Sandrine Lablanche

Inhibition of complex I regulates the mitochondrial permeability transition through a phosphate-sensitive inhibitory site masked by cyclophilin D

Inhibition of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (PTP) has proved to be an effective strategy for preventing oxidative stress-induced cell death, and the pore represents a viable cellular target for drugs. Here, we report that inhibition of complex I by rotenone is more effective at PTP inhibition than cyclosporin A in tissues that express low levels of the cyclosporin A mitochondrial target, cyclophilin D; and, conversely, that tissues in which rotenone does not affect the PTP are characterized by high levels of expression of cyclophilin D and sensitivity to cyclosporin A. Consistent with a regulatory role of complex I in the PTP-inhibiting effects of rotenone, the concentrations of the latter required for PTP inhibition precisely match those required to inhibit respiration; and a similar effect is seen with the antidiabetic drug metformin, which partially inhibits complex I. Remarkably (i) genetic ablation of cyclophilin D or its displacement with cyclosporin A restored PTP inhibition by rotenone in tissues that are otherwise resistant to its effects; and (ii) rotenone did not inhibit the PTP unless phosphate was present, in striking analogy with the phosphate requirement for the inhibitory effects of cyclosporin A [Basso et al. (2008) J. Biol. Chem. 283, 26307-26311]. These results indicate that inhibition of complex I by rotenone or metformin and displacement of cyclophilin D by cyclosporin A affect the PTP through a common mechanism; and that cells can modulate their PTP response to complex I inhibition by modifying the expression of cyclophilin D, a finding that has major implications for pore modulation in vivo.

Five-Year Metabolic, Functional, and Safety Results of Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Transplanted With Allogenic Islets Within the Swiss-French GRAGIL Network

OBJECTIVE To describe the 5-year outcomes of islet transplantation within the Swiss-French GRAGIL Network. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Retrospective analysis of all subjects enrolled in the GRAGIL-1c and GRAGIL-2 islet transplantation trials. Parameters related to metabolic control, graft function, and safety outcomes were studied. RESULTS Forty-four patients received islet transplantation (islet transplantation alone [ITA] 24 patients [54.5%], islet after kidney [IAK] transplantation 20 patients [45.5%]) between September 2003 and April 2010. Recipients received a total islet mass of 9,715.75 ± 3,444.40 IEQ/kg. Thirty-four patients completed a 5-year follow-up, and 10 patients completed a 4-year follow-up. At 1, 4, and 5 years after islet transplantation, respectively, 83%, 67%, and 58% of the ITA recipients and 80%, 70%, and 60% of the IAK transplant recipients reached HbA1c under 7% (53 mmol/mol) and were free of severe hypoglycemia, while none of the ITA recipients and only 10% of the IAK transplant recipients met this composite criterion at the preinfusion stage. Thirty-three of 44 patients (75%) experienced insulin independence during the entire follow-up period, with a median duration of insulin independence of 19.25 months (interquartile range 2–58). Twenty-nine of 44 recipients (66%) exhibited at least one adverse event; 18 of 55 adverse events (33%) were possibly related to immunosuppression; and complications related to the islet infusion (n = 84) occurred in 10 recipients (11.9%). CONCLUSIONS In a large cohort with a 5-year follow-up and in a multicenter network setting, islet transplantation was safe and efficient in restoring good and lasting glycemic control and preventing severe hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Respective effects of oxygen and energy substrate deprivation on beta cell viability.

Deficit in oxygen and energetic substrates delivery is a key factor in islet loss during islet transplantation. Permeability transition pore (PTP) is a mitochondrial channel involved in cell death. We have studied the respective effects of oxygen and energy substrate deprivation on beta cell viability as well as the involvement of oxidative stress and PTP opening. Energy substrate deprivation for 1h followed by incubation in normal conditions led to a cyclosporin A (CsA)-sensitive-PTP-opening in INS-1 cells and human islets. Such a procedure dramatically decreased INS-1 cells viability except when transient removal of energy substrates was performed in anoxia, in the presence of antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC) or when CsA or metformin inhibited PTP opening. Superoxide production increased during removal of energy substrates and increased again when normal energy substrates were restored. NAC, anoxia or metformin prevented the two phases of oxidative stress while CsA prevented the second one only. Hypoxia or anoxia alone did not induce oxidative stress, PTP opening or cell death. In conclusion, energy substrate deprivation leads to an oxidative stress followed by PTP opening, triggering beta cell death. Pharmacological prevention of PTP opening during islet transplantation may be a suitable option to improve islet survival and graft success.

Islet transplantation versus insulin therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes with severe hypoglycaemia or poorly controlled glycaemia after kidney transplantation (TRIMECO): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND Islet transplantation is indicated for patients with type 1 diabetes with severe hypoglycaemia or after kidney transplantation. We did a randomised trial to assess the efficacy and safety of islet transplantation compared with insulin therapy in these patients. METHODS In this multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial, we randomly assigned (1:1) patients with type 1 diabetes at 15 university hospitals to receive immediate islet transplantation or intensive insulin therapy (followed by delayed islet transplantation). Eligible patients were aged 18-65 years and had severe hypoglycaemia or hypoglycaemia unawareness, or kidney grafts with poor glycaemic control. We used computer-generated randomisation, stratified by centre and type of patient. Islet recipients were scheduled to receive 11 000 islet equivalents per kg bodyweight in one to three infusions. The primary outcome was proportion of patients with a modified β-score (in which an overall score of 0 was not allocated when stimulated C-peptide was negative) of 6 or higher at 6 months after first islet infusion in the immediate transplantation group or 6 months after randomisation in the insulin group. The primary analysis included all patients who received the allocated intervention; safety was assessed in all patients who received islet infusions. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01148680, and is completed. FINDINGS Between July 8, 2010, and July 29, 2013, 50 patients were randomly assigned to immediate islet transplantation (n=26) or insulin treatment (n=24), of whom three (one in the immediate islet transplantation group and two in the insulin therapy group) did not receive the allocated intervention. Median follow-up was 184 days (IQR 181-186) in the immediate transplantation group and 185 days (172-201) in the insulin therapy group. At 6 months, 16 (64% [95% CI 43-82]) of 25 patients in the immediate islet transplantation group had a modified β-score of 6 or higher versus none (0% [0-15]) of the 22 patients in the insulin group (p<0·0001). At 12 months after first infusion, bleeding complications had occurred in four (7% [2-18]) of 55 infusions, and a decrease in median glomerular filtration rate from 90·5 mL/min (IQR 76·6-94·0) to 71·8 mL/min (59·0-89·0) was observed in islet recipients who had not previously received a kidney graft and from 63·0 mL/min (55·0-71·0) to 57·0 mL/min (45·5-65·1) in islet recipients who had previously received a kidney graft. INTERPRETATION For the indications assessed in this study, islet transplantation effectively improves metabolic outcomes. Although studies with longer-term follow-up are needed, islet transplantation seems to be a valid option for patients with severe, unstable type 1 diabetes who are not responding to intensive medical treatments. However, immunosuppression can affect kidney function, necessitating careful selection of patients. FUNDING Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique grant from the French Government.

Randomised, prospective, medico-economic nationwide French study of islet transplantation in patients with severely unstable type 1 diabetes: the STABILOT study protocol

Introduction Islet transplantation may be an appropriate treatment option for patients with severely unstable type 1 diabetes experiencing major glucose variability with severe hypoglycaemia despite intensive insulin therapy. Few data are available on the costs associated with islet transplantation in relation to its benefits. The STABILOT study proposes to assess the economic impact of islet transplantation in comparison with the current best medical treatment defined as sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy. Methods The trial will adopt an open-label, randomised, multicentred design. The study will include 30 patients with severely unstable type 1 diabetes. Eligible participants will be 18–65 years old, with type 1 diabetes duration >5 years, a negative basal or stimulated C-peptide, and severe instability defined by persistent, recurrent and disabling severe hypoglycaemia, despite optimised medical treatment. Participants will be randomised into two groups: one group with immediate registration for islet transplantation, and one group with delayed registration for 1 year while patients receive SAP therapy. The primary endpoint will be the incremental cost-utility ratio at 1 year between islet transplantation and SAP therapy. Perspectives of both the French Health Insurance System and the hospitals will be retained. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval has been obtained at all sites. The trial has been approved by ClinicalTrials.gov (Trial registration ID NCT02854696). All participants will sign a free and informed consent form before randomisation. Results of the study will be communicated during national and international meetings in the field of diabetes and transplantation. A publication will be sought in journals usually read by physicians involved in diabetes care, transplantation and internal medicine. Trial registration number NCT02854696; Pre-results.

Impact of flexible insulin therapy on blood glucose variability, oxidative stress and inflammation in type 1 diabetic patients: The VARIAFIT study

AIMS HbA1c only partially predicts vascular risk in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D), and a role for blood glucose variability (BGV) is a matter of debate. For this reason, this study investigated the impact of an educational programme of flexible insulin therapy (FIT) on BGV and oxidative stress. METHODS Tests were conducted on 30 adult T1D patients in a prospective, single-centre trial at baseline (M0), and at 3 and 6 months (M3 and M6, respectively) of the FIT programme to determine BGV, as reflected by mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE), low blood glucose index (LBGI), lability index (LI), average daily risk range (ADRR), glycaemic lability (scored by two diabetologists), urinary leukotriene E4 (LTE4), 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 (TXB2) and 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α (PGF2). RESULTS HbA1c (7.7 ± 0.9%), ADRR, MAGE, LBGI and LI did not change from M0 to M3 and M6, although ADRR and LBGI significantly improved at M3 and M6 in patients with the highest baseline indices (≥ 40 and ≥ 5, respectively). TXB2 declined at M6 (832 ± 625 vs. 633 ± 972 pg/mg; P=0.048), whereas LTE4 and PGF2 remained stable. ADRR showed the strongest correlation with glycaemic lability scores at all visits (r≥0.84, P<0.0001). CONCLUSION A FIT educational programme improved BGV only in patients with the highest baseline variability, and led to no changes in HbA1c, while ADRR closely correlated with glycaemic lability score. Our data do not support a relationship between BGV and oxidative stress in T1D patients, although the impact of variability on TXB2 deserves further investigation (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00973492).

Thérapie cellulaire du diabète de type 1 : un pancréas bio-artificiel, sinon rien ?

Resume La therapie cellulaire vise a pallier la deficience insulino-secretoire caracterisant le diabete de type 1. Dans sa forme actuelle, la greffe d’ilots allogeniques, elle aboutit a un taux d’insulino-independance de 44 % a 3 ans, et a une disparition du risque d’hypoglycemie severe chez 90 % des receveurs a 5 ans. La generalisation de ce procede therapeutique passe par deux conditions : – eviter le recours a une immunosuppression lourde et prolongee ; – disposer d’une source alternative de cellules. L’immunoprotection de cellules souches, dans des microcapsules ou des chambres de diffusion, remplirait ces conditions, mais n’a pas encore de perspectives cliniques a court terme.

New Automatized Method of 3D Multiculture Viability Analysis Based on Confocal Imagery: Application to Islets and Mesenchymal Stem Cells Co-Encapsulation

Co-encapsulation of pancreatic islets with mesenchymal stem cells in a three-dimensional biomaterial’s structure is a promising technique to improve transplantation efficacy and to decrease immunosuppressant therapy. Currently, evaluation of graft quality after co-encapsulation is only based on insulin secretion. Viability measurement in a 3D conformation structure involving two different cell types is complex, mainly performed manually, highly time consuming and examiner dependent. Standardization of encapsulated graft viability analysis before transplantation is a key point for the translation of the method from the bench side to clinical practice. In this study, we developed an automated analysis of islet viability based on confocal pictures processing of cells stained with three probes (Hoechst, propidium iodide, and PKH67). When compared with results obtained manually by different examiners, viability results show a high degree of similarity (under 3% of difference) and a tight correlation (r = 0.894; p < 0.001) between these two techniques. The automated technique offers the advantage of reducing the analysis time by 6 and avoids the examiner’s dependent variability factor. Thus, we developed a new efficient tool to standardize the analysis of islet viability in 3D structure involving several cell types, which is a key element for encapsulated graft analysis in clinical practice.

Study of MiniMed 640G Insulin Pump with SmartGuard in Prevention of Low Glucose Events in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes (SMILE): Design of a Hypoglycemia Prevention Trial with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data as Outcomes

BACKGROUND Sensor-integrated pump systems with low-glucose suspend (also known as threshold suspend) functions have markedly transformed the management of type 1 diabetes, but most studies to date have excluded patients at high risk of hypoglycemia. The SMILE study is investigating the efficacy of the MiniMed™ 640G insulin pump with the SmartGuard™ predictive low-glucose management (PLGM) feature in the prevention of hypoglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes, who are at high risk of hypoglycemia. METHODS SMILE is a prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled trial being undertaken in four European countries and Canada. Following a 2-week run-in phase, eligible participants will be randomized to use either the MiniMed 640G system with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and the SmartGuard PLGM feature on continuously for 24 weeks (treatment arm), or the MiniMed 640G without CGM and with blinded continuous glucose measurements between weeks 10-12, 16-18, and 22-24 (control arm). The primary endpoint is the mean number of hypoglycemic events, defined as sensor glucose ≤55 mg/dL (≤3.0 mmol/L) for >20 consecutive minutes. Secondary endpoints include various glycemic indices in the hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic ranges, as well as glycated hemoglobin. Data on patient-reported outcomes such as hypoglycemia awareness and treatment satisfaction will also be collected. CONCLUSIONS It is anticipated that the SMILE study will provide important insights into the effectiveness of SmartGuard technology in adult patients with type 1 diabetes.

Indications for islet or pancreatic transplantation: Statement of the TREPID working group on behalf of the Société francophone du diabète (SFD), Société francaise d’endocrinologie (SFE), Société francophone de transplantation (SFT) and Société française de néphrologie – dialyse – transplantation (SFNDT)

While either pancreas or pancreatic islet transplantation can restore endogenous insulin secretion in patients with diabetes, no beta-cell replacement strategies are recommended in the literature. For this reason, the aim of this national expert panel statement is to provide information on the different kinds of beta-cell replacement, their benefit-risk ratios and indications for each type of transplantation, according to type of diabetes, its control and association with end-stage renal disease. Allotransplantation requires immunosuppression, a risk that should be weighed against the risks of poor glycaemic control, diabetic lability and severe hypoglycaemia, especially in cases of unawareness. Pancreas transplantation is associated with improvement in diabetic micro- and macro-angiopathy, but has the associated morbidity of major surgery. Islet transplantation is a minimally invasive radiological or mini-surgical procedure involving infusion of purified islets via the hepatic portal vein, but needs to be repeated two or three times to achieve insulin independence and long-term functionality. Simultaneous pancreas-kidney and pancreas after kidney transplantations should be proposed for kidney recipients with type 1 diabetes with no surgical, especially cardiovascular, contraindications. In cases of high surgical risk, islet after or simultaneously with kidney transplantation may be proposed. Pancreas, or more often islet, transplantation alone is appropriate for non-uraemic patients with labile diabetes. Various factors influencing the therapeutic strategy are also detailed in this report.