Santiago Pavlovsky

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: IMWG consensus perspectives risk factors for progression and guidelines for monitoring and management

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) was identified in 3.2% of 21 463 residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, 50 years of age or older. The risk of progression to multiple myeloma, Waldenstroms macroglobulinemia, AL amyloidosis or a lymphoproliferative disorder is approximately 1% per year. Low-risk MGUS is characterized by having an M protein <15 g/l, IgG type and a normal free light chain (FLC) ratio. Patients should be followed with serum protein electrophoresis at six months and, if stable, can be followed every 2–3 years or when symptoms suggestive of a plasma cell malignancy arise. Patients with intermediate and high-risk MGUS should be followed in 6 months and then annually for life. The risk of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma (SMM) progressing to multiple myeloma or a related disorder is 10% per year for the first 5 years, 3% per year for the next 5 years and 1–2% per year for the next 10 years. Testing should be done 2–3 months after the initial recognition of SMM. If the results are stable, the patient should be followed every 4–6 months for 1 year and, if stable, every 6–12 months.

Meta-analysis of chemotherapy versus combined modality treatment trials in Hodgkin's disease. International Database on Hodgkin's Disease Overview Study Group.

DESIGN To perform a meta-analysis of all randomized trials that compared chemotherapy (CT) alone versus combined modality treatment (CT + radiotherapy [RT]) for which individual patient data could be made available. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data on 1,740 patients treated on 14 different trials that included 16 relevant comparisons have been analysed. Eight comparisons were designed to evaluate the benefit of additional RT after the same CT (CT1 v CT1 + RT; additional RT design). Eight comparisons were designed to evaluate whether RT in a combined modality setting can be substituted by CT using either more cycles of the same CT or regimens that contain additional drugs (CT1 + CT2 v CT1 + RT or CT1 v CT2 + RT; parallel RT/CT design). RESULTS Additional RT showed an 11% overall improvement in tumor control rate after 10 years (P = .0001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4% to 18%). No difference could be detected with respect to overall survival (P = .57; 95% CI, -10% to 4%). In contrast, when combined modality treatment was compared with CT alone in the parallel-design trials, no difference could be detected in tumor control rates (P = .43; 95% CI, -6% to 9%), but overall survival was significantly better after 10 years in the group that did not receive RT (P = .045; 8% difference; 95% CI, 1% to 15%). There were significantly fewer fatal events among patients in continuous complete remission (relative risk [RR], 1.73; 95% CI, 1.17 to 2.53; P = .005) if no RT was given. CONCLUSION Combined modality treatment in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkins disease overall has a significantly inferior long-term survival outcome than CT alone if CT is given over an appropriate number of cycles. The role of RT in this setting is limited to specific indications.

Autotransplants for Hodgkin's disease in first relapse or second remission: A report from the autologous blood and marrow transplant registry (ABMTR)

Although patients with relapsed Hodgkins disease have a poor prognosis with conventional therapies, high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autotransplantation) may provide long-term progression-free survival. We reviewed data from the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry (ABMTR) to determine relapse, disease-free survival, overall survival, and prognostic factors in this group of patients. Detailed records from the ABMTR on 414 patients with Hodgkins disease in first relapse (n = 295) or second complete remission (CR) (n = 119) receiving an autotransplant from 1989 to 1995 were reviewed. Median age was 29 (range, 7–64) years. Median time from diagnosis to relapse was 18 (range, 6–219) months; median time from relapse to transplant was 5 (range, <1–215) months. Most patients received high-dose chemotherapy without total body irradiation for conditioning (n = 370). The most frequently used high-dose regimen was cyclophosphamide, BCNU, VP-16 (CBV) (n = 240). The graft consisted of bone marrow (n = 246), blood stem cells (n = 112), or both (n = 56). Median follow-up was 46 (range, 5–96) months. One hundred-day mortality (95% confidence interval) was 7 (5–9)%. One hundred and sixty-five of 295 patients (56%) transplanted in relapse achieved CR after autotransplantation. Of these, 61 (37%) recurred. Twenty-four of 119 patients (20%) transplanted in CR recurred. The probability of disease-free survival at 3 years was 46 (40–52)% for transplants in first relapse and 64 (53–72)% for those in second remission (P < 0.001). Overall survival at 3 years was 58 (52–64)% after transplantation in first relapse and 75 (66–83)% after transplantation in second CR (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, Karnofsky performance score <90% at transplant, abnormal serum LDH at transplant, and chemotherapy resistance were adverse prognostic factors for outcome. Progression of Hodgkins disease accounted for 69% of all deaths. Autotransplantation should be considered for patients with Hodgkins disease in first relapse or second remission. Future investigations should focus on strategies designed to decrease relapse after autotransplantation, particularly in patients at high risk for relapse. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2001) 27, 387–396.

Autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients <60 vs ≥60 years of age

Summary:The role of autologous stem cell transplantation (AuSCT) in older multiple myeloma patients is unclear. Using data from the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry, we compared the outcome of 110 patients ⩾the age of 60 (median 63; range 60–73) years, undergoing AuSCT with that of 382 patients <60 (median 52; range 30–59) years. The two groups were similar except that older patients had a higher β2-microglobulin level at diagnosis (P=0.016) and fewer had lytic lesions (P=0.007). Day 100 mortality was 6% (95% confidence interval 4–9) and 1-year treatment-related mortality (TRM) was 9% (6–13) in patients <60 years, compared with 5% (2–10) and 8% (4–14), respectively, in patients ⩾60 years. The relapse rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the two groups were also similar. Multivariate analysis of all patients identified only an interval from diagnosis to AuSCT >12 months and the use of two prior chemotherapy regimens within 6 months of AuSCT as adverse prognostic factors. Our results indicate that AuSCT can be safely performed in selected older patients: the best results were observed in patients undergoing AuSCT relatively early in their disease course.

A COMPARISON OF HLA-IDENTICAL SIBLING ALLOGENEIC VERSUS AUTOLOGOUS TRANSPLANTATION FOR DIFFUSE LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA: A REPORT FROM THE CIBMTR

We compared outcomes of 916 diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients aged >or=18 years undergoing first autologous (n = 837) or myeloablative (MA) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) (n = 79) between 1995 and 2003 reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). Median follow-up was 81 months for allogeneic HCT versus 60 months for autologous HCT. Allogeneic HCT recipients were more likely to have high-risk disease features including higher stage, more prior chemotherapy regimens, and resistant disease. Allogeneic HCT was associated with a higher 1 year treatment-related mortality (TRM) (relative risk [RR] 4.88, 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.21-7.40, P < .001), treatment failure (RR 2.06, 95% CI, 1.54-2.75, P < .001), and mortality (RR 2.75, 95% CI, 2.03-3.72, P < .001). Risk of disease progression was similar in the 2 groups (RR 1.12, 95% CI, 0.73-1.72, P = .59). In fact, for 1-year survivors, no significant differences were observed for TRM, progression, progression-free (PFS) or overall survival (OS). Increased risks of TRM and mortality were associated with older age (>50 years), lower performance score, chemoresistance, and earlier year of transplant. In a cohort of mainly high-risk DLBCL patients, upfront MA allogeneic HCT, although associated with increased early mortality, was associated with a similar risk of disease progression compared to lower risk patients receiving autologous HCT.

Second Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Relapsed Lymphoma after a Prior Autologous Transplant

We determined treatment-related mortality, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) after a second autologous HCT (HCT2) for patients with lymphoma relapse after a prior HCT (HCT1). Outcomes for patients with either Hodgkin lymphoma (HL, n = 21) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL, n = 19) receiving HCT2 reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) were analyzed. The median age at HCT2 was 38 years (range: 16-61) and 22 (58%) patients had a Karnofsky performance score <90. HCT2 was performed >1 year after HCT1 in 82%. The probability of treatment-related mortality at day 100 was 11% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3%-22%). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year probabilities of PFS were 50% (95% CI, 34%-66%), 36% (95% CI, 21%-52%), and 30% (95% CI, 16%-46%), respectively. Corresponding probabilities of survival were 65% (95% CI, 50%-79%), 36% (95% CI, 22%-52%), and 30% (95% CI, 17%-46%), respectively. At a median follow-up of 72 months (range: 12-124 months) after HCT2, 29 patients (73%) have died, 18 (62%) secondary to relapsed lymphoma. The outcomes of patients with HL and NHL were similar. In summary, this series represents the largest reported group of patients with relapsed lymphomas undergoing SCT2 following failed SCT1, and with long-term follow-up. Our series suggests that SCT2 is feasible in patients relapsing after prior HCT1, with a lower treatment-related mortality than that reported for allogeneic transplant in this setting. HCT2 should be considered for patients with relapsed HL or NHL after HCT1 without alternative allogeneic stem cell transplant options.

Is the international staging system superior to the Durie-Salmon staging system? A comparison in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous transplant

The international staging system (ISS) for multiple myeloma (MM) is a validated alternative to the Durie–Salmon staging system (DSS) for predicting survival at diagnosis. We compared these staging systems for predicting outcomes after upfront autologous stem cell transplantation by analyzing the outcomes of 729 patients between 1995 and 2002. With a median follow-up of 56 months, the univariate probabilities (95% CI) of non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 5 years were 7, 68, 25 and 52%, respectively. The median OS for stages I, II, III by DSS and ISS were 82, 68, 50 and 64, 68, 45 months, respectively. The concordance between the two staging systems was only 36%. Staging systems were formally compared using Cox models fit with DSS and ISS stages. The relative risks of PFS and OS were significantly different for stages I vs II and II vs III for DSS, but only for stages II vs III for ISS. Although both systems were predictive of PFS and OS, the DSS was superior in formal statistical comparison using Brier score. However, neither system was strongly predictive of outcomes, indicating the need for newer schemes incorporating other prognostic markers.

Combined cyclophosphamide vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (COPP) therapy of malignant lymphoma. Evaluation of 190 patients.

One hundred ninety patients who had advanced active Hodgkins disease, lymphosarcoma, or reticulum cell sarcoma were treated with a combination of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (COPP) given in a cyclical fashion every month. Complete remission was produced in 91 of 138 (66%) patients with Hodgkins disease and in 39 of 52 (75%) patients with non‐Hodgkins lymphoma (lymphosarcoma and reticulum cell sarcoma). The response rate was higher in patients who completed six cycles of therapy compared to those who completed only three to five cycles: 77% vs. 45%, respectively, in Hodgkins disease, and 85% vs. 46%, respectively, in non‐Hodgkins lymphoma. The median duration of remission was longer for Hodgkins disease patients who completed six cycles (30 months vs. 10 months). The median duration of complete remission for non‐Hodgkins lymphoma was 14 months. The response to treatment correlated positively with survival. The median survival time from start of COPP treatment for patients with Hodgkins disease was 7 months for nonresponders, 14 months for those who attained partial remission, and more than 48 months for those who attained complete remission. For patients with non‐Hodgkins lymphoma, the median survival time from start of COPP treatment was 24 months for nonresponders and those who had partial remission, and more than 32 months for those who attained complete remission. Of complete remission responders with Hodgkins disease, 70% are still alive 84 months after diagnosis, and 63% of the patients with non‐Hodgkins lymphoma are still alive 48 months after diagnosis.

Influence of age and histology on outcome in adult non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT): a report from the Center For International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR).

To compare the clinical outcomes of older (age > or =55 years) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients with younger NHL patients (<55 years) receiving autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) while adjusting for patient-, disease-, and treatment-related variables, we compared autologous HCT outcomes in 805 NHL patients aged > or =55 years to 1949 NHL patients <55 years during the years 1990-2000 using data reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). In multivariate analysis, older patients with aggressive histologies were 1.86 times (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-2.43, P < .001) more likely than younger patients to experience treatment-related mortality (TRM). Relative death risks were 1.33 times (CI 1.04-1.71, P = .024) and 1.50 times (CI 1.33-16.9, P < .001) higher in older compared to younger patients with follicular grade I/II and aggressive histologies, respectively. Autologous HCT in older NHL patients is feasible, but most disease-related outcomes are statistically inferior to younger patients. Studies addressing supportive care particular to older patients, who are most likely to benefit from this approach, are recommended.

Evaluation of intensification and maintenance programs in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

This cooperative prospective study was designed to answer the following questions in cases with acute lymphoblastic leukemia induced to achieve complete remission with the combination of vincristine and prednisone (if by day 29 the bone marrow was not M1, daunorubicin was added to the former regimen) and who received preventive CNS therapy with 2400 rad of cobalt‐60 to cranio‐cervical region and simultaneously intrathecal methotrexate and dexamethasone: 1) Is a short intensification with cytosine‐arabinoside and cyclophosphamide immediately after complete remission useful? 2) Does the use of weekly doses of 6‐mercaptopurine and methotrexate have the same maintenance effect as daily 6‐mercaptopurine and twice weekly methotrexate? and 3) Do further 3 month‐doses of intrathecal methotrexate and dexamethasone help to decrease still more the incidence of meningeal leukemia? From October 1972 to December 1975, 473 previously untreated patients entered this study and 465 (390 children and 75 adults) are evaluated in this paper. Of them, 373 (80%) achieved complete remission (children 84% and adults 61%). Out of 109 “high risk”children (one or more of the following characteristics at diagnosis: marked organomegaly, mediastinal widening, leukocytosis above 50000/ mm3 and CNS involvement) 83 (76%) and out of 281 “standard risk”children (all the others) 244 (87%) achieved complete remission. The median duration of complete remission according to different prognostic factors was as follows: “high risk”children 10 months, adults 24 months and “standard risk”children 25 months. Duration of complete remission of the “standard risk”children in relation to with or without intensification, daily or weekly maintenance and additional intrathecal therapy or none, showed no significant difference; however, those who received intensification, daily maintenance and further intrathecal therapy behaved slightly better. Median survival for all the cases of this study was as follows: adults 10 months, “high risk”children 12 months and “standard risk”children 26. months. At 36 months, 13% of “high risk”children, 25% of adults and 39% of “standard risk”children are still alive. We conclude that the variables studied in this protocol did not show significant extension of complete remission, however the sum of them seems to offer some advantage. Moreover, what appears clear is the importance of prognostic factors which must be taken into account in future studies. Cancer 42:1730–1740, 1978.