Sara J. Newmann
University of California, San Francisco
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sara J. Newmann.
International Journal of Std & Aids | 2000
Sara J. Newmann; P Sarin; N. Kumarasamy; E Amalraj; Michael Rogers; Purnima Madhivanan; Timothy P. Flanigan; Susan Cu-Uvin; Stephen T. McGarvey; Kenneth H. Mayer; Scott D. Solomon
A retrospective study was conducted on 134 HIV-infected females evaluated at an HIV/AIDS centre in south India to characterize their socio-demographics, HIV risk factors and initial clinical presentations. The mean age was 29 years; 81% were housewives; 95% were currently or previously married; 89% reported heterosexual sex as their only HIV risk factor; and 88% reported a history of monogamy. The majority were of reproductive age, thus the potential for vertical transmission of HIV and devastating impacts on families is alarming. Nearly half of these women initially presented asymptomatically implying that partner recruitment can enable early HIV detection. Single partner heterosexual sex with their husband was the only HIV risk factor for the majority of women. HIV prevention and intervention strategies need to focus on married, monogamous Indian women whose self-perception of HIV risk may be low, but whose risk is inextricably linked to the behaviour of their husbands.
Cancer Causes & Control | 2005
Sara J. Newmann; Elizabeth I.O. Garner
ObjectiveTo reveal areas of research/knowledge related to social inequities and cervical cancer. Methods: A Medline search was performed looking for US based research on cervical cancer and social inequities since 1990. The papers found were organized into cells defined by a “cancer disparities grid.” Results: The majority of research published about cervical cancer and social inequities in the US, lies within the social domains of: race/ethnicity and socioeconomic position. Conflicting information exists as to whether race/ethnicity is a good predictor of screening and survival. Some research implied that differentials based on race/ethnicity are likely secondary to differentials in socioeconomic position. Some research about age, insurance status, and immigrant status and cervical cancer was found. Scarce information was found relating to sexuality, language, disability and geography and cervical cancer. Discussion: The “cancer disparities grid” facilitated a systematic and visual review of existing literature on social inequities and cervical cancer. The grid helped to elucidate uncontested existing social inequities, conflicting social inequities, and areas where social inequity data does not exist. The cancer disparities grid can be used as a research tool to help identify areas for future research, clinical programs, and political action related to cervical cancer and social inequities.
AIDS | 2013
Daniel Grossman; Maricianah Onono; Sara J. Newmann; Cinthia Blat; Elizabeth A. Bukusi; Starley B. Shade; Rachel L. Steinfeld; Craig R. Cohen
Objective:To determine whether integrating family planning services into HIV care is associated with increased use of more effective contraceptive methods (sterilization, intrauterine device, implant, injectable or oral contraceptives). Design:Cluster-randomized trial. Setting:Eighteen public HIV clinics in Nyanza Province, Kenya. Participants:Women aged 18–45 years receiving care at participating HIV clinics; 5682 clinical encounters from baseline period (December 2009–February 2010) and 12 531 encounters from end-line period (July 2011–September 2011, 1 year after site training). Intervention:Twelve sites were randomized to integrate family planning services into the HIV clinic, whereas six clinics were controls where clients desiring contraception were referred to family planning clinics at the same facility. Main outcome measures:Increase in use of more effective contraceptive methods between baseline and end-line periods. Pregnancy rates during the follow-up year (October 2010–September 2011) were also compared. Results:Women seen at integrated sites were significantly more likely to use more effective contraceptive methods at the end of the study [increased from 16.7 to 36.6% at integrated sites, compared to increase from 21.1 to 29.8% at controls; odds ratio (OR) 1.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24–2.63]. Condom use decreased non-significantly at intervention sites compared to controls (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.35–1.19). No difference was observed in incident pregnancy in the first year after integration comparing intervention to control sites (incidence rate ratio 0.90; 95% CI 0.68–1.20). Conclusions:Integration of family planning services into HIV care clinics increased use of more effective contraceptive methods with a non-significant reduction in condom use. Although no significant reduction in pregnancy incidence was observed during the study, 1 year may be too short a period of observation for this outcome.
AIDS | 2013
Starley B. Shade; Sebastian Kevany; Maricianah Onono; George Ochieng; Rachel L. Steinfeld; Daniel Grossman; Sara J. Newmann; Cinthia Blat; Elizabeth A. Bukusi; Craig R. Cohen
Objective:To evaluate costs, cost-efficiency and cost-effectiveness of integration of family planning into HIV services. Intervention:Integration of family planning services into HIV care and treatment clinics. Design:A cluster-randomized trial. Setting:Twelve health facilities in Nyanza, Kenya were randomized to integrate family planning into HIV care and treatment; six health facilities were randomized to (nonintegrated) standard-of-care with separately delivered family planning and HIV services. Main outcome measures:We assessed costs, cost-efficiency (cost per additional use of more effective family planning), and cost-effectiveness (cost per pregnancy averted) associated with the first year of integration of family planning into HIV care. More effective family planning methods included oral and injectable contraceptives, subdermal implants, intrauterine device, and female and male sterilization. Patients and participants:We collected cost data through interviews with study staff and review of financial records to determine costs of service integration. Results:Integration of services was associated with an average marginal cost of
The Lancet HIV | 2015
Rena C. Patel; Maricianah Onono; Monica Gandhi; Cinthia Blat; Jill Hagey; Starley B. Shade; Eric Vittinghoff; Elizabeth A. Bukusi; Sara J. Newmann; Craig R. Cohen
841 per site and
Culture, Health & Sexuality | 2016
Elizabeth K. Harrington; Shari L. Dworkin; Mellissa Withers; Maricianah Onono; Zachary Kwena; Sara J. Newmann
48 per female patient. Average overall and marginal costs of integration were associated with personnel costs [initial (
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics | 2013
Sara J. Newmann; Daniel Grossman; Cinthia Blat; Maricianah Onono; Rachel L. Steinfeld; Elizabeth A. Bukusi; Starley B. Shade; Craig R. Cohen
1003 vs.
Culture, Health & Sexuality | 2015
Mellissa Withers; Shari L. Dworkin; Jennifer M. Zakaras; Maricianah Onono; Beryl Oyier; Craig R. Cohen; Elizabeth A. Bukusi; Daniel Grossman; Sara J. Newmann
872) and refresher (
Aids Research and Treatment | 2013
Rachel L. Steinfeld; Sara J. Newmann; Maricianah Onono; Craig R. Cohen; Elizabeth A. Bukusi; Daniel Grossman
498 vs.
Aids Research and Treatment | 2013
Sara J. Newmann; Kavita Mishra; Maricianah Onono; Elizabeth A. Bukusi; Craig R. Cohen; Olivia Gage; Rose Odeny; Katie D. Schwartz; Daniel Grossman
330) training, mentoring (