Saurabh Zalpuri

Red-blood-cell alloimmunization and number of red-blood-cell transfusions

Background  Patients receiving red‐blood‐cells may form antibodies against the alloantigens expressed by red‐blood‐cells, with the risk of serious morbidity and the need for extensive phenotype‐matching in subsequent transfusions. The incidence of alloimmunization is considered variable for specific patient groups and for first time antibody formation. We therefore studied the cumulative incidence of the first formed alloantibody as a function of red‐blood‐cells exposure.

Immunosuppressants and alloimmunization against red blood cell transfusions

Patients receiving red blood cell (RBC) transfusions are at risk of developing alloantibodies against donor RBC antigens. The risk of alloimmunization is dependent on the number of units administered and patients genetic predisposition, but has also been suggested to be modulated by a patients clinical profile. Our aim was to examine whether immunosuppressants suppress the development of clinically relevant RBC antibodies.

Red-blood-cell alloimmunisation in relation to antigens' exposure and their immunogenicity: a cohort study

BACKGROUND Matching donor red blood cells based on recipient antigens prevents alloimmunisation. Knowledge about the immunogenicity of red-blood-cell antigens can help optimise risk-adapted matching strategies. We set out to assess the immunogenicity of red-blood-cell antigens. METHODS In an incident new-user cohort of previously non-transfused, non-alloimmunised white patients receiving non-extended matched red-blood-cell transfusions in six Dutch hospitals between 2006 and 2013, we determined the cumulative number of mismatched red-blood-cell units per patient. We used multiple imputation to address missing antigen data. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, we estimated cumulative alloimmunisation incidences per mismatched antigen dose as a measure of immunogenicity. FINDINGS Of 54 347 patients assessed, 21 512 were included in our study. Alloantibodies occurred in 474 (2·2%) of all transfused patients, with cumulative alloimmunisation incidences increasing up to 7·7% (95% CI 4·9-11·2) after 40 units received. The antigens C, c, E, K, and Jk(a) were responsible for 78% of all alloimmunisations in our cohort. K, E, and C(w) were the most immunogenic antigens (cumulative immunisation incidences after 2 mismatched units of 2·3% [95% CI 1·0-4·8] for K, 1·5% [0·6-3·0] for E, and 1·2% [0·0-10·8] for C(w)). These antigens were 8·7 times (for K), 5·4 times (for E), and 4·6 times (for C(w)) as immunogenic as Fy(a). The next most immunogenic antigens were, in order, e (1·9 times as immunogenic as Fy(a)), Jk(a) (1·9 times), and c (1·6 times). INTERPRETATION Red-blood-cell antigens vary in their potency to evoke a humoral immune response. Our findings highlight that donor-recipient red-blood-cell matching strategies will be most efficient when primarily focusing on prevention of C, c, E, K, and Jk(a) alloimmunisation. Matching for Fy(a) is of lower clinical relevance. Variations of antigen frequencies determined by ethnic background prevent extrapolating these conclusions to non-white populations. FUNDING None.

Intensive red blood cell transfusions and risk of alloimmunization.

Exposure to allogenic red blood cells (RBCs) may lead to formation of antibodies against nonself‐antigens in transfused patients. While alloimmunization rates are known to increase with the number of transfusions, the transfusion course in patients can vary from receiving multiple units during a single transfusion event or getting them dispersed over a long(er) period. In this study we compared the immunization risk between different transfusion intensities.

Early occurrence of red blood cell alloimmunization in patients with sickle cell disease

Red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization is a major complication of transfusion therapy in sickle cell disease (SCD). Identification of high‐risk patients is hampered by lack of studies that take the cumulative transfusion exposure into account. In this retrospective cohort study among previously non‐transfused SCD patients in the Netherlands, we aimed to elucidate the association between the cumulative transfusion exposure, first alloimmunization and independent risk factors. A total of 245 patients received 11 952 RBC units. Alloimmunization occurred in 43 patients (18%), half of them formed their first alloantibody before the 8th unit. In patients with exposure to non‐extended matched transfusions (ABO and RhD) the cumulative alloimmunization risk increased up to 35% after 60 transfused units. This was significantly higher compared to a general transfused population (HR 6.6, CI 4.2–10.6). Receiving the first transfusion after the age of 5 was an independent risk factor for alloimmunization (HR 2.3, CI 1.0–5.1). Incidental, episodic transfusions in comparison to chronic scheme transfusions (HR 2.3, CI 0.9–6.0), and exposure to non‐extended matched units in comparison to extended matching (HR 2.0, CI 0.9–4.6) seemed to confer a higher alloimmunization risk. The majority of first alloantibodies are formed after minor transfusion exposure, substantiating suggestions of a responder phenotype in SCD and stressing the need for risk factor identification. In this study, older age at first transfusion, episodic transfusions and non‐extended matched transfusions appeared to be risk factors for alloimmunization. Am. J. Hematol. 91:763–769, 2016.

Risk Factors for Alloimmunisation after red blood Cell Transfusions (R-FACT): a case cohort study

Introduction Individuals exposed to red blood cell alloantigens through transfusion, pregnancy or transplantation may produce antibodies against the alloantigens. Alloantibodies can pose serious clinical problems such as delayed haemolytic reactions and logistic problems, for example, to obtain timely and properly matched transfusion blood for patients in which new alloantibodies are detected. Objective The authors hypothesise that the particular clinical conditions (eg, used medication, concomitant infection, cellular immunity) during which transfusions are given may contribute to the risk of immunisation. The aim of this research was to examine the association between clinical, environmental and genetic characteristics of the recipient of erythrocyte transfusions and the risk against erythrocyte alloimmunisation during that transfusion episode. Methods and analysis Study design Incident case–cohort study. Setting Secondary care, nationwide study (within the Netherlands) including seven hospitals, from January 2005 to December 2011. Study population Consecutive red cell transfused patients at the study centres. Inclusion The study cohort comprises of consecutive red blood cell transfused patients at the study centre. Exclusion Patients with transfusions before the study period and/or pre-existing alloantibodies.Cases defined as first time alloantibody formers; Controls defined as transfused individuals matched (on number of transfusions) to cases and have not formed an alloantibody. Statistical analysis Logistic regression models will be used to assess the association between the risk to develop antibodies and potential risk factors, adjusted for other risk factors. Ethics and dissemination Approval at each local ethics regulatory committee will be obtained. Data will be coded for privacy reasons. Patients will be sent a letter and an information brochure explaining the purpose of the study. A consent form in presence of the study coordinator will be signed before the blood taking commences. Investigators will submit progress summary of the study to study sponsor regularly. Investigators will notify the accredited ethics board of the end of the study within a period of 8 weeks.

Effect of storage of red blood cells on alloimmunization

Red blood cells (RBCs) undergo changes during storage. Various studies have suggested a higher risk of adverse and often multifactorial clinical outcomes associated with older‐stored RBCs. Our aim therefore was to examine if storage of transfused RBCs is also associated with the risk of RBC‐specific alloantibody formation.

Red cell alloimmunisation in patients with different types of infections.

Red cell alloantigen exposure can cause alloantibody‐associated morbidity. Murine models have suggested that inflammation modulates red cell alloimmunisation. This study quantifies alloimmunisation risks during infectious episodes in humans. We performed a multicentre case–control study within a source population of patients receiving their first and subsequent red cell transfusions during an 8‐year follow‐up period. Patients developing a first transfusion‐induced red cell alloantibody (N = 505) were each compared with two similarly exposed, but non‐alloimmunised controls (N = 1010) during a 5‐week ‘alloimmunisation risk period’ using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Transfusions during ‘severe’ bacterial (tissue‐invasive) infections were associated with increased risks of alloantibody development [adjusted relative risk (RR) 1·34, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0·97–1·85], especially when these infections were accompanied with long‐standing fever (RR 3·06, 95% CI 1·57–5·96). Disseminated viral disorders demonstrated a trend towards increased risks (RR 2·41, 95% CI 0·89–6·53), in apparent contrast to a possible protection associated with Gram‐negative bacteraemia (RR 0·58, 95% CI 0·13–1·14). ‘Simple’ bacterial infections, Gram‐positive bacteraemia, fungal infections, maximum C‐reactive protein values and leucocytosis were not associated with red cell alloimmunisation. These findings are consistent with murine models. Confirmatory research is needed before patients likely to develop alloantibodies may be identified based on their infectious conditions at time of transfusion.

Associations of health status with subsequent blood donor behavior — an alternative perspective on the Healthy Donor Effect from Donor InSight

Introduction In donor health research, the ‘Healthy Donor Effect’ (HDE) often biases study results and hampers their interpretation. This refers to the fact that donors are a selected ‘healthier’ subset of a population due to both donor selection procedures and self-selection. Donors with long versus short donor careers, or with high versus low donation intensities are often compared to avoid this HDE, but underlying health differences might also cause these differences in behaviour. Our aim was to estimate to what extent a donor´s perceived health status associates with donation cessation and intensity. Methods All active whole blood donors participating in Donor InSight (2007–2009; 11,107 male; 12,616 female) were included in this prospective cohort study. We performed Cox survival and Poisson regression analyses to assess whether self-reported health status, medication use, disease diagnosed by a physician and recently having consulted a general practitioner (GP) or specialist were associated with (time to) donation cessation and donation intensity. Results At the end of 2013, 44% of the donors in this study had stopped donating. Donors in self-rated good health had a 15% lower risk to stop donating compared to donors in perceived poorer health. Medication use, disease diagnoses and consulting a GP were associated with a 20–40% increased risk to stop donating and a lower donation intensity, when adjusting for age, number of donations and new donor status. Both men and women reporting good health made on average 10% more donations. Conclusion Donors with a “good” health status were less likely to stop donating blood and tended to donate blood more often than donors with perceived poorer health status. This implies that the HDE is an important source of selection bias in studies on donor health and this includes studies where comparisons within donors are made. This HDE should be adjusted for appropriately when assessing health effects of donation and donors’ health status may provide estimates of future donation behavior.

Utility of zinc protoporphyrin in management of whole blood donors

Deferral for low hemoglobin (Hb) increases the likelihood that donors do not return for future donations. Zinc protoporphyrin (ZPP) has been described as a sensitive marker of iron‐deficient erythropoiesis, before Hb decreases. It is a relatively cheap, rapid, and easy‐to‐perform measurement in a drop of whole blood. To assess the utility of ZPP measurement in donor management we examined whether ZPP and Hb levels among first‐time donors differ from repeat donors. We further explored whether ZPP increases over subsequent donations at a donor population level and whether increasing ZPP levels coincide with decreasing Hb levels and donor deferral.