Scheltus J. van Luijk
VU University Amsterdam
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Scheltus J. van Luijk.
Medical Teacher | 2008
Fedde Scheele; Pim W. Teunissen; Scheltus J. van Luijk; Erik Heineman; Lia Fluit; Hanneke Mulder; Abe Meininger; Marjo Wijnen-Meijer; Gerrit Glas; Henk E. Sluiter; Thalia Hummel
Medical boards around the world face the challenge of creating competency-based postgraduate training programs. Recent legislation requires that all postgraduate medical training programmes in The Netherlands be reformed. In this article the Dutch Advisory Board for Postgraduate Curriculum Development shares some of their experiences with guiding the design of specialist training programs, based on the Canadian Medical Educational Directives for Specialists (CanMEDS). All twenty-seven Dutch Medical Specialty Societies take three steps in designing a curriculum. First they divide the entire content of a specialty into logical units, so-called ‘themes’. The second step is discussing, for each theme, for which tasks trainees have to be instructed, guided, and assessed. Finally, for each task an assessment method is chosen to focus on a limited number of CanMEDS roles. This leads to a three step training cycle: (i) based on their in-training assessment and practices, trainees will gather evidence on their development in a portfolio; (ii) this evidence stimulates the trainee and the supervisor to regularly reflect on a trainees global development regarding the CanMEDS roles as well as on the performance in specific tasks; (iii) a personal development plan structures future learning goals and strategies. The experiences in the Netherlands are in line with international developments in postgraduate medical education and with the literature on workplace-based teaching and learning.
European Journal of Internal Medicine | 2009
Walther N. K. A. van Mook; Scheltus J. van Luijk; Helen O'Sullivan; Valerie Wass; Jan Harm Zwaveling; Cees van der Vleuten
This article is the second in a series on professionalism in the European Journal of Internal Medicine. The current article will first focus on these different views and definitions that are currently adopted by the various researchers, and subsequently discuss the consequences for the training and assessment of professionalism and professional behaviour in medical education.
Medical Teacher | 2007
Agnes D. Diemers; Diana Dolmans; Marijke van Santen; Scheltus J. van Luijk; Ameike M.B. Janssen-Noordman; Albert Scherpbier
Introduction: Real patient encounters before the clinical phase of undergraduate medical education are recommended to stimulate integration of theory and practice. Such encounters are not easy to integrate into the three phases of the problem-based learning cycle, i.e. preparation, self-study and reporting. The authors studied students’ perceptions of problem-based learning with real patient encounters as the starting point for learning. Method: Students’ perceptions of the programme with real patients were evaluated by means of a questionnaire. Mean item scores on a five-point Likert scale and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results: Students showed satisfaction with the patient encounters and said they learned a lot from them. Reporting was also highly rated, particularly the integration of theory and practice. Preparation and self-study received lower scores. Discussion: The findings support the view that real patient encounters can act as a powerful driving force for learning and enhance integration of theory and practice. Student learning might benefit from: better information to students and teachers regarding educational objectives, teacher training and careful selection of patients. In order to gain more insight into learning from patient encounters, further studies should address students’ and teachers’ views and behaviours in respect of this type of learning.
Genetics in Medicine | 2012
Elisa Houwink; Lidewij Henneman; Myrte Westerneng; Scheltus J. van Luijk; Martina C. Cornel; Jan Geert Dinant; Cees van der Vleuten
Purpose:General practitioners (GPs) are increasingly expected to deliver genetics services in daily patient care. Education in primary care genetics is considered suboptimal and in urgent need of revision and innovation. The aim of this study was to prioritize topics for genetics education for general practice.Methods:A Delphi consensus procedure consisting of three rounds was conducted. A purposively selected heterogeneous panel (n = 18) of experts, comprising six practicing GPs who were also engaged in research, five GP trainers, four clinical genetics professionals, and three representatives of patient organizations, participated. Educational needs regarding genetics in general practice in terms of knowledge, skills, and attitudes were rated and ranked in a top-10 list.Results:The entire panel completed all three rounds. Kendalls coefficient of concordance indicated significant agreement regarding the top 10 genetic education needs (P < 0.001). “Recognizing signals that are potentially indicative of a hereditary component of a disease” was rated highest, followed by “Evaluating indications for referral to a clinical genetics centre” and “Knowledge of the possibilities and limitations of genetic tests.”Conclusions:The priorities resulting from this study can inform the development of educational modules, including input for case-based education, to improve GP performance in genetic patient care.
European Journal of Internal Medicine | 2009
Walther N. K. A. van Mook; Willem S. de Grave; Scheltus J. van Luijk; Helen O'Sullivan; Valerie Wass; Cees van der Vleuten
Recommendations in the literature concerning measures to address the challenges to professionalism have converged on the establishment of an education community, on a structured curriculum dealing with professionalism, on developing programs for role modelling and mentoring, and on attention to the assessment of professional conduct. The interventions in the field of medical education appear central among these efforts, since it is during medical school that the template for professional conduct in medicine is primarily learned. This article attempts to provide a more in-depth discussion of the goals, purposes and current factors influencing teaching and learning professional behaviour in the medical school curriculum and the residency programs.
European Journal of Internal Medicine | 2009
Walther N. K. A. van Mook; Simone L. Gorter; Willem S. de Grave; Scheltus J. van Luijk; Helen O'Sullivan; Valerie Wass; Jan Harm Zwaveling; Cees van der Vleuten
Given the changes in society we are experiencing, the increasing focus on patient centred care and acknowledgment that medical education needs to continue not only in the residency programmes but throughout the doctors career, is not surprising. This article describes the attention currently paid to professionalism in the residency programmes, differences in perception of professionalism between patients, faculty, students and residents, differences in professionalism issues in the different educational phases, as well as their consequences for training and assessment regarding professionalism. Continuous medical education in professionalism is thereafter briefly discussed.
Medical Teacher | 2010
Walther N. K. A. van Mook; Simone L. Gorter; Willem S. De Grave; Scheltus J. van Luijk; Valerie Wass; Jan Harm Zwaveling; Cees van der Vleuten
Given the changes in society we are experiencing, the increasing focus on patient-centred care and acknowledgement that medical education including professionalism issues needs to continue not only in the residency programmes but also throughout the doctors career, is not surprising. Although most of the literature on professionalism pertains to learning and teaching professionalism issues, addressing unprofessional behaviour and related patient safety issues forms an alternative or perhaps complementary approach. This article describes the possibility of selecting applicants for a medical school based on personality characteristics, the attention to professional lapses in contemporary undergraduate training, as well as the magnitude, aetiology, surveillance and methods of dealing with reports of unprofessional behaviour in postgraduate education and CME.
European Journal of Human Genetics | 2014
Elisa Houwink; Sarah van Teeffelen; Arno M. M. Muijtjens; Lidewij Henneman; Florijn Jacobi; Scheltus J. van Luijk; Geert-Jan Dinant; Cees van der Vleuten; Martina C. Cornel
Medical professionals are increasingly expected to deliver genetic services in daily patient care. However, genetics education is considered to be suboptimal and in urgent need of revision and innovation. We designed a Genetics e-learning Continuing Professional Development (CPD) module aimed at improving general practitioners’ (GPs’) knowledge about oncogenetics, and we conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the outcomes at the first two levels of the Kirkpatrick framework (satisfaction, learning and behavior). Between September 2011 and March 2012, a parallel-group, pre- and post-retention (6-month follow-up) controlled group intervention trial was conducted, with repeated measurements using validated questionnaires. Eighty Dutch GP volunteers were randomly assigned to the intervention or the control group. Satisfaction with the module was high, with the three item’s scores in the range 4.1–4.3 (5-point scale) and a global score of 7.9 (10-point scale). Knowledge gains post test and at retention test were 0.055 (P<0.05) and 0.079 (P<0.01), respectively, with moderate effect sizes (0.27 and 0.31, respectively). The participants appreciated applicability in daily practice of knowledge aspects (item scores 3.3–3.8, five-point scale), but scores on self-reported identification of disease, referral to a specialist and knowledge about the possibilities/limitations of genetic testing were near neutral (2.7–2.8, five-point scale). The Genetics e-learning CPD module proved to be a feasible, satisfactory and clinically applicable method to improve oncogenetics knowledge. The educational effects can inform further development of online genetics modules aimed at improving physicians’ genetics knowledge and could potentially be relevant internationally and across a wider range of potential audiences.
Medical Teacher | 2010
Walther N. K. A. van Mook; Scheltus J. van Luijk; Marij J. G. Fey-Schoenmakers; Guido Tans; Jan-Joost E. Rethans; Cees P. M. van der Vleuten
Background: Teaching and assessment of professional behaviour (PB) has been receiving increasing attention in the educational literature and educational practice. Although the focus tends to be summative aspects, it seems perfectly feasible to combine formative and summative approaches in one procedural approach. Aims and method: Although, many examples of frameworks of professionalism and PB can be found in the literature, most originate from North America, and only few are designed in other continents. This article presents the framework for PB that is used at Maastricht medical school, the Netherlands. Results: The approach to PB used in the Dutch medical schools is described with special attention to 4 years (2005–2009) of experience with PB education in the first 3 years of the 6-year undergraduate curriculum of Maastricht medical school. Future challenges are identified. Conclusions: The adages ‘Assessment drives learning’ and ‘They do not respect what you do not inspect’ [Cohen JJ. 2006. Professionalism in medical education, an American perspective: From evidence to accountability. Med Educ 40, 607–617] suggest that formative and summative aspects of PB assessment can be combined within an assessment framework. Formative and summative assessments do not represent contrasting but rather complementary approaches. The Maastricht medical school framework combines the two approaches, as two sides of the same coin.
Medical Teacher | 2010
Scheltus J. van Luijk; Ronald C. Gorter; Walther N. K. A. van Mook
Background: From 2002 onwards, a nationwide working group of representatives from all medical (8), dental (3) and veterinary medicine (1) schools collaborated in order to develop and implement recommendations for teaching and assessing professional behaviour. Aim: The aim of this article is to describe the outcomes of this process, including hurdles encountered and challenges to be met. Method: By a qualitative survey, information was requested on teaching professional behaviour, assessment, instruments used, consequences of unprofessional behaviour and faculty training. Results: All schools have adopted at least parts of the 2002 recommendations. Differences exist mainly in the organisational structure of teaching and assessment as well as in the assessment instruments used. In all schools a longitudinal assessment of professional behaviour was accomplished. Conclusion: All schools involved have made progress since 2002 with regard to teaching and assessment of professional behaviour, resulting in a shift from an instrumental to a cultural change for some schools. A stimulating factor was societys call to focus on patient safety and therefore on assessment of unprofessional behaviour. Hurdles yet to be taken are the involvement of students in the assessment process, teacher confidence in personal assessment capacities, remediation programmes and logistic and administrative support.