Salvatore Gizzo

CA 125 serum values in surgically treated endometriosis patients and its relationships with anatomic sites of endometriosis and pregnancy rate

Endometriosis is a benign gynecologic disease defined as the presence of functional endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterine cavity, causing dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, menstrual irregularities, and infertility. Serum CA-125 measurement is now a consolidated method for diagnosing this condition, and its interpretation has posed a number of problems, particularly regarding utility in diagnosing minimal-mild endometriosis, whereas its value as a diagnostic aid in moderate-severe stages is well recognized. In our cohort, serum CA-125 values were significantly elevated in patients with ovarian and mixed endometriosis lesions (median levels 48 U/mL), compared with those who had exclusively extraovarian foci (median levels 27 U/mL), and so the correlation between this marker and the surgical and pathologic finding of ovarian and deep endometriosis was found to be statistically significant; however, the location did not affect the fertility rate.

Which Uterotonic Is Better to Prevent the Postpartum Hemorrhage? Latest News in Terms of Clinical Efficacy, Side Effects, and Contraindications A Systematic Review

Background: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a potentially fatal complication of vaginal and cesarean deliveries. The active management of the third stage of labor provides administration of prophylactic uterotonic drugs just before or immediately after delivery, since they reduce the risk of PPH by 60%. Objective: Overview on all available uterotonics for PPH prevention to clarify indications and contraindications in choice among drugs. Search Strategy: Systematic review of the literature. Main Results: Oxytocin is the first choice for PPH prophylaxis. Ergot alkaloids, syntometrine, and prostaglandins are second-line uterotonic agents. Misoprostol is not effective as oxytocin but it may be used when the latter is not available. Carbetocin should be used instead of continuous oxytocin infusion in elective cesarean sections for PPH prevention and to decrease the need for therapeutic uterotonics. Conclusions: Prophylactic oxytocics should be offered routinely in the third stage of labor in all women. The prophylactic use of uterotonics should be individualized.

Update on Raloxifene: Mechanism of Action, Clinical Efficacy, Adverse Effects, and Contraindications

Raloxifene is the only selective estrogen receptor modulator approved for long-term treatment in the prevention of osteoporotic fractures and for the reduction of invasive breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. The demonstrated beneficial effects on bone and mammalian tissue led clinical and molecular research to focus mainly on these organs, giving less attention to all other systemic effects. The aim of this review was to evaluate all described systemic effects of raloxifene, investigating its molecular and tissutal mechanism of action. A literature research was carried out in electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library in interval time between 2000 and 2012. Outcomes were considered in relation to positive/adverse effects concerning bone metabolism, lipid metabolism, coagulation pattern, menopausal symptoms, breast cancer onset, and endometrial cancer onset. Raloxifene acts as an estrogen agonist or antagonist depending on the tissue. This feature is related to specific actions on at least 2 distinct estrogen receptors, whose proportions vary according to tissue type. Raloxifene is a drug for the treatment of osteoporosis and for the prevention of estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer because it guarantees a safety profile on the endometrium. Raloxifene is furthermore an effective therapy in women with increased levels of plasma cholesterol. Raloxifene treatment shifts the coagulation pattern toward prothrombosis, and the patients should be exhaustively informed about the risks associated with therapy. Raloxifene does not show to affect memory and cognition. Finally, it is noteworthy that quality-of-life studies demonstrated some favorable effects of raloxifene. Target Audience: Obstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians Learning Objectives: After completing this CME activity, physicians should be better able to identify the mechanism of action of raloxifene, treat the adverse effects of raloxifene, prescribe raloxifene for patients with osteoporosis, to prevent estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer, as effective therapy in women with osteoporosis and concomitant increased levels of plasma cholesterol, and select the appropriate patients for raloxifene treatment using the patient’s medical history and risk of thromboembolism.

Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Myomectomy: Safety, Efficacy, Subsequent Fertility and Quality-of-Life Improvements, A Systematic Review.

We performed a systematic review about studies reporting data of myomectomy performed by magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) technique in order to define its safety, feasibility, indications, complications, and impact on uterine fibroid symptom and health-related quality of life (UFS-QOL) and fertility. Outcomes were considered according to fibroids shrinkage, nonperfused volume (NPV), NPV ratio, and uterine fibroid symptoms assessed with UFS-QOL questionnaire (baseline 3, 4, 6, and 12 months). We analyzed 38 eligible studies reporting outcomes about 2500 patients (mean age 43.67 years). The MRgFUS results a safe, efficient, and cost-effective minimal invasive technique for treatment of uterine fibroids. Increasing experience, device improvements, and availability for a larger number of patients are enhancing the outcomes, while the obstetrical ones should be more extensively explored. The MRgFUS could be considered as a minimal invasive alternative to traditional surgical or radiological procedures for the treatment of symptomatic uterine myomas improving both QOL and subsequent fertility.

Wide excision of soft tissues adjacent to the ovary and fallopian tube does not impair the ovarian reserve in women undergoing prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy: results from a randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE To study the effects of the wide excision of soft tissues adjacent to the ovary and fallopian tube on ovarian function and surgical outcomes in women undergoing laparoscopic bilateral prophylactic salpingectomy. DESIGN Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING Teaching hospital. PATIENT(S) One hundred eighty-six women undergoing laparoscopic surgery for uterine myoma (n = 143) or tubal surgical sterilization (n = 43). INTERVENTION(S) Patients were randomly divided into two groups. In group A (n = 91), standard salpingectomy was performed. In group B (n = 95), the mesosalpinx was removed within the tubes. Prior to and 3 months after surgery, antimüllerian hormone (AMH), FSH, three-dimensional antral follicle count (AFC), vascular index (VI), flow index (FI), vascular-flow index (VFI), and OvAge were recorded for each patient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Ovarian reserve modification (Δ) before and after surgery was assessed as the primary outcome. Operative time, variation of the hemoglobin level (ΔHb), postoperative hospital stay, postoperative return to normal activity, and complication rate were assessed as secondary outcomes. RESULT(S) No significant difference was observed between groups for ΔAMH, ΔFSH, ΔAFC, ΔVI, ΔFI, ΔVFI, and ΔOvAge. Moreover, the groups were similar for operative time, ΔHb, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative return to normal activity, and complication rate. CONCLUSION(S) Even when the surgical excision includes the removal of the mesosalpinx, salpingectomy does not damage the ovarian reserve. Moreover, wide salpingectomy with excision of the mesosalpinx did not alter blood loss, hospitalization stay, or return to normal activities. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02086370.

Update on best available options in obstetrics anaesthesia: perinatal outcomes, side effects and maternal satisfaction. Fifteen years systematic literature review

PurposeIn modern obstetrics, different pharmacological and non-pharmacological options allow to obtain pain relief during labour, one of the most important goals in women satisfaction about medical care. The aim of this review is to compare all the analgesia administration schemes in terms of effectiveness in pain relief, length of labour, mode of delivery, side effects and neonatal outcomes.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted in electronic databases in the interval time between January 1999 and March 2013. Key search terms included: “labour analgesia”, “epidural anaesthesia during labour” (excluding anaesthesia for Caesarean section), “epidural analgesia and labour outcome” and “intra-thecal analgesia”.Results10,331 patients were analysed: 5,578 patients underwent Epidural-Analgesia, 259 patients spinal analgesia, 2,724 combined spinal epidural analgesia, 322 continuous epidural infusion (CEI), 168 intermittent epidural bolus, 684 patient-controlled infusion epidural analgesia and 152 intra-venous patient-controlled epidural analgesia. We also considered 341 women who underwent patient-controlled infusion epidural analgesia in association with CEI and 103 patients who underwent patient-controlled infusion epidural analgesia in association with automatic mandatory bolus.ConclusionNo significant differences occurred among all the available administration schemes of neuraxial analgesia. In absence of obstetrical contraindication, neuraxial analgesia has to be considered as the gold standard in obtaining maternal pain relief during labour. The options available in the administration of analgesia should be known and evaluated together by both gynaecologists and anaesthesiologists to choose the best personalized scheme and obtain the best women satisfaction. Since it is difficult to identify comparable circumstances during labour, it is complicate to standardize drugs schemes and their combinations.

An update on diabetic women obstetrical outcomes linked to preconception and pregnancy glycemic profile: a systematic literature review.

Women with type 2 diabetes were less likely to have diabetes related complications than women with type 1. Women with type 1 diabetes had a high prepregnancy care and showed a worse glycemic control than women with type 2 both in the preconception period and during pregnancy. Obstetrical outcomes showed that preeclampsia and stillbirth rate is almost doubled in type 1 patients while perinatal deaths and SGA importantly increased in type 2 diabetes. In modern obstetrical care it is mandatory to maintain glucose levels as close to normal as possible particularly in diabetic population. HbA1C no higher than 6% before pregnancy and during the first trimester seems to decrease the risk of adverse obstetrical outcomes. Both the preconceptional counseling and glycemic profile optimization represent a fundamental step to improve pregnancy outcomes in women with preexisting diabetes. A systematic approach to family planning and the availability of preconception care for all diabetic women who desire pregnancy could be an essential step for diabetic management program.

Radical trachelectomy: The first step of fertility preservation in young women with cervical cancer (Review)

Radical trachelectomy (RT) can be performed vaginally or abdominally (laparotomic, laparoscopic or robotic). The aim of this systematic review was to compare all techniques in terms of surgical complications, disease recurrence and subsequent fertility/pregnancy outcomes. A total of 1293 RTs were analyzed (FIGO-stage: IA1–IIA). The most frequent surgical complications do not differ from the ones of radical hysterectomy. The recurrence risk is approximately 3% (range 0–16.8%). The majority of women conceive spontaneously: 284 pregnancies with 173 live births. The most frequent pregnancy complication was miscarriage and chorioamnionitis. RT appears to be a safe option for eligible women who intend to maintain their future pregnancy desire.

Ovarian Reserve Test An Impartial Means to Resolve the Mismatch Between Chronological and Biological Age in the Assessment of Female Reproductive Chances

Nowadays, the ovarian reserve (OR) is considered more important than chronological age to estimate female reproductive capability. We conducted a retrospective, observational, and cohort study in order to detect the best predictor marker of OR, ovarian response, chances to obtain high-quality embryos, and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle in elderly women. For all eligible patients (aged between 40 and 50 and admitted to their first IVF cycle for primary infertility), we investigated the biochemical parameters and ultrasound aspects of ovaries and how they affected IVF outcomes. Age, basal follicle-stimulating hormone, basal luteinizing hormone, and basal-17β-estradiol are better related to the dose of gonadotropin used during a controlled ovarian stimulation cycle. Basal anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), antral follicular count (AFC), and maximum serum level of 17β-estradiol before pickup resulted the best predictors of chances to retrieve at least 6 oocytes (at least 3 in metaphase II) and to have at least 1 to 3 embryos. The basal AMH, AFC and maximum serum level of 17β-estradiol before pickup continue to show higher correlation to pregnancy rate. The maximum endometrial thickness at pickup resulted important to predict the pregnancy rate and the chances to detect ongoing pregnancy. It seems mandatory to well define the ovarian biological age rather than the chronological one in women older than 40 years of age in order to give the best counseling and to choose the most appropriate IVF protocols.

Fertility rate and subsequent pregnancy outcomes after conservative surgical techniques in postpartum hemorrhage: 15 years of literature

OBJECTIVE To investigate the most appropriate surgical technique for optimizing hemostasis and preservation of subsequent fertility after postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). DESIGN Systematic review of the literature. SETTING Not applicable. PATIENT(S) None. INTERVENTION(S) Review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Comparison of the effectiveness of conservative surgical techniques, separately or together, with respect to success rate (ability to stop bleeding and preserve the uterus), fertility rate (subsequent pregnancies or the return of regular menstrual cycles), complication rate of the procedure, and the outcomes of subsequent pregnancies in terms of type of delivery and eventual delivery complications. RESULT(S) Compressive sutures and vessel embolization may be considered life-saving procedures by achieving the best hemostatic efficacy. Data on restoration of menses and pregnancy rates after these procedures are limited by short-term follow-up and by the paucity of studies, especially for vascular ligation. CONCLUSION(S) Pelvic vessel embolization and compressive sutures are associated with high rates of restoration of regular menses and successive pregnancies, even if the former is burdened by an increased rate of placental disorders and fetal growth restriction and the latter by an increased risk of cesarean deliveries and PPH recurrence. Randomized trials would be desirable to define the best management of PPH.