Saske Hoving

Tumor Necrosis Factor α Mediates Homogeneous Distribution of Liposomes in Murine Melanoma that Contributes to a Better Tumor Response

Successful treatment of solid tumors with chemotherapeutics requires that adequate levels reach the tumor cells. Tumor vascular normalization has been proposed to enhance drug delivery and improve tumor response to chemotherapy. Differently, augmenting leakage of the tumor-associated vasculature, and as such enhance vascular abnormality, may improve tumor response as well. In the present study, we show that addition of low-dose tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF) to systemic injections with pegylated long circulating liposomes augmented the tumor accumulation of these liposomes 5- to 6-fold, which strongly correlated with enhanced tumor response. Using intravital microscopy, we could study the liposomal distribution inside the tumor in more detail. Especially 100 nm liposomes effectively extravasate in the surrounding tumor tissue in the presence of TNF and this occurred without any effect on tumor vascular density, branching, and diameter. Next to that, we observed in living animals that tumor cells take up the liposomes intact, followed by intracellular degradation. To our knowledge, this is an unprecedented observation. Taken together, TNF renders more tumor vessels permeable, leading to a more homogeneous distribution of the liposomes throughout the tumor, which is crucial for an optimal tumor response. We conclude that delivery of nanoparticulate drug formulations to solid tumor benefits from augmenting the vascular leakage through vascular manipulation with vasoactive drugs like TNF.

Intact Doxil is taken up intracellularly and released doxorubicin sequesters in the lysosome: evaluated by in vitro/in vivo live cell imaging.

Doxil, also known as Caelyx, is an established liposomal formulation of doxorubicin used for the treatment of ovarian cancer, sarcoma and multiple myeloma. While showing reduced doxorubicin related toxicity, Doxil does not greatly improve clinical outcome. To become biologically active, doxorubicin needs to be released from its carrier. Uptake and breakdown of the liposomal carrier and subsequent doxorubicin release is not fully understood and in this study we explored the hypothesis that Doxil is taken up by tumor cells and slowly degraded intracellularly. We investigated the kinetics of liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) in vitro as well as in vivo by measuring cytotoxic effect, intracellular bioavailability and fate of the carrier and its content. To prevent fixation artifacts we applied live cell imaging in vitro and intravital microscopy in vivo. Within 8h after administration of free doxorubicin, 26% of the drug translocated to the nucleus and when reaching a specific concentration killed the cell. Unlike free doxorubicin, only 0.4% of the doxorubicin added as liposomal formulation entered the nucleus. Looking at the kinetics, we observed a build-up of nuclear doxorubicin within minutes of adding free doxorubicin. This was in contrast to Doxil showing slow translocation of doxorubicin to the nucleus and apparent accumulation in the cytoplasm. Observations made with time-lapse live cell imaging as well as in vivo intravital microscopy revealed the liposomal carrier colocalizing with doxorubicin in the cytoplasm. We also demonstrated the sequestering of liposomal doxorubicin in the lysosomal compartment resulting in limited delivery to the nucleus. This entrapment makes the bioavailable concentration of Doxil-delivered doxorubicin significantly lower and therefore ineffective as compared to free doxorubicin in killing tumor cells.

Synergistic antitumor response of interleukin 2 with melphalan in isolated limb perfusion in soft tissue sarcoma-bearing rats.

The cytokine interleukin 2 (IL-2) is a mediator of immune cell activation with some antitumor activity, mainly in renal cell cancer and melanoma. We have previously shown that tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha has strong synergistic antitumor activity in combination with chemotherapeutics in the isolated limb perfusion (ILP) setting based on a TNF-mediated enhanced tumor-selective uptake of the chemotherapeutic drug followed by a selective destruction of the tumor vasculature. IL-2 can cause vascular leakage and edema and for this reason we examined the antitumor activity of a combined treatment with IL-2 and melphalan in our well-established ILP in soft tissue sarcoma-bearing rats (BN175). ILP with either IL-2 or melphalan alone has no antitumor effect, but the combination of IL-2 and melphalan resulted in a strong synergistic tumor response, without any local or systemic toxicity. IL-2 enhanced significantly melphalan uptake in tumor tissue. No signs of significant vascular damage were detected to account for this observation, although the tumor sections of the IL-2- and IL-2 plus melphalan-treated animals revealed scattered extravasation of erythrocytes compared with the untreated animals. Clear differences were seen in the localization of ED-1 cells, with an even distribution in the sham, IL-2 and melphalan treatments, whereas in the IL-2 plus melphalan-treated tumors clustered ED-1 cells were found. Additionally, increased levels of TNF mRNA were found in tumors treated with IL-2 and IL-2 plus melphalan. These observations indicate a potentially important role for macrophages in the IL-2-based perfusion. The results in our study indicate that the novel combination of IL-2 and melphalan in ILP has synergistic antitumor activity and may be an alternative for ILP with TNF and melphalan.

Equine estrogens induce apolipoprotein E and glial fibrillary acidic protein in mixed glial cultures.

Premarin, which contains several equine estrogens, as well as estradiol (E2) as a minor component, is widely used for replacement therapy of estrogen deficits, but little is known of its direct actions on brain cells. In mixed glial cultures, apolipoprotein E (apoE) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are induced by estrogens. GFAP induction showed an inverted-U shape E2 dose response, with a maximum induction at 1 pM, whereas apoE mRNA induction was greatest at 100 pM. GFAP and ApoE mRNAs were induced by equine estrogens in the following order: E2=equilin>estrone>17 alpha-dihydroequilenin. However, the induction of apoE secretion by 17 alpha-dihydroequilenin was as effective as by the other estrogens. The greater response of apoE secretion than GFAP mRNA induction to 17 alpha-dihydroequilenin might be therapeutically important because of the glial scarring during brain lesions, in which GFAP induction has a major role in inhibiting neurite outgrowth, whereas apoE secretion supports neurite outgrowth.

Addition of low-dose tumor necrosis factor-α to systemic treatment with STEALTH liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) improved anti-tumor activity in osteosarcoma-bearing rats

Improved efficacy of Doxil (STEALTH liposomal doxorubicin) compared to free doxorubicin has been demonstrated in the treatment of several tumor types. We have shown that addition of low-dose tumor necrosis factor (TNF) to systemic Doxil administration dramatically improved tumor response in the highly vascularized rat soft tissue sarcoma BN175. Whether a similar enhanced efficacy can be achieved in less vascularized tumors is uncertain. We therefore examined the effect of systemic administration of Doxil in combination with low-dose TNF in intermediate vascularized osteosarcoma-bearing rats (ROS-1). Small fragments of the osteosarcoma were implanted s.c. in the lower limb. Treatment was started when the tumors reached an average diameter of 1 cm. Rats were treated with five i.v. injections at 4-day intervals with Doxil or doxorubicin and TNF. Systemic treatment with Doxil resulted in a better tumor growth delay than free doxorubicin, but with progressive diseases in all animals. The 3.5-fold augmented accumulation of Doxil compared to free doxorubicin presumably explains the enhanced tumor regression. Addition of low-dose TNF augmented the anti-tumor activity of Doxil, although no increased drug uptake was found compared to Doxil alone. In vitro studies showed that ROS-1 is sensitive to TNF, but systemic treatment with TNF alone did not result in a tumor growth delay. Furthermore, we demonstrated that treatment with Doxil alone or with TNF resulted in massive coagulative necrosis of tumor tissue. In conclusion, combination therapy of Doxil and low-dose TNF seems attractive for the treatment of highly vascularized tumors, but also of intermediate vascularized tumors like the osteosarcoma.

Lack of efficacy of Doxil® in TNF-α-based isolated limb perfusion in sarcoma-bearing rats

Here we show that Doxil® has minimal antitumour activity in the isolated limb perfusion (ILP) setting and its activity was not enhanced by the addition of tumour necrosis factor (TNF). Doxil® accumulation in tumour tissue was low and also not augmented by TNF. In contrast, activity of free conventional doxorubicin was enhanced by TNF. We conclude that application of Doxil® in a TNF-based ILP is not a useful alternative to free conventional doxorubicin or melphalan.