Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Samuel G. Taylor is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Samuel G. Taylor.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1988

Identification of a subgroup of patients with breast cancer and histologically positive axillary nodes receiving adjuvant chemotherapy who may benefit from postoperative radiotherapy.

Barbara Fowble; Robert Gray; Kennedy W. Gilchrist; R L Goodman; Samuel G. Taylor; Douglass C. Tormey

Risk factors for isolated local-regional (LR) recurrence following mastectomy for breast cancer were analyzed in a review of 627 women entered into Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) adjuvant chemotherapy trials between 1978 and 1982. Premenopausal patients were randomized to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (5-FU) (CMF), cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-FU, and prednisone (CMFP), or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-FU, prednisone, and tamoxifen (CMFPT). Postmenopausal patients were randomized to observation, CMFP, or CMFPT. Median follow-up time was 4.5 years. At 3 years, 225 patients relapsed and in 70 (31% of failures, 11% of all patients) the initial site was LR without distant metastases. In a multivariate analysis, the risk of an isolated LR recurrence significantly correlated with the number of positive axillary nodes, the primary tumor size, the presence of tumor necrosis, and the number of axillary nodes examined. Factors that significantly discriminated between an isolated LR recurrence and distant metastasis were the number of positive nodes and primary tumor size. Patients with four to seven positive nodes or tumor size greater than or equal to 5 cm had a chance of developing an isolated LR recurrence almost equal to the risk of distant metastases. These findings suggest a potential for improved survival in this subset of patients with the addition of postmastectomy radiation to chemotherapy, and continue to emphasize the presence of a group of patients at high risk for isolated LR recurrence despite adjuvant chemotherapy.


Cancer | 1998

Final report of a phase II evaluation of paclitaxel in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck : an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial (PA390)

Arlene A. Forastiere; Darleen Shank; Donna Neuberg; Samuel G. Taylor; Ronald C. DeConti; George L. Adams

A number of single agents have been tested in patients with carcinoma of the head and neck receiving palliative treatment. In general, 15‐30% of patients achieve a partial response lasting 3‐4 months. Treatment has not been shown to alter survival rates. It is clear that new drugs with potentially greater activity need to be identified. For this purpose, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group conducted a Phase II evaluation of paclitaxel.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1994

Randomized comparison of neoadjuvant cisplatin and fluorouracil infusion followed by radiation versus concomitant treatment in advanced head and neck cancer.

Samuel G. Taylor; Anantha K. Murthy; J. M. Vannetzel; P. Colin; M. Dray; David D. Caldarelli; S. Shott; E. Vokes; John Showel; James C. Hutchinson; T. R. Witt; Katherine L. Griem; W. F. Hartsell; M. S. Kies; Bharat B. Mittal; J. L. Rebischung; D. J. Coupez; J. L. Desphieux; S. Bobin; C. LePajolec

PURPOSE To compare two published schedules of cisplatin plus fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion and radiation as either sequential or concomitant treatment for toxicity and efficacy in patients with unresectable head and neck cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a randomized trial between cisplatin 100 mg/m2 over 15 minutes on day 1 plus 5-FU 1.0 g/m2 by continuous infusion on days 1 to 5, repeated every 3 weeks for three cycles, followed by 70 Gy of radiation in 7 to 8 weeks, versus cisplatin 60 mg/m2 over 15 minutes on day 1 plus 5-FU 800 mg/m2 by continuous infusion on days 1 to 5 plus radiation 2 Gy on days 1 to 5, repeated every other week for seven cycles. Unresectable head and neck squamous cancer patients not previously treated with radiation or chemotherapy and with a performance status of 0 to 2 were stratified by tumor (T) and node (N) groupings and performance status and randomized. RESULTS Two hundred fifteen patients were entered and 214 analyzed, 107 on each arm. After all treatment, overall response rates were different (P = .003), with similar complete response rates, but more partial responses and fewer patients with no change or progression with concomitant treatment. Cox regression analysis for progression-free survival identified concomitant treatment (P = .003), Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) stage III grouping (P < .0001), performance status (P = .0002), concomitant treatment (P = .003), and treating institution (P = .006) as significant. The sequential and concomitant treatments showed similar distant failure patterns (10% and 7%, respectively), but divergent regional failure rates (55% and 39%). Severe and worse toxic events were similar between the treatment programs, but radiation-induced mucositis combined with cisplatin-induced water-losing nephropathy, in the concomitant arm only, demanded more supportive care. Survival duration was similar between the treatment arms, but significantly more patients in the sequential arm died of their cancer (P = .011). CONCLUSION Concomitant treatment offered improved disease control, predominantly of regional disease, but benefit was dependent on the experience of the treating institution. Translation of this benefit into improved survival is not yet evident, with an excess of deaths from other causes in the concomitant arm.


The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 1989

Preoperative chemotherapy and irradiation for stage III non-small cell lung cancer

L. Penfield Faber; C. Frederick Kittle; William H. Warren; Philip Bonomi; Samuel G. Taylor; Salitha Reddy; Myung-Sook Lee

Surgical therapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not resulted in substantial long-term survival. Neoadjuvant treatment programs that could down-stage the tumor and achieve increased long-term survival would be of obvious benefit. We have used preoperative simultaneous chemotherapy and irradiation in 85 patients with clinical stage III non-small cell lung cancer considered candidates for surgical resection. One group of 56 patients was treated with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and simultaneous irradiation for five days every other week for a total of four cycles. After treatment, 39 patients underwent resection, and the operative mortality was 2 (5%) of 39. A second trial was undertaken in which etoposide (VP-16) was added because of its synergism with cisplatin. In this group, 29 patients were considered to have potentially resectable disease, and 23 underwent thoracotomy with 1 operative death (4%). Of the total of 62 patients having thoracotomy, 60 underwent resection (97%). Complications were major, and there were four bronchopleural fistulas. For the 85 patients eligible for surgical intervention in these two groups of patients, the Kaplan-Meier median survival estimate is 40% at 3 years. The median survival of the 62 patients having thoracotomy is 36.6 months. Combination preoperative chemotherapy and irradiation is feasible with acceptable toxicity and operative mortality in patients with clinical stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Prospective randomized studies are suggested for further evaluation of this treatment program.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1997

Induction cisplatin/vinblastine and irradiation vs. irradiation in unresectable squamous cell lung cancer: Failure patterns by cell type in rtog 88-08/ECOG 4588

Ritsuko Komaki; Charles Scott; William T. Sause; David H. Johnson; Samuel G. Taylor; Jin S. Lee; B. Emami; Roger W. Byhardt; Walter J. Curran; Abdul R. Dar; James D. Cox

PURPOSE To analyze disease failure patterns by pretreatment characteristics and treatment groups in a prospective randomized trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with medically inoperable Stage II, unresectable IIIA and IIIB nonsmall cell lung cancer with KPS > or =70 and weight loss < or =5% were randomized to one of three treatment groups: standard radiation therapy with 60 Gy at 2.0 Gy per day (STD RT), induction chemotherapy with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 days 1 and 29 with vinblastine 5 mg/m2 weekly for 5 weeks followed by 60 Gy at 2.0 Gy per day (CT + RT), or hyperfractionated radiation therapy with 69.6 Gy at 1.2 Gy b.i.d. (HFX RT). Of 490 patients enrolled, 458 were evaluable. Minimum and median periods of observation for this analysis were 4 years and 6 years, respectively. RESULTS Pretreatment characteristics were equally distributed. Toxicities were previously reported. Median survival rates were 11.4, 13.6, and 12.3 months for STD RT, CT + RT, and HFX RT, respectively (log rank p = 0.05, Wilcoxon p = 0.04). Survivals were 20, 31, and 24% at 2 years, and 4, 11, and 9% at 4 years in the STD RT, CT + RT, and HFX RT groups, respectively. There were no differences in local tumor control rates among the treatments. Patterns of first failure showed less distant metastasis (DM) (other than brain) for CT + RT compared to the RT alone arms (p = 0.04). Within squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), DM (other than brain) rates were 43%, 16%, and 38% in SCC for STD RT, CT + RT, and HFX RT, respectively (p = 0.0015). Patients with peripheral/chest wall lesions were significantly more likely to fail first in the thorax when treated on STD RT compared to CT + RT and HFX RT (p = 0.009). Survival rates were similar among the treatment arms for patients with squamous cell carcinoma. Among patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma, failure patterns did not differ by treatment group, but survival was significantly better in those who were treated by induction chemotherapy (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION Patients with squamous cell carcinoma treated on the CT + RT arm had a significant reduction of first DM other than brain, but there was difference in survival. Survival favored CT + RT in nonsquamous carcinoma despite similar failure patterns. Reasons for improved survival with CT + RT in NSCLC are not yet available.


The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 1987

Simultaneous Cisplatin Fluorouracil Infusion and Radiation Followed by Surgical Resection in Regionally Localized Stage III, Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Samuel G. Taylor; Marion Trybula; Philip Bonomi; L. Penfield Faber; Myung-Sook Lee; Salitha Reddy; Susan C. Maffey; Douglas J. Mathisen; Robert J. Jensik; C. Frederick Kittle

Sixty-four patients with stage III (M omicron) non-small cell lung cancer were treated with cisplatin fluorouracil infusion chemotherapy and simultaneous radiation therapy for 5 days every other week. A total of 4 cycles (40 Gy) was followed by attempted surgical resection. Clinical response to the preoperative treatment included 5 (8%) complete and 32 (48%) partial responses. Thirty-nine (61%) underwent the planned operation, and in 9 (23%) of these patients the resected specimens were histologically negative. Clinical assessment failed to predict histological response. With 17 months median follow-up (range, 2.4-29 months), estimated 1-year survival was 61% and median survival was 16 months for all patients.


Cancer | 1971

Clinical study with bleomycin

Sachidananda Shastri; Robert E. Slayton; Janet Wolter; Charles P. Perlia; Samuel G. Taylor

Bleomycin is an antitumor antibiotic produced by Streptomyces verticillus. Seventy‐five patients with various neoplasms were studied using this drug. Fourteen out of 20 patients with epidermoid carcinoma of the head and neck region, 5 out of 14 cases of lymphoma including Hodgkins disease, 3 out of 6 patients with testicular tumors, and one patient with lymphangiosarcoma of the arm showed evidence of objective regression. Common side effects encountered were hyperthermic reactions, gastrointestinal disturbances, hyperkeratosis and vesiculation of fingers, alopecia, and stomatitis. Pulmonary fibrosis is a rare but serious complication. One patient in this series died of this complication. There was no evidence of bone marrow, liver, or renal toxicity. Bleomycin promises to be a useful therapeutic agent and merits further study.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1981

Integration of chemotherapy into a combined modality treatment plan for head and neck cancer: A review☆

John H. Glick; Samuel G. Taylor

Abstract This review highlights the most important recent advances in the chemotherapeutic management of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Prior chemotherapy trials must be interpreted with caution in the absence of information concerning important prognostic variables, such as prior treatment, nutritional and performance status, and the heterogeneity of primary sites. In patients who have recurrent or metastatic disease, metbotrexate, platinum, and bleomycin are three active drugs when used as single agents. There is no evidence that high-dose metbotrexate therapy is superior to more conventional weekly intravenous methotrexate in the treatment of recurrent disease. Platinum is a new agent that has demonstrated activity against hemstogenous as well as regional disease. In the absence of evidence of a dose-response curve for platinum, the lower dosage schedules should be used that can be given with acceptable toxicity on an outpatient basis. Combination chemotherapy has resulted in a high proportion of objective responders and approximately 20% complete remissions to any of several platinum-contaialog regimens. However, the median duration of response remains short and none of the combination drug programs has been established as yet as superior to single agent chemotherapy in a randomized trial. Both single agent and combination chemotherapy programs have been used prior to initial surgery or radiation in patients with advanced inoperable but non-metastatic disease. Despite dramatically higher response rates over these obtained with the same drugs used in recurrent disease, there is as yet no evidence that chemotherapy given in this manner has resulted in improved disease-free or overall survival compared with local treatment alone. Similarly, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy following tumor clearance to eradicate potential micrometastic disease is currently under investigation and cannot be recommended in the absence of a controlled trial. This paper reviews the clinical trials currently in a progress both for patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, as well as those with advanced local or regional disease.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1987

Treatment of advanced head and neck cancer with concomitant radiation and chemotherapy

Anantha K. Murthy; Samuel G. Taylor; John Showel; David D. Caldarelli; James C. Hutchinson; Lauren D. Holinger; Thomas R. Witt; Stanley V. Hoover

Forty-four patients with predominantly inoperable or recurrent head and neck cancers were treated with combined chemotherapy (CT) and radiation therapy (RT) in a Phase I/II study. CT and RT were combined in a concomitant fashion to take advantage of radiosensitizing properties of the chemotherapeutic agents. Each treatment cycle consisted of cisplatin 60 mg/M2 on day 1, 5-FU infusion at a dose of 800 mg/M2 per day continuously for 5 days and RT at 200 cGy per day, days 1 through 5. The treatment cycle was repeated every 2 weeks for 7 cycles in patients treated curatively and for 2 to 6 cycles in patients treated palliatively due to prior radiation therapy or the presence of metastatic disease. Regional control was achieved in 98% of the patients. Regional control has persisted in 87% of the patients treated curatively with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Distant failure occurred in 23% of this group. Actuarial survival of 2 years for the curative group is 66%. Concomitant combination of radiation with radiation potentiating chemotherapeutic agents shows promise of increase in local control.


American Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1992

Phase II trial of combination chemotherapy and irradiation in non-small-cell lung cancer, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 88-04.

William T. Sause; Charles E. Scott; Samuel G. Taylor; Roger W. Byhardt; Franklin L. Banker; John W. Thomson; Thomas K. Jones; Jay S. Cooper; Robert D. Lindberg

Encouraging results of several clinical trials utilizing combination chemotherapy and irradiation in unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer have been reported. A recent report from a cooperative group study suggested that preirradiation vinblastine and cisplatin improved survival over irradiation alone. In an attempt to enhance the possible effectiveness of combination chemotherapy and irradiation, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group embarked on a Phase II trial utilizing preirradiation vinblastine (5 mg/m2 weekly χ 5) and cisplatin (100 mg/m2) on days 1 and 29 prior to irradiation and on days 50, 71, and 92 during irradiation. The irradiation began on day 50 and consisted of 6300 cGy in 7 weeks.Between May 20, 1988 and May 1, 1989, 30 patients were entered on study. Seventy-two percent of patients had Karnofsky status >90, and 76% had weight loss <5%. Forty-eight percent of the patients were younger than 60 years of age. Forty-five percent of the patients had Stage IIIA disease. Eighty-three percent of the patients received at least four courses of vinblastine, and 59% received at least four courses of cisplatin. Seventy-eight percent of the patients received at least 95% of the prescribed irradiation. The major toxicity was hematologie, and there were two fatal complications in the study group. The preliminary survival figures are encouraging. This combination of chemotherapy and irradiation appears to be tolerable and may merit further investigation.

Collaboration


Dive into the Samuel G. Taylor's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David D. Caldarelli

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James C. Hutchinson

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Philip Bonomi

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anantha K. Murthy

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Salitha Reddy

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Katherine L. Griem

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Myung-Sook Lee

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Harvey D. Preisler

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Showel

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William T. Sause

Intermountain Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge