Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Samuel J. Aronson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Samuel J. Aronson.


Nature | 2015

Building the foundation for genomics in precision medicine.

Samuel J. Aronson; Heidi L. Rehm

Precision medicine has the potential to profoundly improve the practice of medicine. However, the advances required will take time to implement. Genetics is already being used to direct clinical decision-making and its contribution is likely to increase. To accelerate these advances, fundamental changes are needed in the infrastructure and mechanisms for data collection, storage and sharing. This will create a continuously learning health-care system with seamless cycling between clinical care and research. Patients must be educated about the benefits of sharing data. The building blocks for such a system are already forming and they will accelerate the adoption of precision medicine.


Genetics in Medicine | 2012

Communicating new knowledge on previously reported genetic variants

Samuel J. Aronson; Eugene H. Clark; Matthew Varugheese; Samantha Baxter; Lawrence J. Babb; Heidi L. Rehm

Genetic tests often identify variants whose significance cannot be determined at the time they are reported. In many situations, it is critical that clinicians be informed when new information emerges on these variants. It is already extremely challenging for laboratories to provide these updates. These challenges will grow rapidly as an increasing number of clinical genetic tests are ordered and as the amount of patient DNA assayed per test expands; the challenges will need to be addressed before whole-genome sequencing is used on a widespread basis.Information technology infrastructure can be useful in this context. We have deployed an infrastructure enabling clinicians to receive knowledge updates when a laboratory changes the classification of a variant. We have gathered statistics from this deployment regarding the frequency of both variant classification changes and the effects of these classification changes on patients. We report on the system’s functionality as well as the statistics derived from its use.Genet Med 2012:14(8):713–719


Human Mutation | 2011

The GeneInsight Suite: A Platform to Support Laboratory and Provider Use of DNA based Genetic Testing

Samuel J. Aronson; Eugene H. Clark; Lawrence J. Babb; Samantha Baxter; Lisa M. Farwell; Birgit Funke; Amy Lovelette Hernandez; Victoria A. Joshi; Elaine Lyon; Andrew R. Parthum; Franklin J. Russell; Matthew Varugheese; Thomas C. Venman; Heidi L. Rehm

The future of personalized medicine will hinge on effective management of patient genetic profiles. Molecular diagnostic testing laboratories need to track knowledge surrounding an increasingly large number of genetic variants, incorporate this knowledge into interpretative reports, and keep ordering clinicians up to date as this knowledge evolves. Treating clinicians need to track which variants have been identified in each of their patients along with the significance of these variants. The GeneInsightSM Suite assists in these areas. The suite also provides a basis for interconnecting laboratories and clinicians in a manner that increases the scalability of personalized medicine processes. Hum Mutat 32:1–5, 2011.


Genetics in Medicine | 2013

A survey of informatics approaches to whole-exome and whole-genome clinical reporting in the electronic health record

Peter Tarczy-Hornoch; Laura M. Amendola; Samuel J. Aronson; Levi A. Garraway; Stacy W. Gray; Robert W. Grundmeier; Lucia A. Hindorff; Gail P. Jarvik; Dean Karavite; Matthew S. Lebo; Sharon E. Plon; Eliezer M. Van Allen; Karen E. Weck; Peter S. White; Yaping Yang

Purpose:Genome-scale clinical sequencing is being adopted more broadly in medical practice. The National Institutes of Health developed the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) program to guide implementation and dissemination of best practices for the integration of sequencing into clinical care. This study describes and compares the state of the art of incorporating whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing results into the electronic health record, including approaches to decision support across the six current CSER sites.Methods:The CSER Medical Record Working Group collaboratively developed and completed an in-depth survey to assess the communication of genome-scale data into the electronic health record. We summarized commonalities and divergent approaches.Results:Despite common sequencing platform (Illumina) adoptions, there is a great diversity of approaches to annotation tools and workflow, as well as to report generation. At all sites, reports are human-readable structured documents available as passive decision support in the electronic health record. Active decision support is in early implementation at two sites.Conclusion:The parallel efforts across CSER sites in the creation of systems for report generation and integration of reports into the electronic health record, as well as the lack of standardized approaches to interfacing with variant databases to create active clinical decision support, create opportunities for cross-site and vendor collaborations.Genet Med 15 10, 824–832.Genetics in Medicine (2013); 15 10, 824–832. doi:10.1038/gim.2013.120


Journal of Biomedical Informatics | 2012

Usability of a novel clinician interface for genetic results

Pamela M. Neri; Stephanie E. Pollard; Lynn A. Volk; Lisa P. Newmark; Matthew Varugheese; Samantha Baxter; Samuel J. Aronson; Heidi L. Rehm; David W. Bates

The complexity and rapid growth of genetic data demand investment in information technology to support effective use of this information. Creating infrastructure to communicate genetic information to healthcare providers and enable them to manage that data can positively affect a patients care in many ways. However, genetic data are complex and present many challenges. We report on the usability of a novel application designed to assist providers in receiving and managing a patients genetic profile, including ongoing updated interpretations of the genetic variants in those patients. Because these interpretations are constantly evolving, managing them represents a challenge. We conducted usability tests with potential users of this application and reported findings to the application development team, many of which were addressed in subsequent versions. Clinicians were excited about the value this tool provides in pushing out variant updates to providers and overall gave the application high usability ratings, but had some difficulty interpreting elements of the interface. Many issues identified required relatively little development effort to fix suggesting that consistently incorporating this type of analysis in the development process can be highly beneficial. For genetic decision support applications, our findings suggest the importance of designing a system that can deliver the most current knowledge and highlight the significance of new genetic information for clinical care. Our results demonstrate that using a development and design process that is user focused helped optimize the value of this application for personalized medicine.


Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association | 2014

A novel clinician interface to improve clinician access to up-to-date genetic results

Allison R. Wilcox; Pamela M. Neri; Lynn A. Volk; Lisa P. Newmark; Eugene H. Clark; Lawrence J. Babb; Matthew Varugheese; Samuel J. Aronson; Heidi L. Rehm; David W. Bates

OBJECTIVES To understand the impact of GeneInsight Clinic (GIC), a web-based tool designed to manage genetic information and facilitate communication of test results and variant updates from the laboratory to the clinics, we measured the use of GIC and the time it took for new genetic knowledge to be available to clinicians. METHODS Usage data were collected across four study sites for the GIC launch and post-GIC implementation time periods. The primary outcome measures were the time (average number of days) between variant change approval and notification of clinic staff, and the time between notification and viewing the patient record. RESULTS Post-GIC, time between a variant change approval and provider notification was shorter than at launch (average days at launch 503.8, compared to 4.1 days post-GIC). After e-mail alerts were sent at launch, providers clicked into the patient record associated with 91% of these alerts. In the post period, clinic providers clicked into the patient record associated with 95% of the alerts, on average 12 days after the e-mail was sent. DISCUSSION We found that GIC greatly increased the likelihood that a provider would receive updated variant information as well as reduced the time associated with distributing that variant information, thus providing a more efficient process for incorporating new genetic knowledge into clinical care. CONCLUSIONS Our study results demonstrate that health information technology systems have the potential effectively to assist providers in utilizing genetic information in patient care.


Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics | 2018

Research Directions in the Clinical Implementation of Pharmacogenomics: An Overview of US Programs and Projects

Simona Volpi; Rex L. Chisholm; Patricia A. Deverka; Geoffrey S. Ginsburg; Howard J. Jacob; Melpomeni Kasapi; Howard L. McLeod; Dan M. Roden; Marc S. Williams; Eric D. Green; Laura Lyman Rodriguez; Samuel J. Aronson; Larisa H. Cavallari; Joshua C. Denny; Lynn G. Dressler; Julie A. Johnson; Teri E. Klein; J. Steven Leeder; Micheline Piquette-Miller; Minoli A. Perera; Laura J. Rasmussen-Torvik; Heidi L. Rehm; Marylyn D. Ritchie; Todd C. Skaar; Nikhil Wagle; Richard M. Weinshilboum; Kristin Weitzel; Robert Wildin; John Wilson; Teri A. Manolio

Response to a drug often differs widely among individual patients. This variability is frequently observed not only with respect to effective responses but also with adverse drug reactions. Matching patients to the drugs that are most likely to be effective and least likely to cause harm is the goal of effective therapeutics. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) holds the promise of precision medicine through elucidating the genetic determinants responsible for pharmacological outcomes and using them to guide drug selection and dosing. Here we survey the US landscape of research programs in PGx implementation, review current advances and clinical applications of PGx, summarize the obstacles that have hindered PGx implementation, and identify the critical knowledge gaps and possible studies needed to help to address them.


Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics | 2016

Providing Access to Genomic Variant Knowledge in a Healthcare Setting: A Vision for the ClinGen Electronic Health Records Workgroup

Casey Lynnette Overby; Bret S. E. Heale; Samuel J. Aronson; J. M. Cherry; S. Dwight; Aleksandar Milosavljevic; Tristan Nelson; Annie Niehaus; Meredith A. Weaver; Erin M. Ramos; Marc S. Williams

The Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) is a National Institutes of Health (NIH)‐funded collaborative program that brings together a variety of projects designed to provide high‐quality, curated information on clinically relevant genes and variants. ClinGens EHR (Electronic Health Record) Workgroup aims to ensure that ClinGen is accessible to providers and patients through EHR and related systems. This article describes the current scope of these efforts and progress to date. The ClinGen public portal can be accessed at www.clinicalgenome.org.


The Lancet Haematology | 2018

Automated typing of red blood cell and platelet antigens: a whole-genome sequencing study

William J. Lane; Connie M. Westhoff; Nicholas Gleadall; Maria Aguad; Robin Smeland‐Wagman; Sunitha Vege; Daimon P. Simmons; Helen Mah; Matthew S. Lebo; Klaudia Walter; Nicole Soranzo; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; John Danesh; David J. Roberts; Nicholas A. Watkins; Willem H. Ouwehand; Adam S. Butterworth; Richard M. Kaufman; Heidi L. Rehm; Leslie E. Silberstein; Robert C. Green; David W. Bates; Carrie Blout; Kurt D. Christensen; Allison L. Cirino; Carolyn Y. Ho; Joel B. Krier; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Calum A. MacRae; Cynthia C. Morton

BACKGROUND There are more than 300 known red blood cell (RBC) antigens and 33 platelet antigens that differ between individuals. Sensitisation to antigens is a serious complication that can occur in prenatal medicine and after blood transfusion, particularly for patients who require multiple transfusions. Although pre-transfusion compatibility testing largely relies on serological methods, reagents are not available for many antigens. Methods based on single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays have been used, but typing for ABO and Rh-the most important blood groups-cannot be done with SNP typing alone. We aimed to develop a novel method based on whole-genome sequencing to identify RBC and platelet antigens. METHODS This whole-genome sequencing study is a subanalysis of data from patients in the whole-genome sequencing arm of the MedSeq Project randomised controlled trial (NCT01736566) with no measured patient outcomes. We created a database of molecular changes in RBC and platelet antigens and developed an automated antigen-typing algorithm based on whole-genome sequencing (bloodTyper). This algorithm was iteratively improved to address cis-trans haplotype ambiguities and homologous gene alignments. Whole-genome sequencing data from 110 MedSeq participants (30 × depth) were used to initially validate bloodTyper through comparison with conventional serology and SNP methods for typing of 38 RBC antigens in 12 blood-group systems and 22 human platelet antigens. bloodTyper was further validated with whole-genome sequencing data from 200 INTERVAL trial participants (15 × depth) with serological comparisons. FINDINGS We iteratively improved bloodTyper by comparing its typing results with conventional serological and SNP typing in three rounds of testing. The initial whole-genome sequencing typing algorithm was 99·5% concordant across the first 20 MedSeq genomes. Addressing discordances led to development of an improved algorithm that was 99·8% concordant for the remaining 90 MedSeq genomes. Additional modifications led to the final algorithm, which was 99·2% concordant across 200 INTERVAL genomes (or 99·9% after adjustment for the lower depth of coverage). INTERPRETATION By enabling more precise antigen-matching of patients with blood donors, antigen typing based on whole-genome sequencing provides a novel approach to improve transfusion outcomes with the potential to transform the practice of transfusion medicine. FUNDING National Human Genome Research Institute, Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, National Health Service Blood and Transplant, National Institute for Health Research, and Wellcome Trust.


Journal of Personalized Medicine | 2016

Information Technology Support for Clinical Genetic Testing within an Academic Medical Center

Samuel J. Aronson; Lisa Mahanta; Lei Lei Ros; Eugene H. Clark; Lawrence J. Babb; Michael Oates; Heidi L. Rehm; Matthew S. Lebo

Academic medical centers require many interconnected systems to fully support genetic testing processes. We provide an overview of the end-to-end support that has been established surrounding a genetic testing laboratory within our environment, including both laboratory and clinician facing infrastructure. We explain key functions that we have found useful in the supporting systems. We also consider ways that this infrastructure could be enhanced to enable deeper assessment of genetic test results in both the laboratory and clinic.

Collaboration


Dive into the Samuel J. Aronson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David W. Bates

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge