Satoru Nihei

The efficacy of sodium azulene sulfonate L-glutamine for managing chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in cancer patients: a prospective comparative study

BackgroundThe efficacy of sodium azulene sulfonate L-glutamine (GA) in treating oral mucositis caused by the administration of anticancer agents has not been previously elucidated. Therefore, this prospective comparative study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of GA in treating oral mucositis caused by chemotherapy regimens involving fluorinated pyrimidine anticancer drugs.MethodsThe subjects of this study were patients with oral mucositis of grade 2 or higher while on outpatient chemotherapy regimens involving fluorinated pyrimidine anticancer drugs for colorectal or breast cancer. The subjects were randomly divided into a group that received GA (the GA group) or a group that did not receive GA (the control group) by using the closed-envelope method. GA was administered three times a day every day from the first day of the regimen until the final day. The primary endpoint was the development of oral mucositis of grade 2 or higher. The secondary endpoint was the severity of oral pain, which was judged using an 11-stage numerical rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 to 10.ResultsThe proportion of patients with oral mucositis of grade 2 or higher was 32.4% in the GA group and 57.6% in the control group. The GA group had a significantly lower frequency of occurrence. The changes in the NRS scores before and after the trial began were − 2.9 ± 0.6 in the GA group and − 1.2 ± 0.5 in the control group. The NRS score decreased more significantly in the GA group than in the control group (P = 0.046). One patient stopped GA treatment voluntarily due to nausea; other than nausea, no GA-related side effects were observed.ConclusionsGA protects against oral mucositis and reduces the severity of prevailing oral mucositis symptoms. Our findings indicate that GA is a highly safe and convenient drug.

Antiproteinuric effects of renin–angiotensin inhibitors in lung cancer patients receiving bevacizumab

PurposeThe objective of this study was to investigate the effect of renin–angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs) on bevacizumab (BV)-induced proteinuria in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of NSCLC patients receiving BV between 2008 and 2014 at 11 hospitals. The patients were categorized into three groups according to their antihypertensive drug use: RASI user, non-RASI user, and non-user groups. The primary outcome was a proteinuria event of any grade during the first 6 cycles of BV treatment.ResultsA total of 211 patients were included, 89 of whom received antihypertensive drugs. Of these 89 patients, 49 were in the RASI user group, and 40 were in the non-RASI user group. The non-user group comprised 122 patients. The occurrence of proteinuria in the RASI user group was significantly lower than that in the non-RASI user group (P = 0.037) but was not significantly lower than that in the non-user group (P = 0.287). Patients using RASIs had a lower rate of proteinuria than those who did not use RASIs according to multivariate analysis (odds ratio 0.32; 95% confidence interval 0.12–0.86; P = 0.024).ConclusionOur study suggests that RASI administration reduces the risk of proteinuria in patients receiving BV.

Effect of olanzapine for breast cancer patients resistant to triplet antiemetic therapy with nausea due to anthracycline-containing adjuvant chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE Triplet antiemetic therapy with neurokinin 1 receptor blocker, 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor blocker and steroids is commonly used in patients who are highly emetic after chemotherapy. However, an alternative antiemetic therapy for patients who are resistant to triplet antiemetic therapy is not established. Olanzapine is recommended in the guidelines as an optional antiemetic drug. However, the effectiveness of adding olanzapine to triplet antiemetic therapy is unknown. In this study, the effectiveness and safety of adding olanzapine to triplet antiemetic therapy with aprepitant, palonosetron and dexamethasone as highly emetic anthracycline-containing adjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer patients were prospectively investigated. METHODS Forty-five patients with breast cancer who experienced >Grade 1 nausea or any vomiting after the first cycle of chemotherapy using both epirubicin and cyclophosphamide were included. Low-dose olanzapine (2.5 mg/day) was administered orally from the first day of chemotherapy for 4 days, and the number of episodes of vomiting, scale of nausea, dietary intake and somnolence were compared with the symptoms after the first cycle. RESULTS As the primary endpoint, the nausea grade was significantly improved by adding olanzapine (P < 0.05). As the secondary endpoints, mean nausea scale (3.2→1.9, Day 1; 3→1.3-1, Days 2-6) and dietary intake (33.6→53.8%, Day 1; 42.0→60.7-78.1%, Days 2-6) were improved by adding olanzapine. Only four patients withdrew due to somnolence and/or dizziness. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated the effectiveness and tolerability of adding low-dose olanzapine for patients with insufficient nausea relief with triplet antiemetic therapy consisting of palonosetron, steroid and aprepitant.