Samuel John Harris

Immuno-oncology combinations: raising the tail of the survival curve.

There have been exponential gains in immuno-oncology in recent times through the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Already approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for advanced melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitors also appear to have significant antitumor activity in multiple other tumor types. An exciting component of immunotherapy is the durability of antitumor responses observed, with some patients achieving disease control for many years. Nevertheless, not all patients benefit, and efforts should thus now focus on improving the efficacy of immunotherapy through the use of combination approaches and predictive biomarkers of response and resistance. There are multiple potential rational combinations using an immunotherapy backbone, including existing treatments such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy or molecularly targeted agents, as well as other immunotherapeutics. The aim of such antitumor strategies will be to raise the tail on the survival curve by increasing the number of long term survivors, while managing any additive or synergistic toxicities that may arise with immunotherapy combinations. Rational trial designs based on a clear understanding of tumor biology and drug pharmacology remain paramount. This article reviews the biology underpinning immuno-oncology, discusses existing and novel immunotherapeutic combinations currently in development, the challenges of predictive biomarkers of response and resistance and the impact of immuno-oncology on early phase clinical trial design.

Target-based therapeutic matching of phase I trials in patients with metastatic breast cancer in a tertiary referral centre

BackgroundGreater understanding of the molecular classification of breast cancer has permitted the development of rational drug design strategies. In a phase I clinical trial setting, molecular profiling with next-generation sequencing of individual tumour samples has been employed to guide treatment.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective evaluation of clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated in phase I clinical trials at our institution to assess the benefit of molecularly matched compared to non-matched treatments.ResultsA total of 97 consecutive patients with MBC were enrolled onto ≥1 trial between 2009 and 2015. Fourteen patients participated in multiple trials, and a total of 113 trial encounters were reviewed in this retrospective study. Eighty-three percent of patients with molecular data available were able to participate in trials matched to molecular aberrations. Patients who were treated on matched studies had improved clinical benefit (RR: 1.80, p = 0.005), progression-free (HR: 0.52, p = 0.003) and overall survival (HR: 0.54, p < 0.001). Treatment was well tolerated with low rates of treatment discontinuation for toxicity (8% overall) that did not differ between groups. No toxicity-related deaths were observed.ConclusionsMolecular profiling for MBC patients in a phase I setting is feasible and aids therapeutic decisions with improved patient outcomes.

Current and advancing systemic treatment options for soft tissue sarcomas

Introduction: Soft tissue sarcomas are a collection of rare malignancies, the treatment of which has evolved over time. Although cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of management of metastatic disease, many new treatments have been developed or show great promise in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma. Research into the different underlying pathogenesis of individual subtypes has driven progress in treatment. This has allowed development of treatments targeted to specific subtypes of sarcoma. Areas covered: We provide a review of the current field of systemic therapy in soft tissue sarcoma. This is followed by an in-depth analysis of recent developments in treatment, as well as new treatments that are aimed at specific subtypes of sarcoma, and the biological rationale behind these therapies. We also look in detail at the promising new agents currently in development. Expert opinion: Much progression has been made in treatment of soft tissue sarcomas with multiple exciting new treatments in development. However outcomes in general remain poor. Further research into the underlying pathogenesis of soft tissue sarcomas may help deliver more effective systemic therapies. Increased collaboration between basic science, translational and clinical investigators is required at national and international levels to maximise progress.