated with CCRT. Median age was 58 years old (range 39–75) and 87 (89.7%) of the patients were men. ECOG performance score was 0–1 in 93 patients (95.9%). Squamous histology, the most common histology, was diagnosed in 46 patients (47.4%). Median follow-up time was 23.8 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival time (OS) were 10.3 months and 17.8 months, respectively. Objective response rate and clinical benefit rate were 75.3% and 83.5%, respectively. Distant and local relapse rate were 57.1% and 42.9%, respectively. Hematological and non-hematological grade 3–4 toxicities were seen in 13 (13.4%) and 16 (16.5%) patients, respectively. Six (6.1%) patients died due to toxicity. Conclusions The results of this study suggest that split-dose cisplatin may offer fewer grade III–IV toxicities without sacrificing efficacy and could be an option in patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC during CCRT. Similar to past studies, despite high response rate during CCRT, distant relapse is the major parameter that influences patient survival in long-term in NSCLC.

Primary extranodal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: clinicopathological features, survival and treatment outcome in two cancer centers of southern Turkey.

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to assess the epidemiological and clinicopathological characteristics of primary extranodal non-Hodgkins lymphoma (pENL) patients, focusing on treatment and survival outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between October 2003 and March 2012, 802 patients with non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) were diagnosed and treated in two different cancer centers of Southern Turkey. RESULTS pENL, constituted 12.4% (100/802) of all NHL studied during this period. Median age of the patients was 56 years (range 17-87 years) and the male: female distribution was 3:2. Eighty-five of 100 patients (85%) were in stage I/II, 9/100 (9%) in stage III, whereas 6/100 (6%) were in stage IV. Head and neck constituted the most common site (51/100, 51%), followed by gastrointestinal tract (GIL) (37/100, 37%), and cerebrum (CL) (5/100, 5%). Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was the most common histological type, observed in 53% of patients, followed by marginal zone extranodal lymphoma (13%). Most of patients (76%) received a CHOP containing regimen. Complete remission (CR) were achieved in 71% of patients. The median follow-up duration of all patients was reported as 37.6 months (range, 0.8-165 months). This period was reported as 137.5 months (range, 117.5- 1578.6 months) in gastrointestinal lymphoma (GIL) patients, 119.0 months (range, 91.8-146.1 months) in head and neck lymphoma (HNL) patients, and 18.4 months (range, 12.6-24.1 months) in cerebral lymphoma (CL) patients. CONCLUSIONS Head and neck, and the gastrointestinal tract were the two most common extranodal sites observed. Histologically DLBC accounted for the majority of cases. Most patients were on earlier stages, had low-low intermediate IPI scores and had a favorable prognosis.

Can low molecular weight heparins circumvent the problem of coumadine and chemotherapy interaction in cancer patients with prosthetic heart valves

In the everyday routine practice of a medical oncologist, it is not so infrequent that a patient with prosthetic heart valve who is on warfarine therapy has to receive chemotherapy, . This is a problematic situation for a medical oncologist since, drug interactions of warfarine with various chemotherapeutics are unpredictable, the result may either be thrombosis or bleeding. Furthermore, chemotherapeutic agents are given mostly on an intermittent basis, meaning that these unpredictable interactions occur when chemotherapy is given and then thrombocytopenia follows. The data on how to continue anti-coagulation therapy in such patients are sparse and in major guidelines, it is not involved (Holbrook et al., 2012; Vahanian et al., 2012). Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) are superior to warfarine in patients with cancer in the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis, probably owing to lack of significant drug interactions with chemotherapeutic agents. There is also no need for INR (International normalized ratio) monitorization. They are also safe as bridging therapy in patients with prosthetic heart valves peri-operatively instead of warfarine (Holbrook et al., 2012; Vahanian et al., 2012). For the reasons above, we tend to follow such patients on chemotherapy with LMWH instead of warfarine. Here, we wanted to share our experience on nine patients with prosthetic heart valves treated with LMWH during chemotherapy (Table 1). During our follow up, we had not observed neither any thrombotic complications nor LMWH associated bleeding LETTER to the EDITOR