Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Samuel N. Quinn is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Samuel N. Quinn.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2011

Characteristics of planetary candidates observed by Kepler II : Analysis of the first four months of data

William J. Borucki; David G. Koch; Gibor Basri; Natalie M. Batalha; Timothy M. Brown; Stephen T. Bryson; Douglas A. Caldwell; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; William D. Cochran; Edna DeVore; Edward W. Dunham; Thomas N. Gautier; John C. Geary; Ronald L. Gilliland; Alan Gould; Steve B. Howell; Jon M. Jenkins; David W. Latham; Jack J. Lissauer; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Jason F. Rowe; Dimitar D. Sasselov; Alan P. Boss; David Charbonneau; David R. Ciardi; Laurance R. Doyle; Andrea K. Dupree; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney; Matthew J. Holman

On 2011 February 1 the Kepler mission released data for 156,453 stars observed from the beginning of the science observations on 2009 May 2 through September 16. There are 1235 planetary candidates with transit-like signatures detected in this period. These are associated with 997 host stars. Distributions of the characteristics of the planetary candidates are separated into five class sizes: 68 candidates of approximately Earth-size (R_p < 1.25 R_⊕), 288 super-Earth-size (1.25 R_⊕ ≤ R_p < 2 R_⊕), 662 Neptune-size (2 R_⊕ ≤ R_p < 6 R_⊕), 165 Jupiter-size (6 R_⊕ ≤ R_p < 15 R_⊕), and 19 up to twice the size of Jupiter (15 R_⊕ ≤ R_p < 22 R_⊕). In the temperature range appropriate for the habitable zone, 54 candidates are found with sizes ranging from Earth-size to larger than that of Jupiter. Six are less than twice the size of the Earth. Over 74% of the planetary candidates are smaller than Neptune. The observed number versus size distribution of planetary candidates increases to a peak at two to three times the Earth-size and then declines inversely proportional to the area of the candidate. Our current best estimates of the intrinsic frequencies of planetary candidates, after correcting for geometric and sensitivity biases, are 5% for Earth-size candidates, 8% for super-Earth-size candidates, 18% for Neptune-size candidates, 2% for Jupiter-size candidates, and 0.1% for very large candidates; a total of 0.34 candidates per star. Multi-candidate, transiting systems are frequent; 17% of the host stars have multi-candidate systems, and 34% of all the candidates are part of multi-candidate systems.


Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2013

Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler III: Analysis of the First 16 Months of Data

Natalie M. Batalha; Jason F. Rowe; Stephen T. Bryson; Christopher J. Burke; Douglas A. Caldwell; Jessie L. Christiansen; Fergal Mullally; Susan E. Thompson; Timothy M. Brown; Andrea K. Dupree; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney; Ronald L. Gilliland; Howard Isaacson; David W. Latham; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Samuel N. Quinn; Darin Ragozzine; Avi Shporer; William J. Borucki; David R. Ciardi; Thomas N. Gautier; Michael R. Haas; Jon M. Jenkins; David G. Koch; Jack J. Lissauer; William Rapin; Gibor Basri; Alan P. Boss

New transiting planet candidates are identified in 16 months (2009 May-2010 September) of data from the Kepler spacecraft. Nearly 5000 periodic transit-like signals are vetted against astrophysical and instrumental false positives yielding 1108 viable new planet candidates, bringing the total count up to over 2300. Improved vetting metrics are employed, contributing to higher catalog reliability. Most notable is the noise-weighted robust averaging of multi-quarter photo-center offsets derived from difference image analysis that identifies likely background eclipsing binaries. Twenty-two months of photometry are used for the purpose of characterizing each of the candidates. Ephemerides (transit epoch, T_0, and orbital period, P) are tabulated as well as the products of light curve modeling: reduced radius (R_P/R_★), reduced semimajor axis (d/R_★), and impact parameter (b). The largest fractional increases are seen for the smallest planet candidates (201% for candidates smaller than 2 R_⊕ compared to 53% for candidates larger than 2 R_⊕) and those at longer orbital periods (124% for candidates outside of 50 day orbits versus 86% for candidates inside of 50 day orbits). The gains are larger than expected from increasing the observing window from 13 months (Quarters 1-5) to 16 months (Quarters 1-6) even in regions of parameter space where one would have expected the previous catalogs to be complete. Analyses of planet frequencies based on previous catalogs will be affected by such incompleteness. The fraction of all planet candidate host stars with multiple candidates has grown from 17% to 20%, and the paucity of short-period giant planets in multiple systems is still evident. The progression toward smaller planets at longer orbital periods with each new catalog release suggests that Earth-size planets in the habitable zone are forthcoming if, indeed, such planets are abundant.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2011

KEPLER'S FIRST ROCKY PLANET: KEPLER-10b*

Natalie M. Batalha; William J. Borucki; Stephen T. Bryson; Lars A. Buchhave; Douglas A. Caldwell; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; David R. Ciardi; Edward W. Dunham; Francois Fressin; Thomas N. Gautier; Ronald L. Gilliland; Michael R. Haas; Steve B. Howell; Jon M. Jenkins; Hans Kjeldsen; David G. Koch; David W. Latham; Jack J. Lissauer; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Jason F. Rowe; Dimitar D. Sasselov; Sara Seager; Jason H. Steffen; Guillermo Torres; Gibor Basri; Timothy M. Brown; David Charbonneau; Jessie L. Christiansen; Bruce D. Clarke; William D. Cochran

NASAs Kepler Mission uses transit photometry to determine the frequency of Earth-size planets in or near the habitable zone of Sun-like stars. The mission reached a milestone toward meeting that goal: the discovery of its first rocky planet, Kepler-10b. Two distinct sets of transit events were detected: (1) a 152 ± 4 ppm dimming lasting 1.811 ± 0.024 hr with ephemeris T [BJD] = 2454964.57375^(+0.00060)_(–0.00082) + N * 0.837495^(+0.000004)_(–0.000005) days and (2) a 376 ± 9 ppm dimming lasting 6.86 ± 0.07 hr with ephemeris T [BJD] = 2454971.6761^(+0.0020)_(–0.0023) + N * 45.29485^(+0.00065) _(–0.00076) days. Statistical tests on the photometric and pixel flux time series established the viability of the planet candidates triggering ground-based follow-up observations. Forty precision Doppler measurements were used to confirm that the short-period transit event is due to a planetary companion. The parent star is bright enough for asteroseismic analysis. Photometry was collected at 1 minute cadence for >4 months from which we detected 19 distinct pulsation frequencies. Modeling the frequencies resulted in precise knowledge of the fundamental stellar properties. Kepler-10 is a relatively old (11.9 ± 4.5 Gyr) but otherwise Sun-like main-sequence star with T_(eff) = 5627 ± 44 K, M_⋆ = 0.895 ± 0.060 M_⊙ , and R_⋆ = 1.056 ± 0.021 R_⊙. Physical models simultaneously fit to the transit light curves and the precision Doppler measurements yielded tight constraints on the properties of Kepler-10b that speak to its rocky composition: M_P = 4.56^9+1.17)_(–1.29) M_⊕, R_P = 1.416^(+0.033)_(–0.036) R_⊕, and ρ_P = 8.8^(+2.1)_(–2.9) g cm^(–3). Kepler-10b is the smallest transiting exoplanet discovered to date.


Science | 2011

Kepler-16: a transiting circumbinary planet.

Laurance R. Doyle; Joshua A. Carter; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Robert W. Slawson; Steve B. Howell; Joshua N. Winn; Jerome A. Orosz; Andrej Prˇsa; William F. Welsh; Samuel N. Quinn; David W. Latham; Guillermo Torres; Lars A. Buchhave; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Jonathan J. Fortney; Avi Shporer; Eric B. Ford; Jack J. Lissauer; Darin Ragozzine; Michael Rucker; Natalie M. Batalha; Jon M. Jenkins; William J. Borucki; David G. Koch; Christopher K. Middour; Jennifer R. Hall; Sean McCauliff; Michael N. Fanelli; Elisa V. Quintana; Matthew J. Holman

An exoplanet has been observed, comparable in size and mass to Saturn, that orbits a pair of stars. We report the detection of a planet whose orbit surrounds a pair of low-mass stars. Data from the Kepler spacecraft reveal transits of the planet across both stars, in addition to the mutual eclipses of the stars, giving precise constraints on the absolute dimensions of all three bodies. The planet is comparable to Saturn in mass and size and is on a nearly circular 229-day orbit around its two parent stars. The eclipsing stars are 20 and 69% as massive as the Sun and have an eccentric 41-day orbit. The motions of all three bodies are confined to within 0.5° of a single plane, suggesting that the planet formed within a circumbinary disk.


Nature | 2012

Transiting circumbinary planets Kepler-34 b and Kepler-35 b

William F. Welsh; Jerome A. Orosz; Joshua A. Carter; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Eric B. Ford; Jack J. Lissauer; Andrej Prsa; Samuel N. Quinn; Darin Ragozzine; Donald R. Short; Guillermo Torres; Joshua N. Winn; Laurance R. Doyle; Natalie M. Batalha; S. Bloemen; Erik Brugamyer; Lars A. Buchhave; Caroline Caldwell; Douglas A. Caldwell; Jessie L. Christiansen; David R. Ciardi; William D. Cochran; Michael Endl; Jonathan J. Fortney; Thomas N. Gautier; Ronald L. Gilliland; Michael R. Haas; Jennifer R. Hall; Matthew J. Holman; Andrew W. Howard

Most Sun-like stars in the Galaxy reside in gravitationally bound pairs of stars (binaries). Although long anticipated, the existence of a ‘circumbinary planet’ orbiting such a pair of normal stars was not definitively established until the discovery of the planet transiting (that is, passing in front of) Kepler-16. Questions remained, however, about the prevalence of circumbinary planets and their range of orbital and physical properties. Here we report two additional transiting circumbinary planets: Kepler-34 (AB)b and Kepler-35 (AB)b, referred to here as Kepler-34 b and Kepler-35 b, respectively. Each is a low-density gas-giant planet on an orbit closely aligned with that of its parent stars. Kepler-34 b orbits two Sun-like stars every 289 days, whereas Kepler-35 b orbits a pair of smaller stars (89% and 81% of the Sun’s mass) every 131 days. The planets experience large multi-periodic variations in incident stellar radiation arising from the orbital motion of the stars. The observed rate of circumbinary planets in our sample implies that more than ∼1% of close binary stars have giant planets in nearly coplanar orbits, yielding a Galactic population of at least several million.


Nature | 2012

An abundance of small exoplanets around stars with a wide range of metallicities

Lars A. Buchhave; David W. Latham; Anders Johansen; Martin Bizzarro; Guillermo Torres; Jason F. Rowe; Natalie M. Batalha; William J. Borucki; Erik Brugamyer; Caroline Caldwell; Stephen T. Bryson; David R. Ciardi; William D. Cochran; Michael Endl; Gilbert A. Esquerdo; Eric B. Ford; John C. Geary; Ronald L. Gilliland; Terese Hansen; Howard Isaacson; John B. Laird; Philip W. Lucas; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Jon A. Morse; Paul Robertson; Avi Shporer; Robert P. Stefanik; Martin Still; Samuel N. Quinn

The abundance of heavy elements (metallicity) in the photospheres of stars similar to the Sun provides a ‘fossil’ record of the chemical composition of the initial protoplanetary disk. Metal-rich stars are much more likely to harbour gas giant planets, supporting the model that planets form by accumulation of dust and ice particles. Recent ground-based surveys suggest that this correlation is weakened for Neptunian-sized planets. However, how the relationship between size and metallicity extends into the regime of terrestrial-sized exoplanets is unknown. Here we report spectroscopic metallicities of the host stars of 226 small exoplanet candidates discovered by NASA’s Kepler mission, including objects that are comparable in size to the terrestrial planets in the Solar System. We find that planets with radii less than four Earth radii form around host stars with a wide range of metallicities (but on average a metallicity close to that of the Sun), whereas large planets preferentially form around stars with higher metallicities. This observation suggests that terrestrial planets may be widespread in the disk of the Galaxy, with no special requirement of enhanced metallicity for their formation.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2012

Kepler-22b: A 2.4 Earth-radius Planet in the Habitable Zone of a Sun-like Star

William J. Borucki; David G. Koch; Natalie M. Batalha; Stephen T. Bryson; Jason F. Rowe; Francois Fressin; Guillermo Torres; Douglas A. Caldwell; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; William D. Cochran; Edna DeVore; Thomas N. Gautier; John C. Geary; Ronald L. Gilliland; Alan Gould; Steve B. Howell; Jon M. Jenkins; David W. Latham; Jack J. Lissauer; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Dimitar D. Sasselov; Alan P. Boss; David Charbonneau; David R. Ciardi; Lisa Kaltenegger; Laurance R. Doyle; Andrea K. Dupree; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney; Matthew J. Holman

A search of the time-series photometry from NASAs Kepler spacecraft reveals a transiting planet candidate orbiting the 11th magnitude G5 dwarf KIC 10593626 with a period of 290 days. The characteristics of the host star are well constrained by high-resolution spectroscopy combined with an asteroseismic analysis of the Kepler photometry, leading to an estimated mass and radius of 0.970 ± 0.060 M ☉ and 0.979 ± 0.020 R ☉. The depth of 492 ± 10 ppm for the three observed transits yields a radius of 2.38 ± 0.13 Re for the planet. The system passes a battery of tests for false positives, including reconnaissance spectroscopy, high-resolution imaging, and centroid motion. A full BLENDER analysis provides further validation of the planet interpretation by showing that contamination of the target by an eclipsing system would rarely mimic the observed shape of the transits. The final validation of the planet is provided by 16 radial velocities (RVs) obtained with the High Resolution Echelle Spectrometer on Keck I over a one-year span. Although the velocities do not lead to a reliable orbit and mass determination, they are able to constrain the mass to a 3σ upper limit of 124 M ⊕, safely in the regime of planetary masses, thus earning the designation Kepler-22b. The radiative equilibrium temperature is 262 K for a planet in Kepler-22bs orbit. Although there is no evidence that Kepler-22b is a rocky planet, it is the first confirmed planet with a measured radius to orbit in the habitable zone of any star other than the Sun.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2011

Modeling Kepler Transit Light Curves as False Positives: Rejection of Blend Scenarios for Kepler-9, and Validation of Kepler-9 d, A Super-earth-size Planet in a Multiple System

Guillermo Torres; Natalie M. Batalha; William J. Borucki; Timothy M. Brown; Stephen T. Bryson; Lars A. Buchhave; David Charbonneau; David R. Ciardi; Edward W. Dunham; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Eric B. Ford; Thomas N. Gautier; Ronald L. Gilliland; Matthew J. Holman; Steve B. Howell; Mary Ann Jenkins; David G. Koch; David W. Latham; Jack J. Lissauer; Geoffrey W. Marcy; David G. Monet; Andrej Prsa; Samuel N. Quinn; Darin Ragozzine; Jason F. Rowe; Dimitar D. Sasselov; Jason H. Steffen; William F. Welsh

Light curves from the Kepler Mission contain valuable information on the nature of the phenomena producing the transit-like signals. To assist in exploring the possibility that they are due to an astrophysical false positive, we describe a procedure (BLENDER) to model the photometry in terms of a “blend” rather than a planet orbiting a star. A blend may consist of a background or foreground eclipsing binary (or star–planet pair) whose eclipses are attenuated by the light of the candidate and possibly other stars within the photometric aperture. We apply BLENDER to the case of Kepler-9 (KIC 3323887), a target harboring two previously confirmed Saturn-size planets (Kepler-9 b and Kepler-9 c) showing transit timing variations, and an additional shallower signal with a 1.59 day period suggesting the presence of a super-Earth-size planet. Using BLENDER together with constraints from other follow-up observations we are able to rule out all blends for the two deeper signals and provide independent validation of their planetary nature. For the shallower signal, we rule out a large fraction of the false positives that might mimic the transits. The false alarm rate for remaining blends depends in part (and inversely) on the unknown frequency of small-size planets. Based on several realistic estimates of this frequency, we conclude with very high confidence that this small signal is due to a super-Earth-size planet (Kepler-9 d) in a multiple system, rather than a false positive. The radius is determined to be 1.64 +0.19 −0.14 R⊕, and current spectroscopic observations are as yet insufficient to establish its mass.


Nature | 2012

Two Earth-sized planets orbiting Kepler-20

Francois Fressin; Guillermo Torres; Jason F. Rowe; David Charbonneau; Leslie A. Rogers; Sarah Ballard; Natalie M. Batalha; William J. Borucki; Stephen T. Bryson; Lars A. Buchhave; David R. Ciardi; J.-M. Desert; Courtney D. Dressing; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Eric B. Ford; Thomas N. Gautier; Christopher E. Henze; Matthew J. Holman; Andrew W. Howard; Steve B. Howell; Jon M. Jenkins; David G. Koch; David W. Latham; Jack J. Lissauer; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Samuel N. Quinn; Darin Ragozzine; Dimitar D. Sasselov; Sara Seager; Fergal Mullally

Since the discovery of the first extrasolar giant planets around Sun-like stars, evolving observational capabilities have brought us closer to the detection of true Earth analogues. The size of an exoplanet can be determined when it periodically passes in front of (transits) its parent star, causing a decrease in starlight proportional to its radius. The smallest exoplanet hitherto discovered has a radius 1.42 times that of the Earth’s radius (R⊕), and hence has 2.9 times its volume. Here we report the discovery of two planets, one Earth-sized (1.03R⊕) and the other smaller than the Earth (0.87R⊕), orbiting the star Kepler-20, which is already known to host three other, larger, transiting planets. The gravitational pull of the new planets on the parent star is too small to measure with current instrumentation. We apply a statistical method to show that the likelihood of the planetary interpretation of the transit signals is more than three orders of magnitude larger than that of the alternative hypothesis that the signals result from an eclipsing binary star. Theoretical considerations imply that these planets are rocky, with a composition of iron and silicate. The outer planet could have developed a thick water vapour atmosphere.


Science | 2011

KOI-126: A Triply Eclipsing Hierarchical Triple with Two Low-Mass Stars

Joshua A. Carter; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Darin Ragozzine; Matthew J. Holman; Samuel N. Quinn; David W. Latham; Lars A. Buchhave; Jeffrey Edward van Cleve; William D. Cochran; Miles T. Cote; Michael Endl; Eric B. Ford; Michael R. Haas; Jon M. Jenkins; David G. Koch; Jie Li; Jack J. Lissauer; Phillip J. MacQueen; Christopher K. Middour; Jerome A. Orosz; Jason F. Rowe; Jason H. Steffen; William F. Welsh

The Kepler telescope detected a triple stellar system and reveals details of the structure of low-mass stars. The Kepler spacecraft has been monitoring the light from 150,000 stars in its primary quest to detect transiting exoplanets. Here, we report on the detection of an eclipsing stellar hierarchical triple, identified in the Kepler photometry. KOI-126 [A, (B, C)], is composed of a low-mass binary [masses MB = 0.2413 ± 0.0030 solar mass (M☉), MC = 0.2127 ± 0.0026 M☉; radii RB = 0.2543 ± 0.0014 solar radius (R☉), RC = 0.2318 ± 0.0013 R☉; orbital period P1 = 1.76713 ± 0.00019 days] on an eccentric orbit about a third star (mass MA = 1.347 ± 0.032 M☉; radius RA = 2.0254 ± 0.0098 R☉; period of orbit around the low-mass binary P2 = 33.9214 ± 0.0013 days; eccentricity of that orbit e2 = 0.3043 ± 0.0024). The low-mass pair probe the poorly sampled fully convective stellar domain offering a crucial benchmark for theoretical stellar models.

Collaboration


Dive into the Samuel N. Quinn's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David R. Ciardi

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William D. Cochran

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric B. Ford

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge