Satsuki Kawasaki

Ocular Arterial Flow Hemodynamics in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

The purpose of this study was to investigate ocular blood flow hemodynamics in patients with diabetes mellitus. We used color Doppler sonography, in 22 normal subjects and 52 patients with (n = 25) or without (n = 27) diabetic retinopathy, to determine blood flow velocities and the resistive index of the central retinal artery. The resistive index of the central retinal artery in patients with diabetic retinopathy (0.85 +/‐ 0.09) was significantly greater (P < 0.01) than that in normal subjects (0.72 +/‐ 0.08) and in patients without diabetic retinopathy (0.81 +/‐ 0.09). The resistive index of the central retinal artery in the patients without diabetic retinopathy was also significantly greater than that of normal subjects (P < 0.01). The resistive index of ocular arterial flow was increased in the patients with diabetes mellitus and further increased in the presence of retinopathy. Increased resistance in the peripheral ocular vascular bed contributes to diabetic retinopathy, and this change is present before the appearance of overt diabetic retinopathy.

Use of telemedicine in periodic screening of diabetic retinopathy.

Telemedicine was used for taking ocular fundus images of diabetic patients, which were subsequently sent by electronic mail to experienced ophthalmologists at a university hospital. The ophthalmologists provided reports on the patients to the internists. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this telemedicine system. A total of 279 diabetic patients were admitted to the Third Department of Internal Medicine of Yokohama City University Hospital, School of Medicine, for blood sugar control or for education on lifestyle between April, 1999, and October, 2000. The subjects did not have eye disease nor diabetic retinopathy when evaluated by an ophthalmologist (at either Yokohama City University Hospital or other facility) within 3 months before enrollment in the study. After dilation of the pupil, fundus images were taken of each eye from four angles using a nonmydriatic fundus camera. The images were transmitted by electronic mail to the Division of Ophthalmology of Tokyo University Branch Hospital along with other patient information. The ophthalmologists there evaluated the images on the screen according to Fukudas classification of diabetic retinopathy. They sent ophthalmologic reports to the internists at the Third Department of Internal Medicine of Yokohama City University Hospital, School of Medicine, and recommended whether the patient should be seen by his/her regular ophthalmologist earlier than the next scheduled visit. Fundus images were obtained at the time of admission, at 1, 3, and 6 months after discharge, and at every 6 months thereafter. Out of the images of 1170 eyes obtained at various time points from the 279 patients, 1076 (92.0%) were successfully evaluated by the ophthalmologists at the University of Tokyo, while 60 (5.1%) could not be evaluated and there was a communication problem for the images of 34 eyes. The ophthalmologists determined that 5 eyes of 3 patients required further evaluation by the patients regular ophthalmologist based on the images transferred by telemedicine. No patient dropped out during the study period.

Glycemic control after addition of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor alogliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes showing inadequate response to thrice-a-day treatment with α-glucosidase inhibitors.

Objective: We investigated the effect of addition of alogliptin, while continuing the α-glucosidase inhibitor (αGI) administration at the same or reduced dose, or discontinuing the drug, on the glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients showing inadequate response to αGI treatment. Research design and methods: A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter interventional study trial. Subjects were randomly assigned to treatment with alogliptin alone (Intake 0 group), or alogliptin in addition to an αGI administered once-/twice-/thrice-daily (Intake 1, 2 and 3 groups). Main outcome measures: Changes in glycemic control were measured. Results: The HbA1c and glycoalbumin levels at 1 and 3 months were significantly lower than the values at the baseline in the Intake 1, 2 and 3 groups, but not the Intake 0 group. The body weight at 3 months was significantly lower than that at the baseline in the Intake 3 group. There were no significant differences in the degree of satisfaction or participating volition recorded, before and after the start of the study treatments. Conclusions: Addition of alogliptin to once-/twice-daily administration of an αGI may be effective for obtaining improved glycemic control, without lowering the treatment satisfaction level, in type 2 diabetic patients.

Sonographic assessment of fatty liver infiltration using the measurement of para‐ and perirenal fat thickness

Usefulness of abdominal ultrasonography for quantitative estimation of fatty liver by measurement of para‐ and perirenal sonographic fat thickness (UFT) was investigated.

Comparison of Azelnidipine and Trichlormethiazide in Japanese Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Hypertension: The COAT Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective This study compared the efficacy and safety of azelnidipine with that of trichlormethiazide in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension. Methods In a multicenter, open-label trial, 240 patients with adequately controlled diabetes (HbA1c ≤ 7.0%) under lifestyle modification and/or administration of hypoglycemic agents and inadequately controlled hypertension (systolic blood pressure [sBP] ≥ 130 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure [dBP] ≥ 80 mmHg) who were being treated with olmesartan were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to an azelnidipine group or a trichlormethiazide group and were followed up for 48 weeks. Main outcome measure was the difference in the change in HbA1c levels from the baseline values at 48 weeks between these two groups. Results Of the 240 subjects that were enrolled, 209 subjects (azelnidipine group: 103 patients, trichlormethiazide group: 106 patients) completed this trial. At 48 weeks, the following changes were observed in the azelnidipine and trichlormethiazide groups, respectively: HbA1c levels, 0.19 ± 0.52% and 0.19 ± 0.54%; sBP/dBP, -10.7 ± 9.6/-6.6 ± 6.6 mmHg and -7.1 ± 7.7/-3.3 ± 6.1 mmHg (P < 0.001 for both sBP and dBP). In both groups, dizziness (12 patients [11.7%] and 16 patients [15.1%]) and edema (16 patients [15.5%] and 7 patients [6.6%], P = 0.047) were observed during the 48-week follow-up period. Conclusions Azelnidipine was more effective for controlling blood pressure than trichlormethiazide in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients, whereas trichlormethiazide was more effective for reducing albuminuria than azelnidipine. Both of these agents, however, similarly exacerbated glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension. Trial Registration UMIN 000006081.