Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sam W. Wiesel is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sam W. Wiesel.


Spine | 1984

A study of computer-assisted tomography I. The incidence of positive CAT scans in an asymptomatic group of patients

Sam W. Wiesel; Nicholas Tsourmas; Henry L. Feffer; Charles M. Citrin; Nicholas Patronas

In order to study the type and number of CAT scan abnormalities of the lumbar spine that occur in asymptomatic people, 52 studies from a control population with no history of back trouble were mixed randomly with six scans from patients with surgically proven spinal disease, and all were interpreted by three neuroradiologists in a blinded fashion. Irrespective of age, 35.4% (26.6%, 51.0%, and 31.3%) were found to be abnormal. Spinal disease was identified in an average of 19.5% (23.8%, 22.7%, and 12.5%) of the under 40-year-olds, and it was a herniated nucleus pulposus in every instance. In the over 40-year-old age group, there was an average of 50% (29.2%, 81.5%, and 48.1%) abnormal findings, with diagnoses of herniated disc, facet degeneration, and stenosis occurring most frequently.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2001

The value of magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine to predict low-back pain in asymptomatic subjects : a seven-year follow-up study.

David G. Borenstein; James W. O'Mara; Scott D. Boden; William C. Lauerman; Alan Jacobson; Craig Platenberg; Dieter Schellinger; Sam W. Wiesel

Background: In 1989, a group of sixty-seven asymptomatic individuals with no history of back pain underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine. Twenty-one subjects (31%) had an identifiable abnormality of a disc or of the spinal canal. In the current study, we investigated whether the findings on the scans of the lumbar spine that had been made in 1989 predicted the development of low-back pain in these asymptomatic subjects. Methods: A questionnaire concerning the development and duration of low-back pain over a seven-year period was sent to the sixty-seven asymptomatic individuals from the 1989 study. A total of fifty subjects completed and returned the questionnaire. A repeat magnetic resonance scan was made for thirty-one of these subjects. Two neuroradiologists and one orthopaedic spine surgeon interpreted the original and repeat scans in a blinded fashion, independent of clinical information. At each disc level, any radiographic abnormality, including bulging or degeneration of the disc, was identified. Radiographic progression was defined as increasing severity of an abnormality at a specific disc level or the involvement of additional levels. Results: Of the fifty subjects who returned the questionnaire, twenty-nine (58%) had no back pain. Low-back pain developed in twenty-one subjects during the seven-year study period. The 1989 scans of these subjects demonstrated normal findings in twelve, a herniated disc in five, stenosis in three, and moderate disc degeneration in one. Eight individuals had radiating leg pain; four of them had had normal findings on the original scans, two had had spinal stenosis, one had had a disc protrusion, and one had had a disc extrusion. In general, repeat magnetic resonance imaging scans revealed a greater frequency of disc herniation, bulging, degeneration, and spinal stenosis than did the original scans. Conclusions: The findings on magnetic resonance scans were not predictive of the development or duration of low-back pain. Individuals with the longest duration of low-back pain did not have the greatest degree of anatomical abnormality on the original, 1989 scans. Clinical correlation is essential to determine the importance of abnormalities on magnetic resonance images.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 1985

The use of epidural steroids in the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

J M Cuckler; P A Bernini; Sam W. Wiesel; Robert E. Booth; Richard H. Rothman; G T Pickens

Seventy-three patients with lumbar radicular pain syndromes were treated in a prospective, randomized, double-blind fashion with either seven milliliters of methylprednisolone acetate and procaine or seven milliliters of physiological saline solution and procaine. All patients had radiographic confirmation of lumbar nerve-root compression, consistent with the clinical diagnosis of either an acute herniated nucleus pulposus or spinal stenosis. No statistically significant difference was observed between the control and experimental patients with either acute disc herniation or spinal stenosis. Long-term follow-up, averaging twenty months, failed to demonstrate the efficacy of a second injection of epidural steroids administered to the patients whose pain did not respond within twenty-four hours to an injection of either eighty milligrams of methylprednisolone acetate combined with five milliliters of 1 per cent procaine or two milliliters of sterile saline combined with five milliliters of 1 per cent procaine. Therefore, a decision to use epidural steroids must be made with the realization that we failed to demonstrate its clinical efficacy in this study and that reports of serious complications of this procedure have been published.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 1996

Orientation of the Lumbar Facet Joints: Association with Degenerative Disc Disease*

Scott D. Boden; K. Daniel Riew; Ken Yamaguchi; Thomas P. Branch; Dieter Schellinger; Sam W. Wiesel

The orientation of the lumbar facet joints was studied with magnetic resonance imaging in 140 subjects to determine if there is an association between facet tropism and intervertebral disc disease or between the orientation of the facet joints and degenerative spondylolisthesis. The 140 subjects were divided into four groups: sixty-seven asymptomatic volunteers, forty-six of whom did not have a herniated disc on magnetic resonance scans (Group I) and twenty-one who did (Group II); forty-six symptomatic patients who had a herniated disc confirmed operatively (Group III); and twenty-seven patients who had degenerative spondylolisthesis at the interspace between the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae (Group IV). Axial scans were made at each lumbar level and digitized, and the facet joint angle was measured by two independent observers with use of image analysis software in a personal computer. The technique of measurement of the facet angles on magnetic resonance scans was validated with a subset of subjects who also had computed tomography scans made. Similar values were obtained with the two methods (r = 0.92; p = 0.00001). For the forty-six asymptomatic volunteers who did not have a herniated disc on the magnetic resonance scans (Group I), the median facet tropism was 5 to 6 degrees and was more than 10 degrees in 24 per cent (eleven) of the subjects. There was no association between increased facet tropism and disc degeneration. At the level of the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae, the median facet tropism was 10.3 degrees in the symptomatic patients who had a herniated disc at the same level and 5.4 degrees in the asymptomatic volunteers (Group I) (p = 0.05). The mean orientation of the lumbar facet angles relative to the coronal plane was more sagittal at all levels in the patients who had degenerative spondylolisthesis. The greatest difference was at the level of the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae (p = 0.000001). The mean facet angle was 41 degrees (95 per cent confidence interval, 37.6 to 44.6 degrees) in the asymptomatic volunteers and 60 degrees (95 per cent confidence interval, 52.7 to 67.1 degrees) in the patients who had degenerative spondylolisthesis. Furthermore, both the left and the right facet joints were more sagittally oriented in the patients who had degenerative spondylolisthesis. An individual in whom both facet-joint angles at the level of the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae were more than 45 degrees relative to the coronal plane was twenty-five times more likely to have degenerative spondylolisthesis (95 per cent confidence interval, seven to ninety-eight times). The increase in facet angles at levels other than that of the spondylolisthesis suggests that increased facet angles represent variations in anatomy rather than a secondary result of spondylolisthesis.


Spine | 1989

A prospective, randomized, double-blind evaluation of trigger-point injection therapy for low-back pain

Timothy A. Garvey; Michael R. Marks; Sam W. Wiesel

The efficacy of trigger-point injection therapy In treatment of low-back strain was evaluated in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. The patient population consisted of 63 individuals with low-back strain. Patients with this diagnosis had nonradiating low-back pain, normal neurologic examination, absence of tension signs, and lumbosacral roentgenograms interpreted as being within normal limits. They were treated conservatively for 4 weeks before entering the study. Injection therapy was of four different types: lldocaine, lldocaine combined with a steroid, acupuncture, and vapocoolant spray with acupressure. Results indicated that therapy without injected medication (63% improvement rate) was at least as effective as therapy with drug injection (42% improvement rate), at a P value of 0.09. Trigger-point therapy seems to be a useful adjunct In treatment of low-back strain. The injected substance apparently is not the critical factor, since direct mechanical stimulus to the trigger-point seems to give symptomatic relief equal to that of treatment with various types of injected medication


Spine | 1985

Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: To Fuse or Not to Fuse

Henry L. Feffer; Sam W. Wiesel; John M. Cuckler; Richard H. Rothman

Two groups of surgically treated patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis were compared. Those who had decompression accompanied by fusion had more favorable outcomes than those treated with decompression alone.


Spine | 1980

Acute low-back pain. An objective analysis of conservative therapy.

Sam W. Wiesel; John M. Cuckler; Francis N. DeLuca; Frederick L. Jones; Michael S. Zeide; Richard H. Rothman

The roles of bedrest, antiinflammatory medication, and analgesic medication in the treatment of acute back strain were objectively analyzed to determine whether they have a measurable effect on the return of patients to full daily activities as well as on the relief of pain. Two hundred patients were studied prospectively. Each patient had the diagnosis of acute back strain, which was defined as nonradiating low-back pain. The results of the patients neurologic examination, straight leg raising test, and lumbosacral spine roentgenograms had to be within normal limits for the patient to be included in the study. The results showed that bedrest, as compared with ambulation, will decrease the amount of time lost from work by 50%. Bedrest will also decrease the amount of discomfort by 60%. Analgesic medication, when combined with bedrest, will further decrease the amount of pain incurred, particularly when used in the first three days of the healing process. However, analgesic medication will not allow a more prompt return to work. Antiinflammatory medication, when added to bedrest in the treatment of lumbago, does not provide an advantage over bedrest alone.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1989

Posterior acetabular fracture-dislocations: fragment size, joint capsule, and stability

James C. Vailas; Shepard Hurwitz; Sam W. Wiesel

In acetabular fractures, the size of a significant posterior wall fragment remains undefined as it affects joint stability. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate fragment size and hip stability in cadaveric specimens after serial osteotomies. Also, the role of the posterior capsule, in the various osteotomies, was evaluated for changes in hip stability. We found that fragments involving 25% or less of the acetabulum are insignificant, i.e., do not affect joint stability, while fragments involving 50% or more are significant. The significance of transitional fragments (25-50% of the acetabulum) is determined by the posterior capsule.


Journal of Spinal Disorders | 1997

Spondylolisthesis in the elite football player : An epidemiologic study in the NCAA and NFL

Benjamin Shaffer; Sam W. Wiesel; William C. Lauerman

Although spondylolisthesis in and of itself is not a contraindication to participation or successful performance in football, having spondylolisthesis may well predispose to symptoms and be associated with a worse prognosis. The purpose of this study was to determine the reported prevalence, treatment approach, outcomes, and perceptions regarding prognosis of elite football players with spondylolisthesis by their National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and National Football League (NFL) team physicians. A questionnaire regarding the prevalence, treatment, results, and perceptions regarding prognosis related to spondylolisthesis in football players was submitted to each team orthopaedic surgeon of the 28 NFL and the Final Associated Press ranked top-25 NCAA Division I teams at the conclusion of the 1993-1994 season. All questionnaires were returned for review. The prevalence of players with known spondylolisthesis currently participating in elite football was 1% in both the NCAA and NFL. Fifty-two percent of NCAA and 43% of NFL team physicians were aware of at least one athlete with spondylolisthesis currently playing. Only six college and two NFL team physicians were aware of athletes surgically treated for spondylolisthesis. Sixty-four percent of NFL team physicians and 36% of college team physicians believed that the presence of spondylolisthesis implies a poor prognosis. Ninety-six percent of professional team physicians downgraded the rating of players with known spondylolisthesis before the NFL draft.


American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation | 1998

Neck pain : medical diagnosis and comprehensive management

David G. Borenstein; Sam W. Wiesel; Scott D. Boden

Section I: Anatomy and Physiology of Neck Pain. Anatomy and Biomechanics of the Cervical Spine. Epidemiology of Neck Pain. Sources of Neck Pain. Section II: Clinical Evaluation of Neck Pain. History. Physical Examination. Laboratory Test. Radiographic Evaluation. Miscellaneous Tests. Standardized Approach to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Neck Pain. Section III: Diseases Associated with Neck Pain. Mechanical Disorders of the Cervical. Rheumatologic Disorders of the Cervical Spine. Infections of the Cervical Spine. Tumors and Infiltrative Lesions of the Cervical Spine. Endocrinologic and Heritable Disorders of the Cervical Spine. Neurologic and Psychiatric Disorders of the Cervical Spine. Referred Pain. Miscellaneous Diseases. Section IV: Therapy. Medical Therapy. Surgical Therapy. Occupational Neck Pain.

Collaboration


Dive into the Sam W. Wiesel's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard H. Rothman

Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David G. Borenstein

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Henry L. Feffer

George Washington University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dieter Schellinger

Georgetown University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John M. Cuckler

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nicholas Patronas

George Washington University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge