Sandra Mathers
University of Oxford
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sandra Mathers.
International Journal of Early Years Education | 2007
Sandra Mathers; Faye Linskey; Judith Seddon; Kathy Sylva
The ECERS‐R and ITERS‐R are among two of the most widely used observational measures for describing the characteristics of early childhood education and care. This paper describes a professional development programme currently taking place in seven regions across England, designed to train local government staff in the application of the scales as tools for improving practice. While the scales offer a transparent and measurable means of assessing and improving quality, a number of differences between criteria presented by the scales and by national regulations, curricular guidelines and notions of quality have been identified.
BMJ Open | 2017
Jane Barlow; Sarah Beake; Debra Bick; Caroline Bryson; Laurie Day; Nicholas Gilby; Vivette Glover; Sarah Knibbs; Alastair H Leyland; Geoff Lindsay; Sandra Mathers; Katharine McKenna; Stavros Petrou; Susan Purdon; Kathy Sylva; Carolyn Summerbell; Fiona Tudor; Amy Wheeler; Virginia Woolgar
Introduction Pregnancy and the first few years of a child’s life are important windows of opportunity in which to equalise life chances. A Better Start (ABS) is an area-based intervention being delivered in five areas of socioeconomic disadvantage across England. This protocol describes an evaluation of the impact and cost-effectiveness of ABS. Methods and analysis The evaluation of ABS comprises a mixed-methods design including impact, cost-effectiveness and process components. It involves a cohort study in the 5 ABS areas and 15 matched comparison sites (n=2885), beginning in pregnancy in 2017 and ending in 2024 when the child is age 7, with a separate cross-sectional baseline survey in 2016/2017. Process data will include a profiling of the structure and services being provided in the five ABS sites at baseline and yearly thereafter, and data regarding the participating families and the services that they receive. Eligible participants will include pregnant women living within the designated sites, with recruitment beginning at 16 weeks of pregnancy. Data collection will involve interviewer-administered and self-completion surveys at eight time points. Primary outcomes include nutrition, socioemotional development, speech, language and learning. Data analysis will include the use of propensity score techniques to construct matched programme and comparison groups, and a range of statistical techniques to calculate the difference in differences between the intervention and comparison groups. The economic evaluation will involve a within-cohort study economic evaluation to compare individual-level costs and outcomes, and a decision analytic cost-effectiveness model to estimate the expected incremental cost per unit change in primary outcomes for ABS in comparison to usual care. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval to conduct the study has been obtained. The learning and dissemination workstream involves working within and across the sites to generate learning via communities of practice and a range of learning and dissemination events.
Journal of Children's Services | 2014
Sandra Mathers; Kathy Sylva; Naomi Eisenstadt; Elena Soukakou; Katharina Ereky-Stevens
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on young childrens learning at home and in early childhood settings, in order to identify key caregiving practices which support the learning and development of children under three. Design/methodology/approach – Starting with well-known reviews carried out in England, the USA, Australia and New Zealand, the authors searched the literature for evidence of the developmental needs of babies and toddlers. They then drew on the psychological and educational literatures to identify key practices supporting physical development, learning and communication, using expert review to build on the scientific research in areas where evidence was sparse. Findings – The review explores three key areas of practice: play-based activities and routines; support for communication and language; and opportunities to move and be physically active. Research limitations/implications – This review is not systematic or exhaustive, but aims to integrate current evidenc...
HMSO: [London]. | 2007
Sandra Mathers; Kathy Sylva; Heather Joshi; Kirstine Hansen; Ian Plewis; Jon Johnson; Anitha George; Faye Linskey; Yvonne Grabbe
Sutton Trust | 2014
Sandra Mathers; Naomi Eisenstadt; Kathy Sylva; Elena Soukakou; Katharina Ereky-Stevens
Archive | 2009
Ruth Smith; Susan Purdon; Vera Schneider; Ivana La Valle; Ivonne Wollny; Rachael Owen; Caroline Bryson; Sandra Mathers; Kathy Sylva; Eva Lloyd
Archive | 2010
F. Roberts; Sandra Mathers; Heather Joshi; Kathy Sylva; Elizabeth Jones
Archive | 2004
Teresa Smith; Kathy Sylva; Sandra Mathers; Lorraine Dearden; Alissa Goodman; Greg Kaplan; Ivana La Valle
Archive | 2011
Helen Ranns; Sandra Mathers; Alison Moody; Arjette Karemaker; Jenny Graham; Kathy Sylva; Iram Siraj-Blatchford; James Hall; Sam Clemens; Thomas Newmark; Nilufer Rahim; Clarissa Penfold
Archive | 2018
Sandra Mathers; Katharina Ereky-Stevens