Sanjeev Nath

Optic pit, microphthalmos and orbital cyst.

An orbital cyst was discovered by ultrasonography behind the globe of the left eye in a five-year-old boy with a left esotropia. In addition, an optic pit was present in the optic nerve head of the same eye, which was microphthalmic relative to the right eye. Although orbital cyst has been reported in the literature, this case is of interest because of the presence of two congenital anomalies in the same eye - namely, optic pit and orbital cyst. These two conditions have never been previously reported as existing together in the same eye.

Sensitivity and specificity of the iVue iWellnessExam™ in detecting retinal and optic nerve disorders

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to assess the specificity and sensitivity of the iWellnessExam™ screening protocol available on iVue® spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), in a cohort of confirmed normal subjects and subjects with confirmed disease. METHODS In total, 126 of 132 confirmed normal subjects and 101 of 107 subjects with confirmed disease were included for analysis. Of the patients with confirmed disease, 67 had retinal disease, 50 had optic nerve disease, and 16 had both retinal and optic nerve pathology. All subjects were screened on the iWellnessExam protocol. Screen shots of the OD, OS, and OU comparison data were obtained and deidentified for reviewer analysis. Based on these data alone, each subject was sorted by a well trained eye care clinician into one of four categories (1, normal; 2, retinal disease; 3, optic nerve disease; 4, retinal and optic nerve disease). RESULTS Of the confirmed normal subjects, 125 of 126 were correctly identified as normal (specificity 99%). Retinal and/or optic nerve disease was correctly detected in 97 of 101 patients with confirmed disease (category 2, 3, 4), retinal pathology was correctly detected in 64 of 67 patients with retinal disease (category 2, 4), and optic nerve pathology was properly detected in 45 of 50 patients with optic nerve disease (category 3, 4), with a sensitivity of 96%, 95.5%, and 90%, respectively. CONCLUSION The iWellnessExam offers the health care provider an excellent method for identifying eyes at risk using very reliable technology. High specificity and sensitivity was obtained when reviewed by a well trained eye care clinician. It would be valuable to repeat the study with a novice and/or student clinician reviewing the same data set to ascertain interobserver variability, as well as the impact of clinical experience on accurate referral, based on the screening data.