Sarah Buelens

Cytoreductive Prostatectomy for Metastatic Prostate Cancer: First Lessons Learned From the Multicentric Prospective Local Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer (LoMP) Trial

OBJECTIVE To prospectively evaluate patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer in the context of the LoMP trial (which investigates the role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy [cRP] in addition to standard of care [SoC]) and to provide a preliminary analysis of patients characteristics, safety of cRP, and early local symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS cRP was performed in asymptomatic patients with a resectable tumor and who were fit to undergo surgery (group A, n = 17). Only SoC was administered to patients with metastatic prostate cancer ineligible or unwilling to undergo cRP (group B, n = 29). At 3 months, surgical complications related to cRP and local symptoms for both groups were evaluated. RESULTS Median operation time, blood loss, and hospital stay for cRP were 215 minutes (150-290), 250 mL (100-900), and 4 days (2-7), respectively. Respectively 5 (29.4%) and 2 (11.8%) patients suffered grades 1 and 2 complications within 3 months postoperatively. When compared with Group B, patients in group A were younger (64 vs 72 years, P = .005), had lower initial prostate-specific antigen (15.9 vs 156 µg/L, P = .002), and less high-volume metastatic disease (5.9% vs 69%, P <.001). At 3 months, 5 (29.4%) patients in group A reported stress urinary incontinence without any further local symptoms. In group B, respectively 2 (6.8%), 11 (37.9%), and 2 (6.8%) patients suffered urge incontinence, obstructive voiding needing medical intervention, and ureteric obstruction. CONCLUSION In a group of well-selected patients, cRP is safe. These patients have more favorable characteristics compared with patients treated with only SoC. If only SoC can be offered, patients are at risk to suffer from local symptoms.

Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Exploring the Effect of TachoSil on Lymphocele Formation After Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer

OBJECTIVE To explore whether TachoSil, a hemostatic patch, can reduce the incidence of lymphocele formation. Development of a lymphocele is a frequent complication after pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) for nodal staging in prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS From 2013 to 2017, 100 patients with prostate cancer who were set to undergo a staging PLND before external beam radiotherapy (n = 50) or PLND concomitant with radical prostatectomy (RP) (n = 50) were prospectively randomized 1:1 between bilateral TachoSil placement or nonplacement. Primary end points were radiographic lymphocele development, lymphocele volume (1 week and 1 month postoperatively), and the duration and volume of postoperative catheter drainage. RESULTS Patient, tumor, and surgical characteristics of the TachoSil and the control groups did not differ significantly. In total, 65 patients (65%) experienced a radiographic lymphocele up to 3 months after surgery: 29 (58%) in the TachoSil group and 36 (72%) in the control group (P = .34). Significantly less radiographic lymphoceles were observed 1 week postoperatively for patients who underwent sole PLND and 1 month postoperatively for patients who underwent PLND with RP in the TachoSil group compared with the control group (16% vs 48%, P = .024, and 24% vs 52%, P = .047, respectively). The other postoperative characteristics presented no significant differences between the 2 groups, neither for patients undergoing sole PLND nor for patients undergoing PLND with RP. CONCLUSION Patients undergoing bilateral TachoSil placement after PLND seem less likely to develop a radiographic lymphocele early postoperatively. Nevertheless, the clinical relevance of the use of TachoSil remains highly debatable.

Prognostic and therapeutic implications of circulating androgen receptor gene copy number in prostate cancer patients using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction

&NA; Because resistance mechanisms in the androgen receptor (AR) pathway remain key drivers of progression, we assessed the AR gene copy number (CN) gain in a general population (n = 100) and its implications in prostate cancer. AR CN gain was found to be a promising biomarker anticipating faster progression to castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), a poor prognosis, and worse abiraterone and enzalutamide outcomes in CRPC. Background: Resistance mechanisms in the androgen receptor (AR) signaling pathway remain key drivers in the progression to castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and relapse under antihormonal therapy. Materials and Methods: We evaluated the circulating AR gene copy number (CN) gain using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction in 21 control and 91 prostate cancer serum samples and its prognostic and therapeutic implications in prostate cancer. Results: In CRPC, AR CN gain was associated with faster progression to CRPC (P = .026), a greater number of previous treatments (P = .045), and previous chemotherapy (P = .016). Comparing patients with and without CN gain, the median progression‐free survival (PFS) in the abiraterone subgroup was 1.7 months versus not reached (P = .004), and the median overall survival (OS) was 7 months versus 20.9 months (P = .020). In the enzalutamide subgroup, PFS was 1.7 versus 10.8 months (P = .006), and OS was 6.1 versus 16.5 months (P = .042). In the taxane subgroup, PFS was 3.2 versus 6.5 months (P = .093), and OS was 3.9 months versus not reached (P = .026). The presence of more AR copies correlated with shorter androgen deprivation (P = .002), abiraterone (P = .022), enzalutamide (P = .008), and taxane (P = .039) therapy. Conclusion: Circulating AR CN gain predicts for a poor prognosis in CRPC. It is a promising biomarker predetermining rapid CRPC progression and predicting worse abiraterone and enzalutamide outcomes. Furthermore, it is associated with multiple previous treatments and previous chemotherapy.