Sanjay V. Joag

Simple and Choice Reaction Time Performance in SIV-Infected Rhesus Macaques

It is well established that HIV infection can lead to motor/cognitive disorders in humans. A number of studies have shown that simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection in rhesus macaques parallels many aspects of HIV disease in humans. The purpose of this study was to define further the SIV-infected rhesus macaque as a model of neuro-AIDS. Our objective was to detect movement-related impairments in behaviorally trained, SIV-infected macaques using both simple and choice reaction time tasks. Reaction times (RTs), movement times (MTs), and error types were examined. Nine monkeys were infected with neurovirulent strains of SIVmac, four of which served initially as controls before their inoculation. Seven of the nine monkeys developed simian AIDS within 4 months of inoculation (rapid progressors), while two monkeys survived for more than 1 year postinoculation (slow progressors). Of the rapid progressors, four exhibited slowed reaction times and six showed movement time slowing. One rapid progressor showed evidence of a strategy shift to overcome impaired motor abilities. Monkeys with rapidly progressing SIV-related disease consistently show behavioral abnormalities reflecting underlying neuronal injury. Although the slow progressors also showed RT and/or MT slowing, a role for nonspecific factors related to late-stage simian AIDS could not be ruled out in these cases. The results demonstrate that motor impairments associated with SIV infection in rhesus macaques can be detected using RT and MT measures, further establishing the SIVmac-infected macaque monkey as a viable model of neuro-AIDS.

Significance of macrophage tropism of SIV in the macaque model of HIV disease.

Microglia, alveolar macrophages, and Langerhans cells are representatives of cells of macrophage lineage that are susceptible to infection with HIV‐1 and they play important roles in the pathogenesis of AIDS dementia, lymphoid interstitial pneumonia, and systemic viral invasion from mucosal surfaces, respectively. In contrast, elimination of CD4+ T cells with resultant development of immunosuppression and AIDS is thought to be reflective of the exclusive tropism of the virus for CD4+ T cells. Examination of these concepts in macaques infected with molecularly cloned strains of SIVmac suggested that all strains of the virus are both macrophage‐ and lymphocyte‐tropic and that all aspects of pathogenesis including loss of CD4+ T cells are dependent on infection in both cell types. However, viral clones that caused productive lytic infection in macrophages were less virulent than those which caused persistent nonproductive infection. The former caused subclinical and even immunizing infections, whereas the latter caused activation and productive infection in CD4+ T cells, AIDS, and systemic infection, even after inoculation of the virus on mucosal surfaces. If these findings on SIVmac are relevant to HIV‐1 disease, then demonstration that HIV‐1 isolates are macrophage‐tropic probably does not necessarily correlate with their pathogenic potential. J. Leukoc. Biol. 62: 12–19; 1997.

Passively Administered Neutralizing Serum that Protected Macaques against Infection with Parenterally Inoculated Pathogenic Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Failed to Protect against Mucosally Inoculated Virus

Macaques inoculated orally, vaginally, or parenterally with SHIV(KU-1) develop severe systemic infection, acute loss of CD4+ T cells, and AIDS. We showed in a previous report that passive immunization with neutralizing serum protected macaques against infection with parenterally inoculated pathogenic SHIV given 24 hr later. In the study reported here we asked whether the identical passive immunization protocol would protect macaques against infection with pathogenic SHIV following oral inoculation of the virus. Ten pigtail macaques were inoculated orally with one animal infectious dose of SHIV(KU-1). Four of the 10 had been given pooled anti-SHIV plasma (15 ml/kg) 24 hr earlier, 4 others were given the same dose of anti-SHIV plasma 2 hr after virus challenge, and the 2 remaining animals were used as controls. The neutralizing antibodies failed to protect macaques against infection after mucosal challenge with SHIV(KU-1).