Sang In Shim
The Catholic University of America
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sang In Shim.
Cytometry | 1999
Kyungja Han; Yonggoo Kim; Jehoon Lee; Jihyang Lim; Kyo Young Lee; Chang Suk Kang; Won Il Kim; Byung Kee Kim; Sang In Shim; Sun Moo Kim
BACKGROUNDnEven modern automatic cell counters cannot count basophils precisely. Therefore, we need a rapid, accurate, precise, and easy method for counting basophils.nnnMETHODSnUsing flow cytometry, basophils (CD22+/CD19-) and B cells (CD22+/CD19+) were counted. Within a large lymphocyte light scatter gate, % basophils (G%baso) and % B cells (G%B) were determined from the total count. Another method of analysis was to make two regions (R1 for basophils and R2 for B cells) and to determine in those the % basophils (R1%baso) and % B cells (R2%B) without gating. The flow cytometric basophil counts of the blood of 21 normal controls and 43 chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients were compared with manual basophil count (Ma%baso) and basophil count by Coulter electronic cell counter (Hialeah, FL) (Auto%baso). CD22+/CD19- cells were sorted by a FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA).nnnRESULTSnThe G%baso of all samples was 4.66 +/- 5.35%, and R1%baso was 4.23 +/- 4.88%, and they were well-correlated (r = 0.996, P < 0.001). The G%B of all samples was 1.55 +/- 1.68%, and R2%B was 1.59 +/- 1.67%, and they were also well-correlated (r = 0.993, P < 0.001). Their correlation was better in normal controls than in CML. G%baso was well-correlated to Ma%baso (r = 0.827) and Auto%baso (r = 0.806), and R1%baso was well-correlated to Ma%baso (r = 0.831) but showed poor correlation to Auto%baso (r = 0.734). Auto%baso revealed the poorest correlation to Ma%baso (r = 0.692). The sorted CD22+/CD19- cells were all basophils (99.48 +/- 0.30%), and they revealed CD13, CD33, and dim CD45 expression, whereas CD3, CD14, CD16, and HLA-DR were not detected on them.nnnCONCLUSIONSnWe discovered a specific marker combination to identify basophils (CD22+/CD19-), and we suggest that flow cytometric analysis using these markers is an easy, reliable, and accurate method of basophil counting.
Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics | 1996
Kyungja Han; Eun Jee Oh; Young-Shin Kim; Yong Goo Kim; Kyo Young Lee; Chang Suck Kang; Byung Kee Kim; Won Il Kim; Sang In Shim; Sun Moo Kim
Paraffin-embedded tumor cells of 18 cases of gastric carcinoma were hybridized with digoxigenin-labeled repetitive DNA probes specific for the centromeric regions of chromosomes X, Y, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 20. All cases demonstrated numerical chromosomal aberrations. The most exciting aberration, polysomy (five or more copies) of several chromosomes, was found in all cases except a case of mucinous adenocarcinoma, which showed trisomy 9 as the sole chromosomal numerical aberration. In nine cases of tubular adenocarcinoma, poorly-differentiated polysomies of several chromosomes were the consistent numerical aberration and monosomy 7, 18(2 cases each), 10, and 17(1 case each) were also found. In moderately-differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma all three cases also showed polysomies of several chromosomes. The total number of extra chromosomes (polysomy was counted as 5 copies) was higher in the intestinal type (mean 20.9) than in the diffuse type (mean 14.1). Regional lymph node metastasis, vein invasion, or perineural invasion was not related to any specific chromosomal numerical aberration in gastric cancer. Chromosomes X, 1, 2, 3, 4, 15, 17, and 20 had extra copies especially polysomy in most cases. However, chromosomes 7 and 18 revealed monosomy in many cases (31.3% and 33.3% respectively, and chromosome 9 and 11 revealed trisomy in 35.7% and 75% each. Numerically, the most conserved chromosome in gastric cancer was chromosome 12 (62.5%). By flow cytometry, two diploidy and 8 aneuploidy cases with the DNA indices from 1.30 to 1.85 were found.
Journal of Dermatology | 1996
Dong Won Lee; Dou Hee Yoon; Yeun Soo Lee; Sang In Shim; Baik Kee Cho
We report a unique case of solitary milialike idiopathic calcinosis cutis (MICC) in a healthy Korean woman, which is not associated with Down syndrome. This case of MICC would be a form of idiopathic calcinosis cutis, which can be solitary or multiple, sporadic or associated with Down syndrome.
Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics | 1999
Wonbae Lee; Yonggoo Kim; Kyo Young Lee; Chang Suck Kang; Weonsun Lee; Kyung Soo Lee; Sang In Shim; Kyungja Han
Using simultaneous detection of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to acrocentric chromosome centromeres and argyrophilic nucleolar organizer regions (AgNOR), we investigated the number of AgNOR and involvement pattern of acrocentric chromosomes in the nucleoli in various types of human interphase cells. The number of AgNOR of normal gastric mucosal epithelial cells was 2.27 +/- 1.18 and was higher than that of lymphocytes (1.08 +/- 0.28) and lower than that of gastric cancer (7.76 +/- 3.21). The number of acrocentric chromosome centromere signals of normal gastric mucosal epithelial cells was higher than that of normal leukocytes (P < 0.000), and lower than that of gastric cancer (P < 0.000). The acrocentric chromosome centromere signals in the lymphocytes and neutrophils were only half of that expected for diploid cells, perhaps related to acrocentric chromosome association. The proportion of acrocentric chromosomes attached to AgNOR in gastric cancer (0.88 +/- 0.22) was significantly higher than that of normal gastric mucosal epithelial cells (0.72 +/- 0.35, P = 0.007). In conclusion, acrocentric chromosome association appears to be present in circulating leukocytes even in interphase. The number of AgNORs and proportion of acrocentric chromosomes involved in AgNORs in human interphase cells may vary according to cell types. This could play a significant role in rDNA transcription and determination of cell phenotype, including malignant change.
Journal of Korean Medical Science | 1995
Kyoung Mee Kim; Anhi Lee; Hyun Suk Chae; Sang In Shim
Journal of Korean Medical Science | 1988
Sang Bae Lee; Baik Kee Cho; W Houh; Young Tack Song; Sang In Shim; Ihl Bohng Choi
Journal of Korean Medical Science | 1996
Yeong Jin Choi; Tae Kon Hwang; Seok Jin Kang; Byung Kee Kim; Sang In Shim
Journal of Korean Medical Science | 1996
Eun Joo Seo; Hi Jeong Kwon; Sang In Shim
Journal of Clinical Dermatology | 1995
Hong Jin Park; Dong Won Lee; Sung Woo Choi; Baik Kee Cho; Moon Jae Cho; Sang In Shim
Journal of Korean Medical Science | 1994
Kyoung Mee Kim; Kyoung Ja Han; Chang Suck Kang; Sang In Shim