Sasikanth Adigopula

Outcomes of nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention with and without on-site surgical backup: a meta-analysis.

Despite major advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) techniques, the current guidelines recommend against elective PCI at hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery backup. Nonetheless, an increasing number of hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery in the United States have developed programs for elective PCI. Studies evaluating outcome in this setting have yielded mixed results, leaving the question unanswered. Hence, a meta-analysis comparing outcomes of nonemergent PCI in hospitals with and without on-site surgical backup was performed. A systematic review of literature identified four studies involving 6817 patients. Three clinical end points were extracted from each study and included in-hospital death, myocardial infarction, and the need for emergency coronary artery bypass grafting. The studies were homogenous for each outcome studied. Therefore, the combined relative risks (RRs) across all the studies and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model. A two-sided alpha error less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Compared with facilities with on-site surgical backup, the risk of in-hospital death (RR, 2.7; CI, 0.6-12.9; P = 0.18), nonfatal myocardial infarction (RR, 1.3; CI, 0.7- 2.2; P = 0.29), and need of emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (RR, 0.46; CI, 0.06- 3.1; P = 0.43) was similar in those lacking on-site surgical backup. The present meta-analysis suggests that there is no difference in the outcome with regard to risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction, need for emergency coronary artery bypass grafting, and the risk of death in patients undergoing elective PCI in hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery backup.

Pioglitazone and the risk of myocardial infarction and other major adverse cardiac events: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials

A recent meta-analysis suggested that the use of rosiglitazone increases the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. It is unclear whether this is a class effect of thiazolidinediones (TZD). We did a meta-analysis to evaluate cardiovascular outcomes with the use of pioglitazone. Randomized, controlled trials in which pioglitazone was compared with placebo or other hypoglycemic agents were considered for analysis. Studies were included if the data for MI were available. Studies were identified with use of relevant search words in Medline, Pubmed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases. Data abstraction was done by 2 individual authors using a standardized protocol. The relative risk across all study groups was computed by the Mantel-Haenszel method, and interstudy heterogeneity was assessed by the χ2 method. All results were computed according to 95% confidence intervals. Five trials (N = 9965) met the inclusion criteria for analysis. The relative risk for MI was 0.86 (0.69-1.07; P = 0.17). The relative risks for stroke and revascularization were 0.79 (0.61-1.02; P = 0.07) and 0.40 (0.13-1.23; P = 0.11), respectively. Pioglitazone does not increase the risk for MI and may decrease the risk for stroke and revascularization.

Comparative analysis of beta-blockers with other antihypertensive agents on cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ObjectivesTo analyze the effects of beta-blockers (BBs) on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in diabetic patients with hypertension. Data SourceLiterature search was performed with relevant search words using PubMed and Ovid Gateway search engines for trials published in English from June 1996 to July 2007. Review MethodsSystematic reviews of randomized control trials that used BBs as treatment or control therapy in diabetic patients with hypertension were included for the analysis. All the included studies use intention-to-treat analysis. Two individual authors procured the data. Myocardial infarction, stroke, CV mortality, and total mortality were the outcomes analyzed. Relative risk across the different groups was calculated using Mantel-Haenszel random- and fixed-effects model. Interstudy heterogeneity was computed by χ2 test. Results were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and were considered significant with double-sided alpha error less than 0.05. Funnel plot was used to assess for publication bias. ResultsEight trials (N = 130,270) met the inclusion criteria for the analysis. The relative risks for myocardial infarction, stroke, CV mortality, and total mortality were 1.08 (95% CI 0.82-1.42; P = 0.6), 1.13 (95% CI 0.95-1.36; P = 0.1), 1.15 (95% CI 0.83-1.6; P = 0.3), and 1.16 (95% CI 0.92-1.47; P = 0.2), respectively. BBs were associated with increased risk for CV mortality 1.39 (95% CI 1.07-1.804; P < 0.01) when compared with renin angiotensin blockade (RAS) therapy. ConclusionBBs have increased risk for CV mortality when compared with RAS blockade therapy in diabetic patients with hypertension. BBs do not have increased risk for myocardial infarction, stroke, CV mortality, and total mortality when compared with control antihypertensive therapy in diabetic patients with hypertension.

Recent advances in oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained rhythm disturbance. Thromboembolic events related to atrial fibrillation result in significant morbidity, mortality and increases in the cost of healthcare. Anticoagulants are pivotal agents for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. The latest American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend antithrombotic therapy to prevent thromboembolism for all patients with atrial fibrillation, except those with lone atrial fibrillation or contraindications. Vitamin K antagonists were first synthesized in 1948 and for the past six decades they have been the only agents used for long-term oral anticoagulant therapy. Although these drugs are effective, they have numerous limitations, which have led to the development of newer anticoagulant therapies. The emerging oral anticoagulant agents are target selective. They have predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters and do not require routine monitoring. They are not associated with significant food and drug interactions, and can be administered in simple fixed daily or twice daily doses. This article reviews the current literature on various targets for anticoagulant therapy and newer oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation.

Safety and efficacy of prolonged use of unfractionated heparin after percutaneous coronary intervention

The current guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention do not address the prolonged postprocedural use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) to prevent acute occlusion. However, recently published small studies have yielded mixed results, leaving the question unanswered. Hence, we performed a meta-analysis of the existing evidence to assess the safety and efficacy of prolonged infusion of UFH after percutaneous coronary intervention. A systematic review of literature revealed seven studies involving 2412 patients. End points analyzed were ischemic complications (acute closure, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization) and major vascular complications (hematoma, arteriovenous fistula, pseudoaneurysm, and retroperitoneal bleed). Because the studies were homogenous for outcomes, combined relative risks across all the studies and the 95% confidence intervals were computed using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model. A two-sided alpha error <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. There were no significant differences in patient demographics between both groups. Compared with placebo, the risk of major vascular complication was significantly higher in patients getting postprocedural UFH for prolonged hours (relative risk, 2.24; confidence interval, 1.68-3.48; P = 0.001). However, the risk of ischemic complications was similar in both groups (relative risk, 0.95; confidence interval, 0.46-1.96; P = 0.89). The meta-analysis suggests that routine infusion of UFH after uncomplicated percutaneous coronary intervention may result in increased vascular complications without any reduction in incidence of ischemic complications.

Needle-guided ultrasound technique for axillary artery catheter placement in critically ill patients: A case series and technique description

Purpose: Axillary arterial cannulation for blood pressure monitoring has been reported in adults since 1973. Reported failure rates using palpation landmarks are high. This report describes a needle‐guided ultrasound technique for axillary arterial line placement in critically ill patients. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients requiring axillary arterial cannulation attempts with ultrasound‐assisted needle guidance for hemodynamic monitoring was performed from July 2010 to June 2016 at a single institution. Results: One hundred fifty nine (159) cannulation attempts were performed in 155 patients. The overall success rate was 97%, with a first pass success rate of 84%. Inexperienced operators performed 49% of procedures under direct faculty supervision, and had a 99% success rate, which was not different from experienced operators. Almost 20% of patients had moderate‐to‐severe coagulopathy (platelets < 50 k/uL, INR > 2.0 or PTT > 60 s). Complications reported included the following: nonfunctioning of catheter (6%) and hematoma (6%). Ischemia was noted in 2 patients (1%), but only one was attributed to the arterial catheter. Conclusions: Use of the needle‐guided ultrasound assisted approach for axillary arterial line placement is easily teachable and can be used to promote safe and successful placement of axillary arterial lines for novice learners. HIGHLIGHTS159 axillary arterial cannulations attempts using ultrasound.97% overall success rate99% success rate of inexperienced operators20% of patients had coagulopathy and 7% had BMI ≥ 50 m2.Procedural video demonstrating ultrasound technique is shown.

P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Clinical Implications of Pharmacologic and Pharmacogenetic Differences

Platelet activation and aggregation are key events in the pathophysiological process of thrombosis, and vascular occlusions. Antiplatelet therapy has proven to be crucial for managing patients with acute coronary syndromes, coronary artery disease and in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. However, residual platelet reactivity on antiplatelet treatment confers a five-fold increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events which indicates a need for more effective antiplatelet medications to address the substantial burden of cardiovascular disease. This article reviews the P2Y(12) receptor antagonists with regards to pharmacologic and pharmacogenetic differences and their clinical implications along with the discussion of recent patents.