Sandhya M. Rao
University of Pittsburgh
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sandhya M. Rao.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2006
Sandhya M. Rao; David A. Turnshek; Daniel B. Nestor
We present results of our Hubble Space Telescope Cycle 11 survey for low-redshift (z 0.1 ?. (2) The mean H I column density of Mg II systems with 0.3 ? ? W < 0.6 ? is = (9.7 ? 2.2) ? 1018 cm-2. For the larger REW systems in our sample, = (3.5 ? 0.7) ? 1020 cm-2. (3) The DLA incidence per unit redshift for 0 < z < 5 is nDLA(z) = n0(1 + z)?, where n0 = 0.044 ? 0.005 and ? = 1.27 ? 0.11. This parameterization is consistent with no evolution for z 2 (?? = 0.7, ?M = 0.3) but exhibits significant evolution for z 2. (4) The cosmological neutral gas mass density due to DLAs is constant in the redshift interval 0.5 < z < 5.0 to within the uncertainties, ?DLA ? 1 ? 10-3. This is larger than ?gas(z = 0) by a factor of ?2. (5) The slope of the H I column density distribution does not change significantly with redshift. However, the low-redshift distribution is marginally flatter due to the higher fraction of high column density systems in our sample. (6) Finally, using the precision of Mg II survey statistics, we show that under the assumption of constant DLA fraction and H I column density suggested by our current sample, there may be evidence of a decreasing ?DLA from z = 0.5 to 0.We present results of our HST Cycle 11 Survey for low-redshift (z 0.1 A. (2) The mean N(HI) of MgII systems with 0.3 A \le W2796 ~ 2. (4) Omega_{DLA} is constant for 0.5<z<5.0 to within the uncertainties. This is larger than Omega_{gas}(z=0) by a factor of ~2. (5) The slope of the N(HI) distribution does not change significantly with redshift. However, the low redshift distribution is marginally flatter due to the higher fraction of high N(HI) systems in our sample. (6) Finally, using the precision of MgII survey statistics, we find that there may be evidence of a decreasing Omega_{DLA} from z=0.5 to z=0. We reiterate the conclusion of Hopkins, Rao, & Turnshek that very high columns of neutral gas might be missed by DLA surveys because of their very small cross sections, and therefore, that Omega_{DLA} might not include the bulk of the neutral gas mass in the Universe. (Abridged)
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2000
Sandhya M. Rao; David A. Turnshek
We present results from an efficient, nontraditional survey to discover damped Lyα (DLA) absorption systems with neutral hydrogen column densities N ≥ 2 × 1020 atoms cm-2 and redshifts z 0.5 A are DLA systems. (2) The incidence of DLA systems per unit redshift, nDLA, decreases as a function of decreasing redshift. The low-redshift data are consistent with the larger incidence of DLA systems seen at high redshift and the inferred low incidence for DLA at z = 0 derived from 21 cm observations of gas-rich spirals. However, the errors in our determination are large enough that it is not clear if the decrease per comoving volume begins to be significant at z ≈ 2 or possibly does not set in until z ≈ 0.5. (3) On the other hand, the cosmological mass density of neutral gas in low-redshift DLA absorbers, ΩDLA, is observed to be comparable to that observed at high redshift. In particular, there is no observed trend that would indicate that ΩDLA at low redshift is approaching the value at z = 0, which is a factor of ≈4-6.5 lower than ΩDLA. (4) The low-redshift DLA absorbers exhibit a larger fraction of very high column density systems in comparison to determinations both at high redshift and at z = 0. In addition, at no redshift is the column density distribution of DLA absorbers observed to fall off in proportion to ~N with increasing column density, a trend that is theoretically predicted for disklike systems. We discuss this and other mounting evidence that DLA absorption arises not solely in luminous disks but in a mixture of galaxy types. Although we have doubled the sample of confirmed low-redshift DLA systems, we are still confronted with the statistics of small numbers. As a result, the errors in the low-redshift determinations of nDLA and ΩDLA are substantial. Therefore, aside from the above evolutionary trends, we also discuss associated limitations caused by small-number statistics and the robustness of our results. In addition, we note concerns due to gravitational lensing bias, reliance on the Mg II statistics, dust obscuration, and the sensitivity of local H I 21 cm emission surveys.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2005
Daniel B. Nestor; David A. Turnshek; Sandhya M. Rao
We present the results of a MgII absorption-line survey using QSO spectra from the SDSS EDR. Over 1,300 doublets with rest equivalent widths greater than 0.3\AA and redshifts
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2006
Donald G. York; Pushpa Khare; Daniel E. Vanden Berk; Varsha P. Kulkarni; Arlin P. S. Crotts; James Thomas Lauroesch; Gordon T. Richards; Donald P. Schneider; Daniel E. Welty; Yusra Alsayyad; Abhishek Kumar; Britt Lundgren; Natela Shanidze; Tristan L. Smith; Johnny Vanlandingham; Britt Baugher; Patrick B. Hall; Edward B. Jenkins; Brice Menard; Sandhya M. Rao; Jason Tumlinson; David A. Turnshek; Ching-Wa Yip; J. Brinkmann
0.366 \le z \le 2.269
The Astrophysical Journal | 2003
Sandhya M. Rao; Daniel B. Nestor; David A. Turnshek; W. M. Lane; Eric Martin Monier; Jacqueline Bergeron
were identified and measured. We find that the
The Astrophysical Journal | 1993
Sandhya M. Rao; F. Briggs
\lambda2796
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2008
Brice Ménard; Daniel Nestor; David A. Turnshek; Anna M. Quider; Gordon T. Richards; Doron Chelouche; Sandhya M. Rao
rest equivalent width (
The Astrophysical Journal | 1998
Sandhya M. Rao; David A. Turnshek
W_0^{\lambda2796}
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2011
Sandhya M. Rao; Michèle Belfort-Mihalyi; David A. Turnshek; Eric M. Monier; Daniel B. Nestor; Anna M. Quider
) distribution is described very well by an exponential function
arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics | 2011
Sandhya M. Rao; David A. Turnshek; Daniel B. Nestor; Anna M. Quider
\partial N/\partial W_0^{\lambda2796} = \frac{N^*}{W^*} e^{-\frac{W_0}{W^*}}