Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Samuel A. Richmond is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Samuel A. Richmond.


Synthese | 1996

A simplification of the theory of simplicity

Samuel A. Richmond

Nelson Goodman has constructed two theories of simplicity: one of predicates; one of hypotheses. I offer a simpler theory by generalization and abstraction from his. Generalization comes by dropping special conditions Goodman imposes on which unexcluded extensions count as complicating and which excluded extensions count as simplifying. Abstraction is achieved by counting only nonisomorphic models and subinterpretations. The new theory takes into account all the hypotheses of a theory in assessing its complexity, whether they were projected prior to, or result from, projection of a given hypothesis. It assigns simplicity post-projection priority over simplicity pre-projection. It better orders compound conditionals than does the theory of simplicity of hypotheses, and it does not inherit an anomaly of the theory of simplicity of predicates — its failure to order the ordering relations. Drop Goodmans special conditions, and the problems fall away with them.


The American Review of Public Administration | 2007

Administrative Discretion: Can We Move Beyond Cider House Rules?

Jennifer K. Alexander; Samuel A. Richmond

The authors use a novel, The Cider House Rules, as a framework to examine legitimate administrative action when execution of a law will result in harm. Four political values that have informed administrative dissent are reviewed: publicity, utility, democracy, and liberty. The authors identify questions to serve as guidelines for front-line administrators when deciding to exercise discretion in opposition to a political mandate. The questions offer checkpoints for considering whether administrative action in opposition to mandate is ethical. The authors extend the logic of the new public service by arguing that administrators are responsible for protecting liberty because liberty is constitutionally fundamental and particularly at risk in the case of citizens peripheral to political processes. The authors argue that administrative discretion in opposition to mandate requiring secrecy or misrepresentation may be exercised under particular circumstances, for the protection of individual liberty, given its elevated status among the regime values.


Ethics | 1977

A note on the priority of liberty

Joseph P. DeMarco; Samuel A. Richmond


Worldview | 1976

Equality—an American Dilemma

Joseph P. DeMarco; Samuel A. Richmond


Reflections: Narratives of Professional Helping (Click on Current or Archives; Registration Optional) | 2014

INDIVIDUAL OBLIGATION AND THE LAW An Essay on "Do the Right Thing".

Samuel A. Richmond


Reflections: Narratives of Professional Helping (Click on Current or Archives; Registration Optional) | 2010

Distributive Justice and Inequality

Samuel A. Richmond


Archive | 2009

\"Who Owns Truth?\" - Biomedical Research in a Health Policy Context

Samuel A. Richmond


Archive | 2006

Administrative Discretion: can we move beyond the cider house rules

Jennifer K. Alexander; Samuel A. Richmond


Southern Journal of Philosophy | 1987

Justice: Simple theories, complex applications

Joseph P. DeMarco; Samuel A. Richmond


Journal of Social Philosophy | 1986

THE MUTUALITY OF LIBERTY, EQUALITY, AND FRATERNITY

Joseph P. DeMarco; Samuel A. Richmond

Collaboration


Dive into the Samuel A. Richmond's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joseph P. DeMarco

Cleveland State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge