Sarah E. Ivy
Vanderbilt University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sarah E. Ivy.
Exceptional Children | 2014
Sarah E. Ivy; Deborah D. Hatton; Jonathan D. Hooper
Students with visual impairment (VI) were taught to request using the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) and tangible symbols. Participants were four males with additional disabilities, 5 to 11 years old, who had little to no functional vision. A functional relation between PECS Phase 1 and requesting was established using a multiple baseline single subject design. All students learned to request independently within 7 to 14 sessions in Phase 1. Students maintained requesting above criterion for 1 to 5 months. All students generalized requesting to a new communication partner (CP); however, only two students reached criterion during generalization sessions. Two students learned to seek out a CP 5 feet away to request; however, no functional relation was established for Phase 2. More research is needed to establish PECS as an evidence-based practice for children with VI.
International review of research in developmental disabilities | 2014
Sarah E. Ivy; Deborah D. Hatton
Abstract A search of the literature on prompting procedures to teach skill acquisition yielded 22 single-subject studies that included participants with little to no functional vision. Studies were published between 1984 and 2012 in 13 different journals. Quality indicators for single-subject research ( Horner et al., 2005 ) were applied to identify studies that met high quality standards. Findings from high-quality studies were aggregated to determine if prompting could be considered an evidence-based practice (EBP) for this population. Across the 12 studies meeting high quality standards, 8 different research groups taught 35 different behaviors to 27 participants. Behaviors included chained and discrete skills across domains of communication, motor skills, self-care, vocational/leisure, and community/living. System of least prompts was used most frequently with several procedural variations. Research supports the conclusion that prompting is an evidence-based practice to teach new skills to learners with blindness.A search of the literature on prompting procedures to teach skill acquisition yielded 22 single-subject studies that included participants with little to no functional vision. Studies were published between 1984 and 2012 in 13 different journals. Quality indicators for single-subject research (Horner et al., 2005) were applied to identify studies that met high quality standards. Findings from high-quality studies were aggregated to determine if prompting could be considered an evidence-based practice (EBP) for this population. Across the 12 studies meeting high quality standards, 8 different research groups taught 35 different behaviors to 27 participants. Behaviors included chained and discrete skills across domains of communication, motor skills, self-care, vocational/leisure, and community/living. System of least prompts was used most frequently with several procedural variations. Research supports the conclusion that prompting is an evidence-based practice to teach new skills to learners with blindness.
Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness | 2013
Deborah D. Hatton; Sarah E. Ivy; Charles Boyer
Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness | 2009
Ellen Trief; Susan M. Bruce; Paul W. Cascella; Sarah E. Ivy
International review of research in developmental disabilities | 2014
Amy T. Parker; Sarah E. Ivy
Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness | 2014
Jonathan D. Hooper; Sarah E. Ivy; Deborah D. Hatton
Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness | 2017
Sarah E. Ivy; Jennifer A. Guerra; Deborah D. Hatton
Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness | 2017
Jonathan M. Lima; Sarah E. Ivy
Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness | 2015
Sarah E. Ivy; Jonathan D. Hooper
Archive | 2014
Sarah E. Ivy; Deborah D. Hatton