Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sarah Edkins is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sarah Edkins.


Nature | 2002

Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer

Helen Davies; Graham R. Bignell; Charles Cox; Philip Stephens; Sarah Edkins; S. M. Clegg; Jon Teague; Hayley Woffendin; Mathew J. Garnett; William Bottomley; Neil Davis; Ed Dicks; Rebecca Ewing; Yvonne Floyd; Kristian Gray; Sarah Hall; Rachel Hawes; Jaime Hughes; Vivian Kosmidou; Andrew Menzies; Catherine Mould; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Stephen Watt; Steven Hooper; Rebecca Wilson; Hiran Jayatilake; Barry A. Gusterson; Colin S. Cooper; Janet Shipley

Cancers arise owing to the accumulation of mutations in critical genes that alter normal programmes of cell proliferation, differentiation and death. As the first stage of a systematic genome-wide screen for these genes, we have prioritized for analysis signalling pathways in which at least one gene is mutated in human cancer. The RAS–RAF–MEK–ERK–MAP kinase pathway mediates cellular responses to growth signals. RAS is mutated to an oncogenic form in about 15% of human cancer. The three RAF genes code for cytoplasmic serine/threonine kinases that are regulated by binding RAS. Here we report BRAF somatic missense mutations in 66% of malignant melanomas and at lower frequency in a wide range of human cancers. All mutations are within the kinase domain, with a single substitution (V599E) accounting for 80%. Mutated BRAF proteins have elevated kinase activity and are transforming in NIH3T3 cells. Furthermore, RAS function is not required for the growth of cancer cell lines with the V599E mutation. As BRAF is a serine/threonine kinase that is commonly activated by somatic point mutation in human cancer, it may provide new therapeutic opportunities in malignant melanoma.


Nature | 2007

Patterns of somatic mutation in human cancer genomes

Christopher Greenman; Philip Stephens; Raffaella Smith; Gillian L. Dalgliesh; Chris Hunter; Graham R. Bignell; Helen Davies; Jon Teague; Adam Butler; Claire Stevens; Sarah Edkins; Sarah O’Meara; Imre Vastrik; Esther Schmidt; Tim Avis; Syd Barthorpe; Gurpreet Bhamra; Gemma Buck; Bhudipa Choudhury; Jody Clements; Jennifer Cole; Ed Dicks; Simon A. Forbes; Kris Gray; Kelly Halliday; Rachel Harrison; Katy Hills; Jon Hinton; Andy Jenkinson; David Jones

Cancers arise owing to mutations in a subset of genes that confer growth advantage. The availability of the human genome sequence led us to propose that systematic resequencing of cancer genomes for mutations would lead to the discovery of many additional cancer genes. Here we report more than 1,000 somatic mutations found in 274 megabases (Mb) of DNA corresponding to the coding exons of 518 protein kinase genes in 210 diverse human cancers. There was substantial variation in the number and pattern of mutations in individual cancers reflecting different exposures, DNA repair defects and cellular origins. Most somatic mutations are likely to be ‘passengers’ that do not contribute to oncogenesis. However, there was evidence for ‘driver’ mutations contributing to the development of the cancers studied in approximately 120 genes. Systematic sequencing of cancer genomes therefore reveals the evolutionary diversity of cancers and implicates a larger repertoire of cancer genes than previously anticipated.


Nature | 2010

A comprehensive catalogue of somatic mutations from a human cancer genome

Erin Pleasance; R. Keira Cheetham; Philip Stephens; David J. McBride; Sean Humphray; Christopher Greenman; Ignacio Varela; Meng-Lay Lin; Gonzalo R. Ordóñez; Graham R. Bignell; Kai Ye; Julie A Alipaz; Markus J. Bauer; David Beare; Adam Butler; Richard J. Carter; Lina Chen; Anthony J. Cox; Sarah Edkins; Paula Kokko-Gonzales; Niall Anthony Gormley; Russell Grocock; Christian D. Haudenschild; Matthew M. Hims; Terena James; Mingming Jia; Zoya Kingsbury; Catherine Leroy; John Marshall; Andrew Menzies

All cancers carry somatic mutations. A subset of these somatic alterations, termed driver mutations, confer selective growth advantage and are implicated in cancer development, whereas the remainder are passengers. Here we have sequenced the genomes of a malignant melanoma and a lymphoblastoid cell line from the same person, providing the first comprehensive catalogue of somatic mutations from an individual cancer. The catalogue provides remarkable insights into the forces that have shaped this cancer genome. The dominant mutational signature reflects DNA damage due to ultraviolet light exposure, a known risk factor for malignant melanoma, whereas the uneven distribution of mutations across the genome, with a lower prevalence in gene footprints, indicates that DNA repair has been preferentially deployed towards transcribed regions. The results illustrate the power of a cancer genome sequence to reveal traces of the DNA damage, repair, mutation and selection processes that were operative years before the cancer became symptomatic.


Nature | 2010

A small-cell lung cancer genome with complex signatures of tobacco exposure

Erin Pleasance; Philip Stephens; Sarah O’Meara; David J. McBride; Alison Meynert; David Jones; Meng-Lay Lin; David Beare; King Wai Lau; Christopher Greenman; Ignacio Varela; Serena Nik-Zainal; Helen Davies; Gonzalo R. Ordóñez; Laura Mudie; Calli Latimer; Sarah Edkins; Lucy Stebbings; Lina Chen; Mingming Jia; Catherine Leroy; John Marshall; Andrew Menzies; Adam Butler; Jon Teague; Jonathon Mangion; Yongming A. Sun; Stephen F. McLaughlin; Heather E. Peckham; Eric F. Tsung

Cancer is driven by mutation. Worldwide, tobacco smoking is the principal lifestyle exposure that causes cancer, exerting carcinogenicity through >60 chemicals that bind and mutate DNA. Using massively parallel sequencing technology, we sequenced a small-cell lung cancer cell line, NCI-H209, to explore the mutational burden associated with tobacco smoking. A total of 22,910 somatic substitutions were identified, including 134 in coding exons. Multiple mutation signatures testify to the cocktail of carcinogens in tobacco smoke and their proclivities for particular bases and surrounding sequence context. Effects of transcription-coupled repair and a second, more general, expression-linked repair pathway were evident. We identified a tandem duplication that duplicates exons 3–8 of CHD7 in frame, and another two lines carrying PVT1–CHD7 fusion genes, indicating that CHD7 may be recurrently rearranged in this disease. These findings illustrate the potential for next-generation sequencing to provide unprecedented insights into mutational processes, cellular repair pathways and gene networks associated with cancer.SUMMARY Cancer is driven by mutation. Worldwide, tobacco smoking is the major lifestyle exposure that causes cancer, exerting carcinogenicity through >60 chemicals that bind and mutate DNA. Using massively parallel sequencing technology, we sequenced a small cell lung cancer cell line, NCI-H209, to explore the mutational burden associated with tobacco smoking. 22,910 somatic substitutions were identified, including 132 in coding exons. Multiple mutation signatures testify to the cocktail of carcinogens in tobacco smoke and their proclivities for particular bases and surrounding sequence context. Effects of transcription-coupled repair and a second, more general expression-linked repair pathway were evident. We identified a tandem duplication that duplicates exons 3-8 of CHD7 in-frame, and another two lines carrying PVT1-CHD7 fusion genes, suggesting that CHD7 may be recurrently rearranged in this disease. These findings illustrate the potential for next-generation sequencing to provide unprecedented insights into mutational processes, cellular repair pathways and gene networks associated with cancer.


Nature | 2010

Systematic sequencing of renal carcinoma reveals inactivation of histone modifying genes

Gillian L. Dalgliesh; Kyle A. Furge; Christopher Greenman; Lina Chen; Graham R. Bignell; Adam Butler; Helen Davies; Sarah Edkins; Claire Hardy; Calli Latimer; Jon Teague; Jenny Andrews; Syd Barthorpe; Dave Beare; Gemma Buck; Peter J. Campbell; Simon A. Forbes; Mingming Jia; David Jones; Henry Knott; Chai Yin Kok; King Wai Lau; Catherine Leroy; Meng-Lay Lin; David J. McBride; Mark Maddison; Simon Maguire; Kirsten McLay; Andrew Menzies; Tatiana Mironenko

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common form of adult kidney cancer, characterized by the presence of inactivating mutations in the VHL gene in most cases, and by infrequent somatic mutations in known cancer genes. To determine further the genetics of ccRCC, we have sequenced 101 cases through 3,544 protein-coding genes. Here we report the identification of inactivating mutations in two genes encoding enzymes involved in histone modification—SETD2, a histone H3 lysine 36 methyltransferase, and JARID1C (also known as KDM5C), a histone H3 lysine 4 demethylase—as well as mutations in the histone H3 lysine 27 demethylase, UTX (KMD6A), that we recently reported. The results highlight the role of mutations in components of the chromatin modification machinery in human cancer. Furthermore, NF2 mutations were found in non-VHL mutated ccRCC, and several other probable cancer genes were identified. These results indicate that substantial genetic heterogeneity exists in a cancer type dominated by mutations in a single gene, and that systematic screens will be key to fully determining the somatic genetic architecture of cancer.


Nature Genetics | 2008

Identification of somatically acquired rearrangements in cancer using genome-wide massively parallel paired-end sequencing

Peter J. Campbell; Philip Stephens; Erin Pleasance; Sarah O'Meara; Heng Li; Thomas Santarius; Lucy Stebbings; Catherine Leroy; Sarah Edkins; Claire Hardy; Jon Teague; Andrew Menzies; Ian Goodhead; Daniel J. Turner; C. M. Clee; Michael A. Quail; Antony Cox; Clive Gavin Brown; Richard Durbin; Paul A.W. Edwards; Graham R. Bignell; Michael R. Stratton; P. Andrew Futreal

Human cancers often carry many somatically acquired genomic rearrangements, some of which may be implicated in cancer development. However, conventional strategies for characterizing rearrangements are laborious and low-throughput and have low sensitivity or poor resolution. We used massively parallel sequencing to generate sequence reads from both ends of short DNA fragments derived from the genomes of two individuals with lung cancer. By investigating read pairs that did not align correctly with respect to each other on the reference human genome, we characterized 306 germline structural variants and 103 somatic rearrangements to the base-pair level of resolution. The patterns of germline and somatic rearrangement were markedly different. Many somatic rearrangements were from amplicons, although rearrangements outside these regions, notably including tandem duplications, were also observed. Some somatic rearrangements led to abnormal transcripts, including two from internal tandem duplications and two fusion transcripts created by interchromosomal rearrangements. Germline variants were predominantly mediated by retrotransposition, often involving AluY and LINE elements. The results demonstrate the feasibility of systematic, genome-wide characterization of rearrangements in complex human cancer genomes, raising the prospect of a new harvest of genes associated with cancer using this strategy.


Nature | 2009

Complex landscapes of somatic rearrangement in human breast cancer genomes.

Philip Stephens; David J. McBride; Meng-Lay Lin; Ignacio Varela; Erin Pleasance; Jared T. Simpson; Lucy Stebbings; Catherine Leroy; Sarah Edkins; Laura Mudie; Christopher Greenman; Mingming Jia; Calli Latimer; Jon Teague; King Wai Lau; John Burton; Michael A. Quail; Harold Swerdlow; Carol Churcher; Rachael Natrajan; Anieta M. Sieuwerts; John W.M. Martens; Daniel P. Silver; Anita Langerød; Hege G. Russnes; John A. Foekens; Jorge S. Reis-Filho; Laura J. van 't Veer; Andrea L. Richardson; Anne Lise Børresen-Dale

Multiple somatic rearrangements are often found in cancer genomes; however, the underlying processes of rearrangement and their contribution to cancer development are poorly characterized. Here we use a paired-end sequencing strategy to identify somatic rearrangements in breast cancer genomes. There are more rearrangements in some breast cancers than previously appreciated. Rearrangements are more frequent over gene footprints and most are intrachromosomal. Multiple rearrangement architectures are present, but tandem duplications are particularly common in some cancers, perhaps reflecting a specific defect in DNA maintenance. Short overlapping sequences at most rearrangement junctions indicate that these have been mediated by non-homologous end-joining DNA repair, although varying sequence patterns indicate that multiple processes of this type are operative. Several expressed in-frame fusion genes were identified but none was recurrent. The study provides a new perspective on cancer genomes, highlighting the diversity of somatic rearrangements and their potential contribution to cancer development.


Nature Genetics | 2010

A genome-wide association study identifies new psoriasis susceptibility loci and an interaction between HLA-C and ERAP1

Amy Strange; Francesca Capon; Chris C. A. Spencer; Jo Knight; Michael E. Weale; Michael H. Allen; Anne Barton; Céline Bellenguez; Judith G.M. Bergboer; Jenefer M. Blackwell; Elvira Bramon; Suzannah Bumpstead; Juan P. Casas; Michael J. Cork; Aiden Corvin; Panos Deloukas; Alexander Dilthey; Audrey Duncanson; Sarah Edkins; Xavier Estivill; Oliver FitzGerald; Colin Freeman; Emiliano Giardina; Emma Gray; Angelika Hofer; Ulrike Hüffmeier; Sarah Hunt; Alan D. Irvine; Janusz Jankowski; Brian J. Kirby

To identify new susceptibility loci for psoriasis, we undertook a genome-wide association study of 594,224 SNPs in 2,622 individuals with psoriasis and 5,667 controls. We identified associations at eight previously unreported genomic loci. Seven loci harbored genes with recognized immune functions (IL28RA, REL, IFIH1, ERAP1, TRAF3IP2, NFKBIA and TYK2). These associations were replicated in 9,079 European samples (six loci with a combined P < 5 × 10−8 and two loci with a combined P < 5 × 10−7). We also report compelling evidence for an interaction between the HLA-C and ERAP1 loci (combined P = 6.95 × 10−6). ERAP1 plays an important role in MHC class I peptide processing. ERAP1 variants only influenced psoriasis susceptibility in individuals carrying the HLA-C risk allele. Our findings implicate pathways that integrate epidermal barrier dysfunction with innate and adaptive immune dysregulation in psoriasis pathogenesis.


Nature Genetics | 2009

Somatic mutations of the histone H3K27 demethylase gene UTX in human cancer

Gijs van Haaften; Gillian L. Dalgliesh; Helen Davies; Lina Chen; Graham R. Bignell; Christopher Greenman; Sarah Edkins; Claire Hardy; Sarah O'Meara; Jon Teague; Adam Butler; Jonathan Hinton; Calli Latimer; Jenny Andrews; Syd Barthorpe; Dave Beare; Gemma Buck; Peter J. Campbell; Jennifer Cole; Simon A. Forbes; Mingming Jia; David Jones; Chai Yin Kok; Catherine Leroy; Meng-Lay Lin; David J. McBride; Mark Maddison; Simon Maquire; Kirsten McLay; Andrew Menzies

Somatically acquired epigenetic changes are present in many cancers. Epigenetic regulation is maintained via post-translational modifications of core histones. Here, we describe inactivating somatic mutations in the histone lysine demethylase gene UTX, pointing to histone H3 lysine methylation deregulation in multiple tumor types. UTX reintroduction into cancer cells with inactivating UTX mutations resulted in slowing of proliferation and marked transcriptional changes. These data identify UTX as a new human cancer gene.


Nature | 2010

Signatures of mutation and selection in the cancer genome

Graham R. Bignell; Christopher Greenman; Helen Davies; Adam Butler; Sarah Edkins; Jenny Andrews; Gemma Buck; Lina Chen; David Beare; Calli Latimer; Sara Widaa; Jonathon Hinton; Ciara Fahey; Beiyuan Fu; Sajani Swamy; Gillian L. Dalgliesh; Bin Tean Teh; Panos Deloukas; Fengtang Yang; Peter J. Campbell; P. Andrew Futreal; Michael R. Stratton

The cancer genome is moulded by the dual processes of somatic mutation and selection. Homozygous deletions in cancer genomes occur over recessive cancer genes, where they can confer selective growth advantage, and over fragile sites, where they are thought to reflect an increased local rate of DNA breakage. However, most homozygous deletions in cancer genomes are unexplained. Here we identified 2,428 somatic homozygous deletions in 746 cancer cell lines. These overlie 11% of protein-coding genes that, therefore, are not mandatory for survival of human cells. We derived structural signatures that distinguish between homozygous deletions over recessive cancer genes and fragile sites. Application to clusters of unexplained homozygous deletions suggests that many are in regions of inherent fragility, whereas a small subset overlies recessive cancer genes. The results illustrate how structural signatures can be used to distinguish between the influences of mutation and selection in cancer genomes. The extensive copy number, genotyping, sequence and expression data available for this large series of publicly available cancer cell lines renders them informative reagents for future studies of cancer biology and drug discovery.

Collaboration


Dive into the Sarah Edkins's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Adam Butler

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Graham R. Bignell

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael R. Stratton

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Patrick Tarpey

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Claire Stevens

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jon Teague

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Helen Davies

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

P. Andrew Futreal

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge