Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sara M. Falzarano is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sara M. Falzarano.


European Urology | 2014

A 17-gene Assay to Predict Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness in the Context of Gleason Grade Heterogeneity, Tumor Multifocality, and Biopsy Undersampling

Eric A. Klein; Matthew R. Cooperberg; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Jeffry Simko; Sara M. Falzarano; Tara Maddala; June M. Chan; Jianbo Li; Janet E. Cowan; Athanasios C. Tsiatis; Diana B. Cherbavaz; Robert J. Pelham; Imelda Tenggara-Hunter; Frederick L. Baehner; Dejan Knezevic; Phillip G. Febbo; Steven Shak; Michael W. Kattan; Mark Lee; Peter R. Carroll

BACKGROUND Prostate tumor heterogeneity and biopsy undersampling pose challenges to accurate, individualized risk assessment for men with localized disease. OBJECTIVE To identify and validate a biopsy-based gene expression signature that predicts clinical recurrence, prostate cancer (PCa) death, and adverse pathology. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Gene expression was quantified by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for three studies-a discovery prostatectomy study (n=441), a biopsy study (n=167), and a prospectively designed, independent clinical validation study (n=395)-testing retrospectively collected needle biopsies from contemporary (1997-2011) patients with low to intermediate clinical risk who were candidates for active surveillance (AS). OUTCOME MEASURES AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The main outcome measures defining aggressive PCa were clinical recurrence, PCa death, and adverse pathology at prostatectomy. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate the association between gene expression and time to event end points. Results from the prostatectomy and biopsy studies were used to develop and lock a multigene-expression-based signature, called the Genomic Prostate Score (GPS); in the validation study, logistic regression was used to test the association between the GPS and pathologic stage and grade at prostatectomy. Decision-curve analysis and risk profiles were used together with clinical and pathologic characteristics to evaluate clinical utility. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Of the 732 candidate genes analyzed, 288 (39%) were found to predict clinical recurrence despite heterogeneity and multifocality, and 198 (27%) were predictive of aggressive disease after adjustment for prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score, and clinical stage. Further analysis identified 17 genes representing multiple biological pathways that were combined into the GPS algorithm. In the validation study, GPS predicted high-grade (odds ratio [OR] per 20 GPS units: 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-3.7; p<0.001) and high-stage (OR per 20 GPS units: 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3-3.0; p=0.003) at surgical pathology. GPS predicted high-grade and/or high-stage disease after controlling for established clinical factors (p<0.005) such as an OR of 2.1 (95% CI, 1.4-3.2) when adjusting for Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score. A limitation of the validation study was the inclusion of men with low-volume intermediate-risk PCa (Gleason score 3+4), for whom some providers would not consider AS. CONCLUSIONS Genes representing multiple biological pathways discriminate PCa aggressiveness in biopsy tissue despite tumor heterogeneity, multifocality, and limited sampling at time of biopsy. The biopsy-based 17-gene GPS improves prediction of the presence or absence of adverse pathology and may help men with PCa make more informed decisions between AS and immediate treatment. PATIENT SUMMARY Prostate cancer (PCa) is often present in multiple locations within the prostate and has variable characteristics. We identified genes with expression associated with aggressive PCa to develop a biopsy-based, multigene signature, the Genomic Prostate Score (GPS). GPS was validated for its ability to predict men who have high-grade or high-stage PCa at diagnosis and may help men diagnosed with PCa decide between active surveillance and immediate definitive treatment.


BMC Genomics | 2013

Analytical validation of the Oncotype DX prostate cancer assay – a clinical RT-PCR assay optimized for prostate needle biopsies

Dejan Knezevic; Audrey Goddard; Nisha Natraj; Diana B. Cherbavaz; Kim M. Clark-Langone; Jay Snable; Drew Watson; Sara M. Falzarano; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Eric A. Klein; Christopher Quale

BackgroundThe Oncotype DX® Prostate Cancer Assay is a multi-gene RT-PCR expression assay that was developed for use with fixed paraffin-embedded (FPE) diagnostic prostate needle biopsies containing as little as 1 mm of prostate tumor in the greatest dimension. The assay measures expression of 12 cancer-related genes representing four biological pathways and 5 reference genes which are algorithmically combined to calculate the Genomic Prostate Score (GPS). This biopsy-based assay has been analytically and subsequently clinically validated as a predictor of aggressive prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to validate the analytical performance of the Oncotype DX Prostate Cancer Assay using predefined acceptance criteria.ResultsThe lowest quartile of RNA yields from prostate needle biopsies (six 5 μm sections) was between 19 and 34 ng. Analytical validation of the process requiring as little as 5 ng of RNA met all pre-defined acceptance criteria. Amplification efficiencies, analytical sensitivity, and accuracy of gene assays were measured by serially diluting an RNA sample and analyzing features of the linear regression between RNA expression measured by the crossing point (Cp) versus the log2 of the RNA input per PCR assay well. Gene assays were shown to accurately measure expression over a wide range of inputs (from as low as 0.005 ng to 320 ng). Analytical accuracy was excellent with average biases at qPCR inputs representative of patient samples <9.7% across all assays while amplification efficiencies were within ±6% of the median. Assessments of reproducibility and precision were performed by testing 10 prostate cancer RNA samples over multiple instruments, reagent lots, operators, days (precision), and RNA input levels (reproducibility) using appropriately parameterized linear mixed models. The standard deviations for analytical precision and reproducibility were 1.86 and 2.11 GPS units (100-unit scale) respectively.ConclusionsThe Oncotype DX Prostate Cancer Assay, a clinical RT-PCR assay specifically designed for use with prostate needle biopsies, has been analytically validated using very limited RNA inputs. The assay requirements and analytical performance will provide physicians with test results from a robust and reliable assay which will enable improved treatment decisions for men diagnosed with early-stage prostate cancer.


Virchows Archiv | 2011

ERG gene rearrangement status in prostate cancer detected by immunohistochemistry.

Sara M. Falzarano; Ming Zhou; Paula Carver; Toyonori Tsuzuki; Kelly Simmerman; Huiying He; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi

TMPRSS2–ERG, the most common gene fusion in prostate cancer, is associated with expression of a truncated protein product of the oncogene ERG. A novel anti-ERG monoclonal antibody has been recently characterized. We investigated the correlation between ERG rearrangement assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and ERG expression detected by immunohistochemistry in a large cohort of patients treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Thirteen tissue microarrays comprising 305 tumors and a subset of 112 samples of nonneoplastic prostatic tissue were assessed for ERG rearrangement status by FISH and for ERG expression by immunohistochemistry. Accuracy of ERG detection by immunohistochemistry in predicting ERG status as assessed by FISH (criterion standard) was calculated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values. Of 305 tumor foci, 103 (34%) showed ERG rearrangement by FISH. ERG was detected by immunohistochemistry in 100 (33%) cases, 99 of which were FISH positive. ERG detection by immunohistochemistry demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 96% and 99%, respectively, with positive and negative predictive values of 99% and 98%, respectively. None of the 112 samples of nonneoplastic prostatic tissue was rearranged by FISH or showed any ERG expression. In conclusion, ERG detection by immunohistochemistry in prostate cancer was highly predictive of ERG rearrangement as assessed by FISH in a large cohort of prostatectomy patients. Given the high yield and the easier task of performing immunohistochemistry vs. FISH, ERG assessment by immunohistochemistry may be useful for characterizing ERG status in prostate cancer.


The American Journal of Surgical Pathology | 2011

The utility of ERG/P63 double immunohistochemical staining in the diagnosis of limited cancer in prostate needle biopsies.

Oksana Yaskiv; Xiaochun Zhang; Kelly Simmerman; Tom Daly; Huiying He; Sara M. Falzarano; Longwen Chen; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Ming Zhou

Diagnosis of limited cancer can be challenging in prostate needle biopsies, and immunohistochemistry is commonly used in such settings. Recently, TMPRSS2:ERG gene rearrangement was found to be highly specific for and detected in approximately 50% of prostate cancer. Positive immunohistochemical staining with a novel anti-ERG antibody highly correlated with TMPRSS2:ERG gene rearrangement status. We developed a double immunohistochemical staining containing both erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogen (ERG) and basal cell marker P63 antibodies and evaluated its use in the diagnosis of limited cancer in prostate needle biopsies. A total of 77 prostate needle biopsies containing cancer occupying <1 mm of the length of only 1 core of the entire biopsy set were stained with the double stain containing ERG and P63 antibodies. ERG positivity and its staining intensity in cancerous and other noncancerous lesions were evaluated. ERG expression was detected in 42% (32 of 77) of cases, with strong, moderate, and weak staining intensity in 72%, 16%, and 12% of cases. The staining was uniform in 84% of cases and heterogeneous in 16% of cases with different staining intensities in >10% of cancerous cells. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia was present in 17 cases, and in 5 (29%) cases ERG was positive in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia glands, which were all immediately adjacent to or intermingled with ERG-positive cancerous glands. In 4 additional cases, positive ERG staining was found in morphologically benign glands, which were also immediately adjacent to or intermingled with ERG-positive cancerous glands. All other benign lesions distant from cancerous glands, including simple and partial atrophy, were negative for ERG. P63 was negative in all cancerous glands and positive in noncancerous lesions. The P63/ERG double immunostain combines the high sensitivity of P63 and the high specificity of ERG and may be potentially useful in the work-up of difficult prostate biopsies. The high specificity of ERG for the presence of cancer may have important implications for prostate biopsy interpretation and needs to be further validated in larger prospective studies.


Modern Pathology | 2010

ERG rearrangement is present in a subset of transition zone prostatic tumors

Sara M. Falzarano; Maria Navas; Kelly Simmerman; Eric A. Klein; Mark A. Rubin; Ming Zhou; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi

A majority of prostate cancers exhibit a recurrent gene rearrangement involving chromosome 21. In approximately 90% of cases, the rearrangement is characterized by fusion of the androgen-regulated gene TMPRSS2 with the oncogene ERG. A recent study suggested that TMPRSS2–ERG gene fusion is lacking in cancers arising from the transition zone of the prostate. A dominant transition zone cancer was detected in 62/397 (16%) patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at our institution and were reviewed and mapped by a single pathologist. In 46/62 specimens, a secondary tumor was identified in the peripheral zone of the prostate. A tissue microarray containing both transition and peripheral zone tumors was constructed and evaluated for gene fusion analysis. TMPRSS2–ERG fusion status was determined using a multicolor interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization assay for ERG break-apart. The median age of the patients was 59 years. Prostatectomy Gleason score was 6 in 21, 7 in 34, and ≥8 in 7 cases. Median tumor volume was 200 mm2. TMPRSS2–ERG gene fusion was present in 7/59 (12%) transition zone, and in 12/35 (34%) peripheral zone tumors. Transition zone fusion-positive cases were larger than their negative counterparts. No significant correlation was found between fusion status and Gleason score or pathologic stage. Gene fusion through deletion occurred in 4/7 transition zone and 7/12 peripheral zone tumors. Transition zone prostate cancers are considered biologically and genetically different from peripheral zone tumors. Although ERG rearrangement is more common in peripheral zone tumors, we have detected TMPRSS2–ERG fusion in a subset of transition zone cancers (12%). The lower frequency of gene fusion in transition zone prostate cancer may suggest distinct molecular alterations from peripheral zone tumors and the association with a high tumor volume may indicate a growth advantage for transition zone tumors harboring the gene fusion. Further studies are necessary to confirm this hypothesis.


The American Journal of Surgical Pathology | 2011

The diagnostic utility of novel immunohistochemical marker ERG in the workup of prostate biopsies with "atypical glands suspicious for cancer".

Huiying He; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Jianbo Li; Paula Carver; Sara M. Falzarano; Karen Smith; Mark A. Rubin; Ming Zhou

A diagnosis of “atypical glands suspicious for cancer” (ATYP) in prostate needle biopsy is associated with a 40% to 50% risk of finding prostate carcinoma (PCa) in subsequent biopsies. Many studies have attempted to identify clinical, histologic, or molecular characteristics of ATYP that correlated with the risk of PCa in follow-up biopsies. TMPRSS2:ERG gene rearrangement is the most common chromosomal alteration and is highly specific for PCa. Recently, 2 studies reported that positive immunohistochemical (IHC) stains with an ERG antibody highly correlated with the TMPRSS2:ERG gene rearrangement status. We evaluated the use of this antibody as an IHC marker on prostate biopsies with an initial ATYP diagnosis to determine whether positive ERG IHC was associated with increased PCa detection in subsequent biopsies, which therefore might be useful for stratifying ATYP prostate biopsies. ERG IHC was performed on 103 biopsies with initial ATYP diagnosis. Positive ERG IHC staining was detected in 16 of the 103 cases (15.5%) of the ATYP prostate biopsies. Of these 16 ERG-positive cases, the atypical glands were positive for ERG in 9 cases. In the remaining 7 cases, positive ERG staining was found in glands other than ATYP glands, including high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and morphologically benign glands. ERG IHC was negative in other benign prostate lesions, including simple atrophy, partial atrophy, proliferative inflammatory atrophy, basal cell hyperplasia, postatrophic hyperplasia, and squamous metaplasia. In subsequent follow-up biopsies, PCa was detected in 7 of the 16 (43.8%) ERG-positive cases and in 42 of the 87 (48.3%) ERG-negative cases (P=0.952 by &khgr;2 test). In biopsies with ERG-positive ATYP glands, cancer was found in 5 of 9 (55.6%) cases in subsequent biopsies. This is the first study to investigate the use of ERG IHC in difficult prostate biopsies. ERG IHC was positive in a small percentage (15.5%) of the ATYP prostate biopsies, and positive ERG staining did not correlate with the increased cancer detection in subsequent prostate biopsies. Therefore, ERG IHC is not useful for stratifying ATYP prostate biopsies to identify patients who have increased risk for PCa in repeat biopsies. Furthermore, positive ERG staining is not entirely specific for PCa and can occasionally be found in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and benign glands that are not associated with PCa in prostate biopsies.


Cancer Research | 2013

Dysregulation of cholesterol homeostasis in human prostate cancer through loss of ABCA1.

Byron H. Lee; Margaret G. Taylor; Peggy Robinet; Jonathan D. Smith; Jessica Schweitzer; Ephraim Sehayek; Sara M. Falzarano; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Eric A. Klein; Angela H. Ting

Recent epidemiologic data show that low serum cholesterol level as well as statin use is associated with a decreased risk of developing aggressive or advanced prostate cancer, suggesting a role for cholesterol in aggressive prostate cancer development. Intracellular cholesterol promotes prostate cancer progression as a substrate for de novo androgen synthesis and through regulation of AKT signaling. By conducting next-generation sequencing-based DNA methylome analysis, we have discovered marked hypermethylation at the promoter of the major cellular cholesterol efflux transporter, ABCA1, in LNCaP prostate cancer cells. ABCA1 promoter hypermethylation renders the promoter unresponsive to transactivation and leads to elevated cholesterol levels in LNCaP. ABCA1 promoter hypermethylation is enriched in intermediate- to high-grade prostate cancers and not detectable in benign prostate. Remarkably, ABCA1 downregulation is evident in all prostate cancers examined, and expression levels are inversely correlated with Gleason grade. Our results suggest that cancer-specific ABCA1 hypermethylation and loss of protein expression direct high intracellular cholesterol levels and hence contribute to an environment conducive to tumor progression.


American Journal of Clinical Pathology | 2012

ERG Protein Expression in Human Tumors Detected With a Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody

Oksana Yaskiv; Brian P. Rubin; Huiying He; Sara M. Falzarano; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Ming Zhou

Avian v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog (ERG) is highly sensitive and specific for endothelial neoplasms and specific for prostate carcinoma. We characterized a rabbit anti-ERG antibody as an immunohistochemical agent to detect ERG expression in various tumors using tissue microarrays with a wide array of epithelial and mesenchymal tumors. ERG was positive in 63 (38%) of 168 prostate carcinomas and negative in all other epithelial tumors. ERG was positive in all 125 vascular lesions. It was also positive in the sarcomatoid component of a high-grade urothelial carcinoma and 6 (40%) of 15 meningiomas. Twelve (80%) of 15 meningiomas were positive for Fli1, including all 6 ERG-positive cases. Positive immunostaining with this antibody is therefore highly specific for prostate carcinoma and vascular lesions, with a few caveats. ERG is rarely detected in nonvascular mesenchymal tumors with this antibody. Furthermore, about 40% of meningiomas are also positive for ERG immunohistochemically, probably because of cross-reactivity with Fli1.


The Prostate | 2012

Discrepancy in prostate cancer localization between biopsy and prostatectomy specimens in patients with unilateral positive biopsy: implications for focal therapy.

Michael Sinnott; Sara M. Falzarano; Adrian V. Hernandez; J. Stephen Jones; Eric A. Klein; Ming Zhou; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi

Unilateral ablative strategy success depends on reliable prediction of prostate cancer (PCA) location. We evaluated the discrepancy in PCA localization between unilateral positive biopsy (PBx) and radical prostatectomy (RP).


Modern Pathology | 2009

Microscopic bladder neck involvement by prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy specimens is not a significant independent prognostic factor

Ming Zhou; Alwyn M. Reuther; Howard S. Levin; Sara M. Falzarano; Emmanuel Kodjoe; Jonathan Myles; Eric A. Klein; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi

The independent prognostic importance of microscopic bladder neck involvement by prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy is questionable. We studied a cohort of 1845 patients to determine the significance of microscopic bladder neck involvement. Bladder neck involvement was defined as prostate cancer present within the coned bladder neck. We further categorized the cases as ‘true bladder neck involvement’ and ‘false bladder neck involvement.’ True bladder neck involvement required prostate cancer within thick smooth muscle bundles without intermixed benign prostatic glands. False bladder neck involvement was characterized by prostate cancer intermixed with benign prostatic glands. Bladder neck involvement was analyzed in relation to preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle involvement, positive surgical margin, lymph node involvement, radical prostatectomy Gleason score, and tumor volume. Of the 90 patients (4.9%) with microscopic bladder neck involvement, 63 were further classified as true bladder neck involvement and 27 as false bladder neck involvement. In univariate model, both types of bladder neck involvement (P<0.001), true (P<0.001), and false (P=0.040), were significantly associated with increased PSA-recurrence risk compared to bladder neck negative cases. In multivariate model the PSA-recurrence relative risk associated with bladder neck involvement (true or false) was not a significant independent prognostic factor. Extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle involvement, positive surgical margin, lymph node involvement, PSA, and Gleason score were significant independent predictors of PSA recurrence. The time to biochemical recurrence in patients with bladder neck involvement was similar to that of pT2 with positive surgical margin or pT3a with negative surgical margin patients (Kaplan–Meier curves). Bladder neck involvement was associated with other adverse pathologic features, but was not an independent predictor of PSA recurrence. In view of the previous and current data, the staging system for bladder neck involvement should be revised and patients may be best categorized as having pT3a disease.

Collaboration


Dive into the Sara M. Falzarano's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tara Maddala

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge