Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sarah R. Fritts is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sarah R. Fritts.


Ecological Applications | 2016

Do biomass harvesting guidelines influence herpetofauna following harvests of logging residues for renewable energy

Sarah R. Fritts; Christopher E. Moorman; Steven M. Grodsky; Dennis W. Hazel; Jessica A. Homyack; Chris Farrell; Steven B. Castleberry

Forests are a major supplier of renewable energy; however, gleaning logging residues for use as woody biomass feedstock could negatively alter habitat for species dependent on downed wood. Biomass Harvesting Guidelines (BHGs) recommend retaining a portion of woody biomass on the forest floor following harvest. Despite BHGs being developed to help ensure ecological sustainability, their contribution to biodiversity has not been evaluated experimentally at operational scales. We compared herpetofauanal evenness, diversity, and richness and abundance of Anaxyrus terrestris and Gastrophryne carolinensis among six treatments that varied in volume and spatial arrangement of woody biomass retained after clearcutting loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantations in North Carolina, USA (n = 4), 2011-2014 and Georgia (n = 4), USA 2011-2013. Treatments were: (1) biomass harvest with no BHGs, (2) 15% retention with biomass clustered, (3) 15% retention with biomass dispersed, (4) 30% retention with biomass clustered, (5) 30% retention with biomass dispersed, and (6) no biomass harvest. We captured individuals with drift fence arrays and compared evenness, diversity, and richness metrics among treatments with repeated-measure, linear mixed-effects models. We determined predictors of A. terrestris and G. carolinensis abundances using a priori candidate N-mixture models with woody biomass volume, vegetation structure, and groundcover composition as covariates. We had 206 captures of 25 reptile species and 8710 captures of 17 amphibian species during 53690 trap nights. Herpetofauna diversity, evenness, and richness were similar among treatments. A. terrestris abundance was negatively related to volume of retained woody biomass in treatment units in North Carolina in 2013. G. carolinensis abundance was positively related with volume of retained woody debris in treatment units in Georgia in 2012. Other relationships between A. terrestris and G. carolinensis abundances and habitat metrics were weak or absent. The lack of consistent community or population responses suggests the addition of a woody biomass harvest to a clearcut in pine plantations does not impact herpetofauna use of Coastal Plain loblolly plantations in the southeastern United States. We recommend additional research to examine relationships between woody biomass harvesting and rarer species or amphibians with high desiccation risk, particularly in other regions and harvesting systems.


PLOS ONE | 2016

Breeding, Early-Successional Bird Response to Forest Harvests for Bioenergy.

Steven M. Grodsky; Christopher E. Moorman; Sarah R. Fritts; Steven B. Castleberry; T. Bently Wigley; Bi-Song Yue

Forest regeneration following timber harvest is a principal source of habitat for early-successional birds and characterized by influxes of early-successional vegetation and residual downed woody material. Early-successional birds may use harvest residues for communication, cover, foraging, and nesting. Yet, increased market viability of woody biomass as bioenergy feedstock may intensify harvest residue removal. Our objectives were to: 1) evaluate effects of varying intensities of woody biomass harvest on the early-successional bird community; and (2) document early-successional bird use of harvest residues in regenerating stands. We spot-mapped birds from 15 April– 15 July, 2012–2014, in six woody biomass removal treatments within regenerating stands in North Carolina (n = 4) and Georgia (n = 4), USA. Treatments included clearcut harvest followed by: (1) traditional woody biomass harvest with no specific retention target; (2) 15% retention with harvest residues dispersed; (3) 15% retention with harvest residues clustered; (4) 30% retention with harvest residues dispersed; (5) 30% retention with harvest residues clustered; and (6) no woody biomass harvest (i.e., reference site). We tested for treatment-level effects on breeding bird species diversity and richness, early-successional focal species territory density (combined and individual species), counts of breeding birds detected near, in, or on branches of harvest piles/windrows, counts of breeding bird behaviors, and vegetation composition and structure. Pooled across three breeding seasons, we delineated 536 and 654 territories and detected 2,489 and 4,204 birds in the North Carolina and Georgia treatments, respectively. Woody biomass harvest had limited or short-lived effects on the early-successional, breeding bird community. The successional trajectory of vegetation structure, rather than availability of harvest residues, primarily drove avian use of regenerating stands. However, many breeding bird species used downed wood in addition to vegetation, indicating that harvest residues initially may provide food and cover resources for early-successional birds in regenerating stands prior to vegetation regrowth.


Wildlife Biology | 2015

Do silvicultural practices to restore oaks affect salamanders in the short term

Amy L. Raybuck; Christopher E. Moorman; Sarah R. Fritts; Cathryn H. Greenberg; Christopher S. DePerno; Dean M. Simon; Gordon S. Warburton

Salamanders are an important ecological component of eastern hardwood forests and may be affected by natural or silvicultural disturbances that alter habitat structure and associated microclimate. From May to August in 2008 (pretreatment) and 2011 (post-treatment), we evaluated the response of salamanders to three silvicultural practices designed to promote oak regeneration — prescribed fire, midstory herbicide application and shelterwood harvest — and a control. We trapped salamanders using drift fences with pitfall traps in five replicates of the four treatments. Only the southern gray-cheeked salamander Plethodon metcalfi and the southern Appalachian salamander P. teyahalee were captured in sufficient numbers for robust statistical analysis. We analyzed data for these species using single-species dynamic occupancy models in statistical software program R. We allowed changes in four covariates to influence extinction probability from pre- to post-treatment implementation: 1) percent leaf litter cover; 2) percent understory cover; 3) percent CWD cover; and 4) percent canopy cover. The final combined model set describing extinction probability contained four models with &Dgr;AIC < 2 for P. metcalfi and nine models with &Dgr;AIC < 2, including the null model, for P. teyahalee. For both species, the 95% confidence intervals for model-averaged extinction probability parameter estimates overlapped zero, suggesting none were significant predictors of extinction probability. Absence of short-term salamander response in midstory herbicide and prescribed burn treatments was likely because of minor or transitory changes to forest structure. In shelterwood harvests, any potential effects of reduced canopy and leaf litter cover may have been mitigated by rapid post-treatment vegetation sprouting. Additionally, climatic conditions associated with high elevation sites and high amounts of rainfall in 2011 may have compensated for potential changes to microclimate. Continued monitoring of Plethodon salamanders to assess responses at longer time scales (e.g. > 3 years post-treatment) is warranted.


Ecology and Evolution | 2018

Interactive effects of severe drought and grazing on the life history cycle of a bioindicator species

Sarah R. Fritts; Blake A. Grisham; Robert D. Cox; Clint W. Boal; David A. Haukos; Patricia McDaniel; Christian A. Hagen; Daniel U. Greene

Abstract We used the lesser prairie‐chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus), an iconic grouse species that exhibits a boom–bust life history strategy, on the Southern High Plains, USA, as a bioindicator of main and interactive effects of severe drought and grazing. This region experienced the worst drought on record in 2011. We surveyed lesser prairie‐chicken leks (i.e., communal breeding grounds) across 12 years that represented 7 years before the 2011 drought (predrought) and 4 years during and following the 2011 drought (postdrought). Grazing was annually managed with the objective of achieving ≤50% utilization of aboveground vegetation biomass. We used lek (n = 49) count data and covariates of weather and managed grazing to: (a) estimate long‐term lesser prairie‐chicken abundance and compare abundance predrought and postdrought; (b) examine the influence of annual and seasonal drought (modified Palmer drought index), temperature, and precipitation on long‐term lesser prairie‐chicken survival and recruitment; and (c) assess and compare the influence of grazing on lesser prairie‐chicken population predrought and postdrought. Lesser prairie‐chicken abundance was nearly seven times greater predrought than postdrought, and population declines were attributed to decreased survival and recruitment. The number of days with temperature >90th percentile had the greatest effect, particularly on recruitment. The population exhibited a substantial bust during 2011 and 2012 without a boom to recover in four postdrought years. Adaptive grazing positively influenced the population predrought, but had no effects postdrought. Results suggest that the severe drought in 2011 may have been beyond the range of environmental conditions to which lesser prairie‐chickens, and likely other species, have adapted. Land management practices, such as grazing, should remain adaptive to ensure potential negative influences to all species are avoided. Increasing habitat quantity and quality by reducing habitat loss and fragmentation likely will increase resiliency of the ecosystem and individual species.


Biomass & Bioenergy | 2014

Biomass Harvesting Guidelines affect downed woody debris retention

Sarah R. Fritts; Christopher E. Moorman; Dennis W. Hazel; Ben D. Jackson


Forest Ecology and Management | 2015

Shrew response to variable woody debris retention: Implications for sustainable forest bioenergy

Sarah R. Fritts; Christopher E. Moorman; Steven M. Grodsky; Dennis W. Hazel; Jessica A. Homyack; Christopher B. Farrell; Steven B. Castleberry


Forest Ecology and Management | 2016

Winter bird use of harvest residues in clearcuts and the implications of forest bioenergy harvest in the southeastern United States

Steven M. Grodsky; Christopher E. Moorman; Sarah R. Fritts; Dennis W. Hazel; Jessica A. Homyack; Steven B. Castleberry; T. Bently Wigley


Forest Ecology and Management | 2015

Quantifying multi-scale habitat use of woody biomass by southern toads

Sarah R. Fritts; Steven M. Grodsky; Dennis W. Hazel; Jessica A. Homyack; Steven B. Castleberry; Christopher E. Moorman


Ecological Applications | 2018

Invertebrate community response to coarse woody debris removal for bioenergy production from intensively managed forests

Steven M. Grodsky; Christopher E. Moorman; Sarah R. Fritts; Joshua W. Campbell; Clyde E. Sorenson; Matthew A. Bertone; Steven B. Castleberry; T. Bently Wigley


Forest Ecology and Management | 2018

Variable responses of non-native and native ants to coarse woody debris removal following forest bioenergy harvests

Steven M. Grodsky; Joshua W. Campbell; Sarah R. Fritts; T. Bently Wigley; Christopher E. Moorman

Collaboration


Dive into the Sarah R. Fritts's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christopher E. Moorman

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Steven M. Grodsky

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dennis W. Hazel

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christopher B. Farrell

Texas Parks and Wildlife Department

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amy L. Raybuck

Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge