Sander F. Rodrigo
Leiden University Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sander F. Rodrigo.
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research | 2013
Sander F. Rodrigo; Jan van Ramshorst; Georgette E. Hoogslag; Helèn Boden; Matthijs A. Velders; Suzanne C. Cannegieter; Helene Roelofs; Imad Al Younis; Petra Dibbets-Schneider; Willem E. Fibbe; Jaap Jan Zwaginga; Jeroen J. Bax; Martin J. Schalij; Saskia L.M.A. Beeres; Douwe E. Atsma
In experimental studies, mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) models has been associated with enhanced neovascularization and myogenesis. Clinical data however, are scarce. Therefore, the present study evaluates the safety and feasibility of intramyocardial MSC injection in nine patients, shortly after AMI during short-term and 5-year follow-up. Periprocedural safety analysis demonstrated one transient ischemic attack. No other adverse events related to MSC treatment were observed during 5-year follow-up. Clinical events were compared to a nonrandomized control group comprising 45 matched controls. A 5-year event-free survival after MSC-treatment was comparable to controls (89 vs. 91xa0%, Pu2009=u20090.87). Echocardiographic imaging for evaluation of left ventricular function demonstrated improvements up to 5xa0years after MSC treatment. These findings were not significantly different when compared to controls. The present safety and feasibility study suggest that intramyocardial injection of MSC in patients shortly after AMI is feasible and safe up to 5-year follow-up.
American Heart Journal | 2012
Sander F. Rodrigo; Jan van Ramshorst; Saskia L.M.A. Beeres; Imad Al Younis; Petra Dibbets-Schneider; Albert de Roos; Willem E. Fibbe; Jaap Jan Zwaginga; Martin J. Schalij; Jeroen J. Bax; Douwe E. Atsma
BACKGROUNDnWe recently demonstrated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that intramyocardial bone marrow cell (BMC) injection is associated with improvements in myocardial perfusion and anginal symptoms in chronic myocardial ischemia patients. In the present study the results of the crossover phase of this trial, in which patients previously treated with placebo received autologous BMC injections are reported. This allows a unique intra-patient comparison on the effect of BMC versus placebo injection with elimination of patient-related confounding factors.nnnMETHODSnIn 16 patients (14 male, 64 ± 10 years), who previously received intramyocardial placebo injections in the setting of a randomized trial, 100 × 10(6) BMC were injected using the NOGA-system. Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina score and quality of life were evaluated at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Tc-99m single photon emission computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were performed at baseline and 3 months to assess myocardial perfusion and left ventricular (LV) function.nnnRESULTSnCanadian Cardiovascular Society score and quality of life improved significantly after BMC injection as compared to placebo (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively). Single photon emission computed tomography revealed a significant greater improvement (P = 0.03) in summed stress score after BMC injection as compared to placebo. LV end-systolic volume significantly decreased after BMC injection but not after placebo injection. LV end-diastolic volume and LV ejection fraction did not change.nnnCONCLUSIONnIntramyocardial BMC injection in patients with chronic myocardial ischemia who previously received intramyocardial placebo treatment resulted in significant improvement in angina symptoms and myocardial perfusion. These results confirm the outcome of our previously reported randomized trial.
Netherlands Heart Journal | 2012
M. L. A. Haeck; Georgette E. Hoogslag; Sander F. Rodrigo; Douwe E. Atsma; Robert J.M. Klautz; E. E. van der Wall; M. J. Schalij; Harriette F. Verwey
Chronic heart failure is a major healthcare problem associated with high morbidity and mortality. Despite significant progress in treatment strategies, the prognosis of heart failure patients remains poor. The golden standard treatment for heart failure is heart transplantation after failure of medical therapy, surgery and/or cardiac resynchronisation therapy. In order to improve patients’ outcome and quality of life, new emerging treatment modalities are currently being investigated, including mechanical cardiac support devices, of which the left ventricular assist device is the most promising treatment option. Structured care for heart failure patients according to the most recent international heart failure guidelines may further contribute to optimal decision-making. This article will review the conventional and novel treatment modalities of heart failure.
Circulation-cardiovascular Interventions | 2015
Imke Mann; Sander F. Rodrigo; Jan van Ramshorst; Saskia L.M.A. Beeres; Petra Dibbets-Schneider; Albert de Roos; Ron Wolterbeek; Jaap Jan Zwaginga; Willem E. Fibbe; Jeroen J. Bax; Martin J. Schalij; Douwe E. Atsma
Background—Intramyocardial bone marrow cell injection is associated with improvements in myocardial perfusion and anginal symptoms in patients with refractory angina pectoris. This study evaluates the effect of repeated intramyocardial bone marrow cell injection in patients with residual or recurrent myocardial ischemia. Methods and Results—Twenty-three patients (17 men; 69±9 years) who had improved myocardial perfusion after the first injection but had residual or recurrent angina and ischemia on single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging were included. Patients again received intramyocardial injection of 100×106 autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells, 4.6±2.5 years after their first injection. No periprocedural complications occurred. Myocardial perfusion assessed using single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging improved from a summed stress score of 27.3±5.8 at baseline to 24.5±4.4 at 3 months (P=0.002) and 25.4±4.9 at 12 months of follow-up (P=0.002). Perfusion improvement after 3 months was comparable with the effect of the first injection (P=0.379). Anginal complaints improved ⩽12 months after cell injection in Canadian Cardiovascular Society score (mean change at 3, 6, and 12 months: 0.6±0.9%, 0.5±0.9%, and 0.6±0.9%, respectively; Pslope=0.007, first versus repeated; P=0.188) and in quality of life score as measured by Seattle Angina Questionnaire (mean change at 3, 6, and 12 months: 7±14%, 8±14%, and 7±15%, respectively; Pslope=0.020, first versus repeated; P=0.126). Conclusions—Repeated bone marrow cell injection in previously responding patients with refractory angina is associated with improvements in myocardial perfusion, anginal complaints, and quality of life score ⩽12 months of follow-up. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.trialregister.nl. Unique identifier: NTR2664.
International Journal of Cardiology | 2014
Sander F. Rodrigo; Jan van Ramshorst; Imke Mann; Darryl P. Leong; Suzanne C. Cannegieter; Imad Al Younis; Petra Dibbets-Schneider; Albert de Roos; Willem E. Fibbe; Jaap Jan Zwaginga; Jeroen J. Bax; Martin J. Schalij; Saskia L.M.A. Beeres; Douwe E. Atsma
BACKGROUNDnWe previously showed that intramyocardial bone marrow cell (BMC) injection in patients with refractory angina and chronic myocardial ischemia improves myocardial perfusion, cardiac function and disease-related complaints. Treatment effect varied between patients, but the predictors of response remain to be identified. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess whether patient characteristics, procedural data and baseline measurements influence the response to intramyocardial BMC treatment in a large cohort of refractory angina patients.nnnMETHODS AND RESULTSnIn 120 patients (64 ± 9 years, 88% men) with refractory angina, 97 ± 13 × 10(6) BMCs were injected intramyocardially in regions with stress-inducible ischemia as assessed by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina (CCS) class, quality-of-life score, exercise testing, SPECT and magnetic resonance imaging were performed at baseline and at 3 months follow-up demonstrating significant improvements in CCS class, quality-of-life, exercise capacity, myocardial perfusion and left ventricular function (all variables P<0.001). Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of patient characteristics, procedural data and baseline measurements on BMC treatment response. Based on the improvement of myocardial perfusion at stress, diabetes and a large number of ischemic segments at baseline were shown to be independently associated with a large response to BMC therapy.nnnCONCLUSIONnThe present study demonstrates that diabetes and a large number of ischemic segments are predictors of a large response to intramyocardial BMC injection in refractory angina and chronic ischemia. Furthermore, the safety and efficacy results of previous trials are now confirmed in a larger study population.
Journal of Interventional Cardiology | 2017
Sander F. Rodrigo; Imke Mann; Jan van Ramshorst; Saskia L.M.A. Beeres; Jaap Jan Zwaginga; Willem E. Fibbe; Jeroen J. Bax; Martin J. Schalij; Douwe E. Atsma
BACKGROUNDnIntramyocardial injection of bone marrow cells (BMC) in refractory angina patients with chronic myocardial ischemia has shown to be safe and improve clinical status during short-term follow-up. However, scarce data are available on long-term (>12 months) safety and efficacy. Therefore, the occurrence of clinical events and the long-term clinical effects of intramyocardial BMC injection were evaluated in patients with chronic myocardial ischemia up to 10 years after treatment.nnnMETHODS AND RESULTSnPatients (nu2009=u2009100, age 64u2009±u20099 years, male 88%) with chronic myocardial ischemia who underwent intramyocardial BMC injection between 2004 and 2010 were evaluated. During yearly outpatient clinic visits, the occurrence of clinical events was documented. In addition, clinical status was assessed according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) score and quality of life was measured using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. These parameters were evaluated at baseline and during the first year, followed by cross-sectional long-term follow-up which was performed in 2011 and 2014. No adverse events considered related to the procedure occurred during 10 years of follow-up. Observed annual mortality rate and annual myocardial infarction rate were 3.8% and 1.9% per year, respectively. When compared to baseline, CCS class and quality of life remained significantly better during 5-year follow-up after BMC treatment (both Pu2009<u20090.05).nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe present long-term follow-up study shows that intramyocardial BMC injection in patients with chronic myocardial ischemia is safe and improves both angina complaints and quality of life up to 5 years after BMC treatment.
International Journal of Cardiology | 2016
Sander F. Rodrigo; Imke Mann; Jan van Ramshorst; Saskia L.M.A. Beeres; Jaap Jan Zwaginga; Willem E. Fibbe; Jeroen J. Bax; Martin J. Schalij; Douwe E. Atsma
☆ Funding: This work was supported by the Transla [TeRM-Smart Mix SSM06004], the BioMedical Materials Heart Foundation [cell therapy program: Translational Department of Cardiology receives unrestricted research Medtronic and Biotronik. ☆☆ Disclosures: None. ⁎ Corresponding author at: Department of Cardiolo Center, Post Office Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Nether Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail address: [email protected] (D.E. Atsma). 1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the re of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2012
Sander F. Rodrigo; Jan van Ramshorst; Saskia L.M.A. Beeres; Imad Al Younis; Petra Dibbets-Schneider; Willem E. Fibbe; Jaap Jan Zwaginga; Ernst E. van der Wall; Martin J. Schalij; Jeroen J. Bax; Douwe E. Atsma
European Heart Journal | 2018
G. Van Dijk; Sander F. Rodrigo; Douwe E. Atsma
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2014
Imke Mann; Sander F. Rodrigo; Jan van Ramshorst; Saskia L.M.A. Beeres; Albert de Roos; Jeroen J. Bax; Willem E. Fibbe; Martin J. Schalij; Douwe E. Atsma