Samuel T. Jones

A Combined Numerical and Experimental Study of Hydrodynamics for an Air-Water External Loop Airlift Reactor

The external loop airlift reactor (ELALR) is a modified bubble column reactor that is composed of two vertical columns that are interconnected with two horizontal tubes and is often preferred over traditional bubble column reactors because they can operate over a wider range of conditions. In the present work, the gas-liquid flow dynamics in an ELALR was simulated using an Eulerian―Eulerian ensemble-averaging method in two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) coordinate systems. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were compared to experimental measurements from a 10.2 cm diameter ELALR for superficial gas velocities ranging from 1 cm/s to 20 cm/s. The effect of specifying a mean bubble diameter to represent the gas phase in the CFD modeling was investigated, and 2D and 3D simulations were found to be in good agreement with the experimental data. The ELALR flow regimes were compared for the reactor operating in bubble column, closed vent, and open vent modes, and the 2D simulations qualitatively predicted the behavior of bubble growth in the downcomer. However, it was found that 3D simulations were necessary to capture the physics of the ELALR for gas holdup, bulk density differences, and riser superficial liquid velocity.

THE EFFECT OF A MODIFIED DOWNCOMER ON THE HYDRODYNAMICS IN AN EXTERNAL LOOP AIRLIFT REACTOR

Gas holdup and superficial liquid velocity in the downcomer and riser are studied for an external loop airlift reactor with an area ratio of 1:16. Two downcomer configurations are investigated consisting of the downcomer open or closed to the atmosphere. Experiments for these two configurations are carried out over a range of superficial gas velocities from UG = 0.5 to 20 cm/s using three aeration plates with open area ratios of 0.62, 0.99 and 2.22%. These results are compared to a bubble column operated with similar operating conditions. Experimental results show that the gas holdup in the riser does not vary significantly with a change in the downcomer configuration or bubble column operation, while a considerable variation is observed in the downcomer gas holdup. Gas holdup in both the riser and downcomer are found to increase with increasing superficial gas velocity. Test results also show that the maximum gas holdup for the three aerator plates is similar, but the gas holdup trends are different. The superficial liquid velocity is found to vary considerably for the two downcomer configurations. However, for both cases the superficial liquid velocity is a function of the superficial gas velocity and/or the flow condition in the downcomer. These observed variations are independent of the aerator plate open area ratio. When the downcomer vent is open to the atmosphere, the superficial liquid velocity is initially observed to increase with increasing superficial gas velocity until the onset of choking occurs in the downcomer. Increasing the superficial gas velocity beyond the onset of choking increases the effect of choking and decreases the superficial liquid velocity. Once maximum choking is reached, the superficial liquid velocity becomes independent of the superficial gas velocity. When the downcomer vent is closed to the atmosphere, the superficial liquid velocity is initially observed to decrease with increasing superficial gas velocity as choking in the downcomer is immediately present. Once maximum choking occurs, the superficial liquid velocity once again becomes independent of the superficial gas velocity.Copyright

A Review of Dissolved Oxygen Concentration Measurement Methods for Biological Fermentations

Dissolved oxygen levels in biological processes depend on the biological, chemical, and physical properties of the process being monitored. The analysis of dissolved oxygen concentration is a key test for process control and optimization. A review of the measurement methods for dissolved oxygen concentrations will be presented in this paper. Included in this review are the chemical, volumetric, tubing, electrochemical electrode, and optode methods. Advantages and disadvantages of these methods are discussed and key considerations for their use are summarized.