Samuel Lazerson
Princeton University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Samuel Lazerson.
Nuclear Fusion | 2015
T. S. Pedersen; T. Andreeva; H.-S. Bosch; S. Bozhenkov; F. Effenberg; M. Endler; Y. Feng; D.A. Gates; J. Geiger; D. Hartmann; H. Hölbe; M. Jakubowski; R. König; H. P. Laqua; Samuel Lazerson; M. Otte; M. Preynas; O. Schmitz; T. Stange; Y. Turkin
Wendelstein 7-X (W7-X) is currently under commissioning in preparation for its initial plasma operation phase, operation phase 1.1 (OP1.1). This first phase serves primarily to provide an integral commissioning of all major systems needed for plasma operation, as well as systems, such as diagnostics, that need plasma operation to verify their foreseen functions. In OP1.1, W7-X will have a reduced set of in-vessel components. In particular, five graphite limiter stripes replace the later foreseen divertor. This paper describes the expected machine capabilities in OP1.1, as well as a selection of physics topics that can be addressed in OP1.1, despite the simplified configuration and the reduced machine capabilities. Physics topics include the verification and adjustment of the magnetic topology, the testing of the foreseen plasma start-up scenarios and the feed-forward control of plasma density and temperature evolution, as well as more advanced topics such as scrape-off layer (SOL) studies at short connection lengths and transport studies. Plasma operation in OP1.1 will primarily be performed in helium, with a hydrogen plasma phase at the end.
Physics of Plasmas | 2015
Joaquim Loizu; S. R. Hudson; A. Bhattacharjee; Samuel Lazerson; P. Helander
We consider the linear and nonlinear ideal plasma response to a boundary perturbation in a screw pinch. We demonstrate that three-dimensional, ideal-MHD equilibria with continuously nested flux-surfaces and with discontinuous rotational-transform across the resonant rational-surfaces are well defined and can be computed both perturbatively and using fully nonlinear equilibrium calculations. This rescues the possibility of constructing MHD equilibria with current sheets and continuous, smooth pressure profiles. The results predict that, even if the plasma acts as a perfectly conducting fluid, a resonant magnetic perturbation can penetrate all the way into the center of a tokamak without being shielded at the resonant surface.
Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion | 2016
M. Otte; D. Aßmus; C. Biedermann; S. Bozhenkov; T. Bräuer; A. Dudek; J. Geiger; G. Kocsis; Samuel Lazerson; T. S. Pedersen; F. Schauer; T. Szepesi; B. Standley
Wendelstein 7-X is an optimized stellarator with superconducting magnetic field coils that just started plasma operation at the Max-Planck-Institut fur Plasmaphysik (IPP) Greifswald. Utilizing the electron beam technique the first vacuum flux surface measurements were performed during the commissioning of the magnet system. For the magnetic configurations investigated so far the existence of closed and nested flux surfaces has been validated. All features of the configuration designed for the initial plasma operation phase, including a predicted island chain, were confirmed. No evidence on significant magnetic field errors was found. Furthermore, the effect of the elastic deformation of the non-planar coils was confirmed by the measurements.
Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion | 2016
J. H. E. Proll; H. E. Mynick; P. Xanthopoulos; Samuel Lazerson; B. J. Faber
With the advent of neoclassically optimised stellarators, optimising stellarators for turbulent transport is an important next step. The reduction of ion-temperature-gradient-driven turbulence has been achieved via shaping of the magnetic field, and the reduction of trapped-electron mode (TEM) turbulence is adressed in the present paper. Recent analytical and numerical findings suggest TEMs are stabilised when a large fraction of trapped particles experiences favourable bounce-averaged curvature. This is the case for example in Wendelstein 7-X [C.D. Beidler
Physics of Plasmas | 2017
K. C. Hammond; Samuel Lazerson; F. Volpe
\textit{et al}
Nuclear Fusion | 2016
Samuel Lazerson; M. Otte; S. Bozhenkov; C. Biedermann; T. S. Pedersen
Fusion Technology
Nuclear Fusion | 2017
M. Hirsch; A. Dinklage; A. Alonso; G. Fuchert; S. Bozhenkov; U. Höfel; T. Andreeva; J. Baldzuhn; M. Beurskens; H.-S. Bosch; C. D. Beidler; C. Biedermann; E. Blanco; R. Brakel; R. Burhenn; B. Buttenschön; A. Cappa; A. Czarnecka; M. Endler; T. Estrada; T. Fornal; J. Geiger; O. Grulke; J. H. Harris; D. Hartmann; M. Jakubowski; T. Klinger; J. Knauer; G. Kocsis; R. König
\bf{17}
Nuclear Fusion | 2017
Samuel Lazerson; M. Otte; M. Jakubowski; Ben Israeli; G. A. Wurden; U. Wenzel; T. Andreeva; S. Bozhenkov; C. Biedermann; G. Kocsis; T. Szepesi; J. Geiger; T. S. Pedersen; David A. Gates
, 148 (1990)] and other Helias-type stellarators. Using this knowledge, a proxy function was designed to estimate the TEM dynamics, allowing optimal configurations for TEM stability to be determined with the STELLOPT [D.A. Spong
Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion | 2018
Caoxiang Zhu; S. R. Hudson; Samuel Lazerson; Yuntao Song; Yuanxi Wan
\textit{et al}
Nuclear Fusion | 2017
S. Bozhenkov; M. Jakubowski; H. Niemann; Samuel Lazerson; G. A. Wurden; C. Biedermann; G. Kocsis; R. König; F. Pisano; L. Stephey; T. Szepesi; U. Wenzel; T. S. Pedersen; R. C. Wolf
Nucl. Fusion