Saye Khoo

British HIV Association guidelines for the treatment of HIV-1-infected adults with antiretroviral therapy 2008

This summary document is an update to the full British HIV Association (BHIVA) Treatment Guidelines published in HIV Medicine in July 2005 (Volume 6, Supplement 2). Only the ‘What to start with’ and ‘Treatment-experienced patients’ sections have been completely rewritten. The tables of recommendations (Tables 1–7) have also been updated to include new data. Please refer to the full guidelines for more information.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection (PROUD): effectiveness results from the pilot phase of a pragmatic open-label randomised trial

Summary Background Randomised placebo-controlled trials have shown that daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tenofovir–emtricitabine reduces the risk of HIV infection. However, this benefit could be counteracted by risk compensation in users of PrEP. We did the PROUD study to assess this effect. Methods PROUD is an open-label randomised trial done at 13 sexual health clinics in England. We enrolled HIV-negative gay and other men who have sex with men who had had anal intercourse without a condom in the previous 90 days. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive daily combined tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (245 mg) and emtricitabine (200 mg) either immediately or after a deferral period of 1 year. Randomisation was done via web-based access to a central computer-generated list with variable block sizes (stratified by clinical site). Follow-up was quarterly. The primary outcomes for the pilot phase were time to accrue 500 participants and retention; secondary outcomes included incident HIV infection during the deferral period, safety, adherence, and risk compensation. The trial is registered with ISRCTN (number ISRCTN94465371) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02065986). Findings We enrolled 544 participants (275 in the immediate group, 269 in the deferred group) between Nov 29, 2012, and April 30, 2014. Based on early evidence of effectiveness, the trial steering committee recommended on Oct 13, 2014, that all deferred participants be offered PrEP. Follow-up for HIV incidence was complete for 243 (94%) of 259 patient-years in the immediate group versus 222 (90%) of 245 patient-years in the deferred group. Three HIV infections occurred in the immediate group (1·2/100 person-years) versus 20 in the deferred group (9·0/100 person-years) despite 174 prescriptions of post-exposure prophylaxis in the deferred group (relative reduction 86%, 90% CI 64–96, p=0·0001; absolute difference 7·8/100 person-years, 90% CI 4·3–11·3). 13 men (90% CI 9–23) in a similar population would need access to 1 year of PrEP to avert one HIV infection. We recorded no serious adverse drug reactions; 28 adverse events, most commonly nausea, headache, and arthralgia, resulted in interruption of PrEp. We detected no difference in the occurrence of sexually transmitted infections, including rectal gonorrhoea and chlamydia, between groups, despite a suggestion of risk compensation among some PrEP recipients. Interpretation In this high incidence population, daily tenofovir–emtricitabine conferred even higher protection against HIV than in placebo-controlled trials, refuting concerns that effectiveness would be less in a real-world setting. There was no evidence of an increase in other sexually transmitted infections. Our findings strongly support the addition of PrEP to the standard of prevention for men who have sex with men at risk of HIV infection. Funding MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Public Health England, and Gilead Sciences.

British HIV Association guidelines for the treatment of HIV-1-positive adults with antiretroviral therapy 2015

Writing Group Duncan Churchill, Chair, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK Laura Waters, Vice Chair, Mortimer Market Centre, London, UK Nadia Ahmed, Mortimer Market Centre, London, UK Brian Angus, University of Oxford, UK Marta Boffito, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK Mark Bower, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK David Dunn, University College London, UK Simon Edwards, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, UK Carol Emerson, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK Sarah Fidler, Imperial College School of Medicine at St Mary’s, London, UK †Martin Fisher, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK Rob Horne, University College London, UK Saye Khoo, University of Liverpool, UK Clifford Leen, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK Nicola Mackie, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK Neal Marshall, Royal Free Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK Fernando Monteiro, UK-CAB Mark Nelson, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

P-Glycoprotein and transporter MRP1 reduce HIV protease inhibitor uptake in CD4 cells: potential for accelerated viral drug resistance?

BackgroundThe multidrug transporters P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and MRP1 are functionally expressed in several subclasses of lymphocytes. HIV-1 protease inhibitors interact with both; consequently the transporters could reduce the local concentration of HIV-1 protease inhibitors and, thus, influence the selection of viral mutants. ObjectivesTo study the effect of the expression of P-gp and MRP1 on the transport and accumulation of HIV-1 protease inhibitors in human lymphocytes and to study the effects of specific P-gp and MRP1 inhibitors. MethodsThe initial rate and the steady-state intracellular accumulation of radiolabelled ritonavir, indinavir, saquinavir and nelfinavir was measured in three human lymphocyte cell lines: control CEM cells, CEM-MDR cells, which express 30-fold more P-gp than CEM cells, and CEM-MRP cells, which express fivefold more MRP1 protein than CEM cells. The effect of specific inhibitors of P-gp (GF 120918) and MRP1 (MK 571) was also examined. ResultsCompared with CEM cells, the initial rates of uptake and the steady-state intracellular concentrations of all protease inhibitors are significantly reduced in CEM-MDR cells. The intracellular concentrations of the protease inhibitors are increased upon co-administration with GF 120918, in some cases to levels approaching those in CEM cells. The intracellular concentrations of the protease inhibitors are also significantly reduced in CEM-MRP cells. Co-administration with MK -571 can partially overcome these effects. ConclusionsThe overexpression of multidrug transporters significantly reduces the accumulation of protease inhibitors at this major site of virus replication, which, potentially, could accelerate the acquisition of viral resistance. Targeted inhibition of P-gp may represent an important strategy by which this problem can be overcome.

Minimum Costs for Producing Hepatitis C Direct-Acting Antivirals for Use in Large-Scale Treatment Access Programs in Developing Countries

Large-scale manufacture of treatment to cure hepatitis C virus (HCV) is feasible, with target prices of US

HIV protease inhibitors are substrates for OATP1A2, OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 and lopinavir plasma concentrations are influenced by SLCO1B1 polymorphisms

100–

Impact of CYP2B6 983T>C polymorphism on non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor plasma concentrations in HIV-infected patients

250 per 12-week treatment course. These low prices could make widespread access to HCV treatment in low- and middle-income countries a realistic goal.

Differences in the intracellular accumulation of HIV protease inhibitors in vitro and the effect of active transport.

Objective OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 are major hepatic drug transporters whilst OATP1A2 is mainly located in the brain but is also located in liver and several other organs. These transporters affect the distribution and clearance of many endobiotics and xenobiotics and have been reported to have functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). We have assessed the substrate specificities of these transporters for a panel of antiretrovirals and investigated the effects of SNPs within these transporters on the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir. Methods SLCO1A2, SLCO1B1 and SLCO1B3 were cloned, verified and used to generate cRNA for use in the Xenopuslaevis oocyte transport system. Using the oocyte system, antiretrovirals were tested for their substrate specificities. Plasma samples (n=349) from the Liverpool therapeutic drug monitoring registry were genotyped for SNPs in SLCO1A2, SLCO1B1 and SLCO1B3 and associations between SNPs and lopinavir plasma concentrations were analysed. Result Antiretroviral protease inhibitors, but not non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, are substrates for OATP1A2, OATP1B1 and OATP1B3. Furthermore, ritonavir was not an inhibitor of OATP1B1. The 521T>C polymorphism in SLCO1B1 was significantly associated with higher lopinavir plasma concentrations. No associations were observed with functional variants of SLCO1A2 and SLCO1B3. Conclusion These data add to our understanding of the factors that contribute to variability in plasma concentrations of protease inhibitors. Further studies are now required to confirm the association of SLCO1B1 521T>C with lopinavir plasma concentrations and to assess the influence of other polymorphisms in the SLCO family.

HIV infection and stroke: Current perspectives and future directions

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of CYP2B6 polymorphisms (according to ethnicity) and the influence of heterozygosity and homozygosity on plasma concentrations of efavirenz and nevirapine. METHODS Following written informed consent, 225 Caucasians and 146 Blacks were recruited from the German Competence Network for HIV/AIDS. Plasma concentrations of efavirenz and nevirapine were assessed by HPLC, and genotyping for 516G>T, 983T>C and 1459T>C polymorphisms in CYP2B6 was conducted by real-time PCR-based allelic discrimination. RESULTS The minor allele frequency for 516G>T, 983T>C and 1459T>C was 0.29, 0 and 0.08 in Caucasians and 0.34, 0.07 and 0.02 in Blacks, respectively. Two Black patients with the 983C allele receiving efavirenz were identified and both were withdrawn from therapy within 1 week of sampling due to toxicity. In multivariate analyses, efavirenz and nevirapine plasma concentrations were significantly associated with 983T>C (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.02, respectively), 516G>T (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.002, respectively) and time of drug analysis post-dose (P < 0.0001 for both). Body mass index was independently related to efavirenz (P = 0.04) but not nevirapine concentrations, and age was related to nevirapine (P = 0.05) but not efavirenz concentrations. Consistent with other studies, 1459C>T was not associated with plasma concentrations of either drug (P > 0.05 for both drugs). CONCLUSIONS This is the first report that the 983T>C genotype (part of the CYP2B6*18 haplotype) impacts on nevirapine plasma concentrations and the first study to assess the impact of 983C homozygosity on efavirenz concentrations. These data have implications for administration of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors to Black patients.

The potential for interactions between antimalarial and antiretroviral drugs.

ObjectivesTo investigate the intracellular accumulation of HIV protease inhibitors (PI) and to assess the effect of active transport on this accumulation. MethodsCEM cells were incubated with a PI for 18 h and the intracellular concentration determined using cell number and radioactivity. The effect of active transport was investigated using cells expressing P-glycoprotein (CEMVBL) and cells expressing multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1; CEME1000). Incubations were also carried out at 4°C and in the presence of 2-deoxyglucose plus rotenone to examine the effect of inhibiting active transport. ResultsNelfinavir (NFV) accumulated to the greatest extent (> 80-fold) followed by saquinavir (SQV; ∼ 30-fold), ritonavir (RTV; 3–7-fold) and finally indinavir (IDV; extracellular equivalent to intracellular). In CEMVBL cells there was a significant reduction in the intracellular accumulation of NFV, SQV and RTV and in CEME1000 cells there was reduced accumulation of SQV and RTV. Inhibition of active transport processes caused a reduction in SQV and RTV accumulation but had no effect on IDV accumulation in all cell types. NFV accumulation was increased in CEMVBLcells as a result of inhibition of active transport. ConclusionsMarked differences can be detected in the intracellular accumulation of HIV PI drugs in vitro. Both P-glycoprotein and MRP1 may play a role in limiting the intracellular concentration of the PI and active influx mechanisms may contribute to drug accumulation.