Sayantan Paria

Oxidative Decarboxylation of Benzilic Acid by a Biomimetic Iron(II) Complex: Evidence for an Iron(IV)–Oxo–Hydroxo Oxidant from O2

The existence of dioxygen-activating nonheme iron enzymes that carry out four-electron substrate oxidations requires a mechanism where the initially formed iron(III)–superoxide species must be involved as an oxidant to initiate the reaction. Such a step has been proposed for many aromatic and aliphatic C C bond cleaving dioxygenases. Recently discovered examples include 2-hydroxyethylphosphonate (HEP) dioxygenase (HEPD) which catalyzes the cleavage of the HEP C1 C2 bond to form hydroxymethylphosphonate and formate, and CloR, which is involved in the conversion of a mandelate moiety to benzoate in the biosynthesis of chlorobiocin, an aminocoumarin antibiotic. For the above examples, the substrate provides all four electrons needed for the reduction of O2 to water. In contrast, the Rieske dioxygenases require two electrons from NADH to carry out the cis-dihydroxylation of aromatic C=C bonds. 7] A high-valent iron–oxo–hydroxo intermediate has been proposed to carry out this transformation. Recently, a synthetic iron(II)–mandelate complex supported by a tripodal N4 donor ligand was reported by us [8] to undergo nearly quantitative oxidative decarboxylation in the presence of dioxygen, thereby mimicking the C C bond cleavage reaction of CloR. An iron(III)–superoxo species has been implicated in the reaction pathway. In exploring the O2 reactivity of related iron(II)–a-hydroxy acid complexes, specifically those of benzilic acid (2,2-diphenyl-2-hydroxyacetic acid), we discovered a new mode of O2 activation that leads to the formation of an iron(IV)–oxo–hydroxo oxidant. These intriguing results are reported here. The iron(II) model complex [ðTp2ÞFe(benzilate)] (1), where Tp2 = hydrotris(3,5-diphenylpyrazolyl)borate, was synthesized by reacting equimolar amounts of the polydentate ligand, iron(II) perchlorate, benzilic acid, and triethylamine in methanol. The H NMR spectrum of 1 shows broad and paramagnetically shifted peaks indicative of the high-spin nature of the iron(II) complex (Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). The X-ray crystal structure of 1 shows a distorted square-pyramidal iron(II) center (t = 0.46) that is coordinated by the facial tridentate Tp2 ligand and the carboxylate of the benzilate monoanion (Figure 1). The

A functional model of extradiol-cleaving catechol dioxygenases: mimicking the 2-his-1-carboxylate facial triad.

The synthesis and characterization of an iron-catecholate model complex of a tridentate 2-N-1-carboxylate ligand derived from L-proline are reported. The X-ray crystal structure of the complex [(L)(3)Fe(3)(DBC)(3)] (1) (where L is 1-(2-pyridylmethyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxylate and DBC is the dianion of 3,5-di-tert-butyl catechol) reveals that the tridentate ligand binds to the iron center in a facial manner and mimics the 2-his-1-carboxylate facial triad motif observed in extradiol-cleaving catechol dioxygenases. The iron(III)-catecholate complex (1) reacts with dioxygen in acetonitrile in ambient conditions to cleave the C-C bond of catecholate. In the reaction, an equal amount of extra- and intradiol cleavage products are formed without any auto-oxidation product. The iron-catecholate complex is a potential functional model of extradiol-cleaving catechol dioxygenases.

Dioxygen Reactivity of Biomimetic Iron–Catecholate and Iron–o-Aminophenolate Complexes of a Tris(2-pyridylthio)methanido Ligand: Aromatic CC Bond Cleavage of Catecholate versus o-Iminobenzosemiquinonate Radical Formation

An iron(III)-catecholate complex [L(1)Fe(III)(DBC)] (2) and an iron(II)-o-aminophenolate complex [L(1)Fe(II)(HAP)] (3; where L(1) = tris(2-pyridylthio)methanido anion, DBC = dianionic 3,5-di-tert-butylcatecholate, and HAP = monoanionic 4,6-di-tert-butyl-2-aminophenolate) have been synthesised from an iron(II)-acetonitrile complex [L(1)Fe(II)(CH(3)CN)(2)](ClO(4)) (1). Complex 2 reacts with dioxygen to oxidatively cleave the aromatic C-C bond of DBC giving rise to selective extradiol cleavage products. Controlled chemical or electrochemical oxidation of 2, on the other hand, forms an iron(III)-semiquinone radical complex [L(1)Fe(III)(SQ)](PF(6)) (2(ox)-PF(6); SQ = 3,5-di-tert-butylsemiquinonate). The iron(II)-o-aminophenolate complex (3) reacts with dioxygen to afford an iron(III)-o-iminosemiquinonato radical complex [L(1)Fe(III)(ISQ)](ClO(4))(3(ox)-ClO(4); ISQ = 4,6-di-tert-butyl-o-iminobenzosemiquinonato radical) via an iron(III)-o-amidophenolate intermediate species. Structural characterisations of 1, 2, 2(ox) and 3(ox) reveal the presence of a strong iron-carbon bonding interaction in all the complexes. The bond parameters of 2(ox) and 3(ox) clearly establish the radical nature of catecholate- and o-aminophenolate-derived ligand, respectively. The effect of iron-carbon bonding interaction on the dioxygen reactivity of biomimetic iron-catecholate and iron-o-aminophenolate complexes is discussed.

Reactivity of an Iron–Oxygen Oxidant Generated upon Oxidative Decarboxylation of Biomimetic Iron(II) α-Hydroxy Acid Complexes

Three biomimetic iron(II) α-hydroxy acid complexes, [(Tp(Ph2))Fe(II)(mandelate)(H2O)] (1), [(Tp(Ph2))Fe(II)(benzilate)] (2), and [(Tp(Ph2))Fe(II)(HMP)] (3), together with two iron(II) α-methoxy acid complexes, [(Tp(Ph2))Fe(II)(MPA)] (4) and [(Tp(Ph2))Fe(II)(MMP)] (5) (where HMP = 2-hydroxy-2-methylpropanoate, MPA = 2-methoxy-2-phenylacetate, and MMP = 2-methoxy-2-methylpropanoate), of a facial tridentate ligand Tp(Ph2) [where Tp(Ph2) = hydrotris(3,5-diphenylpyrazole-1-yl)borate] were isolated and characterized to study the mechanism of dioxygen activation at the iron(II) centers. Single-crystal X-ray structural analyses of 1, 2, and 5 were performed to assess the binding mode of an α-hydroxy/methoxy acid anion to the iron(II) center. While the iron(II) α-methoxy acid complexes are unreactive toward dioxygen, the iron(II) α-hydroxy acid complexes undergo oxidative decarboxylation, implying the importance of the hydroxyl group in the activation of dioxygen. In the reaction with dioxygen, the iron(II) α-hydroxy acid complexes form iron(III) phenolate complexes of a modified ligand (Tp(Ph2)*), where the ortho position of one of the phenyl rings of Tp(Ph2) gets hydroxylated. The iron(II) mandelate complex (1), upon decarboxylation of mandelate, affords a mixture of benzaldehyde (67%), benzoic acid (20%), and benzyl alcohol (10%). On the other hand, complexes 2 and 3 react with dioxygen to form benzophenone and acetone, respectively. The intramolecular ligand hydroxylation gets inhibited in the presence of external intercepting agents. Reactions of 1 and 2 with dioxygen in the presence of an excess amount of alkenes result in the formation of the corresponding cis-diols in good yield. The incorporation of both oxygen atoms of dioxygen into the diol products is confirmed by (18)O-labeling studies. On the basis of reactivity and mechanistic studies, the generation of a nucleophilic iron-oxygen intermediate upon decarboxylation of the coordinated α-hydroxy acids is proposed as the active oxidant. The novel iron-oxygen intermediate oxidizes various substrates like sulfide, fluorene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and benzaldehyde. The oxidant oxidizes benzaldehyde to benzoic acid and also participates in the Cannizzaro reaction.

Oxidative decarboxylation of α-hydroxy acids by a functional model of the nonheme iron oxygenase, CloR

Iron(II)-alpha-hydroxy acid complexes of a tripodal N4 ligand undergo oxidative decarboxylation upon exposure to O(2) and mimic the aliphatic C1-C2 cleavage step catalyzed by CloR.

Generation, Characterization, and Reactivity of a CuII–Alkylperoxide/Anilino Radical Complex: Insight into the O–O Bond Cleavage Mechanism

The reaction of [Cu(I)(TIPT3tren) (CH3CN)]ClO4 (1) and cumene hydroperoxide (C6H5C(CH3)2OOH, ROOH) at -60 °C in CH2Cl2 gave a Cu(II)-alkylperoxide/anilino radical complex 2, the formation of which was confirmed by UV-vis, resonance Raman, EPR, and CSI-mass spectroscopy. The mechanism of formation of 2, as well as its reactivity, has been explored.

Copper(II)-mediated oxidative transformation of vic-dioxime to furoxan: evidence for a copper(II)-dinitrosoalkene intermediate.

The mononuclear copper(II) complex [Cu(H(2)L(1))(2)(H(2)O)](ClO(4))(2) (1) (where H(2)L(1) = 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dioxime) reacts with copper(II) perchlorate in acetonitrile at ambient conditions in the presence of triethylamine to afford a copper(II) complex, [Cu(L(3))(2)(H(2)O)](ClO(4))(2) (2a), of 1,10-phenanthroline furoxan. A similar complex [Cu(L(3))(2)Cl](ClO(4)) (2) is isolated from the reaction of H(2)L(1) with copper(II) chloride, triethylamine, and sodium perchlorate in acetonitrile. The two-electron oxidation of the vic-dioxime to furoxan is confirmed from the X-ray single crystal structure of 2. An intermediate species, showing an absorption band at 608 nm, is observed at -20 °C during the conversion of 1 to 2a. A similar blue intermediate is formed during the reaction of [Cu(HDMG)(2)] (H(2)DMG = dimethylglyoxime) with ceric ammonium nitrate, but H(2)DMG treated with ceric ammonium nitrate does not form any intermediate. This suggests the involvement of a copper(II) complex in the intermediate step. The intermediate species is also observed during the two-electron oxidation of other vic-dioximes. On the basis of the spectroscopic evidence and the nature of the final products, the intermediate is proposed to be a mononuclear copper(II) complex ligated by a vic-dioxime and a dinitrosoalkene. The dinitrosoalkene is generated upon two-electron oxidation of the dioxime. The transient blue color of the dioxime-copper(II)-dinitrosoalkene complex may be attributed to the ligand-to-ligand charge transfer transition. The intermediate species slowly decays to the corresponding two-electron oxidized form of vic-dioxime, i.e. furoxan and [Cu(CH(3)CN)(4)](ClO(4)). The formation of two isomeric furoxans derived from the reaction of an asymmetric vic-dioxime, hexane-2,3-dioxime, and copper(II) perchlorate supports the involvement of a dinitrosoalkene species in the intermediate step. In addition, the oxidation of 2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dioxime (H(2)L(2)) to the corresponding furoxan and subsequent formation of a copper(I) complex [Cu(L(4))(2)](ClO(4)) (3) (where L(4) = 2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline furoxan) are discussed.

Reductive Activation of O2 by Non-Heme Iron(II) Benzilate Complexes of N4 Ligands: Effect of Ligand Topology on the Reactivity of O2-Derived Oxidant

A series of iron(II) benzilate complexes (1-7) with general formula [(L)FeII(benzilate)]+ have been isolated and characterized to study the effect of supporting ligand (L) on the reactivity of metal-based oxidant generated in the reaction with dioxygen. Five tripodal N4 ligands (tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine (TPA in 1), tris(6-methyl-2-pyridylmethyl)amine (6-Me3-TPA in 2), N1,N1-dimethyl-N2,N2-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)ethane-1,2-diamine (iso-BPMEN in 3), N1,N1-dimethyl-N2,N2-bis(6-methyl-2-pyridylmethyl)ethane-1,2-diamine (6-Me2-iso-BPMEN in 4), and tris(2-benzimidazolylmethyl)amine (TBimA in 7)) along with two linear tetradentate amine ligands (N1,N2-dimethyl-N1,N2-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)ethane-1,2-diamine (BPMEN in 5) and N1,N2-dimethyl-N1,N2-bis(6-methyl-2-pyridylmethyl)ethane-1,2-diamine (6-Me2-BPMEN in 6)) were employed in the study. Single-crystal X-ray structural studies reveal that each of the complex cations of 1-3 and 5 contains a mononuclear six-coordinate iron(II) center coordinated by a monoanionic benzilate, whereas complex 7 contains a mononuclear five-coordinate iron(II) center. Benzilate binds to the iron center in a monodentate fashion via one of the carboxylate oxygens in 1 and 7, but it coordinates in a bidentate chelating mode through carboxylate oxygen and neutral hydroxy oxygen in 2, 3, and 5. All of the iron(II) complexes react with dioxygen to exhibit quantitative decarboxylation of benzilic acid to benzophenone. In the decarboxylation pathway, dioxygen becomes reduced on the iron center and the resulting iron-oxygen oxidant shows versatile reactivity. The oxidants are nucleophilic in nature and oxidize sulfide to sulfoxide and sulfone. Furthermore, complexes 2 and 4-6 react with alkenes to produce cis-diols in moderate yields with the incorporation of both the oxygen atoms of dioxygen. The oxygen atoms of the nucleophilic oxidants do not exchange with water. On the basis of interception studies, nucleophilic iron(II) hydroperoxides are proposed to generate in situ in the reaction pathways. The difference in reactivity of the complexes toward external substrates could be attributed to the geometry of the O2-derived iron-oxygen oxidant. DFT calculations suggest that, among all possible geometries and spin states, high-spin side-on iron(II) hydroperoxides are energetically favorable for the complexes of 6-Me3-TPA, 6-Me2-iso-BPMEN, BPMEN, and 6-Me2-BPMEN ligands, while high spin end-on iron(II) hydroperoxides are favorable for the complexes of TPA, iso-BPMEN, and TBimA ligands.