Sampath Gunda

Short and long-term outcomes of percutaneous left atrial appendage suture ligation: Results from a US multicenter evaluation

BACKGROUND Published studies of epicardial ligation of left atrial appendage (LAA) have reported discordant results. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to delineate the safety and efficacy of LAA closure with the LARIAT device. METHODS This is a multicenter registry of 712 consecutive patients undergoing LAA ligation with LARIAT at 18 US hospitals. The primary end point was successful suture deployment, no leak by intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and no major complication (death, stroke, cardiac perforation, and bleeding requiring transfusion) at discharge. A leak of 2-5 mm on follow-up TEE was the secondary end point. RESULTS LARIAT was successfully deployed in 682 patients (95.5%). A complete closure was achieved in 669 patients (98%), while 13 patients (1.8%) had a trace leak (<2 mm). There was 1 death related to the procedure. Ten patients (1.44%) had cardiac perforation necessitating open heart surgery, while another 14 (2.01%) did not need surgery. The risk of cardiac perforation decreased significantly after the introduction of a micropuncture (MP) needle for pericardial access. Delayed complications (pericarditis requiring >2 weeks of treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs/colchicine and pericardial and pleural effusion after discharge) occurred in 34 (4.78%) patients, and the risk decreased significantly with the periprocedural use of colchicine. Follow-up TEE (n = 480) showed a leak of 2-5 mm in 6.5% and a thrombus in 2.5%. One patient had a leak of >5 mm. CONCLUSION LARIAT effectively closes the LAA and has acceptable procedural risks with the evolution of the use of the micropuncture needle for pericardial access and the use of colchicine for mitigating the postinflammatory response associated with LAA ligation and pericardial access.

Endocardial (Watchman) vs epicardial (Lariat) left atrial appendage exclusion devices: Understanding the differences in the location and type of leaks and their clinical implications

BACKGROUND Watchman and Lariat left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion devices are associated with LAA leaks postdeployment. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence, characteristics, and clinical significance of these leaks. METHODS We performed a multicenter prospective observational study of all patients who underwent LAA closure. Baseline, procedural, and imaging variables along with LAA occlusion rates at 30-90 days and 1-year postprocedure were compared. RESULTS A total of 478 patients (219 with the Watchman device and 259 with the Lariat device) with successful implants were included. Patients in the Lariat group had a higher CHADS2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age >74 years, diabetes, stroke) score and a larger left atrium and LAA. A total of 79 patients (17%) had a detectable leak at 1 year. More patients in the Watchman group had a leak compared with those in the Lariat group (46 [21%] vs 33 [14%]; P = .019). All the leaks were eccentric (edge effect) in the Watchman group and concentric (gunny sack effect) in the Lariat group. The size of the leak was larger in the Watchman group than in the Lariat group (3.10 ± 1.5 mm vs 2.15 ± 1.3 mm; P = .001). The Watchman group had 1 device embolization requiring surgery and 2 pericardial effusions requiring pericardiocentesis. In the Lariat group, 4 patients had cardiac tamponade requiring urgent surgical repair. Three patients in each group had a cerebrovascular accident and were not associated with device leaks. CONCLUSION The Lariat device is associated with a lower rate of leaks at 1 year as compared with the Watchman device, with no difference in rates of cerebrovascular accident. There was no correlation between the presence of residual leak and the occurrence of cerebrovascular accident.

Use of contact force sensing technology during radiofrequency ablation reduces recurrence of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The suboptimal outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation have been attributed to lack of transmural lesions during pulmonary vein isolation. The advent of contact force (CF) sensing technology enables real-time assessment of the applied force at the catheter-tissue interface and increases the chances of transmural lesions. We sought to perform a meta-analysis of data from eligible studies to delineate the true impact of CF technology. Database searches through April 2015 identified 9 eligible studies (enrolling 1148 patients). The relative risk of AF recurrence at follow-up was used as the primary end point and assessed with random-effects meta-analysis. Radiofrequency (RF) duration, total procedure length, and fluoroscopy exposure were assessed as secondary outcomes using weighted mean difference with the random-effects model. Compared with standard technology, the use of CF technology showed a 37% reduction (relative risk 0.63; 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.91; P = .01) in AF recurrence at a median follow-up of 12 months and a 7.3-minute reduction (95% confidence interval -14.05 to -0.55; P = .03) in RF use during ablation. There was no significant difference in total procedure length and fluoroscopy exposure between the 2 groups. In conclusion, this meta-analysis shows that the use of CF technology decreases AF recurrence at a median follow-up of 12 months and also led to decreased use of RF during ablation. There was no difference in total procedure length and fluoroscopy exposure.

Differences in complication rates between large bore needle and a long micropuncture needle during epicardial access: time to change clinical practice?

Background—A dry epicardial access (EA) is increasingly used for advanced cardiovascular procedures. Conventionally used large bore needles (Tuohy or Pajunk needle; LBN) have been associated with low but definite incidence of major complications with EA. Use of micropuncture needle (MPN) may decrease the risk of complications. We intended to compare the outcomes of LBN with MPN for EA. Methods and Results—We report a multicenter observational study of consecutive patients who underwent EA for ventricular tachycardia ablation or Lariat procedure using the LBN or MPN. Oral anticoagulation was stopped before the procedure. Baseline characteristics and procedure-related complications were collected and compared. Of the 404 patients, LBN and MPN were used in 46% and 54% of patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of inadvertent puncture of myocardium between LBN and MPN (7.6% versus 6.8%, P=0.76). However, there was a significantly higher rate of large pericardial effusions with LBN compared with MPN (8.1% versus 0.9%; P<0.001). The incidence of pleural effusions were not significantly different between both (1.6% versus 2.3%; P=0.64). LBN group had an increase in other complications compared with MPN (open heart surgery to repair cardiac laceration [6 versus 0], injury to liver [1 versus 0], coronaries [1 versus 0], and superior epigastric artery requiring surgical exploration [0 versus 1]). Conclusions—The use of MPN is associated with decreased incidence of major complications, and the need for surgical repair and routine use should be considered for EA.

Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation in the Postpneumonectomy Population: A Feasibility, Safety, and Outcomes Study

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) of the remnant pulmonary vein (PV) stumps in pneumonectomy patients has not been well characterized.

Mechanical function of the left atrium is improved with epicardial ligation of the left atrial appendage: Insights from the LAFIT-LARIAT Registry

BACKGROUND Left atrial (LA) strain (ε) and ε rate (SR) analysis by 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography is a novel method for functional assessment of the LA. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of left atrial appendage (LAA) exclusion by Lariat epicardial ligation on mechanical function of the LA by performing ε and SR analysis before and after the procedure. METHODS A total of 66 patients who underwent successful LAA exclusion were included in the study. Of these 66 patients, 32 had adequate paired data for ε and SR analysis. SR during ventricular systole (LA-SRs) represents LA reservoir function, and SR during early ventricular diastole (LA-SRe) represents LA conduit function. ε and SR were determined from apical 4- and 2-chamber views using the electrocardiographic QRS as a reference point. LA volume index as surrogate for LA remodeling was measured from apical views. RESULTS Mean patient age was 70 ± 9.2 years. LAA ligation resulted in improved reservoir function (LA-SRs: pre 0.72, confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.83 vs post 0.81, CI 0.73-0.98; P = .043) and conduit function (LA-SRe: pre 0.74, CI 0.67-0.99 vs post 0.89, CI 0.82-1.07; P = .025). LA volume index improved significantly with the Lariat (pre 35.4, CI 29.4-37.2 vs post 29.2, CI 28.2-35.9; P <.023). CONCLUSION LAA exclusion seems to improve mechanical function of the LA and results in reverse LA remodeling.

Radiofrequency Ablation to Prevent Sudden Cardiac Death.

Radiofrequency ablation may prevent or treat atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Since some of these arrhythmias are associated with sudden cardiac death, it has been hypothesized that ablation may prevent sudden death in certain cases. We performed a literature search to better understand under which circumstances ablation may prevent sudden death and found little randomized data demonstrating the long-term effects of ablation. Current literature shows that ablation clearly prevents symptoms of arrhythmia and may reduce the incidence of sudden cardiac death in select patients, although data does not indicate improved mortality. Ongoing clinical trials are needed to better define the role of ablation in preventing sudden cardiac death.

Characterization of Pleural Effusion After Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion Using the Lariat Procedure

The Lariat procedure is increasingly used for the exclusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. There are anecdotal reports of pleural effusions after the Lariat procedure. However, the incidence, demographics, and pathophysiology of these effusions are largely unknown.

RISK SCORE MODEL FOR PREDICTING OCCURRENCE OF COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ATRIAL FIBRILLATION ABLATION

Background: Individual predictors of complications associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation have been documented. The prognostic impact of their coexistence has not been explored. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample database was utilized to identify 106,105 patients who underwent AF

LARIAT: The Endo-Epicardial Technique for Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a cardiac rhythm disorder and is associated with increased risk of stroke [1]. The prevalence of AF is rapidly increasing and current projections indicate a prevalence of 6.7 million AF patients in the U.S. in the year 2010 and this is projected to increase to 12.1–15.9 million by the year 2050 [2]. Annual healthcare bill for managing AF patients is estimated to be in the range of