Sandrine Sagan

Cell-penetrating peptides: 20 years later, where do we stand?

Twenty years ago, the discovery of peptides able to cross cellular membranes launched a novel field in molecular delivery based on these non‐invasive vectors, most commonly called cell‐penetrating peptides (CPPs) or protein transduction domains (PTDs). These peptides were shown to efficiently transport various biologically active molecules inside living cells, and thus are considered promising devices for medical and biotechnological developments. Moreover, CPPs emerged as potential tools to study the prime mechanisms of cellular entry across the plasma membrane. This review is dedicated to CPP fundamentals, with an emphasis on the molecular requirements and mechanism of their entry into eukaryotic cells.

Translocation and endocytosis for cell-penetrating peptide internalization.

Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) share the property of cellular internalization. The question of how these peptides reach the cytoplasm of cells is still widely debated. Herein, we have used a mass spectrometry-based method that enables quantification of internalized and membrane-bound peptides. Internalization of the most used CPP was studied at 37 °C (endocytosis and translocation) and 4 °C (translocation) in wild type and proteoglycan-deficient Chinese hamster ovary cells. Both translocation and endocytosis are internalization pathways used by CPP. The choice of one pathway versus the other depends on the peptide sequence (not the number of positive changes), the extracellular peptide concentration, and the membrane components. There is no relationship between the high affinity of these peptides for the cell membrane and their internalization efficacy. Translocation occurs at low extracellular peptide concentration, whereas endocytosis, a saturable and cooperative phenomenon, is activated at higher concentrations. Translocation operates in a narrow time window, which implies a specific lipid/peptide co-import in cells.

Cell-surface thiols affect cell entry of disulfide-conjugated peptides

Cell‐penetrating peptides (CPPs) can cross the cell membrane and are widely used to deliver bioactive cargoes inside cells. The cargo and the CPP are often conjugated through a disulfide bridge with the common acceptation that this linker is stable in the extracellular biological medium and should not perturb the internalization process. However, with the use of thiol‐specific reagents combined with mass spectrometry (as a quantitative method to measure intracellular concentrations of peptides) and confocal microscopy (as a qualitative method to visualize internalized pep‐tides) analyses, we could show that, depending on the peptide sequence, thiol/disulfide exchange reactions could happen at the cell surface. These exchange reactions lead to the reduction of disulfide conjugates. In addition, it was observed that not only disulfide‐ but also thiol‐containing peptides could cross‐react with cell‐surface thiols. The peptides cross‐linked by thiolcontaining membrane proteins were either trapped in the membrane or further internalized. Therefore, a new route of cellular uptake was unveiled that is not restricted to CPPs: a protein kinase C peptide inhibitor that is not cell permeant could cross cell membranes when an activated cysteine (with a 3‐nitro‐2‐pyridine‐sulfenyl moiety) was introduced in its sequence.— Aubry, S., Burlina, F., Dupont, E., Delaroche, D., Joliot, A., Lavielle, S., Chassaing, G., Sagan, S. Cell‐surface thiols affect cell entry of disulfide‐conjugated peptides. FASEB J. 23, 2956–2967 (2009). www.fasebj.org

Different membrane behaviour and cellular uptake of three basic arginine-rich peptides.

Cell penetrating peptides (CPPs) are peptides displaying the ability to cross cell membranes and transport cargo molecules inside cells. Several uptake mechanisms (endocytic or direct translocation through the membrane) are being considered, but the interaction between the CPP and the cell membrane is certainly a preliminary key point to the entry of the peptide into the cell. In this study, we used three basic peptides: RL9 (RRLLRRLRR-NH(2)), RW9 (RRWWRRWRR-NH(2)) and R9 (RRRRRRRRR-NH(2)). While RW9 and R9 were internalised into wild type Chinese Hamster Ovary cells (CHO) and glycosaminoglycan-deficient CHO cells, at 4°C and 37°C, RL9 was not internalised into CHO cells. To better understand the differences between RW9, R9 and RL9 in terms of uptake, we studied the interaction of these peptides with model lipid membranes. The effect of the three peptides on the thermotropic phase behaviour of a zwitterionic lipid (DMPC) and an anionic lipid (DMPG) was investigated with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The presence of negative charges on the lipid headgroups appeared to be essential to trigger the peptide/lipid interaction. RW9 and R9 disturbed the main phase transition of DMPG, whereas RL9 did not induce significant effects. Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) allowed us to study the binding of these peptides to large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs). RW9 and R9 proved to have about ten fold more affinity for DSPG LUVs than RL9. With circular dichroism (CD) and NMR spectroscopy, the secondary structure of RL9, RW9 and R9 in aqueous buffer or lipid/detergent conditions was investigated. Additionally, we tested the antimicrobial activity of these peptides against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, as CPPs and antimicrobial peptides are known to share several common characteristics. Only RW9 was found to be mildly bacteriostatic against E. coli. These studies helped us to get a better understanding as to why R9 and RW9 are able to cross the cell membrane while RL9 remains bound to the surface without entering the cell.

Anandamide and WIN 55212-2 inhibit cyclic AMP formation through G-protein-coupled receptors distinct from CB1 cannabinoid receptors in cultured astrocytes

The effects of anandamide and the cannabinoid receptor agonists WIN 55212‐2 and CP 55940 on the evoked formation of cyclic AMP were compared in cultured neurons and astrocytes from the cerebral cortex and striatum of mouse embryos. The three compounds inhibited the isoproterenol‐induced accumulation of cyclic AMP in neuronal cells, and these responses were blocked by the selective CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716A. The three agonists were more potent in cortical than striatal neurons. Interestingly, WIN 55212‐2, CP 55940 and anandamide also inhibited the isoproterenol‐evoked accumulation of cyclic AMP in astrocytes but, in contrast to WIN 55212‐2 and CP 55940, anandamide was much more potent in striatal than cortical astrocytes. Inhibition was prevented by pertussis toxin pretreatment, but not blocked by SR 141716A. Therefore, G‐protein‐coupled receptors, distinct from CB1 receptors, are involved in these astrocytic responses. Moreover, specific binding sites for [3H]‐SR 141716A were found in neurons but not astrocytes. Furthermore, using a polyclonal CB1 receptor antibody, staining was observed in striatal and cortical neurons, but not in striatal and cortical astrocytes. Taken together, these results suggest that glial cells possess G‐protein‐coupled receptors activated by cannabinoids distinct from the neuronal CB1 receptor, and that glial cells responses must be taken into account when assessing central effects of cannabinoids.

Isolation of dermenkephalin from amphibian skin, a high-affinity (δ-selective opioid heptapeptide containing a D-amino acid residue

The predicted amino acid sequence of the biosynthetic precursor of dermorphin, a highly potent and nearly specific μ‐opioid peptide from amphibian skin, contains four repeats of the dermorphin progenitor sequence and one single copy of a different heptapeptide sequence. We have developed a specific enzyme immunoassay and used synthetic peptides to detect and purify the new predicted heptapeptide 2.4 μg/g dry skin) from the skin of the Phyllomedusa sauvagei frog from which dermorphin was originally isolated. The identity of the novel pro‐dermorphin related peptide, Tyr‐D‐Met‐Phe‐His‐Leu‐Met‐Asp‐NH2, was established by co‐chromatography with synthetic peptides on reverse‐phase HPLC, immunological analysis, gas‐phase sequencing, mass spectrometry and by pharmacological assays. Opioid‐binding assays in vitro demonstrated that both the natural and synthetic heptapeptides displayed exceptionally high selectivity and affinity towards the δ‐opioid receptors. Because of its origin and its δ‐opioid (enkephalin) activity and specificity, this novel D‐amino acid containing peptide is named dermenkephalin.

Membrane interaction and perturbation mechanisms induced by two cationic cell penetrating peptides with distinct charge distribution

Independently from the cell penetrating peptide uptake mechanism (endocytic or not), the interaction of the peptide with the lipid bilayer remains a common issue that needs further investigation. The cell penetrating or antimicrobial properties of exogenous peptides require probably different preliminary interactions with the plasma membrane. Herein, we have employed (31)P NMR, differential scanning calorimetry and CD to study the membrane interaction and perturbation mechanisms of two basic peptides with similar length but distinct charge distribution, penetratin (non-amphipathic) and RL16, a secondary amphipathic peptide. The peptide effects on the thermotropic phase behavior of large multilamellar vesicles of dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC), dimyristoylphosphatidylglycerol (DMPG) and dipalmitoleoyl phosphatidylethanolamine (DiPoPE) were investigated. We have found that, even though both peptides are cationic, their interaction with zwitterionic versus anionic lipids is markedly distinct. Penetratin greatly affects the temperature, enthalpy and cooperativity of DMPG main phase transition but does not affect those of DMPC while RL16 presents opposite effects. Additionally, it was found that penetratin induces a negative curvature whereas RL16 induces a positive one, since a decrease in the fluid lamellar to inverted hexagonal phase transition temperature of DiPoPE (T(H)) was observed for penetratin and an increase for RL16. Contrary to penetratin, (31)P NMR of samples containing DMPC MLVs and RL16 shows an isotropic signal indicative of the formation of small vesicles, concomitant with a great decrease in sample turbidity both below and at the phase transition temperature. Opposite effects were also observed on DMPG where both peptides provoke strong aggregation and precipitation. Both CPPs adopt helical structures when contacting with anionic lipids, and possess a dual behavior by either presenting their cationic or hydrophobic domains towards the phospholipid face, depending on the lipid nature (anionic vs zwitterionic, respectively). Surprisingly, the increase of electrostatic interactions at the water membrane interface prevents the insertion of RL16 hydrophobic region in the bilayer, but is essential for the interaction of penetratin. Modulation of amphipathic profiles and charge distribution of CPPs can alter the balance of hydrophobic and electrostatic membrane interaction leading to translocation or and membrane permeabilisation. Penetratin has a relative pure CPP behavior whereas RL16 presents mixed CPP/AMP properties. A better understanding of those processes is essential to unveil their cell translocation mechanism.

Peptide-grafted nanodiamonds: preparation, cytotoxicity and uptake in cells.

Nanodiamonds that were prepared by high pressure/high temperature were functionalised with biomolecules for biological applications. Nanodiamonds (NDs, ≤35 nm) that were coated by silanisation or with polyelectrolyte layers were grafted with a fluorescent thiolated peptide via a maleimido function; this led to an aqueous colloidal suspension that was stable for months. These substituted NDs were not cytotoxic for CHO cells. Their capacity to enter mammalian cells, and their localisation inside were ascertained after labelling the nucleus and actin, by examining the cells by confocal, reflected light and fluorescence microscopy.

Lipid reorganization induced by membrane-active peptides probed using differential scanning calorimetry.

The overlapping biological behaviors between some cell penetrating peptides (CPPs) and antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) suggest both common and different membrane interaction mechanisms. We thus explore the capacity of selected CPPs and AMPs to reorganize the planar distribution of binary lipid mixtures by means of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Additionally, membrane integrity assays and circular dichroism (CD) experiments were performed. Two CPPs (Penetratin and RL16) and AMPs belonging to the dermaseptin superfamily (Drs B2 and C-terminal truncated analog [1-23]-Drs B2 and two plasticins DRP-PBN2 and DRP-PD36KF) were selected. Herein we probed the impact of headgroup charges and acyl chain composition (length and unsaturation) on the peptide/lipid interaction by using binary lipid mixtures. All peptides were shown to be alpha-helical in all the lipid mixtures investigated, except for the two CPPs and [1-23]-Drs B2 in the presence of zwitterionic lipid mixtures where they were rather unstructured. Depending on the lipid composition and peptide sequence, simple binding to the lipid surface that occur without affecting the lipid distribution is observed in particular in the case of AMPs. Recruitments and segregation of lipids were observed, essentially for CPPs, without a clear relationship between peptide conformation and their effect in the lipid lateral organization. Nonetheless, in most cases after initial electrostatic recognition between the peptide charged amino acids and the lipid headgroups, the lipids with the lowest phase transition temperature were selectively recruited by cationic peptides while those with the highest phase transition were segregated. Membrane activities of CPPs and AMPs could be thus related to their preferential interactions with membrane defects that correspond to areas with marked fluidity. Moreover, due to the distinct membrane composition of prokaryotes and eukaryotes, lateral heterogeneity may be differently affected by cationic peptides leading to either uptake or/and antimicrobial activities.

Tryptophan within basic peptide sequences triggers glycosaminoglycan-dependent endocytosis

Deciphering the structural requirements and mechanisms for internalization of cell‐penetrating peptides (CPPs) is required to improve their delivery efficiency. Herein, a unique role of tryptophan (Trp) residues in the interaction and structuring of cationic CPP sequences with glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) has been characterized, in relation with cell internalization. Using isothermal titration calorimetry, circular dichroism, NMR, mass spectrometry, and phase‐contrast microscopy, we compared the interaction of 7 basic CPPs with 5 classes of GAGs. We found that the affinity of CPPs for GAGs increases linearly with the number of Trp residues, from 30 nM for a penetratin analog with 1 Trp residue to 1.5 nM for a penetratin analog with 6 Trp residues for heparin (HI); peptides with Trp residues adopt a predominantly β‐strand structure in complex with HI and form large, stable β‐sheet aggregates with GAGs; and in the absence of any cytotoxicity effect, the quantity of peptide internalized into CHO cells increased 2 times with 1 Trp residue, 10 times with 2 Trp residues, and 20 times with 3 Trp residues, compared with +6 peptides with no Trp residues. Therefore, Trp residues represent molecular determinants in basic peptide sequences not only for direct membrane translocation but also for efficient endocytosis through GAGs.—Bechara, C., Pallerla, M., Zaltsman, Y., Burlina, F., Alves, I. D., Lequin, O., Sagan S. Tryptophan within basic peptide sequences triggers glycosaminoglycan‐dependent endocytosis. FASEB J. 27, 738–749 (2013). www.fasebj.org