Sandra Gori

Anaesthetic effects of propofol polymeric micelle: a novel water soluble propofol formulation

BACKGROUND As a result of its very low water solubility, propofol is generally presented as a lipid-based formulation with well-characterized limitations. METHODS Propofol (99.7%) was added directly to an aqueous solution of poly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone)-block-poly(D,L-lactide)copolymers (PVP-PLA) block copolymers and stirred in order to obtain a clear solution. This formulation was filtered sterile and then lyophilized to its solid form Propofol-PM (propofol polymeric micelle) which reconstitutes to a propofol 1%w/v (10 mg ml(-1)) clear aqueous solution of 30-60 nm propofol-containing micelles. Population pharmacokinetic data from whole blood and plasma were obtained by administering reconstituted Propofol-PM formulations and a 1% oil in water formulation, Diprivan to male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 40) at a dose of 10 mg kg(-1). Preliminary recovery data were obtained from a further small study. RESULTS The pharmacokinetics were best described using a two-compartment mamillary population model, which incorporated sample matrix (blood or plasma) and propofol formulation (Diprivan) or Propofol-PM) as covariates. Sample matrix was applied to all structural model parameters as a dichotomous covariate. An influence of propofol formulation was observed for all parameters (excluding distributional clearance) but only when plasma was used for propofol quantification. In this preliminary pharmacodynamic study, there was no statistically significant difference in the timing of the recovery endpoints between the Propofol-PM formulation and Diprivan groups. CONCLUSIONS Propofol-PM formulations produce anaesthesia in rats. Whole blood pharmacokinetics of Propofol-PM did not differ from those observed with Diprivan.

Novel Lipid and Preservative-free Propofol Formulation: Properties and Pharmacodynamics

PurposePropofol is a water-insoluble intravenous anesthetic agent that is actually formulated as a water-in-oil emulsion with known drawbacks such as pain on injection, microorganism growth support and stability. We report on the properties of formulations of propofol in poly (N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone)-block-poly(d,l-lactide), PVP–PLA, polymeric micelles (Propofol-PM).MethodsMicrobial growth in these formulations was evaluated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 9027), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) and Candida albicans (ATCC 10231). Sleep-recovery studies in female Sprague–Dawley rats, at a dose of 10mg/kg were performed to compare pharmacodynamic profiles of the new Propofol-PM formulations with those of Diprivan®, a commercially available lipid based propofol formulation.ResultsGrowth of microorganisms was not supported in the Propofol-PM formulations tested. No significant differences in times to unconsciousness, awakening, recovery of righting reflex and full recovery were observed between Propofol-PM formulations and Diprivan®.ConclusionsPropofol loaded in PVP–PLA micelles (Propofol-PM) is not significantly different in terms of pharmacodynamic but demonstrates no microorganism growth support and improved stability that opens up the door to pain on injection reduction strategy.