Sára Bálint

Prevalence and correlates of adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: meta-analysis

BACKGROUND In spite of the growing literature about adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), relatively little is known about the prevalence and correlates of this disorder. AIMS To estimate the prevalence of adult ADHD and to identify its demographic correlates using meta-regression analysis. METHOD We used the MEDLINE, PsycLit and EMBASE databases as well as hand-searching to find relevant publications. RESULTS The pooled prevalence of adult ADHD was 2.5% (95% CI 2.1-3.1). Gender and mean age, interacting with each other, were significantly related to prevalence of ADHD. Meta-regression analysis indicated that the proportion of participants with ADHD decreased with age when men and women were equally represented in the sample. CONCLUSIONS Prevalence of ADHD in adults declines with age in the general population. We think, however, that the unclear validity of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for this condition can lead to reduced prevalence rates by underestimation of the prevalence of adult ADHD.

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): gender- and age-related differences in neurocognition

BACKGROUND Despite the growing recognition that the clinical symptom characteristics associated with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) persist into adulthood in a high proportion of subjects, little is known about the persistence of neurocognitive deficits in ADHD. The objective was twofold: (1) to conduct a meta-analysis of neuropsychological studies to characterize attentional performance in subjects with adult ADHD by examining differences in ADHD versus normal control subjects; and (2) to investigate whether these differences vary as a function of age and gender. METHOD Twenty-five neuropsychological studies comparing subjects with adult ADHD and healthy controls were evaluated. Statistical effect size was determined to characterize the difference between ADHD and control subjects. Meta-regression analysis was applied to investigate whether the difference between ADHD and control subjects varied as a function of age and gender across studies. RESULTS Tests measuring focused and sustained attention yielded an effect size with medium to large magnitude whereas tests of simple attention resulted in a small to medium effect size in terms of poorer attention functioning of ADHD subjects versus controls. On some of the measures (e.g. Stroop interference), a lower level of attention functioning in the ADHD group versus the controls was associated with male gender. CONCLUSIONS Adult ADHD subjects display significantly poorer functioning versus healthy controls on complex but not on simple tasks of attention, and the degree of impairment varies with gender, with males displaying a higher level of impairment.

Pharmacotherapy of adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a meta-analysis

Our objective was to conduct a meta-analysis of therapeutic efficacy of pharmacological treatment of adult ADHD based on data from controlled clinical trials. We used the search engines PubMed and Medline to identify relevant clinical trials. Short-term studies with double-blind parallel-group design were selected for the analysis. Altogether, we identified 11 trials that met the criteria, and investigated a total of 1991 subjects, 694 and 1297 of whom were treated with placebo or active medication, respectively. In order to pool efficacy data from studies with different characteristics, including different number of participants, different trial duration and measures of efficacy, the statistical effect sizes for each study had to be calculated. Our findings showed that the pooled effect size across all treatments was in the medium-to-high range (Cohens d=0.65, p<0.0001 vs. placebo), and the effect size for stimulants (Cohens d=0.67, p<0.0001 vs. placebo) was somewhat higher than for non-stimulant medications (Cohens d=0.59, p<0.0001 vs. placebo). The current database of controlled trials for adult ADHD is relatively small, and does not include data for many of the potentially important agents. In addition, effect-size estimates for different classes of medications (i.e. stimulant and non-stimulant medications) were based on separate studies; head-to-head comparisons of various agents are severely lacking. Nonetheless, results of this meta-analysis across all ADHD medications in adult subjects demonstrated statistically significant and clinically robust improvement in symptom severity compared to placebo treatment.