Sandra R. Brave
AstraZeneca
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sandra R. Brave.
Cancer Research | 2005
Stephen R. Wedge; Jane Kendrew; Laurent Francois Andre Hennequin; Paula J. Valentine; Simon T. Barry; Sandra R. Brave; Neil R. Smith; Neil H. James; Michael Dukes; Jon Owen Curwen; Rosemary Chester; Janet A. Jackson; Sarah J. Boffey; Lyndsey L. Kilburn; Sharon Barnett; Graham Richmond; Peter F. Wadsworth; Michael D. Walker; Alison L. Bigley; Sian Tomiko Taylor; Lee A. D. Cooper; Sarah Beck; Juliane M. Jürgensmeier; Donald J. Ogilvie
Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF) signaling is a promising therapeutic approach that aims to stabilize the progression of solid malignancies by abrogating tumor-induced angiogenesis. This may be accomplished by inhibiting the kinase activity of VEGF receptor-2 (KDR), which has a key role in mediating VEGF-induced responses. The novel indole-ether quinazoline AZD2171 is a highly potent (IC50 < 1 nmol/L) ATP-competitive inhibitor of recombinant KDR tyrosine kinase in vitro. Concordant with this activity, in human umbilical vein endothelial cells, AZD2171 inhibited VEGF-stimulated proliferation and KDR phosphorylation with IC50 values of 0.4 and 0.5 nmol/L, respectively. In a fibroblast/endothelial cell coculture model of vessel sprouting, AZD2171 also reduced vessel area, length, and branching at subnanomolar concentrations. Once-daily oral administration of AZD2171 ablated experimental (VEGF-induced) angiogenesis in vivo and inhibited endochondral ossification in bone or corpora luteal development in ovary; physiologic processes that are highly dependent upon neovascularization. The growth of established human tumor xenografts (colon, lung, prostate, breast, and ovary) in athymic mice was inhibited dose-dependently by AZD2171, with chronic administration of 1.5 mg per kg per day producing statistically significant inhibition in all models. A histologic analysis of Calu-6 lung tumors treated with AZD2171 revealed a reduction in microvessel density within 52 hours that became progressively greater with the duration of treatment. These changes are indicative of vascular regression within tumors. Collectively, the data obtained with AZD2171 are consistent with potent inhibition of VEGF signaling, angiogenesis, neovascular survival, and tumor growth. AZD2171 is being developed clinically as a once-daily oral therapy for the treatment of cancer.
Clinical Cancer Research | 2004
Kaye J. Williams; Brian A. Telfer; Sandra R. Brave; Jane Kendrew; Lynsey Whittaker; Ian J. Stratford; Stephen R. Wedge
Purpose: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a key role in tumor angiogenesis and acts as a radiation survival factor for endothelial cells. ZD6474 (N-(4-bromo-2-fluorophenyl)-6-methoxy-7-[(1-methylpiperidin-4-yl)methoxy]quinazolin-4-amine) is a potent VEGF receptor 2 (KDR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that has additional activity versus the epidermal growth factor receptor. This study was designed to determine the efficacy of combining ZD6474 and radiotherapy in vivo. Experimental Design: The Calu-6 (non–small-cell lung cancer) tumor model was selected because it was found to be unresponsive to treatment with a selective epidermal growth factor receptor TKI but responds significantly to treatment with selective VEGF receptor TKIs. Tumor-bearing mice received either vehicle or ZD6474 (50 mg/kg, by mouth, once daily) for the duration of the experiment, with or without radiotherapy (3 × 2 Gy, days 1–3). Two combination schedules were examined: (a) ZD6474 given before each dose of radiation (concurrent schedule); and (b) ZD6474 given 30 minutes after the last dose of radiotherapy (sequential schedule). Results: The growth delay induced using the concurrent schedule was greater than that induced by ZD6474 or radiation treatment alone (22 ± 1 versus 9 ± 1 and 17 ± 2 days, respectively; P = 0.03 versus radiation alone). When administered sequentially, the growth delay was markedly enhanced (36 ± 1 days; P < 0.001 versus radiation alone or the concurrent schedule). Intravenous administration of Hoechst 33342 showed a trend toward reduced tumor perfusion after ZD6474 treatment, and a pairwise comparison (versus control) was significant after three doses of ZD6474 (P = 0.05 by one-tailed t test). Thus, impaired reoxygenation between fractions in the concurrent protocol may be the causal basis for the schedule dependency of the radiopotentiation observed. Conclusions: ZD6474 may be a successful adjuvant to clinical radiotherapy, and scheduling of the treatments could be important to ensure optimal efficacy.
Clinical Cancer Research | 2004
Kaye J. Williams; Brian A. Telfer; Sandra R. Brave; Jane Kendrew; Whittaker L; Ian J. Stratford; Stephen R. Wedge
Purpose: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a key role in tumor angiogenesis and acts as a radiation survival factor for endothelial cells. ZD6474 (N-(4-bromo-2-fluorophenyl)-6-methoxy-7-[(1-methylpiperidin-4-yl)methoxy]quinazolin-4-amine) is a potent VEGF receptor 2 (KDR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that has additional activity versus the epidermal growth factor receptor. This study was designed to determine the efficacy of combining ZD6474 and radiotherapy in vivo. Experimental Design: The Calu-6 (non–small-cell lung cancer) tumor model was selected because it was found to be unresponsive to treatment with a selective epidermal growth factor receptor TKI but responds significantly to treatment with selective VEGF receptor TKIs. Tumor-bearing mice received either vehicle or ZD6474 (50 mg/kg, by mouth, once daily) for the duration of the experiment, with or without radiotherapy (3 × 2 Gy, days 1–3). Two combination schedules were examined: (a) ZD6474 given before each dose of radiation (concurrent schedule); and (b) ZD6474 given 30 minutes after the last dose of radiotherapy (sequential schedule). Results: The growth delay induced using the concurrent schedule was greater than that induced by ZD6474 or radiation treatment alone (22 ± 1 versus 9 ± 1 and 17 ± 2 days, respectively; P = 0.03 versus radiation alone). When administered sequentially, the growth delay was markedly enhanced (36 ± 1 days; P < 0.001 versus radiation alone or the concurrent schedule). Intravenous administration of Hoechst 33342 showed a trend toward reduced tumor perfusion after ZD6474 treatment, and a pairwise comparison (versus control) was significant after three doses of ZD6474 (P = 0.05 by one-tailed t test). Thus, impaired reoxygenation between fractions in the concurrent protocol may be the causal basis for the schedule dependency of the radiopotentiation observed. Conclusions: ZD6474 may be a successful adjuvant to clinical radiotherapy, and scheduling of the treatments could be important to ensure optimal efficacy.
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics | 2011
Sandra R. Brave; Kirsty Ratcliffe; Zena Wilson; Neil H. James; Susan Ashton; Anna Wainwright; Jane Kendrew; Philippa Dudley; Nicola Broadbent; Graham Sproat; Sian Tomiko Taylor; Claire Barnes; Charles Farnsworth; Laurent Francois Andre Hennequin; Donald J. Ogilvie; Juliane M. Jürgensmeier; Stephen R. Wedge; Simon T. Barry
Cediranib is a potent inhibitor of the VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-2 and VEGFR-3 tyrosine kinases. This study assessed the activity of cediranib against the VEGFR-1 tyrosine kinase and the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-associated kinases c-Kit, PDGFR-α, and PDGFR-β. Cediranib inhibited VEGF-A–stimulated VEGFR-1 activation in AG1-G1-Flt1 cells (IC50 = 1.2 nmol/L). VEGF-A induced greatest phosphorylation of VEGFR-1 at tyrosine residues Y1048 and Y1053; this was reversed by cediranib. Potency against VEGFR-1 was comparable with that previously observed versus VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3. Cediranib also showed significant activity against wild-type c-Kit in cellular phosphorylation assays (IC50 = 1–3 nmol/L) and in a stem cell factor–induced proliferation assay (IC50 = 13 nmol/L). Furthermore, phosphorylation of wild-type c-Kit in NCI-H526 tumor xenografts was reduced markedly following oral administration of cediranib (≥1.5 mg/kg/d) to tumor-bearing nude mice. The activity of cediranib against PDGFR-β and PDGFR-α was studied in tumor cell lines, vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC), and a fibroblast line using PDGF-AA and PDGF-BB ligands. Both receptor phosphorylation (IC50 = 12–32 nmol/L) and PDGF-BB–stimulated cellular proliferation (IC50 = 32 nmol/L in human VSMCs; 64 nmol/L in osteosarcoma cells) were inhibited. In vivo, ligand-induced PDGFR-β phosphorylation in murine lung tissue was inhibited by 55% following treatment with cediranib at 6 mg/kg but not at 3 mg/kg or less. In contrast, in C6 rat glial tumor xenografts in mice, ligand-induced phosphorylation of both PDGFR-α and PDGFR-β was reduced by 46% to 61% with 0.75 mg/kg cediranib. Additional selectivity was showed versus Flt-3, CSF-1R, EGFR, FGFR1, and FGFR4. Collectively, these data indicate that cediranib is a potent pan-VEGFR kinase inhibitor with similar activity against c-Kit but is significantly less potent than PDGFR-α and PDGFR-β. Mol Cancer Ther; 10(5); 861–73. ©2011 AACR.
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics | 2013
Sarah A. Loddick; Sarah Ross; Andrew G. Thomason; David M. Robinson; Graeme Walker; Tom P.J. Dunkley; Sandra R. Brave; Nicola Broadbent; Natalie Stratton; Dawn Trueman; Elizabeth Mouchet; Fadhel Shaheen; Vivien Jacobs; Marie Cumberbatch; Joanne Wilson; Rhys D.O. Jones; Robert Hugh Bradbury; Alfred A. Rabow; Luke Gaughan; Chris Womack; Simon T. Barry; Craig N. Robson; Susan E. Critchlow; Stephen R. Wedge; A. Nigel Brooks
Continued androgen receptor (AR) expression and signaling is a key driver in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) after classical androgen ablation therapies have failed, and therefore remains a target for the treatment of progressive disease. Here, we describe the biological characterization of AZD3514, an orally bioavailable drug that inhibits androgen-dependent and -independent AR signaling. AZD3514 modulates AR signaling through two distinct mechanisms, an inhibition of ligand-driven nuclear translocation of AR and a downregulation of receptor levels, both of which were observed in vitro and in vivo. AZD3514 inhibited testosterone-driven seminal vesicle development in juvenile male rats and the growth of androgen-dependent Dunning R3327H prostate tumors in adult rats. Furthermore, this class of compound showed antitumor activity in the HID28 mouse model of CRPC in vivo. AZD3514 is currently in phase I clinical evaluation. Mol Cancer Ther; 12(9); 1715–27. ©2013 AACR.
International Journal of Oncology | 2011
Sandra R. Brave; Rajesh Odedra; Neil H. James; Neil R. Smith; Gayle Marshall; Dawn Baker; Zoe Howard; Lynsay Jackson; Kirsty Ratcliffe; Anna Wainwright; Susan Lovick; D. Mark Hickinson; R. Wilkinson; Simon T. Barry; Georgina Speake; Anderson J. Ryan
Vandetanib is a multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is in clinical development for the treatment of solid tumours. This preclinical study examined the inhibition of two key signalling pathways (VEGFR-2, EGFR) at drug concentrations similar to those achieved in the clinic, and their contribution to direct and indirect antitumour effects of vandetanib. For in vitro studies, receptor phosphorylation was assessed by Western blotting and ELISA, cell proliferation was assessed using a cell viability endpoint, and effects on cell cycle determined using flow cytometry. For in vivo studies, Western blotting, ELISA and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were used to assess receptor phosphorylation. Cell culture experiments demonstrated that anti-proliferative effects of vandetanib resulted from inhibition of either EGFR or VEGFR-2 signalling in endothelial cells, but were associated with inhibition of EGFR signalling in tumour cells. Vandetanib inhibited both EGFR and VEGFR-2 signalling in normal lung tissue and in tumour xenografts. In a lung cancer model expressing an activating EGFR mutation, the activity of vandetanib was similar to that of a highly selective EGFR inhibitor (gefitinib), and markedly greater than that of a highly selective VEGFR inhibitor (vatalanib). These data suggest that at the plasma exposures achieved in the clinic, vandetanib will significantly inhibit both VEGFR-2 and EGFR signalling, and that both inhibition of angiogenesis and direct inhibition of tumour cell growth can contribute to treatment response.
Journal of Biomolecular Screening | 2013
Beverley Isherwood; Rebecca E. Walls; Mark E. Roberts; Thomas M. Houslay; Sandra R. Brave; Simon T. Barry; Neil O. Carragher
Phenotypic screening seeks to identify substances that modulate phenotypes in a desired manner with the aim of progressing first-in-class agents. Successful campaigns require physiological relevance, robust screening, and an ability to deconvolute perturbed pathways. High-content analysis (HCA) is increasingly used in cell biology and offers one approach to prosecution of phenotypic screens, but challenges exist in exploitation where data generated are high volume and complex. We combine development of an organotypic model with novel HCA tools to map phenotypic responses to pharmacological perturbations. We describe implementation for angiogenesis, a process that has long been a focus for therapeutic intervention but has lacked robust models that recapitulate more completely mechanisms involved. The study used human primary endothelial cells in co-culture with stromal fibroblasts to model multiple aspects of angiogenic signaling: cell interactions, proliferation, migration, and differentiation. Multiple quantitative descriptors were derived from automated microscopy using custom-designed algorithms. Data were extracted using a bespoke informatics platform that integrates processing, statistics, and feature display into a streamlined workflow for building and interrogating fingerprints. Ninety compounds were characterized, defining mode of action by phenotype. Our approach for assessing phenotypic outcomes in complex assay models is robust and capable of supporting a range of phenotypic screens at scale.
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics | 2011
Sarah A. Loddick; Sandra R. Brave; Hayley Campbell; Luke Gaughan; Jim Growcott; Natalie Lahan; Elizabeth Mouchet; Daniel O'Neill; Craig N. Robson; Fadhel Shaheen; Andrew G. Thomason; Dawn Trueman; Graeme Walker; Nigel Brooks
The androgen receptor (AR), an important molecular target in the aetiology and progression of prostate cancer, has been found recently to drive key signalling responses in castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) after classical androgen ablation therapies have failed. Here we describe the biological characterisation of a novel and selective small molecule AR downregulator and propose this mechanism as a potential new approach for the treatment of CRPC. The compound is a derivative of a novel AR binding core with selectivity over other nuclear hormone receptors, and causes a reduction of AR protein in human LNCaP prostate cancer cells in vitro. The reduction in AR protein is observed in steroid depleted serum (CSS) conditions and demonstrates a differential mode of action from a classical AR antagonist (bicalutamide) which has no effect on AR protein expression. This AR downregulation translates into functional activity in vitro and in vivo. In cell viability assays in vitro the compound has activity in cells expressing wild-type (VCaP) and mutated (T877A) AR, but is inactive in AR-negative PC3 and DU145 prostate cancer cells, indicating a dependency on AR for efficacy. We have also observed a reduction in PSA synthesis in vitro, consistent with the inhibition of AR signalling. The compound also reduced AR protein expression, PSA synthesis and cell viability in LNCaP-Casodex™-Resistant and LNCaP-Androgen-Independent cells in vitro. We investigated in vivo activity using the Hershberger castrated rat assay where oral dosing (100mg/kg twice-daily for 7 days) resulted in a significant inhibition of testosterone-induced growth of sexual accessory organs. In summary we describe data supporting our hypothesis that a selective AR downregulator offers a novel approach for delivering therapeutic benefit in CRPC. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2011 Nov 12-16; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2011;10(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B107.
Cancer Research | 2004
Donald J. Ogilvie; Jane Kendrew; Simon T. Barry; Sandra R. Brave; Neil H. James; Paula J. Valentine; Sharon Barnett; Juliane M. Jürgensmeier; Laurent Francois Andre Hennequin; Patrick Ple; Elaine Sophie Elizabeth Stokes; Sarah Beck; Stephen R. Wedge
Angiogenesis | 2010
Sandra R. Brave; Cath Eberlein; Stephen R. Wedge; Simon T. Barry