Sarah Sloan

What is the optimal blood pressure in patients after acute coronary syndromes?: Relationship of blood pressure and cardiovascular events in the PRavastatin OR atorVastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (PROVE IT-TIMI) 22 trial.

Background— Aggressive blood pressure (BP) control has been advocated in patients with acute coronary syndrome, but few data exist in this population relative to cardiovascular outcomes. Methods and Results— We evaluated 4162 patients enrolled in the PRavastatin Or atorVastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy–Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (PROVE IT-TIMI) 22 trial (acute coronary syndrome patients randomized to pravastatin 40 mg versus atorvastatin 80 mg). The average follow-up BP (systolic and diastolic) was categorized into 10-mm Hg increments. The primary outcome was a composite of death due to any cause, myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring rehospitalization, revascularization after 30 days, and stroke. The secondary outcome was a composite of death due to coronary heart disease, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or revascularization. The relationship between BP (systolic or diastolic) followed a J- or U-shaped curve association with primary, secondary, and individual outcomes, with increased events rates at both low and high BP values, both unadjusted and after adjustment for baseline variables, baseline C-reactive protein, and on-treatment average levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. A nonlinear Cox proportional hazards model showed a nadir of 136/85 mm Hg (range 130 to 140 mm Hg systolic and 80 to 90 mm Hg diastolic) at which the incidence of primary outcome was lowest. The curve was relatively flat for systolic pressures of 110 to 130 mm Hg and diastolic pressures of 70 to 90 mm Hg. Conclusions— After acute coronary syndrome, a J- or U-shaped curve association existed between BP and the risk of future cardiovascular events, with lowest event rates in the BP range of approximately 130 to 140 mm Hg systolic and 80 to 90 mm Hg diastolic and a relatively flat curve for systolic pressures of 110 to 130 mm Hg and diastolic pressures of 70 to 90 mm Hg, which suggests that too low of a pressure (especially <110/70 mm Hg) may be dangerous. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: . Unique identifier: [NCT00382460][1]. # Clinical Perspective {#article-title-32} [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT00382460&atom=%2Fcirculationaha%2F122%2F21%2F2142.atomBackground— Aggressive blood pressure (BP) control has been advocated in patients with acute coronary syndrome, but few data exist in this population relative to cardiovascular outcomes. Methods and Results— We evaluated 4162 patients enrolled in the PRavastatin Or atorVastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy–Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (PROVE IT-TIMI) 22 trial (acute coronary syndrome patients randomized to pravastatin 40 mg versus atorvastatin 80 mg). The average follow-up BP (systolic and diastolic) was categorized into 10-mm Hg increments. The primary outcome was a composite of death due to any cause, myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring rehospitalization, revascularization after 30 days, and stroke. The secondary outcome was a composite of death due to coronary heart disease, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or revascularization. The relationship between BP (systolic or diastolic) followed a J- or U-shaped curve association with primary, secondary, and individual outcomes, with increased events rates at both low and high BP values, both unadjusted and after adjustment for baseline variables, baseline C-reactive protein, and on-treatment average levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. A nonlinear Cox proportional hazards model showed a nadir of 136/85 mm Hg (range 130 to 140 mm Hg systolic and 80 to 90 mm Hg diastolic) at which the incidence of primary outcome was lowest. The curve was relatively flat for systolic pressures of 110 to 130 mm Hg and diastolic pressures of 70 to 90 mm Hg. Conclusions— After acute coronary syndrome, a J- or U-shaped curve association existed between BP and the risk of future cardiovascular events, with lowest event rates in the BP range of approximately 130 to 140 mm Hg systolic and 80 to 90 mm Hg diastolic and a relatively flat curve for systolic pressures of 110 to 130 mm Hg and diastolic pressures of 70 to 90 mm Hg, which suggests that too low of a pressure (especially <110/70 mm Hg) may be dangerous. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00382460.

Evaluation of Multiple Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Stress for Risk Prediction and Guiding Medical Therapy in Patients with Stable Coronary Disease

Background— Circulating biomarkers can offer insight into subclinical cardiovascular stress and thus have the potential to aid in risk stratification and tailoring of therapy. Methods and Results— We measured plasma levels of 4 cardiovascular biomarkers, midregional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), midregional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), C-terminal pro-endothelin-1 (CT-proET-1), and copeptin, in 3717 patients with stable coronary artery disease and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction who were randomized to trandolapril or placebo as part of the Prevention of Events With Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (PEACE) trial. After adjustment for clinical cardiovascular risk predictors and left ventricular ejection fraction, elevated levels of MR-proANP, MR-proADM, and CT-proET-1 were independently associated with the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure (hazard ratios per 1-SD increase in log-transformed biomarker levels of 1.97, 1.48, and 1.47, respectively; P⩽0.002 for each biomarker). These 3 biomarkers also significantly improved metrics of discrimination when added to a clinical model. Trandolapril significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure in patients who had elevated levels of ≥2 biomarkers (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.36–0.80), whereas there was no benefit in patients with elevated levels of 0 or 1 biomarker (hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.74–1.59; Pinteraction=0.012). Conclusions— In patients with stable coronary artery disease and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, our results suggest that elevated levels of novel biomarkers of cardiovascular stress may help identify patients who are at higher risk of cardiovascular death and heart failure and may be useful to select patients who derive significant benefit from angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy.

Effect of Intensive Statin Therapy on Clinical Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome PCI-PROVE IT: A PROVE IT-TIMI 22 (Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy- Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 22) Substudy

OBJECTIVES The goal of this analysis was to determine whether intensive statin therapy, compared with moderate-dose statin therapy, leads to a reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). BACKGROUND When compared with moderate-dose statins, intensive statin therapy reduces MACE among patients with ACS. The role of intensive statin therapy specifically among patients who undergo PCI for ACS is unknown. METHODS Outcomes were compared in 2,868 patients who underwent PCI for ACS just prior to enrollment in the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 (Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 22) trial, which randomized patients to either atorvastatin 80 mg or pravastatin 40 mg daily. The incidence of the primary composite end point of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, unstable angina leading to hospitalization, and revascularization after 30 days and stroke was evaluated, as was the incidence of target vessel revascularization (TVR) and non-TVR during follow-up. RESULTS Treatment with 80 mg atorvastatin reduced the incidence of the composite end point (21.5% vs. 26.5%, hazard ratio: 0.78, 95% confidence interval: 0.67 to 0.91, p=0.002) and lowered the incidence of both TVR (11.4% vs. 15.4%, p=0.001) and non-TVR (8.0% vs. 10.5%, p=0.017) compared with 40 mg pravastatin. After adjusting for on-treatment serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and C-reactive protein concentrations, the odds of TVR with high-dose statin therapy remained significant (odds ratio: 0.74, p=0.015) while the odds of non-TVR did not (odds ratio: 0.92, p=0.55). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with ACS who undergo PCI, intensive statin therapy reduces MACE compared with moderate-dose statin therapy. The reduction in the incidence of TVR was independent of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and C-reactive protein lowering and may therefore be due, at least in part, to a pleiotropic effect of high-dose statin therapy. (PROVE IT-TIMI 22; NCT00382460).

Detection of myocardial injury in patients with unstable angina using a novel nanoparticle cardiac troponin I assay: Observations from the PROTECT-TIMI 30 Trial

BACKGROUND At least 30% of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome present without evidence of myonecrosis using current generation troponin assays. A new generation of research assays for troponin that offer a >10-fold increase in analytical sensitivity has emerged. METHODS To perform a pilot study to evaluate the clinical sensitivity of a new ultra-sensitive nanoparticle assay for cardiac troponin I (nano-cTnI), we identified 50 patients with unstable angina (serial negative cTnI) and 50 patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction with an initially negative current generation cTnI result. We measured cTnI using an assay (Nanosphere, Northbrook, IL) that can detect pg/mL concentrations of cTnI (detection-limit 0.0002 microg/L). RESULTS Measured at 0, 2, and 8 hours with the nano-cTnI assay 44%, 62%, and 82% of patients with unstable angina defined by the current-generation assay had an elevated nano-cTnI result (> or =0.003 microg/L, 99 th percentile decision-limit, coefficient of variation <10%). In patients with definite myocardial injury (current-generation cTnI > or =0.1 microg/L) but an initially negative cTnI, 72% and 98% had a nano-cTnI > or =0.003 microg/L at 0 and 2 hours. No patient had a positive current-generation cTnI without an elevated nano-cTnI level. CONCLUSIONS In this pilot study using a nanoparticle assay for cTnI, myocardial injury was detectable in a substantial proportion of patients presently classified as having unstable angina, suggesting that ischemia with rest pain without injury is rare. The emergence of a new generation of troponin assays has the potential to lead to new clinical applications based on enhanced analytical performance at very low concentrations of troponin.

Clinical Features and Outcomes of Women With Unstable Ischemic Heart Disease: Observations From Metabolic Efficiency With Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 36 (MERLIN-TIMI 36)

Background— The pathobiological basis of ischemic heart disease and thus the manifestations and response to therapy can differ between women and men. In prior studies, sex-based treatment differences have been observed with the antiischemic ranolazine, with a possibly diminished effect in women. Methods and Results— We conducted a prospectively planned analysis of the clinical, biomarker, angiographic, and continuous ECG features and 1-year outcomes of women with unstable ischemic heart disease randomized to ranolazine or placebo in Metabolic Efficiency With Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 36 (MERLIN-TIMI 36). Compared with men (n=4269), women (n=2291) were older with more risk factors (P<0.001). On presentation, women were less likely than men to have significant epicardial coronary artery disease (no stenosis ≥50% on angiography, 19.4% versus 8.6%; P<0.001) or elevated troponin (57.1% versus 68.9%; P<0.001). Yet, women were more likely to have an elevated B-type natriuretic peptide (47.0% versus 40.2%; P<0.001), worse median angina frequency scores (80 versus 100; P<0.001), and an ischemic episode on continuous ECG administered during the first 7 days (22.5% versus 19.3%; P=0.0025). Women and men were at similar adjusted risk for the primary end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or recurrent ischemia (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.96 to 1.29; P=0.15). Ranolazine was associated with a significant reduction in recurrent ischemia in women (13.0% versus 18.2%; hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.57 to 0.88; P=0.002). Conclusions— Women with a clinical syndrome consistent with unstable ischemic heart disease, despite having less obstructive coronary artery disease, were more likely than men to report anginal episodes and had more recorded ischemic periods on continuous ECG. In this setting, ranolazine may be a particularly useful antiischemic agent in women. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00099788.

Fibroblast growth factor-23, cardiovascular prognosis, and benefit of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in stable ischemic heart disease.

OBJECTIVES This study sought to test 2 hypotheses: 1) fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-23 identifies patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) at high risk of cardiovascular events independent of clinical factors, renal function, and established cardiovascular biomarkers; and 2) FGF-23 identifies patients who derive greater clinical benefit from angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy. BACKGROUND FGF-23 is an endocrine regulator of mineral metabolism and markedly elevated levels are associated with cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease. Data in patients with SIHD are more sparse. METHODS FGF-23 levels were measured in 3,627 patients with SIHD randomly assigned to trandolapril or placebo within the PEACE (Prevention of Events With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme) trial and followed up for a median of 5.1 years. RESULTS After adjustment for clinical risk predictors, left ventricular ejection fraction, markers of renal function, and established cardiovascular biomarkers, FGF-23 concentration was independently associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure among patients allocated to placebo (quartile 4 hazard ratio: 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.09 to 2.74; p = 0.02) and significantly improved metrics of discrimination. Furthermore, among patients in the top quartile of FGF-23 levels, trandolapril significantly reduced cardiovascular death or incident heart failure (hazard ratio: 0.45; 95% confidence interval: 0.28 to 0.72), whereas there was no clinical benefit in the remaining patients (hazard ratio: 1.07; 95% confidence interval: 0.75 to 1.52; p interaction = 0.0039). This interaction was independent of and additive to stratification based on renal function. CONCLUSIONS Elevated levels of FGF-23 are associated with cardiovascular death and incident heart failure in patients with SIHD and identify patients who derive significant clinical benefit from angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy regardless of renal function. (Prevention of Events With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy [PEACE]: NCT00000558).

Predictors of Initial Nontherapeutic Anticoagulation With Unfractionated Heparin in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background— Although weight-based nomograms have improved the efficacy and safety of dosing unfractionated heparin in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, achieving therapeutic anticoagulation in practice remains challenging. Methods and Results— In the Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis in Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (ExTRACT-TIMI) 25 study, 20 506 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were randomized to enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin, the latter dosed according to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association weight-based nomogram with centrally monitored activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs). A total of 6055 patients received study unfractionated heparin and a fibrin-specific lytic and had an initial aPTT drawn within 4 to 8 hours of starting therapy. Despite close adherence to recommended dosing, only 33.8% of initial aPTTs were therapeutic (1.50 to 2.00 times control); 13.2% were markedly low (<1.25 times); and 16.3% were markedly high (≥2.75 times). Markedly high aPTTs were more likely in patients who were older (adjusted risk ratio [RRadj], 1.14 per decade; P=0.001), were female (RRadj, 1.46; P<0.001), were of lower weight (RRadj, 1.19 per 10-kg decrease; P<0.001) or had renal dysfunction (RRadj, 1.08 per 0.2-mg/dL increase in serum creatinine; P=0.006). Markedly high aPTTs were associated with increased risk of TIMI major or minor bleeding by 48 hours (odds ratio, 2.11; P=0.004); markedly low aPTTs tended to be associated with increased risk of fatal or nonfatal reinfarction by 48 hours (odds ratio, 2.19; P=0.057). Conclusions— Despite the use of a standard weight-based unfractionated heparin nomogram in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, nontherapeutic anticoagulation is frequent and more likely among certain vulnerable patient groups, with excess anticoagulation associated with increased bleeding and inadequate anticoagulation associated with reinfarction. These findings should be considered when dosing unfractionated heparin in support of fibrinolytic therapy.

Dynamic TIMI Risk Score for STEMI

Background Although there are multiple methods of risk stratification for ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), this study presents a prospectively validated method for reclassification of patients based on in‐hospital events. A dynamic risk score provides an initial risk stratification and reassessment at discharge. Methods and Results The dynamic TIMI risk score for STEMI was derived in ExTRACT‐TIMI 25 and validated in TRITON‐TIMI 38. Baseline variables were from the original TIMI risk score for STEMI. New variables were major clinical events occurring during the index hospitalization. Each variable was tested individually in a univariate Cox proportional hazards regression. Variables with P<0.05 were incorporated into a full multivariable Cox model to assess the risk of death at 1 year. Each variable was assigned an integer value based on the odds ratio, and the final score was the sum of these values. The dynamic score included the development of in‐hospital MI, arrhythmia, major bleed, stroke, congestive heart failure, recurrent ischemia, and renal failure. The C‐statistic produced by the dynamic score in the derivation database was 0.76, with a net reclassification improvement (NRI) of 0.33 (P<0.0001) from the inclusion of dynamic events to the original TIMI risk score. In the validation database, the C‐statistic was 0.81, with a NRI of 0.35 (P=0.01). Conclusions This score is a prospectively derived, validated means of estimating 1‐year mortality of STEMI at hospital discharge and can serve as a clinically useful tool. By incorporating events during the index hospitalization, it can better define risk and help to guide treatment decisions.

Prognostic utility of neopterin and risk of heart failure hospitalization after an acute coronary syndrome

Aims There is increasing evidence that immune mechanisms are involved in the pathogenesis of heart failure (HF). The relationship between neopterin and the risk of HF has yet to be investigated on a large scale. We assessed the relationship between neopterin, a novel marker of monocyte activation, and risk of hospitalization for HF. Methods and results Among the subjects of Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 22 trial, 3946 had neopterin levels measured at study entry, on average 7 days after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We assessed the relationship between neopterin and hospitalization for HF, and for death or HF over 2 years mean follow-up in a post hoc analysis using Cox regression models. Unadjusted hospitalization rates for HF increased across quartiles of neopterin, from 0.66 to 3.97 per 100 person-years. Per 1SD increment in log (neopterin), the adjusted risk of HF increased by 34% [hazard ratio (HR) 1.34, CI 1.10-1.64; P = 0.004]. Even after excluding individuals with a prior history of HF or recurrent ischaemic events, the relationship between neopterin and HF hospitalization remained significant. When added to a multivariable Cox model of HF-risk containing traditional risk factors, C-reactive protein and brain natriuretic protein (BNP), the further addition of neopterin significantly improved the HF-risk prediction model by likelihood ratio test analysis (P = 0.005), C-statistic (increasing from 0.743 to 0.773; P = 0.027), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) analysis (P = 0.001), but not net reclassification improvement (NRI) analysis (P = 0.406). Similar results were obtained for the endpoint of death or HF. Conclusion Neopterin levels are an independent predictor of HF hospitalization, and improve risk prediction over and above conventional biomarkers.

Relation Between Myocardial Infarct Size and Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia Among Patients With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Following Fibrinolytic Therapy for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

In the era of early reperfusion therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, preserved left ventricular (LV) function is common. Despite preservation of LV ejection fraction (LVEF), there remains a spectrum of risk for adverse cardiovascular events, including ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF). Larger infarct size has been independently associated with death, VT/VF, and heart failure in the post-myocardial infarction population. It was hypothesized that infarct size, as estimated by peak serum creatine kinase (CK)-MB concentration, would be associated with the incidence of VT/VF in patients with preserved LV function after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions. The Clopidogrel as Adjunctive Reperfusion Therapy-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 28 (CLARITY-TIMI 28) study enrolled 3,491 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions who underwent fibrinolytic therapy. The association between estimated infarct size (ratio of peak CK-MB to the upper limit of normal), the LVEF (measured using left ventriculography or echocardiography), and the incidence of VT/VF through 30 days was assessed. A total of 1,436 patients underwent assessments of LV function, of whom 1,133 had adequate CK-MB for analysis. The median LVEF in this group was 55% (interquartile range 45% to 65%), and most patients (n = 814 [87.1%]) had LVEF > or =40%. Among patients with LVEF > or =40%, the ratio of peak CK-MB to the upper limit of normal was significantly associated with the incidence of VT/VF through 30 days (2.2%, 3.7%, and 5.5% across tertiles, respectively, p = 0.041 for trend) and the incidence of the composite of cardiovascular death, heart failure, shock, and VT/VF through 30 days (3.7%, 6.0%, 8.5%, respectively, p = 0.018 for trend). In conclusion, in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with preserved LV function after reperfusion therapy, larger infarct size, as estimated by peak serum CK-MB concentration, is significantly associated with VT/VF as well as other adverse clinical outcomes.