Samer A. Srour
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Samer A. Srour.
Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation | 2017
Samer A. Srour; Denái R. Milton; Amado Karduss-Urueta; Monzr M. Al Malki; Rizwan Romee; Scott D. Solomon; Auayporn Nademanee; Stacey Brown; Michael Slade; Rosendo Perez; Gabriela Rondon; Stephan J. Forman; Richard E. Champlin; Partow Kebriaei; Stefan O. Ciurea
Haploidentical transplantation performed with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis has been associated with favorable outcomes for patients with acute myeloid leukemia and lymphomas. However, it remains unclear if such approach is effective for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We analyzed outcomes of 109 consecutively treated ALL patients 18 years of age and older at 5 institutions. The median age was 32 years and the median follow-up for survivors was 13 months. Thirty-two patients were in first complete remission (CR1), while the rest were beyond CR1. Neutrophil engraftment occurred in 95% of the patients. The cumulative incidences of grades II to IV and III and IV acute GVHD at day 100 after transplantation were 32% and 11%, respectively, whereas chronic GVHD, nonrelapse mortality, relapse rate, and disease-free survival (DFS) at 1 year after transplantation were 32%, 21%, 27%, and 51%, respectively. Patients in CR1 had 52% DFS at 3 years. These results suggest that haploidentical transplants performed with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis provide a very suitable alternative to HLA-matched transplantations for patients with ALL.
American Journal of Hematology | 2016
Sameh Gaballa; Rima M. Saliba; Samer A. Srour; Gary Lu; Jonathan E. Brammer; Nina Shah; Qaiser Bashir; Krina Patel; Fabian Bock; Simrit Parmar; Chitra Hosing; Uday Popat; Ruby Delgado; Gabriela Rondon; Jatin J. Shah; Elisabet E. Manasanch; Robert Z. Orlowski; Richard E. Champlin; Muzaffar H. Qazilbash
TP53 gene deletion is associated with poor outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM). We report the outcomes of patients with MM with and without TP53 deletion who underwent immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) and/or proteasome inhibitor (PI) induction followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto‐HCT). We identified 34 patients with MM and TP53 deletion who underwent IMiD and/or PI induction followed by auto‐HCT at our institution during 2008–2014. We compared their outcomes with those of control patients (n = 111) with MM without TP53 deletion. Median age at auto‐HCT was 59 years in the TP53‐deletion group and 58 years in the control group (P = 0.4). Twenty‐one patients (62%) with TP53 deletion and 69 controls (62%) achieved at least partial remission before auto‐HCT (P = 0.97). Twenty‐three patients (68%) with TP53 deletion and 47 controls (42%) had relapsed disease at auto‐HCT (P = 0.01). Median progression‐free survival was 8 months for patients with TP53 deletion and 28 months for controls (P < 0.001). Median overall survival was 21 months for patients with TP53 deletion and 56 months for controls (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis of both groups, TP53 deletion (hazard ratio 3.4, 95% confidence interval 1.9–5.8, P < 0.001) and relapsed disease at auto‐HCT (hazard ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.2–3.4, P = 0.008) were associated with a higher risk of earlier progression. In MM patients treated with PI and/or IMiD drugs, and auto‐HCT, TP53 deletion and relapsed disease at the time of auto‐HCT are independent predictors of progression. Novel approaches should be evaluated in this high‐risk population. Am. J. Hematol. 91:E442–E447, 2016.
Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation | 2016
Fabian Bock; Gary Lu; Samer A. Srour; Sameh Gaballa; Heather Lin; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani; Medhavi Honhar; Maximilian Stich; Nina Shah; Qaiser Bashir; Krina Patel; Uday Popat; Chitra Hosing; Martin Korbling; Ruby Delgado; Gabriela Rondon; Jatin J. Shah; Sheeba K. Thomas; Elisabet E. Manasanch; Berend Isermann; Robert Z. Orlowski; Richard E. Champlin; Muzaffar H. Qazilbash
The gain/amplification of the CKS1B gene on chromosome 1q21 region is associated with a poor outcome in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, there are limited data on the outcome of patients with CKS1B amplification after a single high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT). We retrospectively evaluated the outcome of patients with CKS1B amplification who received an auto-HCT between June 2012 and July 2014 at our institution. We identified 58 patients with MM and CKS1B gene amplification detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). We compared their outcomes with a propensity score-matched control group of 58 patients without CKS1B amplification who were treated at approximately the same time. The primary objective was to compare the progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the CKS1B and the control groups. Stratified log-rank test with the matched pairs as strata and double robust estimation under the Cox model were used to assess the effect of CKS1B gene amplification on PFS or OS in the matched cohort. Patients in the CKS1B and control groups were well matched for age, gender, disease status, year of auto-HCT, response to pretransplantation therapy, and baseline hemoglobin level. In both groups, 57% patients were in first remission and 43% had relapsed disease at auto-HCT. Twenty-seven (47%) patients with CKS1B amplification had concurrent monosomy 13 or 13q deletion; 6 (10%) by conventional cytogenetics only, 16 (28%) by FISH only, and 5 (9%) by both. Median follow-up after auto-HCT was 25.4 months. The median PFS of the CKS1B and the control groups were 15.0 months and 33.0 months (P = .002), respectively. The median OS have not been reached yet. The 2-year OS rates in the CKS1B and the control groups were 62% and 91% (P = .02), respectively. In conclusion, Patients with CKS1B amplification are more likely to have additional high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities and a shorter PFS and OS after an auto-HCT.
British Journal of Haematology | 2017
Samer A. Srour; Shaoying Li; Uday Popat; Muzaffar H. Qazilbash; Sara Lozano-Cerrada; Farzeneh Maadani; Amin M. Alousi; Partow Kebriaei; Paolo Anderlini; Yago Nieto; Roy B. Jones; Elizabeth J. Shpall; Richard E. Champlin; Chitra Hosing
High‐dose rituximab (HD‐R) combined with carmustine, cytarabine, etoposide and melphalan (BEAM) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was effective and tolerable in a single‐arm prospective study of relapsed aggressive B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (R‐NHL). We performed a randomized phase 2 study comparing HD‐R versus standard‐dose rituximab (SD‐R) in R‐NHL. Ninety‐three patients were randomized to HD‐R (1000 mg/m2) (n = 42) or SD‐R (375 mg/m2) (n = 51) administered on post‐transplant days +1 and +8, using a Bayesian adaptive algorithm. The 2 treatment arms were balanced in regards to patient demographic and clinical characteristics. At a median follow‐up of 7·92 years, the 5‐year disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 40% and 48%, respectively. We found no statistically significant differences between HD‐R and SD‐R in 5‐year DFS (36% vs. 43%; P = 0·205) and OS (43% vs. 52%; P = 0·392). In multivariate analyses, only disease status before ASCT [residual disease versus complete remission (CR)] (hazard ratio [HR] 1·79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1·08–2·95) and number of prior treatments received (>2 vs. ≤2 lines of treatment) (HR 1·89, 95% CI: 1·13–3·18) were associated with worse DFS and OS. Patients who had SCT while in CR or who received ≤2 lines of treatment prior to SCT had better 5‐year OS (57% vs. 35%; P = 0·02 and 54% vs. 30%, P = 0·001, respectively) in both arms. No differences in engraftments or adverse events were noted in the 2 arms. When combined with BEAM and ASCT in relapsed aggressive B‐cell NHL, HD‐R provided no DFS or OS advantage over SD‐R. In patients who have been exposed to rituximab in the frontline or salvage setting, the addition of rituximab in the peri‐transplant setting remains controversial.
British Journal of Haematology | 2018
Preetesh Jain; Jorge Romaguera; Samer A. Srour; Hun J. Lee; Frederick B. Hagemeister; Jason R. Westin; Luis Fayad; Felipe Samaniego; Maria Badillo; Liang Zhang; L. Nastoupil; Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna; Nathan Fowler; Michael L. Wang
Ibrutinib has shown significant activity in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (RR‐MCL). We report the long‐term outcome and safety profile of a single‐centre, single arm, open‐label, phase 2 study of RR‐MCL treated with IR. Overall, the median follow‐up time was 47 months (range 1–52 months), median duration on treatment was 16 months (range 1–53 months) and median number of treatment cycles was 17 (range 1–56). Twenty‐nine patients (58%) achieved complete remission and of these, 12 patients continue on study. Thirty‐eight patients discontinued treatment, 14 due to disease progression (2 transformed). Patients with blastoid morphology, high risk MCL International Prognostic Index score and high Ki67% had inferior survival. The commonest grade 1–2 toxicities were fatigue, diarrhoea, nausea, arthralgias and myalgias. None had long term toxicities. Median progression‐free survival was 43 months. Eighteen patients (36%) died (14 deaths were MCL‐related). The median overall survival has not been reached. Treatment with IR can provide durable remissions in a subset of patients with RR‐MCL, especially those with low Ki67%. The possible benefit of adding other therapies in combination with IR in RR‐MCL is under exploration.
European Journal of Haematology | 2017
Talha Badar; Samer A. Srour; Qaiser Bashir; Nina Shah; Gheath Alatrash; Chitra Hosing; Uday Popat; Yago Nieto; Robert Z. Orlowski; Richard E. Champlin; Muzaffar H. Qazilbash
Outcome of patients with standard‐risk (SR) multiple myeloma (MM) has improved; however, subsets of patients do worse than expected. We sought to identify the factors associated with inferior outcome.
British Journal of Haematology | 2018
Samer A. Srour; Hun J. Lee; Krystle Nomie; Haige Ye; Wendy Chen; Onyeka Oriabure; Jorge Romaguera; Michael L. Wang
Ian Jennings David Perry Henry Watson Raza Alikhan Mike Laffan Keith Gomez Steve Kitchen Isobel Walker and on behalf of the Haemostasis and Thrombosis Task Force of the British Society for Haematology & UK NEQAS for Blood Coagulation Blood Coagulation, UK NEQAS, Sheffield, Cambridge Haemophilia & Thrombophilia Centre, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, Department of Haematology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, Department of Haematology, Hammersmith Hospital, and Haemophilia Centre and Thrombosis Unit Royal Free Hospital, London, UK E-mail: [email protected]
Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation | 2016
Reshma Ramlal; Koji Sasaki; Sara Lozano Cerrada; Samer A. Srour; Julianne Chen; R. Gabriella Rondon; Katy Rezvani; Betul Oran; Amanda Olson; Elizabeth J. Shpall; Richard E. Champlin; Stefan O. Ciurea
Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation | 2018
Samer A. Srour; Parth Desai; Stefan O. Ciurea; Qaiser Bashir; Betul Oran; Amanda Olson; Sairah Ahmed; Prithviraj Bose; Naveen Pemmaraju; Amin M. Alousi; Srdan Verstovsek; Richard E. Champlin; Uday Popat
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2016
Samer A. Srour; Issa F. Khouri; Yago Nieto; Uday Popat; Muzaffar H. Qazilbash; Paolo Anderlini; Partow Kebriaei; Elizabeth J. Shpall; Richard E. Champlin; Chitra Hosing