Sandra D. Comer

Abstinence symptoms following smoked marijuana in humans

Abstract Symptoms of withdrawal after oral Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) administration have been reported, yet little is known about the development of dependence on smoked marijuana in humans. In a 21-day residential study, marijuana smokers (n = 12) worked on five psychomotor tasks during the day (0915–1700 hours), and in the evening engaged in recreational activities (1700–2330 hours); subjective-effects measures were completed 10 times/day. Food and beverages were available ad libitum from 0830 to 2330 hours. Marijuana cigarettes (0.0, 1.8, 3.1% THC) were smoked at 1000, 1400, 1800, and 2200 hours. Placebo marijuana was administered on days 1–4 . One of the active marijuana doses was administered on days 5–8, followed by 4 days of placebo marijuana (days 9–12). The other concentration of active marijuana cigarettes was administered on days 13–16, followed by 4 days of placebo marijuana (days 17–20); the order in which the high and low THC-concentration marijuana cigarettes were administered was counter-balanced between groups. Both active doses of marijuana increased ratings of “High,” and “Good Drug Effect,” and increased food intake, while decreasing verbal interaction compared to the placebo baseline (days 1–4). Abstinence from active marijuana increased ratings such as “Anxious,”“Irritable,” and “Stomach pain,” and significantly decreased food intake compared to baseline. This empirical demonstration of withdrawal from smoked marijuana may suggest that daily marijuana use may be maintained, at least in part, by the alleviation of abstinence symptoms.

Abstinence symptoms following oral THC administration to humans

Abstract Symptoms of dependence and withdrawal after the frequent administration of high doses (210 mg/day) of oral Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) have been reported, yet little is known about dependence on lower oral THC doses, more relevant to levels attained by smoking marijuana. In a 20-day residential study, male (n = 6) and female (n = 6) marijuana smokers worked on five psychomotor tasks during the day (0915–1700 hours), and in the evening engaged in private or social recreational activities (1700–2330 hours); subjective-effects measures were completed 10 times/day, and a sleep questionnaire was completed each morning. Food and beverages were available ad libitum from 0830 to 2330 hours. Capsules were administered at 1000, 1400, 1800, and 2200 hours. Placebo THC was administered on days 1–3, 8–11, and 16–19. Active THC was administered on days 4–7 (20 mg qid) and on days 12–15 (30 mg qid). Both active doses of THC increased ratings of “High,”“Good Drug Effect,” and “Willingness to Take Dose Again” compared to baseline (days 1–3). THC also increased food intake by 35–45%, and decreased verbal interaction among participants compared to placebo baseline. Tolerance developed to the subjective effects of THC but not to its effects on food intake or social behavior. Abstinence from THC increased ratings of “Anxious,”“Depressed,” and “Irritable,” decreased the reported quantity and quality of sleep, and decreased food intake by 20–30% compared to baseline. These behavioral changes indicate that dependence develops following exposure to lower daily doses of THC than have been previously studied, suggesting that the alleviation of abstinence symptoms may contribute to the maintenance of daily marijuana use.

Challenges in the development of prescription opioid abuse-deterrent formulations.

Opioid analgesics remain the cornerstone of effective management for moderate-to-severe pain. In the face of persistent lack of access to opioids by patients with legitimate pain problems, the rate of prescription opioid abuse in the United States has escalated over the past 15 years. Abuse-deterrent opioid products can play a central role in optimizing the risk-benefit ratio of opioid analgesics—if these products can be developed cost-effectively without compromising efficacy or creating new safety issues for the target treatment population. The development of scientific methods for assessing prescription opioid abuse potential remains a critical and challenging step in determining whether a claim of abuse deterrence for a new opioid product is indeed valid and will thus be accepted by the medical, regulatory, and reimbursement communities. To explore this and other potential impediments to the development of prescription opioid abuse-deterrent formulations, a panel of experts on opioid abuse and diversion from academia, industry, and governmental agencies participated in a Tufts Health Care Institute-supported symposium held on October 27 and 28, 2005, in Boston, MA. This manuscript captures the main consensus opinions of those experts, and also information gleaned from a review of the relevant published literature, to identify major impediments to the development of opioid abuse-deterrent formulations and offer strategies that may accelerate their commercialization.

Dronabinol and marijuana in HIV-positive marijuana smokers. Caloric intake, mood, and sleep.

Objectives:Individuals with HIV constitute the largest group using cannabinoids for medicinal reasons; yet, no studies have directly compared the tolerability and efficacy of smoked marijuana and oral dronabinol maintenance in HIV-positive marijuana smokers. This placebo-controlled within-subjects study evaluated marijuana and dronabinol across a range of behaviors: eating topography, mood, cognitive performance, physiologic measures, and sleep. Methods:HIV-positive marijuana smokers (n = 10) completed 2 16-day inpatient phases. Each dronabinol (5 and 10 mg) and marijuana (2.0% and 3.9% Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol [THC]) dose was administered 4 times daily for 4 days, but only 1 drug was active per day, thereby maintaining double-blind dosing. Four days of placebo washout separated each active cannabinoid condition. Results:As compared with placebo, marijuana and dronabinol dose dependently increased daily caloric intake and body weight in HIV-positive marijuana smokers. All cannabinoid conditions produced significant intoxication, except for low-dose dronabinol (5 mg); the intoxication was rated positively (eg, “good drug effect”) with little evidence of discomfort and no impairment of cognitive performance. Effects of marijuana and dronabinol were comparable, except that only marijuana (3.9% THC) improved ratings of sleep. Conclusions:These data suggest that for HIV-positive marijuana smokers, both dronabinol (at doses 8 times current recommendations) and marijuana were well tolerated and produced substantial and comparable increases in food intake.

Classification and definition of misuse, abuse, and related events in clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations

Abstract Terminology related to prescription drug misuse and abuse is inconsistently defined. An expert panel developed consensus classifications and definitions for use in clinical trials. Abstract As the nontherapeutic use of prescription medications escalates, serious associated consequences have also increased. This makes it essential to estimate misuse, abuse, and related events (MAREs) in the development and postmarketing adverse event surveillance and monitoring of prescription drugs accurately. However, classifications and definitions to describe prescription drug MAREs differ depending on the purpose of the classification system, may apply to single events or ongoing patterns of inappropriate use, and are not standardized or systematically employed, thereby complicating the ability to assess MARE occurrence adequately. In a systematic review of existing prescription drug MARE terminology and definitions from consensus efforts, review articles, and major institutions and agencies, MARE terms were often defined inconsistently or idiosyncratically, or had definitions that overlapped with other MARE terms. The Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trials, Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks (ACTTION) public–private partnership convened an expert panel to develop mutually exclusive and exhaustive consensus classifications and definitions of MAREs occurring in clinical trials of analgesic medications to increase accuracy and consistency in characterizing their occurrence and prevalence in clinical trials. The proposed ACTTION classifications and definitions are designed as a first step in a system to adjudicate MAREs that occur in analgesic clinical trials and postmarketing adverse event surveillance and monitoring, which can be used in conjunction with other methods of assessing a treatment’s abuse potential.

Deficits in Dopamine D2 Receptors and Presynaptic Dopamine in Heroin Dependence: Commonalities and Differences with Other Types of Addiction

BACKGROUND Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging studies have shown that addiction to a number of substances of abuse is associated with a decrease in dopamine D(2/3) receptor binding and decreased presynaptic dopamine release in the striatum. Some studies have also shown that these reductions are associated with the severity of addiction. For example, in cocaine dependence, low dopamine release is associated with the choice to self-administer cocaine. The goal of the present study was to investigate these parameters of striatal dopamine transmission in heroin dependence and their association with drug seeking behavior. METHODS Heroin-dependent and healthy control subjects were scanned with [(11)C]raclopride before and after stimulant administration (methylphenidate) to measure striatal D(2/3) receptor binding and presynaptic dopamine release. After the PET scans, the heroin-dependent subjects performed heroin self-administration sessions. RESULTS Both striatal D(2/3) receptor binding and dopamine release were reduced in the heroin-dependent subjects compared with healthy control subjects. However, neither PET measure of dopamine transmission predicted the choice to self-administer heroin. CONCLUSIONS These findings show that heroin addiction, like addiction to other drugs of abuse, is associated with low D(2/3) receptor binding and low presynaptic dopamine. However, neither of these outcome measures was associated with the choice to self-administer heroin.

Risks, management, and monitoring of combination opioid, benzodiazepines, and/or alcohol use.

Abstract The concurrent use of opioids, benzodiazepines (BZDs), and/or alcohol poses a formidable challenge for clinicians who manage chronic pain. While the escalating use of opioid analgesics for the treatment of chronic pain and the concomitant rise in opioid-related abuse and misuse are widely recognized trends, the contribution of combination use of BZDs, alcohol, and/or other sedative agents to opioid-related morbidity and mortality is underappreciated, even when these agents are used appropriately. Patients with chronic pain who use opioid analgesics along with BZDs and/or alcohol are at higher risk for fatal/nonfatal overdose and have more aberrant behaviors. Few practice guidelines for BZD treatment are readily available, especially when they are combined clinically with opioid analgesics and other central nervous system-depressant agents. However, coadministration of these agents produces a defined increase in rates of adverse events, overdose, and death, warranting close monitoring and consideration when treating patients with pain. To improve patient outcomes, ongoing screening for aberrant behavior, monitoring of treatment compliance, documentation of medical necessity, and the adjustment of treatment to clinical changes are essential. In this article, we review the prevalence and pharmacologic consequences of BZDs and/or alcohol use among patients with pain on chronic opioid therapy, as well as the importance of urine drug testing, an indispensable tool for therapeutic drug monitoring, which helps to ensure the continued safety of patients. Regardless of risk or known aberrant drug-related behaviors, patients on chronic opioid therapy should periodically undergo urine drug testing to confirm adherence to the treatment plan.

Abuse liability of prescription opioids compared to heroin in morphine-maintained heroin abusers.

Abuse of prescription opioid medications has increased dramatically in the United States during the past decade, as indicated by a variety of epidemiological sources. However, few studies have systematically examined the relative reinforcing effects of commonly abused opioid medications. The current double-blind, placebo-controlled in-patient study was designed to compare the effects of intravenously delivered fentanyl (0, 0.0625, 0.125, 0.187, and 0.250 mg/70 kg), oxycodone (0, 6.25, 12.5, 25, and 50 mg/70 kg), morphine (0, 6.25, 12.5, 25, and 50 mg/70 kg), buprenorphine (0, 0.125, 0.5, 2, and 8 mg/70 kg), and heroin (0, 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, and 25 mg/70 kg) in morphine-maintained heroin abusers (N=8 completers maintained on 120 mg per day oral morphine in divided doses (30 mg q.i.d.)). All of the participants received all of the drugs tested; drugs and doses were administered in non-systematic order. All of the drugs produced statistically significant, dose-related increases in positive subjective ratings, such as ‘I feel a good drug effect’ and ‘I like the drug.’ In general, the order of potency in producing these effects, from most to least potent, was fentanyl>buprenorphine⩾heroin >morphine=oxycodone. In contrast, buprenorphine was the only drug that produced statistically significant increases in ratings of ‘I feel a bad drug effect’ and it was the only drug that was not self-administered above placebo levels at any dose tested. These data suggest that the abuse liability of buprenorphine in heroin-dependent individuals may be low, despite the fact that it produces increases in positive subjective ratings. The abuse liabilities of fentanyl, morphine, oxycodone, and heroin, however, appear to be similar under these experimental conditions.

Comparison of intravenous and intranasal heroin self-administration by morphine-maintained humans

Abstract Eight heroin-dependent individuals, maintained on divided daily doses of oral morphine, participated in a 2.5-week inpatient study comparing the effects of intranasal (IN) (placebo, 12.5, 25, 50, 100 mg) and intravenous (IV) (placebo, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 mg) heroin. Each morning, participants received

Acute physiological and behavioral effects of intranasal methamphetamine in humans.

20 and a sample dose of heroin, and each afternoon they had the opportunity to self-administer all or part of the morning heroin dose or money amount. Participants responded under a modified progressive-ratio schedule (PR 50, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1200, 1600, 2000, 2400, 2800) during a ten-trial self-administration task. During each trial, participants could respond for 1/10th of the heroin dose or 1/10th of the money amount. The total amount of heroin and/or money chosen during the self-administration task was given at the end of the task. Thus, participants received drug and/or money twice each day: once during the morning sample session and once during the afternoon self-administration session. Participants received IV solution and IN powder simultaneously during each dosing; only one route contained active drug. Heroin produced dose-related increases in break point values by both routes of administration. Although IV heroin was approximately four-fold more potent than IN heroin, the maximal break point values for both routes were not significantly different. A similar difference in potency between the IV and IN routes was found for several ratings of subjective effects (e.g., “I feel a good drug effect,”“I feel high”), but maximal subjective ratings were lower for IN compared to IV heroin. These results suggest that the reinforcing efficacy of heroin is similar by the two routes of administration, but that IN heroin is less potent than IV heroin. The results also underscore the importance of evaluating drug self-administration in the evaluation of the abuse liability of drugs.