Sandra L. Preston

Relationship between Fluoroquinolone Area under the Curve:Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Ratio and the Probability of Eradication of the Infecting Pathogen, in Patients with Nosocomial Pneumonia

Our objective was to prospectively determine the factors influencing the probability of a good microbiological or clinical outcome in patients with nosocomial pneumonia treated with a fluoroquinolone. Levofloxacin was administered as an infusion of 500 mg/h for 1.5 h (total dose, 750 mg). For patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, a second drug was added (ceftazidime or piperacillin/tazobactam for P. aeruginosa and vancomycin for methicillin-resistant S. aureus). Population pharmacokinetic studies of 58 patients demonstrated that this population handled the drug differently from populations of volunteers. Multivariate logistic regression analysis (n=47 patients) demonstrated that only the age of the patient and the achievement of an area under the curve: minimum inhibitory concentration ratio of > or =87 had a significant effect on eradication of the pathogen (P<.001). Achieving the breakpoint made the patient 4 times more likely to achieve eradication. The effect was greatest in patients > or =67 years old.

A 24-week open-label phase I/II evaluation of the HIV protease inhibitor MK-639 (indinavir).

Objective:To investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and activity of the orally bioavailable protease inhibitor MK-639. Design:An open-label Phase I/II trial of medically stable subjects with screening CD4 lymphocyte counts ≤ 300×106/l and ≥ 20 000 HIV RNA copies/ml. Pharmacokinetics were performed at days 1 and 15. In order to better understand the relationships between drug exposure, baseline activity markers, and their changes during the study, mathematical modeling was performed using the traditional sigmoid-Emax relationship of pharmacologic effect and first order inhomogeneous differential equations for a two compartment system. Results:The five men enrolled had extensive prior nucleoside therapy (mean, 32.6 ± 25.6 months), a low mean CD4 lymphocyte cell count (CD4 count, 66.1 ± 61×106/l and CD4 percentage, 4.4 ± 3.1%), high soluble tumor necrosis factor-α type II (sTNFII) receptor concentration (6.23 ± 2.76 ng/ml) and high viral load (5.13 ± 0.46 log10 RNA copies/ml; geometric mean, 133 941 copies/ml). The drug was well tolerated at a dose of 600 mg every 6 h. The steady state concentrations Cmax and Cmin were 4.94 ± 2.16 μM and 0.28 ± 0.1 μM, respectively, which are ≈50 and 3 times the 95% inhibitory concentration (IC95) for clinical isolates, respectively. The mean increase in CD4 cell count was 143×106/l (217% increase), the mean increase in CD4 percentage was 5.2 percentage points (118%), mean decrease in HIV RNA was 1.55 log10 RNA copies/ml (a geometric mean difference of 130 120 copies/ml or 97% decrease) with a slow upward drift on continued therapy to a mean 0.64 log10 RNA copies/ml decrease by week 24 (a geometric mean difference of 103 084 copies/ml or 77% decrease), and a mean decrease in sTNFII receptors of 2.78 ng/ml (45% decrease). The mean CD4 counts per week as a function of the starting CD4 counts fit a sigmoid-Emax relationship (r2 = 0.998, P < 0.0001) with the return of CD4 cells being strongly related to the number of CD4 cells at baseline. Drug exposure as measured by either the total exposure (area under the concentration/time curve) or as the Cmin gave similar significant relationships to the fractional inhibition of HIV generation (r2 = 0.999, P < 0.0001, and r2 = 0.996, P < 0.0001, respectively). Conclusions:MK-639 appears to have significant dose-related antiviral activity and is well tolerated.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of amprenavir and ritonavir following multiple-dose, co-administration to healthy volunteers.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic interaction between amprenavir (APV) and ritonavir (RTV). MethodsThree open-label, randomized, two-sequence, multiple-dose studies having the same design (7 days of APV or RTV alone followed by 7 days of both drugs together) used 450 or 900 mg APV with 100 or 300 mg RTV every 12 h with pharmacokinetic assessments on days 7 and 14. Safety was monitored as clinical adverse events (AEs) and laboratory abnormalities. ResultsRelative to APV alone, RTV co-administration resulted in a 3.3- to 4-fold and 10.84 to 14.25-fold increase in the geometric least-square (GLS) mean area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUCτ,ss) and minimum concentration (Cmin,ss), respectively. APV 900 mg with RTV 100 mg resulted in a 2.09-fold and 6.85-fold increase in the GLS mean AUCτ,ss and Cmin,ss, respectively. On day 14, the geometric mean (95% confidence interval) for 450 mg APV AUCτ,ss (μg • h/mL) was 23.49 (19.32–28.57) with 300 mg RTV and 35.42 (30.46–44.42) with 100 μg RTV, and for the 900 mg APV with 100 mg RTV 47.11 (39.47–61.24). The 450 mg APV Cmin,ss (μg/ml) were 1.32 (1.05–1.67) and 2.01 (1.70–2.61), and 2.47 (2.08–3.32) for 900 mg APV. The most common AEs were mild and included diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, oral parasthesias, and rash. The triglyceride and cholesterol increased significantly from RTV exposure. ConclusionAdding RTV to APV resulted in clinically and statistically significant increases in APV AUC and Cmin with variable effects on maximum concentration. The two RTV doses had similar effects on APV but AEs were more frequent with 300 mg RTV.

Guillain-Barré Syndrome Associated with Immune Reconstitution

We report a case of acute Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) associated with a prompt and vigorous immune reconstitution and decrease in the virus load noted during treatment with a potent regimen of highly active antiretroviral therapy. We hypothesize that GBS may have been due to an aberrant immune response or an adverse drug reaction in association with preexisting peripheral neurologic disease.

Levofloxacin Penetration into Epithelial Lining Fluid as Determined by Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Monte Carlo Simulation

ABSTRACT Levofloxacin was administered orally to steady state to volunteers randomly in doses of 500 and 750 mg. Plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) samples were obtained at 4, 12, and 24 h after the final dose. All data were comodeled in a population pharmacokinetic analysis employing BigNPEM. Penetration was evaluated from the population mean parameter vector values and from the results of a 1,000-subject Monte Carlo simulation. Evaluation from the population mean values demonstrated a penetration ratio (ELF/plasma) of 1.16. The Monte Carlo simulation provided a measure of dispersion, demonstrating a mean ratio of 3.18, with a median of 1.43 and a 95% confidence interval of 0.14 to 19.1. Population analysis with Monte Carlo simulation provides the best and least-biased estimate of penetration. It also demonstrates clearly that we can expect differences in penetration between patients. This analysis did not deal with inflammation, as it was performed in volunteers. The influence of lung pathology on penetration needs to be examined.

Hollow-Fiber Unit Evaluation of a New Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease Inhibitor, BMS-232632, for Determination of the Linked Pharmacodynamic Variable

BMS-232632 is a potent human immunodeficiency type 1 (HIV-1) protease inhibitor with a half-life that allows for once-daily dosing. A concentration of 4 times the viral 50% effective concentration (EC(50) [i.e., approximately EC(95)]) administered as a continuous infusion in vitro provides virtually complete suppression of viral replication. This exposure, modeled in vitro as once-daily administration with oral absorption, allows ongoing viral replication. An exposure 4 times as large was calculated to be necessary to provide virus suppression equivalent to the continuous-infusion exposure. These experiments demonstrated that concentration above a threshold (time > 4xEC50) is the pharmacodynamically linked variable for this HIV-1 protease inhibitor. Protein-binding experiments demonstrated that the EC(50) was increased 13.4 times by the addition of human binding proteins. Monte Carlo simulation of protein binding-adjusted pharmacokinetic data from volunteers demonstrated that 64%-70% of a simulated population (n = 3000) would achieve virus suppression with 400-600 mg of BMS-232632 given once daily, if the viral EC(50) were < or = 1 nM.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of GW433908 and ritonavir, with and without efavirenz, in healthy volunteers

Objective: To evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic interaction between GW433908, ritonavir (RTV), and efavirenz (EFV). Methods: In period 1, subjects received either a once daily (QD) regimen of GW433908 1395 mg + RTV 200 mg (Study 1) or a twice daily (bid) regimen of GW433908 700 mg + RTV 100 mg (Study 2) for 14 days. In period 2, subjects received EFV 600 mg QD with either the same GW433908 + RTV regimen as in period 1 (arm 1) or with a GW433908 + RTV regimen that included an additional 100 mg of RTV (arm 2) for 14 days. Amprenavir (APV) pharmacokinetic sampling and safety assessments were performed on the last day of each period. Results: Plasma APV exposure was not significantly altered when EFV was coadministered with GW433908 700 mg twice daily (BID) + RTV 100 mg BID. Plasma APV exposure was decreased when EFV was coadministered with GW433908 1395 mg QD + RTV 200 mg QD. However, administration of EFV with GW433908 1395 mg QD + RTV 300 mg QD (i.e., adding an extra 100 mg of RTV) was able to negate this interaction. Adverse events were consistent with prior data for each of the separate agents. Conclusion: When EFV is coadministered with the GW433908 700 mg + RTV 100 mg BID regimen, no dosage adjustment is recommended. However, when EFV is coadministered with the GW433908 1400 mg + RTV 200 mg QD regimen, an increase to RTV 300 mg QD is needed to maintain plasma APV exposure.

Intrathecal Administration of Amikacin for Treatment of Meningitis Secondary to Cephalosporin-Resistant Escherichia Coli

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of gram-negative bacillary meningitis (GNBM) secondary to cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli that was treated with intrathecal and intravenous amikacin and intravenous imipenem/cilastatin (I/C). CASE SUMMARY: A patient who had undergone two recent neurosurgical procedures developed GNBM and bacteremia. He was treated empirically with ceftazidime. Both bloodstream and cerebrospinal fluid isolates were identified as E. coli, resistant to third-generation cephalosporins, penicillins, tobramycin, and gentamicin. The patient was subsequently treated with intravenous and intrathecal amikacin plus intravenous I/C He experienced subjective and objective improvement on days 2–4 of antimicrobial therapy; two generalized tonic-clonic seizures occurred on days 7 and 12. Intrathecal amikacin was discontinued after 6 days, and intravenous amikacin and I/C were discontinued after 23 and 27 days, respectively. The patients mental status did not completely return to premeningitis baseline. DISCUSSION: Third-generation cephalosporins are the treatment of choice for GNBM. In the case reported herein, bacterial resistance to these agents prompted the use of a therapy that has not been well studied and is also considered to be less safe and perhaps less efficacious. Treatment of GNBM with an intrathecally administered aminoglycoside or with intravenous I/C plus an aminoglycoside is reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with GNBM secondary to third-generation cephalosporin-resistant organisms may require therapies that may be less effective and more toxic. Further study of alternative agents is warranted.

Optimal Sampling Schedule Design for Populations of Patients

ABSTRACT Generation of pharmacodynamic relationships in the clinical arena requires estimation of pharmacokinetic parameter values for individual patients. When the target population is severely ill, the ability to obtain traditional intensive blood sampling schedules is curtailed. Population modeling guided by optimal sampling theory has provided robust estimates of individual patient pharmacokinetic parameter values. Because of the wide range of parameter values seen in this circumstance, it is important to know how the range of parameter values in the population affects the timing of the optimal samples. We describe a new, simple technique to obtain optimal samples for a population of patients. This technique uses the nonparametric distribution associated with a nonparametric adaptive grid population pharmacokinetic analysis. We used the distribution from an analysis of 58 patients receiving levofloxacin for nosocomial pneumonia at a dose of 750 mg. The collection of parameter vectors and their associated probabilities were entered into a D-optimal design evaluation by using ADAPT II. The sampling times, weighted for their probabilities, were displayed in a frequency histogram (an expression of how system information varies with time for the population). Such an explicit expression of the time distribution of information allows rational sampling design that is robust not only for the population mean vector, as in traditional D-optimal design theory, but also for large portions of the total population. For levofloxacin, one reasonable six-sample design would be 1.5, 2, 2.25, 4, 4.75, and 24 h after starting a 90-min infusion. Such sampling designs allow informative population pharmacokinetic analysis with precise and unbiased estimates after the maximal a posteriori probability Bayesian step. This allows the highest probability of delineating a pharmacodynamic relationship.

In vitro-in vivo model for evaluating the antiviral activity of amprenavir in combination with ritonavir administered at 600 and 100 milligrams, respectively, every 12 hours

ABSTRACT The study objective was to evaluate the pharmacodynamics of amprenavir in an in vitro system, develop an exposure target for maximal viral suppression, and determine the likelihood of target attainment based on the pharmacokinetics of amprenavir and ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. Population pharmacokinetic data were obtained from 13 HIV-infected patients receiving amprenavir and ritonavir in doses of 600 and 100 mg, respectively, every 12 h. A 2,500-subject Monte Carlo simulation was performed. Target attainment was also estimated for a target derived from clinical data. Maximal viral suppression (in vitro) was achieved when amprenavir free-drug concentrations remained greater than four times the 50% effective concentration (EC50) for 80% of the dosing interval. At an amprenavir EC50 of 0.03 μM, the likelihood of target attainment is 97.4%. For reduced-susceptibility isolates for which the EC50s are 0.05 and 0.08 μM, target attainment is 91.0 and 75.8%, respectively. For the clinical target of a trough concentration/EC50 ratio of 5, the target attainment rates were similar. Treatment with amprenavir and ritonavir at doses of 600 and 100 mg, respectively, twice a day provides excellent suppression of wild-type isolates and reduced-susceptibility isolates up to an EC50 of 0.05 μM. Even at 0.12 μM, target attainment likelihood exceeds 50%, making this an option for patients with extensive exposure to protease inhibitors when this treatment is used with additional active antiretroviral agents.