Sai Nimmagadda

Section on allergy and immunology

Founded in 1948, the Section on Allergy and Immunology is dedicated to ensuring that children receive the highest quality of allergy and immunology care. To accomplish its mission, the Section provides a number of educational, training, and research programs and continually advocates for improved allergy and immunology care and services. The Section sponsors educational programs for both pediatric generalists and subspecialists at the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) National Conference and Exhibition (NCE) each fall and at the American Academy of Allergy Asthma & Immunology annual meeting each spring. The Section’s other educational endeavors include this annual “Best Articles Relevant to Pediatric Allergy and Immunology” supplement to Pediatrics, Visiting Professor Program, Pediatric Asthma Speaker’s Kit, online continuing medical education course on “asthma gadgets,” electronic quality improvement in practice program on asthma diagnosis and management (Education in Quality Improvement for Pediatric Practice [eQIPP], which meets the American Board of Pediatrics maintenance-ofcertification criteria), school nurse allergy tool kit, and a number of public education materials. The Section is also active in contributing to educational programs and resources such as AAP News, educational brochures, clinical reports, and many other endeavors. To support training and promote research in pediatric allergy and immunology, the Section awards travel grants to residents and training fellows to participate and present cases at the AAP NCE and provides outstanding abstract awards for training fellows and junior faculty for presentation at the American Academy of Allergy Asthma & Immunology annual meeting. In close collaboration with other subspecialty societies, the Section is actively involved with initiatives to improve subspecialty education such as the American Board of Allergy and Immunology maintenance-of-certification requirements. Section members represent the AAP in national and government conferences and provide input on federal legislation on behalf of the AAP. For more information on all AAP allergy and immunology resources and initiatives, visit www.aap.org/sections/allergy. The reviews contained in the 2011 synopsis were written by Fellows of the AAP Section on Allergy and Immunology and fellows in allergy and immunology training programs who contributed reviews with their mentors. The editor selected the journals to be reviewed on the basis of the likelihood that they would contain articles on allergy and immunology that would be of value and interest to the pediatrician. Each journal was assigned to a voluntary reviewer who was responsible for selecting articles and writing reviews of their articles. Only articles of original research were selected for review. Final selection of the articles to be included was made by the editor. The 2010–2011 journals chosen for review were Allergy, American Journal of Asthma & Allergy for Pediatricians, Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, American Journal of Medicine, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Annals of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology, Annals of Internal Medicine, Archives of Disease in Childhood, Archives of Internal Medicine, Blood, British Journal of Dermatology, British Medical Journal, Chest, Clinical and Experimental Allergy, Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Critical Care Medicine, European Journal of Pediatrics, European Respiratory Journal, Immunology, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, Journal of the American Medical Association, Journal of Applied Physiology, Journal of Experimental Medicine, Journal of Immunology, Journal of Infectious Diseases, Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Journal of Pediatrics, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Lancet, Nature, New England Journal of Medicine, Pediatrics, Medicine, Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Pediatric Asthma, Allergy & Immunology, Pediatric Dermatology, Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, and Science. The editor and the Section on Allergy and Immunology gratefully acknowledge the work of the reviewers and their trainees who assisted. The reviewers were Stuart L. Abramson, MD, PhD, Sugar Land, TX; James R. Banks, MD, Arnold, MD; Theresa A. Bingemann, MD, Rochester,

Effects of glucocorticoids on lymphocyte activation in patients with steroid-sensitive and steroid-resistant asthma

BACKGROUND Glucocorticoids are important medications used to control the airway inflammation associated with asthma. Synthetic glucocorticoids vary in their binding affinity for the glucocorticoid receptor (GCR). METHODS We compared hydrocortisone, beclomethasone dipropionate, triamcinolone acetonide, flunisolide, and budesonide with regard to their capacity to inhibit phytohemagglutinin-induced peripheral blood mononuclear cell proliferation from six patients with steroid-sensitive asthma and seven patients with steroid-resistant asthma. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell GCR binding affinities for dexamethasone and budesonide were also determined for both patient groups by using a radioligand binding assay and Scatchard analysis. RESULTS Dose-dependent inhibition was demonstrated for all glucocorticoids in both patient groups, with the steroid-resistant group requiring approximately 2 log-fold more glucocorticoids for an equivalent degree of inhibition. The mean concentrations necessary to cause 50% inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation (IC50s) for the steroid-sensitive group ranged from 2 x 10(-10) mol/L for budesonide to 7 x 10(-8) mol/L for hydrocortisone, whereas the mean IC50s for the steroid-resistant group ranged from approximately 2 x 10(-8) mol/L for budesonide to greater than 10(-6) mol/L for hydrocortisone. In addition, a significant correlation was noted between the degree of inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation (IC50) and the binding affinity of dexamethasone to the GCR. Patients with steroid-resistant asthma have been shown to have a reduced GCR binding affinity. The GCR binding affinity for budesonide was significantly higher in both groups (i.e., lower dissociation constant) than that obtained for dexamethasone. CONCLUSION These data suggest that glucocorticoids such as budesonide, by virtue of their high GCR binding affinities and greater ability to suppress lymphocyte proliferation, may therefore be beneficial in the management of difficult-to-control asthma.