Scott A. Shikora

Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient—2013 update: Cosponsored by american association of clinical endocrinologists, The obesity society, and american society for metabolic & bariatric surgery*

The development of these updated guidelines was commissioned by the AACE, TOS, and ASMBS Board of Directors and adheres to the AACE 2010 protocol for standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Each recommendation was re‐evaluated and updated based on the evidence and subjective factors per protocol. Examples of expanded topics in this update include: the roles of sleeve gastrectomy, bariatric surgery in patients with type‐2 diabetes, bariatric surgery for patients with mild obesity, copper deficiency, informed consent, and behavioral issues. There are 74 recommendations (of which 56 are revised and 2 are new) in this 2013 update, compared with 164 original recommendations in 2008. There are 403 citations, of which 33 (8.2%) are EL 1, 131 (32.5%) are EL 2, 170 (42.2%) are EL 3, and 69 (17.1%) are EL 4. There is a relatively high proportion (40.4%) of strong (EL 1 and 2) studies, compared with only 16.5% in the 2008 AACE‐TOS‐ASMBS CPG. These updated guidelines reflect recent additions to the evidence base. Bariatric surgery remains a safe and effective intervention for select patients with obesity. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.

Nonsurgical factors that influence the outcome of bariatric surgery: a review.

Objective Severe obesity (ie, at least 100% overweight or body mass index >or=to40 kg/m2) is associated with significant morbidity and increased mortality. It is apparently becoming more common in this country. Conventional weight-loss treatments are usually ineffective for severe obesity and bariatric surgery is recommended as a treatment option. However, longitudinal data on the long-term outcome of bariatric surgery are sparse. Available data indicate that the outcome of bariatric surgery, although usually favorable in the short term, is variable and weight regain sometimes occurs at 2 years after surgery. The objective of this study is to present a review of the outcome of bariatric surgery in three areas: weight loss and improvement in health status, changes in eating behavior, and psychosocial adjustment. The study will also review how eating behavior, energy metabolism, and psychosocial functioning may affect the outcome of bariatric surgery. Suggestions for additional research in these areas are made. Method Literature review. Results On average, most patients lose 60% of excess weight after gastric bypass and 40% after vertical banded gastroplasty. In about 30% of patients, weight regain occurs at 18 months to 2 years after surgery. Binge eating behavior, which is common among the morbidly obese, may recur after surgery and is associated with weight regain. Energy metabolism may affect the outcome of bariatric surgery, but it has not been systematically studied in this population. Presurgery psychosocial functioning does not seem to affect the outcome of surgery, and psychosocial outcome is generally encouraging over the short term, but there are reports of poor adjustment after weight loss, including alcohol abuse and suicide. Conclusions Factors leading to poor outcome of bariatric surgery, such as binge eating and lowered energy metabolism, should be studied to improve patient selection and outcome. Long-term outcome data on psychosocial functioning are lacking. Longitudinal studies to examine the long-term outcome of bariatric surgery and the prognostic indicators are needed.

Binge eating disorder in extreme obesity.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether extremely obese binge eating disorder (BED) subjects (BED defined by the Eating Disorder Examination) differ from their extremely obese non-BED counterparts in terms of their eating disturbances, psychiatric morbidity and health status.DESIGN: Prospective clinical comparison of BED and non-BED subjects undergoing gastric bypass surgery (GBP).SUBJECTS: Thirty seven extremely obese (defined as BMI ≥40 kg/m2) subjects (31 women, six men), aged 22–58 y.MEASUREMENTS: Eating Disorder Examination 12th Edition (EDE), Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ), Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV (SCID-IV), Short-Form Health Status Survey (SF-36), and 24 h Feeding Paradigm.RESULTS: Twenty-five percent of subjects were classified as BED (11% met full and 14% partial BED criteria) and 75% of subjects were classified as non-BED. BED (full and partial) subjects had higher eating disturbance in terms of eating concern and shape concern (as found by the EDE), higher disinhibition (as found by the TFEQ), and they consumed more liquid meal during the 24 h feeding paradigm. No difference was found in psychiatric morbidity between BED and non-BED in terms of DSM-IV Axis I diagnosis. The health status scores of both BED and non-BED subjects were significantly lower than US norms on all subscales of the SF-36, particularly the BED group.CONCLUSION: Our findings support the validity of the category of BED within a population of extremely obese individuals before undergoing GBP. BED subjects differed from their non-BED counterparts in that they had a greater disturbance in eating attitudes and behavior, a poorer physical and mental health status, and a suggestion of impaired hunger/satiety control. However, in this population of extremely obese subjects, the stability of BED warrants further study.

Morbid obesity is an independent determinant of death among surgical critically ill patients.

Objective:To determine whether extreme obesity (morbid obesity; body mass index ≥40 kg/m2) is an independent risk factor for death among critically ill patients; this objective is most salient in the subset of patients who sustain a prolonged intensive care unit stay during which the burdens of care imposed by obesity and its consequences would become most apparent. Design:Cohort analysis of data from the Project Impact database used to catalog admissions and outcomes to a surgical intensive care unit, with predetermined end point analyses of outcomes. Setting:Surgical intensive care unit serving Tufts-New England Medical Center, a tertiary care and university medical center in Boston. Patients:All critically ill surgical patients admitted to the Tufts-New England Medical Center surgical intensive care unit from January 1998 to March 2001. Interventions:Intensive care unit and hospital mortality and lengths of stay were compared with body mass index subclassified into five groups: underweight, normal weight, overweight, obese, and extremely obese. Data were examined for all admissions during the study period and for a predetermined subgroup with a prolonged intensive care unit stay (≥4 days). Measurements and Main Results:The prevalence of obesity in the surgical intensive care unit was 26.7%; extreme obesity was observed in 6.8%. In the full cohort of patients (n = 1373), median length of stay was short (2 days) and there were no differences in mortality in patients among any of the body mass index classes. In the subgroup of prolonged stay patients (n = 406), intensive care unit and hospital mortality rates were significantly increased in extremely obese patients compared with all other patients (intensive care unit, 33.3% vs. 12.3%, p = .009; hospital, 33.3% vs. 16%, p = .045). Multivariate analysis showed that extreme obesity was an independent predictor of death in surgical critically ill patients with prolonged intensive care unit stay after controlling for age, gender, and severity of illness. The odds of death increased 7.4 times in patients with morbid obesity. Conclusions:Morbid obesity (body mass index ≥40 kg/m2) is an independent risk factor for death in surgical patients with catastrophic illness requiring prolonged intensive care. The prevalence of obesity is growing, both in the intensive care unit and in the general population. The increased risk of complications and death in this population mandates that we adapt customized processes of care to specifically address this unique and very challenging subset of patients.

The Development of the Surgical Treatment of Morbid Obesity

Morbid obesity is defined as obesity with a body mass index ≥40, or ≥35 with secondary serious diseases. Conservative medical therapies in these individuals generally fail to sustain weight loss. Thus, surgical operations have evolved which are based on gastric restriction and/or malabsorption. Historically, the intestinal bypass operation was followed by the gastric bypass operation (in some instances combined with intestinal bypass) or by the gastric restriction operations (gastroplasty or gastric banding). Laparoscopic techniques are now being used for these operations, but require surgical expertise in both the bariatric operations and advanced laparoscopic skills. All operations may have complications, but these occur in a very small percent. Postoperative follow-up and nutritional surveillance are mandatory. The operations result in significant weight loss, and the current operations have a mean lasting weight loss of about 50 percent of excess body weight, with improvement or resolution of most obesity-associated conditions. There is evidence that even modest to moderate weight loss in these individuals has significant medical benefit.

Nutrition and Gastrointestinal Complications of Bariatric Surgery

At present, bariatric surgery is the only treatment that can achieve meaningful and sustainable weight loss for the millions of morbidly obese individuals. The current popular operative procedures (the Roux-en-y gastric bypass, laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, and the biliopancreatic diversion with or without duodenal switch) are all relatively safe and effective. However, all of these procedures, to variable degrees, alter the anatomy and physiology of the gastrointestinal tract. This fact, along with postoperative dietary changes, makes these patients vulnerable to a multitude of potential complications. As more and more patients undergo these procedures, an increasing number of clinicians will be asked to care for them. It is therefore imperative that all clinicians have a general understanding of the operative procedures and the potential problems these patients may develop. This article will describe these operative procedures and will discuss the more common consequences.

Effect of Reversible Intermittent Intra-abdominal Vagal Nerve Blockade on Morbid Obesity The ReCharge Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE Although conventional bariatric surgery results in weight loss, it does so with potential short-term and long-term morbidity. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intermittent, reversible vagal nerve blockade therapy for obesity treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial involving 239 participants who had a body mass index of 40 to 45 or 35 to 40 and 1 or more obesity-related condition was conducted at 10 sites in the United States and Australia between May and December 2011. The 12-month blinded portion of the 5-year study was completed in January 2013. INTERVENTIONS One hundred sixty-two patients received an active vagal nerve block device and 77 received a sham device. All participants received weight management education. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The coprimary efficacy objectives were to determine whether the vagal nerve block was superior in mean percentage excess weight loss to sham by a 10-point margin with at least 55% of patients in the vagal block group achieving a 20% loss and 45% achieving a 25% loss. The primary safety objective was to determine whether the rate of serious adverse events related to device, procedure, or therapy in the vagal block group was less than 15%. RESULTS In the intent-to-treat analysis, the vagal nerve block group had a mean 24.4% excess weight loss (9.2% of their initial body weight loss) vs 15.9% excess weight loss (6.0% initial body weight loss) in the sham group. The mean difference in the percentage of the excess weight loss between groups was 8.5 percentage points (95% CI, 3.1-13.9), which did not meet the 10-point target (P = .71), although weight loss was statistically greater in the vagal nerve block group (P = .002 for treatment difference in a post hoc analysis). At 12 months, 52% of patients in the vagal nerve block group achieved 20% or more excess weight loss and 38% achieved 25% or more excess weight loss vs 32% in the sham group who achieved 20% or more loss and 23% who achieved 25% or more loss. The device, procedure, or therapy-related serious adverse event rate in the vagal nerve block group was 3.7% (95% CI, 1.4%-7.9%), significantly lower than the 15% goal. The adverse events more frequent in the vagal nerve block group were heartburn or dyspepsia and abdominal pain attributed to therapy; all were reported as mild or moderate in severity. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE Among patients with morbid obesity, the use of vagal nerve block therapy compared with a sham control device did not meet either of the prespecified coprimary efficacy objectives, although weight loss in the vagal block group was statistically greater than in the sham device group. The treatment was well tolerated, having met the primary safety objective. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01327976.

Reinforcing Gastric Staple-Lines with Bovine Pericardial Strips May Decrease the Likelihood of Gastric Leak after Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Background: Staple-line leakage is a potentially devastating complication of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP). Bovine pericardial strips (BPS) have been used to reinforce staple-lines in pulmonary resections and have been shown to decrease air-leaks.This study examined the use of BPS to decrease gastric staple-line leaks. Methods: 250 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic RYGBP had BPS used for the gastric pouch. Ease of use, operative complications, and visual bleeding were recorded. In addition, the postoperative leak rate was compared to 100 consecutive patients operated on prior to the study when BPS was not used. Results: Patient characteristics were the same for both groups and comparable with most published data. With the use of BPS, there were no operative complications and no meaningful increase in operating time. BPS reinforced staple-lines had no visual bleeding. In the 100 cases without BPS, there were 2 staple-line leaks (2%) both of which required emergency exploration. One additional patient was subsequently found to have a gastrogastric fistula. In the 250 patients who had BPS-reinforced staple-lines, there were no acute leaks.Three patients were subsequently found to have gastrogastric fistula. None required emergency surgery. Conclusion: In this non-randomized trial, BPS were found to be easy and safe to use. In addition, staple-line hemorrhage was essentially non-existent. Although the reduction in gastric staple-line leak rate may also be attributed to learning curve, there were no acute leaks in 250 patients with BPS, which is below the published norms.

Work of breathing: reliable predictor of weaning and extubation

During the course of a critical illness, many patients become ventilator dependent. The standard assessment criteria are not always accurate in predicting potential for extubation. This investigation was designed to analyze whether the work of breathing (WOB) was a more reliable predictor of ventilator dependence. Twenty consecutive ventilator-dependent patients were prospectively studied. Nineteen required ventilator support for >2 wk and all were considered ventilator dependent because of their inability to tolerate weaning trials. The oxygen consumption (Vo2) and resting energy expenditure were measured using a metabolic gas monitor. Respiratory mechanics and arterial blood gas measurements were obtained, and the deadspace to tidal volume ratio (VD/VT) was calculated. The WOB was determined by the difference in Vo2 between spontaneous and mechanical ventilation, and expressed as a percentage of Vo2 during mechanical ventilation.Five of eight patients with a WOB <15% (mean 1.9) were extubated within 2 wk of study, while none of 12 patients with a WOB >15% (mean 34) were able to be extubated in this period. The differences in the WOB between the two groups were statistically significant (p < .01), while there was no significant difference in mechanics, Paco2, VD/VT or measured resting energy expenditure.These data support the use of WOB determinations in evaluating extubation potential. Using a reference value for the WOB of 15%, this study had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 80%. This proved to be of greater predictive value than traditional criteria. (Crit Care Med 1990; 18:157)

Pregnancy after gastric bypass surgery and internal hernia formation.

BACKGROUND: Gastric bypass is a surgical procedure that is increasingly performed in the United States to treat morbid obesity. Because of the changes associated with pregnancy, women with a history of gastric bypass surgery may be at an increased risk of gastrointestinal complications during the antepartum period, as demonstrated by these cases. CASES: The first patient presented at 12 weeks of gestation with abdominal pain. Computed tomography scan revealed rotation of the small bowel mesentery. In the operating room, a Petersens internal hernia was observed. The second patient presented at 34 weeks of gestation with epigastric pain, nausea, and vomiting. An abdominal computed tomography scan suggested distention of the biliopancreatic limb, duodenum, and bypassed stomach. She underwent exploratory laparotomy with repair of an internal (mesenteric loop) hernia. CONCLUSION: As obstetricians, we should be aware of the potential for internal hernias in pregnant patients who have undergone bariatric surgery.