Samuel Jones
University of Victoria
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Samuel Jones.
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2016
M. Pignatari; Falk Herwig; Raphael Hirschi; Michael E. Bennett; Gabriel Rockefeller; Christopher L. Fryer; F. X. Timmes; Christian Ritter; Alexander Heger; Samuel Jones; U. Battino; Aaron Dotter; Reto Trappitsch; Steven Diehl; U. Frischknecht; Aimee L. Hungerford; G. Magkotsios; C. Travaglio; Patrick A. Young
We provide a set of stellar evolution and nucleosynthesis calculations that applies established physics assumptions simultaneously to low- and intermediate-mass and massive star models. Our goal is to provide an internally consistent and comprehensive nuclear production and yield database for applications in areas such as presolar grain studies. Our non-rotating models assume convective boundary mixing (CBM) where it has been adopted before. We include 8 (12) initial masses for Z = 0.01 (0.02). Models are followed either until the end of the asymptotic giant branch phase or the end of Si burning, complemented by simple analytic core-collapse supernova (SN) models with two options for fallback and shock velocities. The explosions show which pre-SN yields will most strongly be effected by the explosive nucleosynthesis. We discuss how these two explosion parameters impact the light elements and the s and p process. For low- and intermediate-mass models, our stellar yields from H to Bi include the effect of CBM at the He-intershell boundaries and the stellar evolution feedback of the mixing process that produces the ¹³C pocket. All post-processing nucleosynthesis calculations use the same nuclear reaction rate network and nuclear physics input. We provide a discussion of the nuclear production across the entire mass range organized by element group. The entirety of our stellar nucleosynthesis profile and time evolution output are available electronically, and tools to explore the data on the NuGrid VOspace hosted by the Canadian Astronomical Data Centre are introduced.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2014
Samuel Jones; Raphael Hirschi; K. Nomoto
In the ONeMg cores of
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2015
Samuel Jones; Raphael Hirschi; M. Pignatari; Alexander Heger; Cyril Georgy; Nobuya Nishimura; Chris L. Fryer; Falk Herwig
8.8-9.5~{\rm M}_\odot
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2017
Samuel Jones; Robert Andrassy; Stou Sandalski; Austin Davis; Paul R. Woodward; Falk Herwig
stars, neon and oxygen burning is ignited off-center. Whether the neon-oxygen flame propagates to the center is critical to determine whether these stars undergo Fe core collapse or electron capture induced ONeMg core collapse. We present more details of stars that ignite neon and oxygen burning off-center. The neon flame is established in a similar manner to the carbon flame of super-AGB stars, albeit with a narrower flame width. The criteria for establishing a flame are able to be met if the strict Schwarzschild criterion for convective instability is adopted. Mixing across the interface of the convective shell disrupts the conditions for the propagation of the burning front and instead the shell burns as a series of inward-moving flashes. While this may not directly affect whether the burning will reach the center (as in super-AGB stars), the core is allowed to contract between each shell flash. Reduction of the electron fraction in the shell reduces the Chandrasekhar mass and the center reaches the threshold density for the URCA process to activate and steer the remaining evolution of the core. This highlights the importance of a more accurate treatment of mixing in the stellar interior for yet another important question in stellar astrophysics - determining the properties of stellar evolution and supernova progenitors at the boundary between electron capture supernova and iron core-collapse supernova.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2018
C. Ritter; F. Herwig; Samuel Jones; M. Pignatari; Christopher L. Fryer; Raphael Hirschi
Massive stars are key sources of radiative, kinetic, and chemical feedback in the universe. Grids of massive star models computed by different groups each using their own codes, input physics choices and numerical approximations, however, lead to inconsistent results for the same stars. We use three of these 1D codes---GENEC, KEPLER and MESA---to compute non-rotating stellar models of 15 M⊙, 20 M⊙, and 25 M⊙ and compare their nucleosynthesis. We follow the evolution from the main sequence until the end of core helium burning. The GENEC and KEPLER models hold physics assumptions used in large grids of published models. The MESA code was set up to use convective core overshooting such that the CO core masses are consistent with those obtained by GENEC. For all models, full nucleosynthesis is computed using the NuGrid post-processing tool MPPNP. We find that the surface abundances predicted by the models are in reasonable agreement. In the helium core, the standard deviation of the elemental overproduction factors for Fe to Mo is less than 30%---smaller than the impact of the present nuclear physics uncertainties. For our three initial masses, the three stellar evolution codes yield consistent results. Differences in key properties of the models, e.g., helium and CO core masses and the time spent as a red supergiant, are traced back to the treatment of convection and, to a lesser extent, mass loss. The mixing processes in stars remain the key uncertainty in stellar modelling. Better constrained prescriptions are thus necessary to improve the predictive power of stellar evolution models.
arXiv: Astrophysics of Galaxies | 2017
Benoît Côté; Christian Ritter; Falk Herwig; Brian W. O’Shea; M. Pignatari; Devin W. Silvia; Samuel Jones; Chris L. Fryer
This work investigates the properties of convection in stars with particular emphasis on entrainment across the upper convective boundary (CB). Idealised simulations of turbulent convection in the O-burning shell of a massive star are performed in
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2017
P. V. F. Edelmann; F. K. Röpke; Raphael Hirschi; Cyril Georgy; Samuel Jones
4\pi
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2018
Falk Herwig; Robert Andrassy; Nic Annau; Ondrea Clarkson; Benoît Côté; Aaron D’Sa; Samuel Jones; Belaid Moa; Jericho O’Connell; David H. Porter; Christian Ritter; Paul R. Woodward
geometry on
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union | 2011
Samuel Jones; Raphael Hirschi; Falk Herwig; Bill Paxton; F. X. Timmes; K. Nomoto
768^3
The Astrophysical Journal | 2013
Samuel Jones; Raphael Hirschi; K. Nomoto; Tobias Fischer; F. X. Timmes; Falk Herwig; Bill Paxton; Hiroshi Toki; T. Suzuki; G. Martínez-Pinedo; Yi Hua Lam; Michael G. Bertolli
and