Sanna Stålhammar
Lund University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sanna Stålhammar.
Ecology and Society | 2016
Christine Wamsler; Lisa Niven; Thomas H. Beery; Torleif Bramryd; Nils Ekelund; Ingemar Jönsson; Adelina Osmani; Thomas Palo; Sanna Stålhammar
Ecosystem-based approaches for climate change adaptation are promoted at international, national, and local levels by both scholars and practitioners. However, local planning practices that support these approaches are scattered, and measures are neither systematically implemented nor comprehensively reviewed. Against this background, this paper advances the operationalization of ecosystem-based adaptation by improving our knowledge of how ecosystem-based approaches can be considered in local planning (operational governance level). We review current research on ecosystem services in urban areas and examine four Swedish coastal municipalities to identify the key characteristics of both implemented and planned measures that support ecosystem-based adaptation. The results show that many of the measures that have been implemented focus on biodiversity rather than climate change adaptation, which is an important factor in only around half of all measures. Furthermore, existing measures are limited in their focus regarding the ecological structures and the ecosystem services they support, and the hazards and risk factors they address. We conclude that a more comprehensive approach to sustainable ecosystem-based adaptation planning and its systematic mainstreaming is required. Our framework for the analysis of ecosystem-based adaptation measures proved to be useful in identifying how ecosystem-related matters are addressed in current practice and strategic planning, and in providing knowledge on how ecosystem-based adaptation can further be considered in urban planning practice. Such a systematic analysis framework can reveal the ecological structures, related ecosystem services, and risk-reducing approaches that are missing and why. This informs the discussion about why specific measures are not considered and provides pathways for alternate measures/designs, related operations, and policy processes at different scales that can foster sustainable adaptation and transformation in municipal governance and planning.
Sustainability Science | 2018
Ebba Brink; Christine Wamsler; Maria Adolfsson; Monica Axelsson; Thomas H. Beery; Helena Björn; Torleif Bramryd; Nils Ekelund; Therese Jephson; Widar Narvelo; Barry Ness; K. Ingemar Jönsson; Thomas Palo; Magnus Sjeldrup; Sanna Stålhammar; Geraldine Thiere
Transdisciplinary research and collaboration is widely acknowledged as a critical success factor for solution-oriented approaches that can tackle complex sustainability challenges, such as biodiversity loss, pollution, and climate-related hazards. In this context, city governments’ engagement in transdisciplinarity is generally seen as a key condition for societal transformation towards sustainability. However, empirical evidence is rare. This paper presents a self-assessment of a joint research project on ecosystem services and climate adaptation planning (ECOSIMP) undertaken by four universities and seven Swedish municipalities. We apply a set of design principles and guiding questions for transdisciplinary sustainability projects and, on this basis, identify key aspects for supporting university–municipality collaboration. We show that: (1) selecting the number and type of project stakeholders requires more explicit consideration of the purpose of societal actors’ participation; (2) concrete, interim benefits for participating practitioners and organisations need to be continuously discussed; (3) promoting the ‘inter’, i.e., interdisciplinary and inter-city learning, can support transdisciplinarity and, ultimately, urban sustainability and long-term change. In this context, we found that design principles for transdisciplinarity have the potential to (4) mitigate project shortcomings, even when transdisciplinarity is not an explicit aim, and (5) address differences and allow new voices to be heard. We propose additional guiding questions to address shortcomings and inspire reflexivity in transdisciplinary projects.
Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning | 2017
Per Schubert; Nils Ekelund; Thomas H. Beery; Christine Wamsler; K. Ingemar Jönsson; Andreas Roth; Sanna Stålhammar; Torleif Bramryd; Michael Johansson; Thomas Palo
ABSTRACT While ecosystem-based planning approaches are increasingly promoted through international and national policies, municipalities are still struggling with translating them into practice. Against this background, this paper aims to increase the knowledge of current advances and possible ways to support the implementation of the ecosystem services (ES) approach at the municipal level. More specifically, we analyze how ES have been integrated into comprehensive planning within the municipality of Malmö in Sweden over the last 60 years, a declared forerunner in local environmental governance. Based on a content analysis of comprehensive plans over the period 1956–2014 and interviews with municipal stakeholders, this paper demonstrates how planning has shifted over time toward a more holistic view of ES and their significance for human well-being and urban sustainability. Both explicit and implicit applications of the ES concept were found in the analyzed comprehensive plans and associated programs and projects. Our study shows how these applications reflect international, national, and local policy changes, and indicates how municipalities can gradually integrate the ES approach into comprehensive planning and facilitate the transition from implicit to more explicit knowledge use.
Ecosystem services | 2017
Sanna Stålhammar; Eja Pedersen
Ecosystem services | 2016
Thomas H. Beery; Sanna Stålhammar; K. Ingemar Jönsson; Christine Wamsler; Torleif Bramryd; Ebba Brink; Nils Ekelund; Michael Johansson; Thomas Palo; Per Schubert
Ymer | 2017
Per Schubert; K. Ingemar Jönsson; Torleif Bramryd; Michael Johansson; Ebba Brink; Christine Wamsler; Thomas Palo; Thomas H. Beery; Nils Ekelund; Sanna Stålhammar
YMER; (137), pp 213-237 (2017) | 2017
Per Schubert; K. Ingemar Jönsson; Torleif Bramryd; Michael Johansson; Ebba Brink; Christine Wamsler; Thomas Palo; Thomas H. Beery; Nils Ekelund; Sanna Stålhammar
Archive | 2017
K. Ingemar Jönsson; Nils Ekelund; Christine Wamsler; Ebba Brink; Thomas H. Beery; Thomas Palo; Per Schubert; Sanna Stålhammar; Torleif Bramryd; Michael Johansson
Naturvårdsverket; (6755) (2017) | 2017
K. Ingemar Jönsson; Nils Ekelund; Christine Wamsler; Ebba Brink; Thomas H. Beery; Thomas Palo; Per Schubert; Sanna Stålhammar; Torleif Bramryd; Michael Johansson
Archive | 2015
Nils Ekelund; Per Schubert; Andreas Roth; Torleif Bramryd; K. Ingemar Jönsson; Christine Wamsler; Michael Johansson; Thomas H. Beery; Sanna Stålhammar; Ebba Brink; Palo R. Thomas