Sara M. Alexanian

Relevance of the Surgical Care Improvement Project on glycemic control in patients undergoing cardiac surgery who receive continuous insulin infusions

OBJECTIVE The Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) has benchmarked 6:00 am blood glucose levels of less than 200 mg/dL on postoperative day (POD) 1 and 2 as quality measures of glycemic control in cardiac surgery. This study was undertaken to (1) determine the incidence of SCIP outliers in patients receiving a continuous insulin infusion (CII) targeted to maintain perioperative serum glucose levels less than 180 mg/dL after cardiac surgery, (2) identify the profile of patients who are SCIP outliers, (3) determine whether SCIP outliers have increased morbidity and mortality, and (4) identify more relevant benchmarks for glycemic control in patients having cardiac surgery. METHODS Between January 1, 2008, and April 30, 2011, a total of 832 patients underwent cardiac surgery and received CII to maintain serum blood glucose levels of less than 180 mg/dL. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients compliant with SCIP and SCIP outliers. RESULTS The incidence of SCIP outliers was 6.6% (55/832). Patients more likely to be SCIP outliers had diabetes mellitus (38, 69% vs 250, 32%; P < .0001), a higher hemoglobin A1c (8.74 ± 2.25 vs 7.59 ± 2.90; P < .0009), and a higher body mass index (31.1 ± 6.5 vs 29.2 ± 5.7; P = .03). However, SCIP outliers had no increase in morbidity, mortality, or hospital length of stay. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing cardiac surgery may still be SCIP outliers despite CII targeted to maintain serum glucose levels below 180 mg/dL; however, SCIP outliers had no increase in morbidity, mortality, or length of stay.

Creating a Perioperative Glycemic Control Program

Hyperglycemia in the surgical population is a recognized risk factor for postoperative complications; however, there is little literature to date regarding the management of hyperglycemia in the perioperative period. Here, we detail the strategies that our institutions have employed to identify and treat hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes who present for surgery. Our approach focuses on the recognition of hyperglycemia and metabolic abnormalities, control of glucose levels via insulin infusion when needed, monitoring for hypoglycemia and a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach that provides standardized recommendations for patients at all points in care as they transition from the preoperative clinic into the operating room, and then into the hospital.

Round Table Discussion on Inpatient Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring at the International Hospital Diabetes Meeting

In May 2015 the Diabetes Technology Society convened a panel of 27 experts in hospital medicine and endocrinology to discuss the current and potential future roles of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in delivering optimum health care to hospitalized patients in the United States. The panel focused on 3 potential settings for CGM in the hospital, including (1) the intensive care unit (ICU), (2) non-ICU, and (3) continuation of use of home CGM in the hospital. The group reviewed barriers to use and solutions to overcome the barriers. They concluded that CGM has the potential to improve the quality of patient care and can provide useful information to help health care providers learn more about glucose management. Widespread adoption of CGM by hospitals, however, has been limited by added costs and insufficient outcome data.In May 2015 the Diabetes Technology Society convened a panel of 27 experts in hospital medicine and endocrinology to discuss the current and potential future roles of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in delivering optimum health care to hospitalized patients in the United States. The panel focused on 3 potential settings for CGM in the hospital, including (1) the intensive care unit (ICU), (2) non-ICU, and (3) continuation of use of home CGM in the hospital. The group reviewed barriers to use and solutions to overcome the barriers. They concluded that CGM has the potential to improve the quality of patient care and can provide useful information to help health care providers learn more about glucose management. Widespread adoption of CGM by hospitals, however, has been limited by added costs and insufficient outcome data.

A primer for achieving glycemic control in the cardiac surgical patient.

Abstract  Maintaining glycemic control (blood glucose <180 mg/dL) has been shown to reduce morbidity and enhance long‐term survival in patients with diabetes mellitus following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. In this review we present a management strategy to achieve perioperative glycemic control in all patients undergoing CABG surgery, with and without diabetes mellitus, designed to achieve compliance with current Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) guidelines. (J Card Surg 2012;27:470‐477)

Adult Hyperglycemic Crisis: A Review and Perspective

Hyperglycemic crisis, which includes Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar State, is a common diagnosis in high acuity hospital units and admission rates continue to increase despite preventive strategies. While diabetic ketoacidosis remains a common cause of death in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes, in adults reported mortality is variable and depends on the severity of metabolic derangement and the presence of other acute and chronic conditions. Hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state, and the overlap syndrome of hyperosmolar ketoacidosis, have a higher overall mortality though outcomes are improving. We discuss the diagnosis, epidemiology, and management strategies with particular reference to commonly encountered pitfalls in care and provide an updated perspective on the shifts in the epidemiology and novel management strategies for these important disorders.

Stress Hyperglycemia During Surgery and Anesthesia: Pathogenesis and Clinical Implications

Numerous studies have demonstrated an association between hyperglycemia in the perioperative period and adverse clinical outcomes. Many patients who experience hyperglycemia while hospitalized do not have a known history of diabetes and experience a transient phenomenon often described as “stress hyperglycemia” (SH). We discuss the epidemiology and pathogenesis of SH as well as evidence to date regarding predisposing factors and outcomes. Further research is needed to identify the long-term sequelae of SH as well as perioperative measures that may modulate glucose elevations and optimal treatment strategies.

HYPOGLYCEMIA RATES AFTER RESTRICTION OF HIGH-DOSE GLARGINE IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS

OBJECTIVE Hypoglycemia remains one of the main challenges of insulin therapy. To reduce insulin-related hypoglycemia at our institution, we restricted inpatient ordering of high glargine doses (≥0.5 U/kg/day) to endocrine staff in May 2013. This retrospective cohort study assesses its effect on hypoglycemia and glycemic control within 48 hours of admission (ADM). METHODS We identified 692 adult patients hospitalized at Boston Medical Center who received glargine upon ADM from November 1, 2012 through April 30, 2013 as the pre-intervention group, and 651 adult patients admitted between November 1, 2013 and April 30, 2014 as the postintervention group. Demographics, medical history, home insulin regimen, concurrent oral diabetes medications or glucocorticoid administration, ADM serum creatinine, all blood glucose levels (BG) ≤48 hours of ADM, and hemoglobin A1c values ≤3 months were assessed. Hypoglycemia was defined as BG ≤70 mg/dL, and hyperglycemia as BG ≥200 mg/dL. Multivariable regression models assessed potential associations between covariates and incidence of hypoglycemia and average BG ≤48 hours of ADM. RESULTS Demographics were similar between groups. Significantly less patients received high-dose glargine in the post-intervention group (5.2% vs. 0.3%, P<.001). Incidences of hypoglycemia were significantly lower in the postintervention group (20.9% vs. 17.8%, P<.001 per ADM; 3.4% vs. 2.3%, P = .001 per BG measurements [BGM]). Mean BG levels ≤48 hours of ADM and incidence of hyperglycemia were not significantly different. The adjusted incident rate ratio of hypoglycemia was 0.63 per ADM and 0.74 per BGM in the postintervention group compared to the pre-intervention group (P = .001 and P = .063, respectively). CONCLUSION We found that implementation of a restriction on high doses of glargine resulted in lower rates of hypoglycemia without worsening glycemic control. ABBREVIATIONS ADM = admission BG = blood glucose BGM = blood glucose measurements BMC = Boston Medical Center BMI = body mass index EMR = electronic medical record HgbA1c = hemoglobin A1c IRR = incidence rate ratio NPH = neutral protamine Hagedorn TDD = total daily dose T2D = type 2 diabetes.

Thyrotoxicosis with Post-Treatment Hypothyroidism in a Patient with Acute Suppurative Thyroiditis Due to Porphyromonas

BACKGROUND Acute suppurative thyroiditis (AST) is a rare, life-threatening thyroid infection characterized by a tender neck mass and fever. As these features are shared with self-limited subacute thyroiditis (SAT), it is important to differentiate between the two disorders. PATIENT FINDINGS We report a case of AST in a 21-year-old woman who presented with steadily worsening throat pain for 3 weeks, a tender left neck mass, and thyrotoxicosis. She was initially given prednisone for treatment of presumed SAT but then it acutely worsened. Fine needle aspiration yielded pus on gross examination, and she required intubation and emergent surgical drainage to maintain her airway. Culture of the abscess isolated Streptococcus F and Porphyromonas, a gram-negative intracellular anaerobe not previously reported to cause AST. She improved quickly after surgery, developed transient hypothyroidism that did not require treatment with thyroid hormone, and is currently euthyroid. An abnormal piriform sinus fistula was identified on the left using an esophagram. SUMMARY AST may be difficult to clinically differentiate from SAT. Fine needle aspiration revealing pus, culture yielding bacteria or fungi, abscess on ultrasonography and computed tomography, and left-sided predominance are important in the diagnosis of AST. CONCLUSIONS AST should be considered in any patient with SAT who does not rapidly improve following institution of steroids. Further, the presence of thyrotoxicosis does not eliminate AST as an initial diagnosis.

OPEN ACCESS TO DIABETES CENTER FROM THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT REDUCES HOSPITALIZATIONS IN THE SUSEQUENT YEAR

OBJECTIVE Patients who present to the emergency department (ED) for diabetes without hyperglycemic crisis are at risk of unnecessary hospitalizations and poor outcomes. To address this, the ED Diabetes Rapid-referral Program (EDRP) was designed to provide ED staff with direct booking into the diabetes center. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of the EDRP on hospitalization rate, ED utilization rate, glycemic control, and expenditures. METHODS We conducted a single-center analysis of the EDRP cohort (n = 420) and compared 1-year outcomes to historic controls (n = 791). We also compared EDRP patients who arrived (ARR) to those who did not show (NS). The primary outcome was hospitalization rate over 1 year. Secondary outcomes included ED recidivism rate, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and healthcare expenditures. RESULTS Compared with controls, the EDRP cohort was less likely to be hospitalized (27.1% vs. 41.5%, P<.001) or return to the ED (52.2% vs. 62.3%, P = .001) at the end of 1 year. Total hospitalizations were also lower in the EDRP (157 ± 19 vs. 267 ± 18 per 1,000 persons per year, P<.001). The EDRP cohort had a greater reduction in HbA1c (-2.66 vs. -2.01%, P<.001), which was more pronounced when ARR patients were compared with NS (-2.71% vs. -1.37%, P<.05). The mean per patient institutional healthcare expenditures were lower by

Approach to the patient with atypical diabetes.

5,461 compared with controls. CONCLUSION Eliminating barriers to scheduling diabetes-focused ambulatory care for ED patients was associated with significant reductions in hospitalization rate, ED recidivism rate, HbA1c, and healthcare expenditures in the subsequent year. ABBREVIATIONS ARR = arrived ED = emergency department EDRP = emergency department diabetes rapid-referral Program HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c NS = no show.