Sarah Sheikh

Peginterferon beta-1a in multiple sclerosis: 2-year results from ADVANCE

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous peginterferon beta-1a over 2 years in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis in the ADVANCE study. Methods: Patients were randomized to placebo or 125 µg peginterferon beta-1a every 2 or 4 weeks. For Year 2 (Y2), patients originally randomized to placebo were re-randomized to peginterferon beta-1a every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks. Patients randomized to peginterferon beta-1a in Year 1 (Y1) remained on the same dosing regimen in Y2. Results: Compared with Y1, annualized relapse rate (ARR) was further reduced in Y2 with every 2 week dosing (Y1: 0.230 [95% CI 0.183–0.291], Y2: 0.178 [0.136–0.233]) and maintained with every 4 week dosing (Y1: 0.286 [0.231–0.355], Y2: 0.291 [0.231–0.368]). Patients starting peginterferon beta-1a from Y1 displayed improved efficacy versus patients initially assigned placebo, with reductions in ARR (every 2 weeks: 37%, p<0.0001; every 4 weeks: 17%, p=0.0906), risk of relapse (every 2 weeks: 39%, p<0.0001; every 4 weeks: 19%, p=0.0465), 12-week disability progression (every 2 weeks: 33%, p=0.0257; every 4 weeks: 25%, p=0.0960), and 24-week disability progression (every 2 weeks: 41%, p=0.0137; every 4 weeks: 9%, p=0.6243). Over 2 years, greater reductions were observed with every 2 week versus every 4 week dosing for all endpoints and peginterferon beta-1a was well tolerated. Conclusions: Peginterferon beta-1a efficacy is maintained beyond 1 year, with greater effects observed with every 2 week versus every 4 week dosing, and a similar safety profile to Y1. Clinicaltrials.gov Registration Number: NCT00906399.

Quality of life outcomes with BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate) in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: The DEFINE study:

Background: Oral BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate), approved for the treatment of the relapsing forms of MS, has demonstrated clinical efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in the Phase III “Determination of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Fumarate in Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)” (DEFINE) and “Comparator and an Oral Fumarate in RRMS” (CONFIRM) studies. Objectives: To evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impairment that is associated with RRMS and to assess the effects of BG-12 on HRQoL in the DEFINE study. Methods: Patients with RRMS were randomized to BG-12 240 mg twice (BID) or three times (TID) daily, or placebo, for 2 years. HRQoL was assessed by the Short Form-36 (SF-36), global assessment of well-being visual analog scale and the EuroQol-5D. Results: In the 1237 patients from DEFINE, HRQoL impairment was greatest in patients who had higher disability scores and in those who had experienced relapse. Change in SF-36 physical component summary scores during 2 years’ treatment significantly favored BG-12 over placebo (both doses: p < 0.001). We saw similar benefits in other measures of functioning and general well-being as early as Week 24. These benefits were maintained during the study. Conclusions: Our results add to evidence for a negative impact of RRMS on HRQoL and they demonstrate the benefits of BG-12 on HRQoL measures, which coupled with significant clinical efficacy, further support its use as a new treatment for RRMS.

Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Delayed-Release Dimethyl Fumarate Administered With and Without Aspirin in Healthy Volunteers

BACKGROUND Delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DR-DMF) has cytoprotective and antiinflammatory properties and has recently been approved in the United States as an oral treatment for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. The most common adverse events associated with DR-DMF are flushing and gastrointestinal (GI) events, the incidences of which diminish over time. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tolerability and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of DR-DMF with or without concomitant acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin), a cyclooxygenase inhibitor. METHODS Healthy volunteers (N = 56) were randomized to receive different dosing regimens of DR-DMF or matching placebo with or without pretreatment with 325 mg aspirin for 4 days. Plasma levels of the active metabolite monomethyl fumarate were assessed on days 1 and 4. Flushing and GI events were assessed using patient-reported scales. Potential flushing mediators were explored. RESULTS DR-DMF showed a safety, tolerability, and PK profile consistent with previous clinical experience, with no evidence of accumulation. Pretreatment with aspirin had no effect on the primary PK parameters, AUC0-10h, or Cmax. Flushing severity, assessed by 2 subject-reported rating scales, was generally mild and was rated highest at the start of treatment. Pretreatment with aspirin reduced flushing incidence and intensity without affecting GI events or the PK profile of DR-DMF. In some DR-DMF-treated individuals, plasma concentrations of a prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) metabolite were increased. CONCLUSIONS In healthy volunteers, DR-DMF was well tolerated over 4 days of dosing, with a PK profile consistent with that previously reported and no evidence of accumulation. Aspirin pretreatment reduced the incidence and intensity of flushing without affecting GI events or the DR-DMF PK profile. Elevated levels of PGD2 in some DR-DMF-treated individuals suggest that flushing may be, at least in part, prostaglandin mediated. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ID: NCT01281111.

Efficacy of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: integrated analysis of the phase 3 trials

Obtain a more precise estimate of the efficacy of delayed‐release dimethyl fumarate (DMF; also known as gastro‐resistant DMF) in relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) and examine the consistency of DMFs effects across patient subgroups stratified by baseline demographic and disease characteristics.

Effects of BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate) on health-related quality of life in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: findings from the CONFIRM study

Multiple sclerosis (MS) has a significant impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with symptoms adversely affecting many aspects of everyday living. BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate) demonstrated significant efficacy in the phase III studies DEFINE and CONFIRM in patients with relapsing–remitting MS. In CONFIRM, HRQoL was worse in patients with greater disability at baseline, and who relapsed during the study, and improved with BG-12 treatment. Mean Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary scores for BG-12 increased over 2 years and scores for placebo decreased. Coupled with clinical and neuroradiological benefits, these HRQoL results further support BG-12 as an effective oral treatment for relapsing MS.

Effects of Delayed-Release Dimethyl Fumarate (DMF) on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: An Integrated Analysis of the Phase 3 DEFINE and CONFIRM Studies

PURPOSE Delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF; also known as gastro-resistant DMF) has been reported to have clinical and neuroradiologic efficacy in people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in the Phase 3 DEFINE and CONFIRM studies. An integrated analysis of data from DEFINE and CONFIRM was conducted to estimate more precisely the therapeutic effects of delayed-release DMF. Here we describe the impact of RRMS on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at baseline and assess the effects of delayed-release DMF on prespecified HRQoL end points over 2 years. METHODS Patients with RRMS were randomly assigned to receive delayed-release DMF 240 mg PO BID or TID or matching placebo for up to 2 years (96 weeks). As a tertiary end point in both studies, patient-reported HRQoL was assessed using the Physical and Mental Component Summaries (PCS and MCS, respectively) of the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36); global assessment of well-being, as measured on a visual analog scale (VAS); and the EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) VAS, administered at baseline and at weeks 24, 48, and 96. Higher scores suggested better HRQoL. FINDINGS The integrated analysis included 2301 patients treated with delayed-release DMF BID (n = 769) or TID (n = 761) or placebo (n = 771). The mean PCS and MCS scores at baseline were lower overall compared with those reported in the general US population and were ≥5 points lower (a clinically meaningful difference) in patients with a baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of ≥2.5 compared with those in patients with a baseline EDSS score of 0. At 2 years, mean PCS and MCS scores were increased from baseline in the patients treated with delayed-release DMF, whereas the mean PCS and MCS scores were decreased from baseline in the placebo group; the difference in PCS and MCS scores was significant for the delayed-release DMF BID and TID groups compared with placebo. SF-36 subscale scores generally remained stable or were improved relative to baseline in patients treated with delayed-release DMF and decreased in patients receiving placebo; improvements were significant for delayed-release DMF BID and TID versus placebo on most subscales. Compared with that in the placebo group, the proportions of patients in the delayed-release DMF groups exhibiting a ≥5-point improvement in SF-36 score were significantly higher. The following factors were found to be predictive of improved PCS and MCS scores at 2 years: delayed-release DMF treatment, lower baseline EDSS score, age ≤40 years (PCS only), and corresponding lower baseline PCS or MCS score. Changes from baseline in VAS and EuroQoL-5D scores were generally consistent with changes in SF-36 scores. IMPLICATIONS These HRQoL benefits parallel the improvements in clinical and magnetic resonance imaging end points with delayed-release DMF, suggesting that delayed-release DMF treatment improves patient-perceived health status as well as neurologic and physical functioning. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT0042012; NCT00451451.

International Issues: Of saints and sickness A neurology elective in India

Standing at the top of Humayuns Tomb (figure 1), I had a wonderful view over Delhi. It was the end of February. Spring had suddenly struck and the thermometer climbed. Kites in the hundreds rode the thermals and green parrots filled the air with their screeches. Figure 1 Humayuns tomb It was a peaceful scene of a building on which the Taj Mahal was modeled and is the final resting place of the 16th century Moghul ruler Humayun, who fell to his death while descending the steps of his library. It was the perfect place to stand back, think about a fascinating month, and distance myself from a sense of being overwhelmed by sheer numbers of people, impressions, and contrasts. A resident, halfway through my 3-year neurology residency, I had come to India to spend an elective rotation in neurology at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences in Delhi, known to the locals as AIIMS (figure 2). It is considered to be one of Indias finest government medical institutions, serving not only the citizens of a multi-million bustling metropolis but also those in search of a cure from all over India. Figure 2 Neurology inpatient ward at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences Battling through the dust and traffic on my 1-hour drive to the hospital in the morning, I pass a daily repeating scene: small Suzuki Marutis jostling for space with motor scooters, cycle rickshaws, cyclists, pedestrians, and the occasional tractor or elephant; cows munching on rubbish in the middle of the road, the barber shaving a man at his roadside stand, throngs of small uniformed children on their way to school. A cyclist with a monkey perched calmly on the cycle rack, a man with a red turban on a scooter, a young lady balancing herself …

International Issues: Tropical neurology in Vietnam

During the last elective period of my neurology residency, I went to Vietnam. My reasons for choosing Vietnam were twofold. First, David Warrell, Professor of Tropical Medicine at Oxford, suggested Vietnam because of its abundance of tropical neurology and because he loves venomous snakes, such as kraits, cobras, and vipers, which flourish in the region. My other motivation for this location was the Vietnam veterans whom I had treated at the Boston VA. Their stories about tropical jungles, unbearable humidity, and armies of blood-sucking insects, and the horrors of a war they were still coming to terms with so many years later, had piqued my curiosity. Times have changed in the 35 years since the end of the war in 1975. Bomb craters still pockmark the landscape. Children still regularly lose their limbs to land mines. There are still humidity and blood-feasting mosquitoes. However, the ghosts of the past are slowly being laid to rest. According to UNICEF statistics, Vietnam is one of the poorest countries in Asia. With a population of 87 million, it has a lower average personal income (US

The exciting field of neuro-repair in multiple sclerosis: an interview with Sarah I Sheikh.

800–

Evaluation of Potential Drug–Drug Interaction Between Delayed‐Release Dimethyl Fumarate and a Commonly Used Oral Contraceptive (Norgestimate/Ethinyl Estradiol) in Healthy Women

900/year) than India (US