Sai Ravi Pingali

Haploidentical transplant with posttransplant cyclophosphamide vs matched unrelated donor transplant for acute myeloid leukemia

We studied adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after haploidentical (n = 192) and 8/8 HLA-matched unrelated donor (n = 1982) transplantation. Haploidentical recipients received calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), mycophenolate, and posttransplant cyclophosphamide for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis; 104 patients received myeloablative and 88 received reduced intensity conditioning regimens. Matched unrelated donor transplant recipients received CNI with mycophenolate or methotrexate for GVHD prophylaxis; 1245 patients received myeloablative and 737 received reduced intensity conditioning regimens. In the myeloablative setting, day 30 neutrophil recovery was lower after haploidentical compared with matched unrelated donor transplants (90% vs 97%, P = .02). Corresponding rates after reduced intensity conditioning transplants were 93% and 96% (P = .25). In the myeloablative setting, 3-month acute grade 2-4 (16% vs 33%, P < .0001) and 3-year chronic GVHD (30% vs 53%, P < .0001) were lower after haploidentical compared with matched unrelated donor transplants. Similar differences were observed after reduced intensity conditioning transplants, 19% vs 28% (P = .05) and 34% vs 52% (P = .002). Among patients receiving myeloablative regimens, 3-year probabilities of overall survival were 45% (95% CI, 36-54) and 50% (95% CI, 47-53) after haploidentical and matched unrelated donor transplants (P = .38). Corresponding rates after reduced intensity conditioning transplants were 46% (95% CI, 35-56) and 44% (95% CI, 0.40-47) (P = .71). Although statistical power is limited, these data suggests that survival for patients with AML after haploidentical transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide is comparable with matched unrelated donor transplantation.

Limited utility of routine surveillance imaging for classical Hodgkin lymphoma patients in first complete remission.

The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) who achieved complete remission with frontline therapy and then underwent either clinical surveillance or routine surveillance imaging.

Current Concepts of Clinical Management of Multiple Myeloma

MM accounts for 1% of all malignancies and 10% of all hematological malignancies with 3-4 cases per 100,000. The incidence is highest among African Americans, then Caucasians, and is least common among Asians. It affects more men than women, with a ratio of 3:2. The disease is more common in developed countries; this could be attributed to more readily available diagnostic testing and longer life expectancy. In the USA, the lifetime risk of MM is 0.6%. The American Cancer Society estimates that in the USA about 20,520 new cases of

Emergence of Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia From a Background of Myeloproliferative Disorder: JAK2V617F as a Potential Risk Factor for BCR-ABL Translocation

We report the emergence of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in a patient with JAK2V617F-positive polycythemia vera after 15 years of phlebotomy. The polycythemia vera clinical and molecular findings were suppressed at the time of CML diagnosis, only to re-emerge after the leukemia was successfully treated with imatinib. We explored the potential association between myeloproliferative disorders and CML in the context of the current literature and found a higher-than-expected coincidence based on known epidemiologic data for each specific condition. We hypothesize that myeloproliferative disorder (JAK2V617F or molecular events that cause JAK2V617F) is a risk factor for CML (BCR-ABL translocation). Because of therapeutic implications, clinicians should be aware that the conditions co-occur more frequently than once thought.

High-dose gemcitabine, busulfan, and melphalan for autologous stem-cell transplant in patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma: a phase 2 trial and matched-pair comparison with melphalan

BACKGROUND High-dose melphalan is of little benefit as a regimen for patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma undergoing an autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT). The poor performance of single-agent melphalan in this setting prompted us to study a new high-dose combination of infused gemcitabine, busulfan, and melphalan. METHODS We did a phase 2 trial at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA). We enrolled patients with primary refractory or relapsed myeloma who had received treatment with bortezomib, an immunomodulatory drug, or both, or who were receiving a salvage ASCT. Gemcitabine was infused at 1875 mg/m2 for 3 h for 2 days, followed by busulfan (target area under the curve 4000 μmol/L per min per day for 4 days) and melphalan (60 mg/m2 per day for 2 days). The primary endpoint of this trial was to establish the proportion of patients with measurable disease at ASCT receiving gemcitabine, busulfan, and melphalan who achieved stringent complete remission in accordance with the International Myeloma Working Group criteria. We then retrospectively compared the patients in this study with all other concurrent patients at the MD Anderson Cancer Center who were eligible for this trial but declined to participate or had no financial coverage for ASCT in a clinical trial and instead received melphalan at 200 mg/m2 intravenously over 30 min on 1 day, followed by ASCT (control group). To compare survival outcomes, we used a statistical algorithm to select a subset of patients from this control cohort who were matched in a 1-2:1 ratio with the patients in the gemcitabine, busulfan, and melphalan group by sex, age, disease status, refractory to both proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory imide drugs, time from diagnosis to ASCT, and cytogenetic risk. All analyses were per protocol. This is the final analysis of the clinical trial, which is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01237951. FINDINGS Between Nov 30, 2010, and Dec 11, 2013, we enrolled 74 patients into the gemcitabine, busulfan, and melphalan trial. In these patients, median age was 58 years (IQR 51-62), median number of previous lines of therapy was two (2-5), 38 patients had high-risk cytogenetics, 17 were unresponsive to all previous treatments, and 32 were receiving a salvage ASCT. We identified 184 patients for the concurrent control cohort. The study patients and the concurrent controls received similar post-ASCT maintenance. Among patients with measurable disease at ASCT, 16 of 65 patients (24·6%, 95% CI 14·2-35·0) in the gemcitabine, busulfan, and melphalan group had stringent complete remission compared with 22 of 174 patients (12·6%, 10·1-15·1) in the concurrent control group (p=0·040). Median follow-up time was 36 months (IQR 30-46) in the patients receiving gemcitabine, busulfan, and melphalan and 34 months (25-53) in the matched control subset (n=111). With respect to the secondary survival endpoints, the gemcitabine, busulfan, and melphalan cohort had significantly longer median progression-free survival than the matched control cohort (15·1 months [95% CI 8·7-22·1] vs 9·3 months [8·0-10·7]) with a significantly reduced risk of progression or death (HR 0·55, 95% CI 0·38-0·81, log-rank p=0·030), as well as significantly longer median overall survival (37·5 months [26-not reached] vs 23·0 months [16·6-30·5]) and a lower risk of death (HR 0·60, 0·34-0·84, log-rank p=0·0092). For only the patients treated with gemcitabine, busulfan, and melphalan, grade 3 or worse adverse events included grade 3 mucositis (12 patients), grade 3 dermatitis (five patients), grade 3 aminotransferase elevation (seven patients), grade 3 diarrhoea (two patients), and three treatment-related deaths. One death was cardiac sudden death and two were due to sepsis. INTERPRETATION Gemcitabine, busulfan, and melphalan is a comparatively safe and active regimen for ASCT in patients with refractory or relapsed myeloma. Better outcomes were achieved in patients who received this regimen than in a concurrent matched cohort receiving melphalan, although this will need to be confirmed in a prospective, randomised trial. FUNDING Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization and US National Cancer Institute.BACKGROUND High-dose melphalan is of limited benefit as autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) regimen for relapsed/refractory myeloma. Its poor results in this setting prompted us to study a new high-dose combination of infusional gemcitabine/busulfan/melphalan (Gem/Bu/Mel). METHODS We conducted a phase 2 trial of Gem/Bu/Mel in patients with primary refractory or relapsed disease after bortezomib and/or an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), or receiving a salvage ASCT. Gemcitabine (1,875 mg/m2 over 3 hours × 2 days) was followed by busulfan (target AUC 4,000/day × 4 days) and melphalan (60 mg/m2/day × 2 days). The primary endpoint of this trial was to determine the stringent complete remission (sCR) rate of Gem/Bu/Mel in this population. We then retrospectively compared the study patients with all other concurrent patients eligible for this trial who, instead, received melphalan at 200 mg/m2 IV at our center. For survival outcomes, we used a statistical algorithm to select a subset from the control cohort that matched with the Gem/Bu/Mel patients by gender, age, disease status, double refractoriness to proteasome inhibitors/IMIDs, duration from diagnosis to transplant and cytogenetic risk, in a 1–2:1 ratio. All analyses are per protocol. This is the final analysis of the clinical trial. Trial registered at NCI.gov (NCT01237951). FINDINGS We enrolled 74 patients on the Gem/Bu/Mel trial, median age 58 (interquartile range [IQR], 11), median 2 prior therapy lines (IQR, 3), 38 high-risk cytogenetics, 17 unresponsive to all prior treatments, and 33 receiving a salvage ASCT. Toxicities of Gem/Bu/Mel included grade 3 mucositis (N=12), grade 3 dermatitis (N=5), grade 3 transaminase elevation (N=7), grade 3 diarrhea (N=2), grade 5 sudden death (N=1) and grade 5 sepsis (N=2). The study patients and the 184 concurrent controls received similar post-ASCT maintenance. Gem/Bu/Mel resulted in more sCR (24.6% v 12.6%, P=0.040), similar overall responses (73.8% v 74.1%, P=0.77) and similar transplant-related mortality (4.0% v 3.8%, P=0.90). The median follow-up times for the Gem/Bu/Mel patients and the matched subset (N=111) were 36 months (IQR, 15.2) and 34 months (IQR, 27), respectively. Gem/Bu/Mel resulted in improved progression-free survival (median 15.1 v 9.3 months, P=0.0030; hazard ratio=0.60; P=0.021) and overall survival (median 37.5 v 23 months, P=0.0092; hazard ratio=0.65, P=0.0087). INTERPRETATION Gem/Bu/Mel is a safe and active ASCT regimen for refractory/relapsed myeloma, with better outcomes than a concurrent matched cohort receiving melphalan. Funding Supported by a grant from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization Inc. and NCI Grant P30 CA016672.

Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection can increase the morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Because of a higher degree of immunosuppression, haploidentical transplant recipients may be at an increased risk of viral infections, particularly CMV. We retrospectively analyzed 86 haploidentical HCT recipients at our institution to determine whether a more intensified antiviral strategy would reduce the incidence of CMV reactivation compared with a traditional antiviral prophylaxis regimen. According to practice changes over time in antiviral prophylaxis at our institution, patients were divided into the following 3 groups: hybrid (n = 15), traditional (n = 26), and intermediate dose (n = 45). The hybrid group received valganciclovir from admission to day -2 followed by standard-dose valacyclovir. The traditional group received standard-dose valacyclovir starting on day -1. The intermediate-dose group received ganciclovir from admission through day -2, followed by intermediate-dose valacyclovir. The hybrid and intermediate-dose groups were combined into an intensified group for further analysis. We found the cumulative incidence (CI) of CMV reactivation within 100 days post-HCT was higher for patients receiving the traditional strategy compared with the hybrid and intermediate-dose strategy groups (81% versus 53% versus 71%, respectively; P = .08) and was significantly higher when the traditional group was compared against the intensified group (81% versus 67%, respectively; P = .032). Median time to CMV reactivation was also shorter in the traditional group versus the intensified group (31 versus 41 days, respectively). Moreover, the CI of CMV disease by day 100 was significantly worse for patients receiving the traditional prophylaxis strategy among the 3 groups (8% traditional versus 0% hybrid versus 0% intermediate dose; P = .032). Renal toxicity did not differ between the traditional and intensified group. In conclusion, an intensified approach to prevention of CMV reactivation was associated with lower incidence of CMV reactivation and less CMV disease without increased toxicity. Because the most benefit was observed in the intensified group, further studies are needed to assess which antiviral intervention is the most beneficial on lowering the rates of CMV viremia and disease.

Patient age and number of apheresis days may predict development of secondary myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myelogenous leukemia after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for lymphoma

The goal of our study was to find predictors for the development of secondary myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myelogenous leukemia (s‐MDS/AML) in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma who received high‐dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).

Effect of Routine Surveillance Imaging on the Outcomes of Patients With Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma After Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Micro‐Abstract Surveillance imaging is often used following autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto‐HCT) to assess for relapse. We evaluated classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) patients who received auto‐HCT, achieved complete remission, and underwent surveillance imaging. Relapse was detected clinically or by surveillance imaging. Outcomes were similar between the two groups. There appears to be limited utility for surveillance imaging in cHL after auto‐HCT. Background: Patients with relapsed and refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) are often treated with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto‐HCT). After auto‐HCT, most transplant centers implement routine surveillance imaging to monitor for disease relapse; however, there is limited evidence to support this practice. Patients and Methods: In this multicenter, retrospective study, we identified cHL patients (n = 128) who received auto‐HCT, achieved complete remission (CR) after transplantation, and then were followed with routine surveillance imaging. Of these, 29 (23%) relapsed after day 100 after auto‐HCT. Relapse was detected clinically in 14 patients and with routine surveillance imaging in 15 patients. Results: When clinically detected relapse was compared with to radiographically detected relapse respectively, the median overall survival (2084 days [range, 225‐4161] vs. 2737 days [range, 172‐2750]; P = .51), the median time to relapse (247 days [range, 141‐3974] vs. 814 days [range, 96‐1682]; P = .30) and the median postrelapse survival (674 days [range, 13‐1883] vs. 1146 days [range, 4‐2548]; P = .52) were not statistically different. In patients who never relapsed after auto‐HCT, a median of 4 (range, 1‐25) surveillance imaging studies were performed over a median follow‐up period of 3.5 years. Conclusion: A minority of patients with cHL who achieve CR after auto‐HCT will ultimately relapse. Surveillance imaging detected approximately half of relapses; however, outcomes were similar for those whose relapse was detected using routine surveillance imaging versus detected clinically in between surveillance imaging studies. There appears to be limited utility for routine surveillance imaging in cHL patients who achieve CR after auto‐HCT.

Cryptococcal meningoencephalitis in patients with mantle cell lymphoma on ibrutinib

Ibrutinib, a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been increasingly widely used in relapsed and refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia [1, 2]. With its use becoming more common, there have been emerging case reports of opportunistic infections like cryptococcal infections [3–8]. These infections in patients receiving ibrutinib were mostly reported in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, who have poor immune reconstitution. Here, we report two cases of cryptococcal meningoencephalitis in patients with MCL on ibrutinib.

Leukapheresis reduces 4-week mortality in acute myeloid leukemia patients with hyperleukocytosis - a retrospective study from a tertiary center.

Abstract Hyperleukocytosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) can lead to leukostasis, which if left untreated, has a high mortality. While prompt cytoreductive chemotherapy is essential, treatment with leukapheresis is controversial. This study investigated the outcomes of patients with hyperleukocytosis who received leukapheresis. From 5596 encounters of patients with leukemia seen at Houston Methodist Hospital, we identified 26 patients who had newly diagnosed AML, WBC >50,000/μL, and received leukapheresis. We matched 26 patients who had similar baseline characteristics but did not receive leukapheresis. The primary endpoint was to compare the 28-day mortality rates between the treatment and the control groups. Secondary endpoints were 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year mortality rates. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, leukapheresis was associated with significantly lower 28-day mortality rate (30.8% vs. 57.7%, p = .022). There was, however, no difference in long-term mortality rate. Our study demonstrates the short-term mortality benefit of using leukapheresis in AML patients presenting with hyperleukocytosis.