Samuel C. Overley

A meta-analysis of cervical foraminotomy: open versus minimally-invasive techniques

BACKGROUND CONTEXT The posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) may be performed using an open or minimally-invasive (MIS) approach using a tubular retractor. Although there are theoretical advantages such as less blood loss and shorter hospitalizations, there is no consensus in the literature regarding the best approach for treatment. PURPOSE To assess clinical outcomes of PCF treated with either an open or an MIS approach using a tubular retractor. STUDY DESIGN Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of English language studies for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy treated with foraminotomy. PATIENT SAMPLE Pooled patient results from Level I studies and Level IV retrospective studies. OUTCOME MEASURES Meta-analysis for clinical success as determined by Odom and Prolo criteria, and visual analog scale scores for arm and neck pain. METHODS A literature search of three databases was performed to identify investigations performed in the treatment of PCF with an open or MIS approach. The pooled results were performed by calculating the effect size based on the logit event rate. Studies were weighted by the inverse of the variance, which included both within and between-study errors. Confidence intervals (CIs) were reported at 95%. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q statistic and I-squared, where I-squared is the estimate of the percentage of error due to between-study variation. RESULTS The initial literature search resulted in 195 articles, of which, 20 were determined as relevant on abstract review. An open foraminotomy approach was performed in six; similarly, an MIS approach was performed in three studies. The pooled clinical success rate was 92.7% (CI: 88.9, 95.3) for open foraminotomy and 94.9% (CI: 90.5, 97.4) for MIS foraminotomy, which was not statistically significant (p=.418). The open group demonstrated relative homogeneity with Q value of 7.6 and I(2) value of 34.3%; similarly, the MIS group demonstrated moderate study heterogeneity with Q value of 4.44 and I(2) value of 54.94%. CONCLUSIONS Patients with symptomatic cervical radiculopathy from foraminal stenosis can be effectively managed with either a traditional open or an MIS foraminotomy. There is no significant difference in the pooled outcomes between the two groups.

Open Versus Minimally Invasive Fixation Techniques for Thoracolumbar Trauma: A Meta-Analysis

Study Design Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of studies published in English. Objective This study evaluated differences in outcome variables between percutaneous and open pedicle screws for traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. Methods A systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase was performed. The variables of interest included postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, kyphosis angle, and vertebral body height, as well as intraoperative blood loss and operative time. The results were pooled by calculating the effect size based on the standardized difference in means. The studies were weighted by the inverse of the variance, which included both within- and between-study error. Confidence intervals were reported at 95%. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q statistic and I 2. Results After two-reviewer assessment, 38 studies were eliminated. Six studies were found to meet inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The combined effect size was found to be in favor of percutaneous fixation for blood loss and operative time (p < 0.05); however, there were no differences in vertebral body height (VBH), kyphosis angle, or VAS scores between open and percutaneous fixation. All of the studies demonstrated relative homogeneity, with I 2 < 25. Conclusions Patients with thoracolumbar fractures can be effectively managed with percutaneous or open pedicle screw placement. There are no differences in VBH, kyphosis angle, or VAS between the two groups. Blood loss and operative time were decreased in the percutaneous group, which may represent a potential benefit, particularly in the polytraumatized patient. All variables in this study demonstrated near-perfect homogeneity, and the effect is likely close to the true effect.

The 5-year Cost-effectiveness of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Cervical Disc Replacement: A Markov Analysis

Study Design. A Markov state-transition model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc replacement (CDR) at 5 years. Objective. To determine the cost-effectiveness of ACDF and CDR at 5 years. Summary of Background Data. ACDF and CDR are surgical options for the treatment of an acute cervical disc herniation with associated myelopathy/radiculopathy. Cost-effectiveness analysis provides valuable information regarding which intervention will lead to a more efficient utilization of health care resources. Methods. Outcome and complication probabilities were obtained from existing literature. Physician costs were based on a fixed percentage of 140% of 2010 Medicare reimbursement. Hospital costs were determined from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Utilities were derived from responses to health state surveys (Short Form 36) at baseline and at 5 years from the treatment arms of the ProDisc-C trial. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were used to compare treatments. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed on all parameters within the model. Results. CDR generated a total 5-year cost of

A Meta-Analysis of the Clinical and Fusion Results following Treatment of Symptomatic Cervical Pseudarthrosis

102,274, whereas ACDF resulted in a 5-year cost of

Impact of Operation Time on 30-Day Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery:

119,814. CDR resulted in a generation of 2.84 quality-adjusted life years, whereas ACDF resulted in 2.81. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was −

Mesenchymal stem cell allograft as a fusion adjunct in one- and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a matched cohort analysis

557,849 per quality-adjusted life year gained. CDR remained the dominant strategy below a cost of

The 100 Most Influential Articles in Cervical Spine Surgery

20,486. ACDF was found to be a cost-effective strategy below a cost of

The Internet as a communication tool for orthopedic spine fellowships in the United States

18,607. CDR was the dominant strategy when the utility value was above 0.713. CDR remained the dominant strategy assuming an annual complication rate less than 4.37%. Conclusion. ACDF and CDR were both shown to be cost-effective strategies at 5 years. CDR was found to be the dominant treatment strategy in our model. Further long-term studies evaluating the clinical and quality-of-life outcomes of these 2 treatments are needed to further validate the model. Level of Evidence: 5

Bone morphogenetic protein use in spine surgery in the united states: how have we responded to the warnings?

Study Design Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Objective This study is a meta-analysis assessing the fusion rate and the clinical outcomes of cervical pseudarthrosis treated with either a posterior or a revision anterior approach. Methods A literature search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase was performed. Variables of interest included fusion rate and clinical success. The effect size based on logit event rate was calculated from the pooled results. The studies were weighted by the inverse of the variance, which included both within- and between-study error. The confidence intervals were reported at 95%. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q statistic and I 2, where I 2 is the estimate of the percentage of error due to between-study variation. Results Sixteen studies reported fusion outcomes; 10 studies reported anterior and/or posterior results. The pooled fusion success was 86.4% in the anterior group and 97.1% in the posterior group (p = 0.028). The anterior group demonstrated significant heterogeneity with Q value of 34.2 and I 2 value of 73.7%; no heterogeneity was seen in the posterior group. The clinical outcomes were reported in 10 studies, with eight reporting results of anterior and posterior approaches. The pooled clinical success rate was 77.0% for anterior and 71.7% for posterior (p = 0.55) approaches. There was significant heterogeneity in both groups (I 2 16.1; 19.2). Conclusions Symptomatic cervical pseudarthrosis can be effectively managed with either an anterior or a posterior approach. The posterior approach demonstrates a significantly greater fusion rate compared with the anterior approach, though the clinical outcome does not differ between the two groups.

Return to Play in Elite Athletes After Lumbar Microdiscectomy: A Meta-analysis.

Study Design: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Objective: There is a paucity of data on the effect of operative duration on postoperative complications during adult spinal deformity surgery (ASDS). The study attempts to explore and quantify the association between increased operation times and postoperative complications. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database from 2010 to 2014. Patients (≥18 years of age) from the NSQIP database undergoing ASDS were separated into cohorts based on quartiles of operation duration. Chi-square and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors. Results: A total of 5338 patients met the inclusion criteria and were divided per quartiles based on operative duration in minutes (154, 235, 346, and 1156 minutes). Multivariate logistic regressions revealed that in comparison to the lowest quartile of operative duration, the highest quartile group was associated significantly with length of stay ≥5 days (odds ratio [OR] = 5.85), any complication (OR = 9.88), wound complication (OR = 5.95), pulmonary complication (OR = 2.85, P = .001), venous thromboembolism (OR = 12.37), intra-/postoperative transfusion (OR = 12.77), sepsis (OR = 5.27), reoperations (OR = 1.48), and unplanned readmissions (OR = 1.29). The odds ratio was higher when comparing a higher quartile group with the reference group across all associations. P < .001 unless otherwise noted. Conclusion: ASDS operation time is associated with multiple postoperative complications, including, but not limited to, wound and pulmonary complications, venous thromboembolism, postoperative transfusion, length of stay ≥5 days, sepsis, reoperation, and unplanned readmission.