Salvatore Toscano

Transthoracic DC Shock May Represent a Serious Hazard in Pacemaker Dependent Patients

External defibrillation is widely used for the termination of various atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias, including pacemaker patients. Our study was intended to evaluate the effects of DC shocks in 36 patients with unipolar pacemakers implanted in the right pectoral region (25 DDD, 10 VVI, 3 AAI). The shocks were delivered with paddles on the anterior surface of the thorax, as far as possible away from the pacemaker. The pacing output was programmed at 0.5 msec and 5 V (25 patients), 4 V (1 patient), and 2.5 V (10 patients). Transient loss of capture occurred in 18 patients (50%). These patients, compared with those without capture failure, received higher peak and cumulative shock energies, respectively, 216 ± 99 versus 123 ± 50 joules (P < 0.002) and 352 ± 62 versus 147 ± 98 joules (P < 0.004) and had a lower pacemaker pulse amplitude (4.0 ± 1.2 vs 4.6 ± 1.0 V, P = 0.11). Failure to capture lasted from 5 seconds to 30 minutes (mean 157 sec). In 15 patients the ventricular stimulation threshold was measured before and serially after cardioversion. A six‐fold threshold increase was observed 3 minutes after the shock (P < 0.004) with gradual recovery to nearly baseline values at 24 hours. Transient sensing failure occurred in 7 of the 17 patients in whom it could be evaluated (41%). Furthermore, three cases of shock induced pacemaker malfunctions were observed requiring replacement of the stimulator in two patients. In conclusion, the incidence of loss of capture in pacemaker patients subjected to electrical cardioversion/defibrillation is high. The phenomenon is due to an abrupt rise in stimulation threshold, caused by the electrical shock, and may represent a serious hazard in pacemaker dependent patients. The risk of pacing failure could be reduced by utilizing low shock energies when possible, and by programming the pacemaker at its maximal output before cardioversion.

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Idiopathic Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Tachycardia: Utility of Intracardiac Echocardiography

Idiopathic LVOT Tachycardia. Introduction: The site of origin of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT) arising from the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) may be closely related to the aortic valve leaflets, and radiofrequency (RF) delivery potentially can damage them. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) can identify accurately the ablation electrode and anatomic landmarks, and contact with the endocardium can be easily assessed. The aim of this study was to define the utility and the accuracy of ICE in guiding RF ablation of idiopathic VT of the LVOT.

DDD Pacing with Rate Drop Response Function Versus DDI with Rate Hysteresis Pacing for Cardioinhibitory Vasovagal Syncope

Background: The effectiveness of cardiac pacing in preventing vasovagal syncope remains controversial. However, DDI pacing with rate hysteresis has been reported to prevent the recurrence of Cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope in up to 35% of affected subjects and to reduce the overall incidence of syncopal episodes in the others. Recently, DDD pacing with a new promising rate drop response function (Medtronic Thera‐I model 7960) has become available in clinical practice. Aim of the study: The aim of the present open trial was to test the effectiveness of this new pacing modality in patients with Cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope. Study population and methods: The study population included 20 patients (12 males and 8 females; mean age 61.1 ± 14 yrs) with recurrent syncope (mean number of prior episode = 6.8, range 5–11) and Cardioinhibitory responses during two head‐up tilt tests: the first diagnostic and the second during drug therapy with either β‐blockade or etilephrine. The study patients were randomized to receive either DDI pacing with rate hysteresis (8 patients) or DDD pacing with rate drop response function (11 patients). The head‐up tilt test performed 1 month after pacemaker implantation was positive in 3 of 12 patients (25%) with DDD pacing with rate drop response function and in 5 of 8 patients (62.5%) with DDI pacing with rate hysteresis. The mean duration of follow‐up was 17.7 ± 7.4 months. During follow‐up no patients with a DDD pacemaker with rate drop response function had syncope, while 3 of 8 patients with a DDI pacemaker with rate hysteresis had recurrence of syncope (P < 0.05). Conclusions: These data suggest that DDD pacing with rate drop response function is effective in Cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope and may be preferable to DDI pacing with rate hysteresis.

Local Capture by Atrial Pacing in Spontaneous Chronic Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) is considered to be maintained by multiple reentrant circuits without or with a very short excitable gap. However, the possibility of local atrial capture has been shown recently in experimental AF or induced AF in humans. METHODS AND RESULTS This study was undertaken to evaluate the feasibility of atrial capture-suggestive of an excitable gap-in spontaneous chronic AF. Decremental pacing was performed in 47 right atrial sites in 14 patients with chronic AF, not taking antiarrhythmic drugs. A Franz catheter (for pacing and monophasic action potential recording) and a recording quadripolar catheter positioned about 10 mm apart were used. Local capture was achieved in 41 (87.2%) sites for a total of 100 captures. In 71 episodes the capture was lost within 15 seconds, while in the remaining 29, pacing was stopped after 15 seconds of stable capture. AF types immediately before capture were type 1 in 83 and type 2 in 17 episodes. Type 3 AF was never captured. Pacing cycle at capture was 175.7 +/- 20.9 ms. The baseline atrial interval (FF) was 185.4 +/- 24.5, significantly longer than the FF recorded during pacing immediately before capture (176.0 +/- 19.8 ms) (P < .02). CONCLUSIONS During spontaneous chronic AF in humans, (1) local capture by atrial pacing is possible up to at least 15 mm from the pacing site, (2) regional entrainment is possible during type 1 and type 2 AF but not type 3 AF, and (3) pacing before capture accelerates AF, probably by transient or local capture. These findings suggest that an excitable gap is present in chronic AF, therefore supporting the hypothesis that leading circle reentry is not the unique electrophysiological mechanism maintaining the arrhythmia.

Effects of Oral Propafenone Therapy on Chronic Myocardial Pacing Threshold

The effects of oral propofenone therapy on pacing threshold were studied in 36 patients chronically paced for sick sinus syndrome or AV block. The pacemakers, all unipolar models and with noninvasive threshold measurement facilities, were: 9 VVI, 15 AAI, and 12 DDD. Each patient received an initial propafenone dose of 450 mg/day, that in 18 cases was increased to 900 mg/day. Threshold was tested at baseline and at each dosage after 7 days of therapy. With the lower propa/enone dosage the threshold, measured at 2.5 V, rose from 0.14 ± 0.10 to 0.21 ± 0.16 msec (+ 55%) in the atrium (P < 0.0001) and from 0.10 ± 0.08 to 0.15 ± 0.09 msec (+ 63%) in the ventricle (P < 0.0001). In the 18 patients who received both dosages, the mean atrial and ventricular threshold increased from 0.12 ± 0.10 to 0.17 ± 0.14 msec with the lower dose and to 0.27 ± 0.22 msec (+125%) with the higher dose (P < 0.0001) for both increments), With the 900 mg/day dose, a threshold increment ± 300% was observed in 15% of the stimulated chambers. A good linear correlation (r = 0.76) was found between the ventricular threshold increment and the drug induced QRS widening. In conclusion, treatment with oral propafenone increases atrial and ventricular stimulation threshold in pacemaker patients. Threshold increment is dose dependent and proportional to the drug induced QHS widening. In the majority of the cases the threshold increment is not clinically significant, but caution must be used in prescribing high doses of the drug to patients with high baseline threshold.

Low Energy Intracardiac Cardioversion of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

The aims of the study were to verify the efficacy and safety of low energy internal Cardioversion (LEIC) in patients with persistent at rial fibrillation (AF) and to identify the factors affecting the at rial defihrillation threshold (ADT). Forty‐nine patients with persistent (lasting ≥ 10 days) AF underwent LEIC. In each patient, two 6 Fr custom‐made catheters with large active surface areas were positioned in the coronary sinus (cathode) and the lateral right wall (anode), respectively, for shock delivery, and a tetrapolar lead was placed in the fight ventricular apex for R wave synchronization. Truncated, biphasic (3 ms+3 ms). exponential shocks were used, beginning at 50 V and increasing in steps of 50 V until sinus rhythm had been restored. Mild sedation (diazepam 5 mg IV) was administered to 12 patients. Sinus rhythm was restored in all the subjects with mean voltage and energy levels of 352.0 ± 80.3 V and 8.2 ± 3.4 J, respectively. The ADT in patients pretreated with amiodarone (6.4 ± 1.8 J) was lower than that of patients who had not received any antiarrhythmic drugs (9.2 ± 3.7) (P = 0.04). No ventricular arrhythmias were induced by any of the atrial shocks, and no other complications were observed. During a mean follow‐up of 162.9 ± 58.7 days, AF recurred in 21 (43%) patients; 71% of these occurred in the first week after Cardioversion. LEIC is effective in restoring sinus rhythm in patients with persistent AF. The technique seems to be safe and does not require general anesthesia or, in most cases, sedation. Patients pretreated with amiodarone have lower ADTs.

Emergency Cardiac Pacing for Severe Bradycardia

ALTAMURA, G., ET AL.: Emergency Cardiac Pacing for Severe Bradycardia. Our study included the treatment of transcutaneous cardiac pacing (TCP) in 32 patients: (A) 19 patients were treated in the emergency area for complete symptomatic AV block before endocavitary pacing; (B) five patients were in asystole following DC shock or out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest; and (C) eight patients were affected by bifascicular block undergoing emergency surgery and were treated in order to prevent complete AV block. Two transcutaneous stimulators were used. PaceAid‐CRC model 50/52 with 20‐msec pulse width; the electrodes were positioned on the V, ECG position and on the back. Results: in all but two patients, it was possible to obtain stable cardiac capture; in one patient arrived in hospital in asystole after prolonged cardiac arrest and in the other one was affected by complete AV block, TCP was ineffective. In groups A and B, TCP was maintained for a mean time of 15 minutes; in group C, TCP was tested in all patients, but performed in only one patient during surgery. Mean threshold was 81 mA. Stimulation was well tolerated in all but five patients. TCP is a reliable, noninvasive method that offers the possibility to initiate pacing within seconds and can be used by medical staff. In our opinion, it should be considered as the first choice emergency treatment of severe symptomatic bradycardia. In asystole, beneficial effects can be obtained only if TCP is performed early enough after the onset of arrhythmia.

Transcutaneous Cardiac Pacing for Termination of Tachyarrhythmias

ALTAMURA, G., ET AL.: Transcutaneous Cardiac Pacing for Termination of Tachyarrhythmias. Transcutaneous cardiac pacing (TCP) was used for interruption of tachyarrhythmias in 31 patients: 20 with ventricular tachycardia (VT); eight with atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) and three had atrioventricular nodal tachycardia (AVNT). The stimulators used (Pace Aid 50/52) allow pacing at programmable rates (50–160 ppm) and output (10–200 mA at 20‐msec pulse duration), when possible overdrive pacing was used. Short bursts of stimuli were delivered with increasing current intensity until interruption of the arrhythmia or to the maximum energy tolerated by the patient. VTs were interrupted in eight of the 20 patients: four of the six (67%) treated by overdrive pacing and four of the 14 (29%) were treated by underdrive pacing. Supraventricular tachycardias (SVT) were terminated in eight of the 11 patients: seven out of eight (88%) AVT, and one out of three AVNT (33%). We observed two cases of arrhythmia worsening: a VT acceleration and induction of ventricular fibrillation in a patient with AVNT. TCP was well tolerated by the majority of the patients. We conclude that TCP is an effective method for interruption of ventricular and supraventricular reentrant tachycardias, but the risk of arrhythmia worsening must be considered.

Changes in Intracardiac Atrial Cardioversion Threshold at Rest and During Exercise

OBJECTIVES We sought to analyze in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) the change in the intracardiac atrial defibrillation threshold (ADT) at rest and during exercise, to quantify the effective risk of low energy endocavitary cardioversion during the effort and to compare the ADT of chronic and reinduced AF. BACKGROUND Low energy endocavitary cardioversion is a new alternative to transthoracic shock in patients with chronic AF. Nevertheless, patient discomfort and possible induction of ventricular arrhythmias should be further evaluated. METHODS Sixteen patients with chronic AF were included in the study. Two 6F custom-made catheters (Electro-Catheter, Inc.) were used for shock delivery and one tetrapolar lead for ventricular synchronization. Without sedation and in a random order, patients underwent two sequences of shocks to determine the ADT at rest and during exercise. Exercise was performed isometrically by the superior limbs. Atrial fibrillation was reinduced by atrial pacing. After each shock, the patients were requested to grade their discomfort with a score from 1 to 5. The power of the study was > 90% in detecting a 25% difference in the ADT between groups. RESULTS Patients were classified into two groups: Nine patients (group A) underwent the first cardioversion during exercise; seven patients (group B) underwent the first cardioversion at rest. In total, the mean (+/-SD) ADT was 6.70 +/- 1.54 J during exercise and 7.02 +/- 1.82 J at rest (p = 0.59). A significantly lower ADT was observed in the second shock sequence than the first one (6.32 +/- 2.09 J vs. 7.40 +/- 0.87 J, p < 0.05). The discomfort score was 3.25 +/- 0.86 at rest and 2.94 +/- 0.77 during exercise (p = 0.09). No complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS Low energy endocavitary cardioversion is a safe and effective procedure in patients with chronic AF. Discomfort is not generally severe enough to result in procedure termination. The ADT is not influenced by exercise and is higher in chronic than in reinduced AF.

Transcutaneous Cardiac Pacing: Evaluation of Cardiac Activation

ALTAMURA, G., ET AL.: Transcutaneous Cardiac Pacing: Evaluation of Cardiac Activation. The effects of transcutaneous cardiac pacing (TCP) on cardiac activation were evaluated by endocavitary recording (HRA, RVA) in eight patients, in order to test the possibility to obtain a simultaneous atrial and ventricular stimulation. The transcutaneous pacemaker used was the Pace Aid 52 (pacing rate 50–160 ppm, current output 10–150 mA, pulse width 20 sec). The two skin electrodes [surface area 50 cm2) were placed on the chest in anteroposterior position. Ventricular capture was observed in all patients [threshold = 74 ± 14 mA), simultaneous atrial capture was obtained in only four cases (threshold = 138 ± 25 mA). In conclusion, our data show that four‐chamber simultaneous stimulation by TCP is possible, but only with pacing energies much higher than those usually required to capture the ventricle. The ability of TCP to simultaneously pace the atria and ventricles, though not relevant in the emergency cardiac stimulation for symptomatic severe bradyarrhythmias, could be useful in the treatment of reentrant supraventricular tachycardias.